Pular para o conteúdo

Instituição

Questões: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) — com gabarito

667 questões de Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), de 2005 a 2021. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 667 questões
  • 13 provas

Resultados: 453 questões

Página 9 de 23

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    According to the text, biofuels
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 24d348c3-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    Brazil is characterized as a ‘natural knowledge economy’ because
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 26fa20d8-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    O trecho do segundo parágrafo – This time, the world was watching. –
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 29088ed0-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do segundo parágrafo – To their advocates, biofuels ... – a expressão their advocates refere-se
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2b3cc618-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do terceiro parágrafo – which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops – a palavra as introduz
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2d163b58-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

     Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

                   Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
    Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

        If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
    Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
        Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
    was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
          From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
        The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
     
    (www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

    An example of the pressing challenges mentioned in last lines of the text – the pressing challenges that confront us all. – is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2ee00cb3-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    Segundo o texto, a risada
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 30c2243e-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    According to the text,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 3299ab4f-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    Jeffrey Burgdorf discovered that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 34913611-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    The excerpt of the first paragraph – You just do. – means that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 3691f535-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    No trecho do terceiro parágrafo – Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. – a palavra whether pode ser substituída, sem alteração de sentido, por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 38b2adc6-46
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 40 a 45.

          To Scientists, Laughter Is No Joke - It’s Serious
    March 31, 2010.

         So a scientist walks into a shopping mall to watch people laugh. There’s no punchline. Laughter is a serious scientific subject, one that researchers are still trying to figure out. Laughing is primal, our first way of communicating. Apes laugh. So do dogs and rats. Babies laugh long before they speak. No one teaches you how to laugh. You just do. And often you laugh involuntarily, in a specific rhythm and in certain spots in conversation.
        You may laugh at a prank on April Fools’ Day. But surprisingly,  only 10 to 15 percent of laughter is the result of someone making a joke, said Baltimore neuroscientist Robert Provine, who has studied laughter for decades. Laughter is mostly about social responses rather than reaction to a joke. “Laughter above all else is a social thing,’’ Provine said. “The requirement for laughter is another person.’’  
        Over the years, Provine, a professor with the University of Maryland Baltimore County, has boiled laughter down to its basics. “All language groups laugh ‘ha-ha-ha’ basically the same way,’’ he said. “Whether you speak Mandarin, French or English, everyone will understand laughter. ... There’s a pattern generator in our brain that produces this sound.’’
        Each “ha’’ is about one-15th of a second, repeated every fifth of a second, he said. Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. Deaf people laugh without hearing, and people on cell phones laugh without seeing, illustrating that laughter isn’t dependent on a single sense but on social interactions, said Provine, author of the book “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation.’’   
        “It’s joy, it’s positive engagement with life,’’ said Jaak Panksepp, a Bowling Green University psychology professor. “It’s deeply social.’’ And it’s not just a people thing either. Chimps tickle each other and even laugh when another chimp pretends to tickle them. By studying rats, Panksepp and other scientists can figure out what’s going on in the brain during laughter. And it holds promise for human ills.
        Northwestern biomedical engineering professor Jeffrey Burgdorf has found that laughter in rats produces an insulin-like growth factor chemical that acts as an antidepressant and anxietyreducer. He thinks the same thing probably happens in humans, too. This would give doctors a new chemical target in the brain in their effort to develop drugs that fight depression and anxiety in people. Even so, laughter itself hasn’t been proven to be the best medicine, experts said.

     (www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)


    No trecho do quarto parágrafo – Laugh faster or slower than that and it sounds more like panting or something else. – a palavra like indica
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 3a88b6dc-46
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Examine a tira Níquel Náusea, do cartunista Fernando Gonsales.

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNIFESP 2012, Interpretação de Textos

    Com a fala – É o novo Drummond –, no último quadrinho, a personagem revela-se

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c4d57014-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Instrução: Leia o poema O constante diálogo, de Carlos Drummond de Andrade, para responder às questões.

