Pular para o conteúdo

Prova

Prova de 2020: Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) — questões com gabarito

60 questões da prova de 2020 de Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), em Inglês, Espanhol, Português. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 60 questões

Resultados: 60 questões

Página 2 de 3

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    “They settled on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent” (lines 66-67) is a/an
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e740aa6-92
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    In the sentence “They've put their best estimate, as accurate as they could be with this data, he said, and used ranges, which underscores that...” (lines 83-86), the underlined verbs are, respectively,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e669148-92
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    A high percentage of the USA's exported recyclable waste goes to countries that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e57cf21-92
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    The article mentions that half of the American recyclable waste is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e55a361-92
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    As to the use of plastic by Americans, the text mentions that it
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e4d60d4-92
  • Linguagens

    Espanhol

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Tradução | Traducción
    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Tradução | Traducción

    La expresión “20 metros de largo” (líneas 69- 70) puede ser traducida correctamente al portugués como
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0fdfd513-93
  • Linguagens

    Espanhol

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Artigos | Artículos
    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Artigos | Artículos

    Apunta el uso correcto del artículo determinante “el”.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0fd3e8f8-93
  • Linguagens

    Espanhol

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Texto | Comprensión de Lectura
    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Espanhol, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Texto | Comprensión de Lectura

    El texto dice que Martín Hechenleitner
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0fc2adf1-93
  • Linguagens

    Português


    O Poeta da Roça


    Sou fio das mata, cantô da mão grosa
    Trabaio na roça, de inverno e de estio
    A minha chupana é tapada de barro
    Só fumo cigarro de paia de mio

    Sou poeta das brenha, não faço o papé
    De argum menestrê, ou errante cantô
    Que veve vagando, com sua viola
    Cantando, pachola, à percura de amô

    Não tenho sabença, pois nunca estudei
    Apenas eu seio o meu nome assiná
    Meu pai, coitadinho! vivia sem cobre
    E o fio do pobre não pode estudá

    Meu verso rastero, singelo e sem graça
    Não entra na praça, no rico salão
    Meu verso só entra no campo da roça e
     [dos eito
    E às vezes, recordando feliz mocidade
    Canto uma sodade que mora em meu peito.
    [...]
    Eu canto o mendigo de sujo farrapo,
    Coberto de trapo e mochila na mão,
    Que chora pedindo o socorro dos home,
    E tomba de fome, sem casa e sem pão.

    E assim, sem cobiça dos cofre luzente,
    Eu vivo contente e feliz com a sorte,
    Morando no campo, sem vê a cidade,
    Cantando as verdade das coisa do Norte.

    Adaptada de ASSARÉ, Patativa do.
    Cante lá que eu canto cá: Filosofia de um trovador
    nordestino. 2. Ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1978.
    No texto 6, a partir dos versos “Não tenho sabença, pois nunca estudei/Apenas eu seio o meu nome assiná/Meu pai, coitadinho! vivia sem cobre/E o fio do pobre não pode estudá” (linhas 168-171) é correto inferir que a intenção do poeta é
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 804244b9-92
  • Linguagens

    Português


    O Poeta da Roça


    Sou fio das mata, cantô da mão grosa
    Trabaio na roça, de inverno e de estio
    A minha chupana é tapada de barro
    Só fumo cigarro de paia de mio

    Sou poeta das brenha, não faço o papé
    De argum menestrê, ou errante cantô
    Que veve vagando, com sua viola
    Cantando, pachola, à percura de amô

    Não tenho sabença, pois nunca estudei
    Apenas eu seio o meu nome assiná
    Meu pai, coitadinho! vivia sem cobre
    E o fio do pobre não pode estudá

    Meu verso rastero, singelo e sem graça
    Não entra na praça, no rico salão
    Meu verso só entra no campo da roça e
     [dos eito
    E às vezes, recordando feliz mocidade
    Canto uma sodade que mora em meu peito.
    [...]
    Eu canto o mendigo de sujo farrapo,
    Coberto de trapo e mochila na mão,
    Que chora pedindo o socorro dos home,
    E tomba de fome, sem casa e sem pão.

    E assim, sem cobiça dos cofre luzente,
    Eu vivo contente e feliz com a sorte,
    Morando no campo, sem vê a cidade,
    Cantando as verdade das coisa do Norte.

    Adaptada de ASSARÉ, Patativa do.
    Cante lá que eu canto cá: Filosofia de um trovador
    nordestino. 2. Ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1978.
    Patativa do Assaré, apesar de ter inúmeros poemas publicados, não escrevia nenhum deles. Com habilidade inacreditável de memorização, o poeta decorava todos seus poemas. Todos os versos que hoje podemos ver são graças ao trabalho de outras pessoas que se empenharam em transcrever os poemas do poeta, seja ouvindo diretamente do poeta, seja através de gravações. Deste modo, sua poesia é fortemente marcada pela oralidade. No texto de Patativa do Assaré, aparecem expressões da fala popular como “Sou fio das mata, cantô da mão grosa” (linha 160), “Trabaio na roça, de inverno e de estio”, (linha 161) “Cantando, pachola, à percura de amô” (linha 167). Considerando este aspecto da poesia de Patativa do Assaré, atente para as seguintes afirmações:

    I. Este tipo de linguagem revela, no texto, uma escrita de estilo coloquial marcada pelo uso consciente de palavras próprias da fala.
    II. As expressões coloquiais utilizadas no texto revelam o lugar de onde veio o poeta e sua história, deixando claro que a poesia que produz é sobre as coisas simples da vida.
    III. O emprego destes coloquialismos revela a cultura local em que o autor está inserido.

