Pular para o conteúdo

Prova

Prova de 2015: Centro de Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CEDERJ) — questões com gabarito

16 questões da prova de 2015 de Centro de Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (CEDERJ), em Português, Inglês. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 16 questões

Resultados: 16 questões

  • Linguagens

    Português

                                         Ele e suas ideias
                                                                             Lima Barreto

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Interpretação de Textos 

    (LIMA BARRETO. Ele e suas ideias. In: Para gostar de ler,
    volume 8, contos. São Paulo: Ática, p. 51-54)

    1 Revista humorística surgida em 1927, dedicada, principalmente, à caricatura. (N.E.)
    2 Cavanhaque.
    3 Edison foi o inventor do telégrafo e Marconi, das ondas de rádio.


    Textos são construídos com base em uma tipologia textual. Esses tipos podem aparecer de forma exclusiva ou mesclada em um texto. Identifique o tipo textual do fragmento seguinte:

    “Era um homem pequeno, magro, com um reduzido cavaignac (...)” (linhas 2-3)
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e3b812bd-96
  • Linguagens

    Português

                                         Ele e suas ideias
                                                                             Lima Barreto

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Crase 

    (LIMA BARRETO. Ele e suas ideias. In: Para gostar de ler,
    volume 8, contos. São Paulo: Ática, p. 51-54)

    1 Revista humorística surgida em 1927, dedicada, principalmente, à caricatura. (N.E.)
    2 Cavanhaque.
    3 Edison foi o inventor do telégrafo e Marconi, das ondas de rádio.


    O acento grave de “àquele" em “...ele lembrava a este ou àquele jornal uma ideia..." (linha 9).
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e3c46fce-96
  • Linguagens

    Português

                                         Ele e suas ideias
                                                                             Lima Barreto

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Figuras de Linguagem 

    (LIMA BARRETO. Ele e suas ideias. In: Para gostar de ler,
    volume 8, contos. São Paulo: Ática, p. 51-54)

    1 Revista humorística surgida em 1927, dedicada, principalmente, à caricatura. (N.E.)
    2 Cavanhaque.
    3 Edison foi o inventor do telégrafo e Marconi, das ondas de rádio.


    “Andávamos por esse tempo na febre dos melhoramentos, das construções; e, a todo momento, ele lembrava a este ou àquele jornal uma ideia.” (linhas 7-9)

    Para obter efeitos de sentido, os autores costumam valerse de diferentes recursos semânticos. A expressão sublinhada no fragmento acima – “febre dos melhoramentos” – exemplifica um caso de:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e3c97736-96
  • Linguagens

    Português

                                         Ele e suas ideias
                                                                             Lima Barreto

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Interpretação de Textos 

    (LIMA BARRETO. Ele e suas ideias. In: Para gostar de ler,
    volume 8, contos. São Paulo: Ática, p. 51-54)

    1 Revista humorística surgida em 1927, dedicada, principalmente, à caricatura. (N.E.)
    2 Cavanhaque.
    3 Edison foi o inventor do telégrafo e Marconi, das ondas de rádio.


    O enunciado “e, de tal modo, a mania de ter ideias o tomou, que não se limitava a deixá-las pelos jornais” (linhas 11-12) veicula a ideia de causa / consequência.

    Assinale a alternativa cujo sentido difere ao do fragmento em destaque.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e3ce3f6c-96
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    What Your Tweets Say About You
    By Maria Konnikov

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, CEDERJ 2015, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    How much can your tweets reveal about you? A lot! - would be the answer of psychologists James Pennebaker e Cindy Chung, at the University of Texas, who study how language relates to well-being and personality. One of Pennebaker’s most famous projects is a computer program called Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (L.I.W.C.), which looks at the words we use, and in what frequency and context, and uses this information to study our psychological states and various aspects of our personality.
    Since the creation of the L.I.W.C., in 1993, studies utilizing the program have suggested a close connection between our language, our state of mind, and our behavior. They have shown, for instance, that a person’s word choices can reveal her place in a social or professional hierarchy; and that the use of different filler words (“I mean”; “You know”) can suggest whether a speaker is male or female, younger or older, and more or less conscientious. “The words we use in natural language reflect our thoughts and feelings in often unpredictable ways,” Pennebaker and Cindy Chung have written.
    The psychologist Johannes Eichstaedt and his colleagues analyzed eight hundred and twenty-six million tweets across fourteen hundred American counties(1). Then, using lists of words that can be reliably associated with positive and negative emotions, they gave each county an emotional profile. Finally, they asked a simple question: Could those profiles help determine which counties were likely to have more deaths from heart disease?
    The answer was yes. Counties where residents’ tweets included words related to hostility, aggression, hate, and, fatigue — words such as “jealous,” and “bored”— had significantly higher rates of heart-related deaths. On the other hand, where people’s tweets reflected more positive emotions and engagement, heart disease was less common. The tweet-based model even had more predictive power than other models based on traditional demographic, socioeconomic, and health-risk factors.

    (1) Um condado (county/counties) ou província é um aglomerado de cidades, não tão grande quanto um estado.

    From: http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/can-tweets-predict-heart-disease

    GLOSSARY: conscientious: consciencioso/cuidadoso; reliably: seguramente; profile: perfil; heart disease: doença do coração; hate: ódio; jealous: com ciúmes; bored: entediado; higher rates: taxas mais altas; engagement: comprometimento; predictive: previsível.