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado
                         o semelhante
                         o diferente
                         o indiferente
                         o oposto
                         o adversário
                         o surdo-mudo
                         o possesso
                         o irracional
                         o vegetal
                         o mineral
                         o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo
                         com a noite
                         os astros
                         os mortos
                         as ideias
                         o sonho
                         o passado
                         o mais que futuro
    Escolhe teu diálogo
                         e
    tua melhor palavra
                        ou
    teu melhor silêncio
    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio
    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)

    O eu lírico, ao mostrar as variedades do diálogo, revela que este

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c5dc5791-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Instrução: Leia o poema O constante diálogo, de Carlos Drummond de Andrade, para responder às questões.

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado
                         o semelhante
                         o diferente
                         o indiferente
                         o oposto
                         o adversário
                         o surdo-mudo
                         o possesso
                         o irracional
                         o vegetal
                         o mineral
                         o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo
                         com a noite
                         os astros
                         os mortos
                         as ideias
                         o sonho
                         o passado
                         o mais que futuro
    Escolhe teu diálogo
                         e
    tua melhor palavra
                        ou
    teu melhor silêncio
    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio
    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)

    Na abordagem temática do poema, destaca-se a inserção do discurso

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c6c9dc7b-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado

    o semelhante

    o diferente

    o indiferente

    o oposto

    o adversário

    o surdo-mudo

    o possesso

    o irracional

    o vegetal

    o mineral

    o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo

    com a noite

    os astros

    os mortos

    as ideias

    o sonho

    o passado

    o mais que futuro

    Escolhe teu diálogo

    e

    tua melhor palavra

    ou

    teu melhor silêncio

    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio

    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)


    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões.

           O silêncio é a matéria significante por excelência, um
    continuum significante. O real da comunicação é o silêncio.
    E como o nosso objeto de reflexão é o discurso, chegamos a
    uma outra afirmação que sucede a essa: o silêncio é o real do
    discurso.
           O homem está “condenado” a significar. Com ou sem palavras,
    diante do mundo, há uma injunção à “interpretação”:
    tudo tem de fazer sentido (qualquer que ele seja). O homem
    está irremediavelmente constituído pela sua relação com o
    simbólico.
           Numa certa perspectiva, a dominante nos estudos dos signos,
    se produz uma sobreposição entre linguagem (verbal e
    não-verbal) e significação.
           Disso decorreu um recobrimento dessas duas noções, resultando
    uma redução pela qual qualquer matéria significante
    fala, isto é, é remetida à linguagem (sobretudo verbal) para
    que lhe seja atribuído sentido.
           Nessa mesma direção, coloca-se o “império do verbal”
    em nossas formas sociais: traduz-se o silêncio em palavras.
    Vê-se assim o silêncio como linguagem e perde-se sua especificidade,
    enquanto matéria significante distinta da linguagem.
    (Eni Orlandi. As formas do silêncio, 1997.)

    A ideia comum entre o poema de Drummond e o texto de Eni Orlandi diz respeito ao fato de que o silêncio

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c895bab0-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado

    o semelhante

    o diferente

    o indiferente

    o oposto

    o adversário

    o surdo-mudo

    o possesso

    o irracional

    o vegetal

    o mineral

    o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo

    com a noite

    os astros

    os mortos

    as ideias

    o sonho

    o passado

    o mais que futuro

    Escolhe teu diálogo

    e

    tua melhor palavra

    ou

    teu melhor silêncio

    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio

    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)


    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões.

           O silêncio é a matéria significante por excelência, um
    continuum significante. O real da comunicação é o silêncio.
    E como o nosso objeto de reflexão é o discurso, chegamos a
    uma outra afirmação que sucede a essa: o silêncio é o real do
    discurso.
           O homem está “condenado” a significar. Com ou sem palavras,
    diante do mundo, há uma injunção à “interpretação”:
    tudo tem de fazer sentido (qualquer que ele seja). O homem
    está irremediavelmente constituído pela sua relação com o
    simbólico.
           Numa certa perspectiva, a dominante nos estudos dos signos,
    se produz uma sobreposição entre linguagem (verbal e
    não-verbal) e significação.
           Disso decorreu um recobrimento dessas duas noções, resultando
    uma redução pela qual qualquer matéria significante
    fala, isto é, é remetida à linguagem (sobretudo verbal) para
    que lhe seja atribuído sentido.
           Nessa mesma direção, coloca-se o “império do verbal”
    em nossas formas sociais: traduz-se o silêncio em palavras.
    Vê-se assim o silêncio como linguagem e perde-se sua especificidade,
    enquanto matéria significante distinta da linguagem.
    (Eni Orlandi. As formas do silêncio, 1997.)

