Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

Resultados

5.311 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 32 de 266.

  • 13A14367-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    Dr. Restak calls attention to the fact that not all memory lapses are really worrying. Among those that people should worry about, he mentions forgetting their
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13a14367-a2
  • 139EC344-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    In his new book, Dr. Restak also approaches the question of the relationship between technology and memory. He argues that nowadays the greatest obstacle for memory is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139ec344-a2
  • 139C8D81-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    Over his decades of treating patients, Dr. Restak believes that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139c8d81-a2
  • 139A6E32-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    To help boost memory, besides mental exercises and sleep habits, Dr. Restak points that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139a6e32-a2
  • 139841BA-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    According to Dr. Restak, working memory is not only tied to intelligence, but also to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139841ba-a2
  • 13960C50-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    To help our spatial memory, we can
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13960c50-a2
  • 1393D7A1-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    One of the memory challenges we can include in our everyday routine is to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 1393d7a1-a2
  • 139192E6-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    As to reading abilities, one of the factors that shows memory difficulties is that people tend to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139192e6-a2
  • 138D607C-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    A positive message in Dr. Restak's new book is that memory decline, as we grow old,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 138d607c-a2
  • 138B3465-A2

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    In relation to the improvement of working memory, Dr. Restak suggests a number of challenging exercises and activities that can generate great benefits. Among these, he includes the frequent practice of
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 138b3465-a2
  • 13860111-A2

    Inglês

    Preposições | Prepositions
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    According to Dr. Restak, a good strategy to learn new things, like words, for example, is to establish an association with a/an
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13860111-a2
  • 37CE32D8-9C

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Considering Damian Carrington’s opinion on the movie Don’t look up, mark the INCORRECT option.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ce32d8-9c
  • 37CC671D-9C

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that “Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists”. Mark the option which best describes the meaning of Nina’s statement.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37cc671d-9c
  • 37CA4B7B-9C

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Consider the following excerpt: “The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord”. Taking into account the context the excerpt was taken from, mark the option which best defines the expression “to strike a chord”. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ca4b7b-9c
  • 37C83904-9C

    Inglês

    Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice
    UEMG · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Consider the following excerpts taken from the text and mark the option which presents a verb form in the passive voice. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c83904-9c
  • 37C61C44-9C

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c61c44-9c
  • 37C3FEA8-9C

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c3fea8-9c
  • 7B248814-7A

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    UERJ · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Essential reading on, and beyond, Indigenous Peoples Day


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2022

    and while there’s truth in those narratives, it’s also critical, (l. 32)


    The linker and while in the fragment above expresses contrast.


    A similar meaning is conveyed in: 

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b248814-7a