    Leia o texto e responda à questão.
    No terceiro parágrafo, o pronome “they" se refere:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e488c8ae-96
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    What Your Tweets Say About You
    By Maria Konnikov

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, CEDERJ 2015, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions 

    How much can your tweets reveal about you? A lot! - would be the answer of psychologists James Pennebaker e Cindy Chung, at the University of Texas, who study how language relates to well-being and personality. One of Pennebaker’s most famous projects is a computer program called Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (L.I.W.C.), which looks at the words we use, and in what frequency and context, and uses this information to study our psychological states and various aspects of our personality.
    Since the creation of the L.I.W.C., in 1993, studies utilizing the program have suggested a close connection between our language, our state of mind, and our behavior. They have shown, for instance, that a person’s word choices can reveal her place in a social or professional hierarchy; and that the use of different filler words (“I mean”; “You know”) can suggest whether a speaker is male or female, younger or older, and more or less conscientious. “The words we use in natural language reflect our thoughts and feelings in often unpredictable ways,” Pennebaker and Cindy Chung have written.
    The psychologist Johannes Eichstaedt and his colleagues analyzed eight hundred and twenty-six million tweets across fourteen hundred American counties(1). Then, using lists of words that can be reliably associated with positive and negative emotions, they gave each county an emotional profile. Finally, they asked a simple question: Could those profiles help determine which counties were likely to have more deaths from heart disease?
    The answer was yes. Counties where residents’ tweets included words related to hostility, aggression, hate, and, fatigue — words such as “jealous,” and “bored”— had significantly higher rates of heart-related deaths. On the other hand, where people’s tweets reflected more positive emotions and engagement, heart disease was less common. The tweet-based model even had more predictive power than other models based on traditional demographic, socioeconomic, and health-risk factors.

    (1) Um condado (county/counties) ou província é um aglomerado de cidades, não tão grande quanto um estado.

    From: http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/can-tweets-predict-heart-disease

    GLOSSARY: conscientious: consciencioso/cuidadoso; reliably: seguramente; profile: perfil; heart disease: doença do coração; hate: ódio; jealous: com ciúmes; bored: entediado; higher rates: taxas mais altas; engagement: comprometimento; predictive: previsível.

    Leia o texto e responda à questão.
    O conector “on the other hand", na quinta linha do último parágrafo, estabelece uma relação de:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e48e8a8e-96
  • Linguagens

    Português

    O Jardineiro

    Lygia Fagundes Telles

    Só colhia rosas ao anoitecer porque durante o sono elas não sentiam o aço frio da tesoura. Uma noite ele sonhou que cortava as hastes de manhã, em pleno sol, as rosas despertas e gritando, sangrando na altura do corte das cabeças decepadas. Quando ele acordou viu que estava com as mãos sujas de sangue.

    TELLES, Lygia Fagundes. A disciplina do amor. 6.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1980, p. 78

    O tipo textual predominante no texto é o:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 739a038e-b8
  • Linguagens

    Português

    O Jardineiro

    Lygia Fagundes Telles

    Só colhia rosas ao anoitecer porque durante o sono elas não sentiam o aço frio da tesoura. Uma noite ele sonhou que cortava as hastes de manhã, em pleno sol, as rosas despertas e gritando, sangrando na altura do corte das cabeças decepadas. Quando ele acordou viu que estava com as mãos sujas de sangue.

    TELLES, Lygia Fagundes. A disciplina do amor. 6.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1980, p. 78

        “Só colhia rosas ao anoitecer..." (linha 1). O conector sublinhado expressa a ideia de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 739f17c1-b8
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Figuras de Linguagem
    Para expressar a beleza do gorjeio da pássara, no verso “Seria como perfumar-se a moça para ver o namorado", é utilizado o seguinte recurso:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 73a3f392-b8
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Interpretação de Textos
    No processo de coesão lexical, o mecanismo de substituição pode se realizado por meio da sinonímia, em que há a substituição de expressões que compartilham os mesmos traços semânticos. Sabe-se, no entanto, que não existem sinônimos perfeitos. Justifique essa afirmativa – de que não existem sinônimos perfeitos – levando em consideração os termos sublinhados em:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 73a93bae-b8
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Imagem da questão de Português, CEDERJ 2015, Interpretação de Textos
        Na frase “É por isso que as árvores deliram", “isso" se refere a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 73adc87c-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Why don’t we take our own advice?
    Oliver Burkeman

    “Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
    The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
    But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
    But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
    If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
    scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

    Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

    Glossary
    advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
        Diante da confissão da especialista em psicologia Melissa Dahl de que ela própria raramente segue os seus próprios conselhos, o autor do texto, Oliver Burkeman, reage com
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 745d1469-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Why don’t we take our own advice?
    Oliver Burkeman

    “Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
    The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
    But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
    But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
    If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
    scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

    Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

    Glossary
    advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
        Segundo o autor do texto, no terceiro parágrafo, muitas vezes não seguimos o nosso próprio conselho porque
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7463bbe7-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Why don’t we take our own advice?
    Oliver Burkeman

    “Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
    The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
    But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
    But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
    If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
    scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

    Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

    Glossary
    advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
        De acordo com o que autor afirma no quarto parágrafo do texto, a tentativa de controlar o mundo

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7467ed07-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Why don’t we take our own advice?
    Oliver Burkeman

    “Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
    The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
    But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
    But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
    If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
    scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

    Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

    Glossary
    advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
        In the second paragraph, in the sentence “we give it to seem wise, when in fact it's nonsense", the conjunction “when" introduces an idea of

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 746dbd29-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Why don’t we take our own advice?
    Oliver Burkeman

    “Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
    The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
    But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
    But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
    If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
    scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

    Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

    Glossary
    advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
        According to the text, friends who are always in trouble because they do not follow our advice should be treated with
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7474f854-b8