    No segundo parágrafo do texto, empregam-se as aspas no termo “condenado” para

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c97be244-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado

    o semelhante

    o diferente

    o indiferente

    o oposto

    o adversário

    o surdo-mudo

    o possesso

    o irracional

    o vegetal

    o mineral

    o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo

    com a noite

    os astros

    os mortos

    as ideias

    o sonho

    o passado

    o mais que futuro

    Escolhe teu diálogo

    e

    tua melhor palavra

    ou

    teu melhor silêncio

    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio

    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)


    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões.

           O silêncio é a matéria significante por excelência, um
    continuum significante. O real da comunicação é o silêncio.
    E como o nosso objeto de reflexão é o discurso, chegamos a
    uma outra afirmação que sucede a essa: o silêncio é o real do
    discurso.
           O homem está “condenado” a significar. Com ou sem palavras,
    diante do mundo, há uma injunção à “interpretação”:
    tudo tem de fazer sentido (qualquer que ele seja). O homem
    está irremediavelmente constituído pela sua relação com o
    simbólico.
           Numa certa perspectiva, a dominante nos estudos dos signos,
    se produz uma sobreposição entre linguagem (verbal e
    não-verbal) e significação.
           Disso decorreu um recobrimento dessas duas noções, resultando
    uma redução pela qual qualquer matéria significante
    fala, isto é, é remetida à linguagem (sobretudo verbal) para
    que lhe seja atribuído sentido.
           Nessa mesma direção, coloca-se o “império do verbal”
    em nossas formas sociais: traduz-se o silêncio em palavras.
    Vê-se assim o silêncio como linguagem e perde-se sua especificidade,
    enquanto matéria significante distinta da linguagem.
    (Eni Orlandi. As formas do silêncio, 1997.)

    Ao analisar a prevalência da linguagem verbal na comunicação social, a autora enfatiza que

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca6aef7b-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Há tantos diálogos

    Diálogo com o ser amado

    o semelhante

    o diferente

    o indiferente

    o oposto

    o adversário

    o surdo-mudo

    o possesso

    o irracional

    o vegetal

    o mineral

    o inominado

    Diálogo consigo mesmo

    com a noite

    os astros

    os mortos

    as ideias

    o sonho

    o passado

    o mais que futuro

    Escolhe teu diálogo

    e

    tua melhor palavra

    ou

    teu melhor silêncio

    Mesmo no silêncio e com o silêncio

    dialogamos.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Discurso de primavera e algumas sombras, 1977.)


    Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões.

           O silêncio é a matéria significante por excelência, um
    continuum significante. O real da comunicação é o silêncio.
    E como o nosso objeto de reflexão é o discurso, chegamos a
    uma outra afirmação que sucede a essa: o silêncio é o real do
    discurso.
           O homem está “condenado” a significar. Com ou sem palavras,
    diante do mundo, há uma injunção à “interpretação”:
    tudo tem de fazer sentido (qualquer que ele seja). O homem
    está irremediavelmente constituído pela sua relação com o
    simbólico.
           Numa certa perspectiva, a dominante nos estudos dos signos,
    se produz uma sobreposição entre linguagem (verbal e
    não-verbal) e significação.
           Disso decorreu um recobrimento dessas duas noções, resultando
    uma redução pela qual qualquer matéria significante
    fala, isto é, é remetida à linguagem (sobretudo verbal) para
    que lhe seja atribuído sentido.
           Nessa mesma direção, coloca-se o “império do verbal”
    em nossas formas sociais: traduz-se o silêncio em palavras.
    Vê-se assim o silêncio como linguagem e perde-se sua especificidade,
    enquanto matéria significante distinta da linguagem.
    (Eni Orlandi. As formas do silêncio, 1997.)

    Na oração do 4.º parágrafo – [...] para que lhe seja atribuído sentido. –, o pronome “lhe” substitui a expressão

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão cb506e6e-fe
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Examine a tira.

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNIFESP 2012, Morfologia

    O efeito de humor na situação apresentada decorre do fato de a personagem, no segundo quadrinho, considerar que “carinho” e “caro” sejam vocábulos

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão cc385e52-fe