    Está correto o que se afirma em
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 803c7e46-92
  • Linguagens

    Português

    TEXTO 5

    Pela primeira vez na história, nova geração tem QI mais baixo que seus antecessores    


    Figura 1 de 4 da questão de Português, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Textos
    Figura 2 de 4 da questão de Português, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Textos
    Figura 3 de 4 da questão de Português, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Textos
    Figura 4 de 4 da questão de Português, UECE 2020, Interpretação de Textos

    CANCELIER, Mariela. Pela primeira vez na história, nova geração tem QI mais baixo que seus antecessores. Mundo conectado.com.br. 31 de outubro de 2020.
    No texto 5, a frase “A nossa forma de vida modifica tanto a estrutura quanto o funcionamento do cérebro” (linhas 139-141) relaciona-se a uma série de argumentos apontados pelo neurocientista Michel Desmurget. Atente para os trechos do texto apresentados a seguir e assinale o que NÃO corresponde a um fator para o QI das gerações atuais ser mais baixo do que o das anteriores.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 8039ab09-92
  • Linguagens

    Português

    TEXTO 3
    Meu Caro Amigo
    Chico Buarque


    Meu caro amigo, me perdoe, por favor
    Se eu não lhe faço uma visita
    Mas como agora apareceu um portador
    Mando notícias nessa fita

    Aqui na terra tão jogando futebol
    Tem muito samba, muito choro e rock'n'roll
    Uns dias chove, noutros dias bate o sol
    Mas o que eu quero é lhe dizer que a coisa
     [aqui tá preta

    Muita mutreta pra levar a situação
    Que a gente vai levando de teimoso e de
     [pirraça
    E a gente vai tomando que também sem a
     [cachaça

    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu não pretendo provocar
    Nem atiçar suas saudades
    Mas acontece que não posso me furtar
    A lhe contar as novidades

    É pirueta pra cavar o ganha-pão
    Que a gente vai cavando só de birra,
     [só de sarro
    E a gente vai fumando que, também,
     [sem um cigarro
    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu quis até telefonar
    Mas a tarifa não tem graça
    Eu ando aflito pra fazer você ficar
    A par de tudo que se passa

    Muita careta pra engolir a transação
    Que a gente tá engolindo cada sapo no
     [caminho
    E a gente vai se amando que, também,
     [sem um carinho
    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu bem queria lhe
     [escrever
    Mas o correio andou arisco

    Se me permitem, vou tentar lhe remeter
    Notícias frescas nesse disco
    A Marieta manda um beijo para os seus
    Um beijo na família, na Cecília e nas crianças
    O Francis aproveita pra também mandar
     [lembranças
    A todo o pessoal
    Adeus!


    BUARQUE, Chico. Phonogram, 1976.

    Atente para a relação das seguintes figuras de linguagem, presentes no texto 3, com as respectivas classificações:

    I. “Que a gente tá engolindo cada sapo no caminho” (linha 57-58) — METÁFORA
    II. “Meu caro amigo, eu quis até telefonar/ Mas a tarifa não tem graça” (linhas 52-53) — METONÍMIA
    III. “Tem muito samba, muito choro e rock'n'roll/ Uns dias chove, noutros dias bate o sol” (linhas 32-33) — EUFEMISMO
    IV. “Mas o correio andou arisco” (linha 64) — CATACRESE

    Estão corretas as classificações contidas em
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 80260443-92
  • Linguagens

    Português

    TEXTO 3
    Meu Caro Amigo
    Chico Buarque


    Meu caro amigo, me perdoe, por favor
    Se eu não lhe faço uma visita
    Mas como agora apareceu um portador
    Mando notícias nessa fita

    Aqui na terra tão jogando futebol
    Tem muito samba, muito choro e rock'n'roll
    Uns dias chove, noutros dias bate o sol
    Mas o que eu quero é lhe dizer que a coisa
     [aqui tá preta

    Muita mutreta pra levar a situação
    Que a gente vai levando de teimoso e de
     [pirraça
    E a gente vai tomando que também sem a
     [cachaça

    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu não pretendo provocar
    Nem atiçar suas saudades
    Mas acontece que não posso me furtar
    A lhe contar as novidades

    É pirueta pra cavar o ganha-pão
    Que a gente vai cavando só de birra,
     [só de sarro
    E a gente vai fumando que, também,
     [sem um cigarro
    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu quis até telefonar
    Mas a tarifa não tem graça
    Eu ando aflito pra fazer você ficar
    A par de tudo que se passa

    Muita careta pra engolir a transação
    Que a gente tá engolindo cada sapo no
     [caminho
    E a gente vai se amando que, também,
     [sem um carinho
    Ninguém segura esse rojão

    Meu caro amigo, eu bem queria lhe
     [escrever
    Mas o correio andou arisco

    Se me permitem, vou tentar lhe remeter
    Notícias frescas nesse disco
    A Marieta manda um beijo para os seus
    Um beijo na família, na Cecília e nas crianças
    O Francis aproveita pra também mandar
     [lembranças
    A todo o pessoal
    Adeus!


    BUARQUE, Chico. Phonogram, 1976.

    Manifestada por elementos formais que assinalam o vínculo entre os componentes do texto, contribuindo para a construção do sentido intentado pelo autor, a coesão textual é compreendida como a conexão entre palavras, expressões ou frases. Considerando esses aspectos, assinale a afirmação verdadeira.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 8023d7dd-92