Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e Substantivos e compostos | Nouns and compounds

Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

Resultados

44 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 1 de 3.

  • D6D1FFF0-C0

    Inglês

    Formação de palavras (prefixos e sufixos) | Word formation (prefix and suffix)
    PUC - RS · 2023DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    INSTRUÇÃO: Responder à questão com base no texto 2. 

    TEXTO 2

    STATELESSNESS
    NEWSLETTER
    #IBELONG CAMPAIGN
    Celebrating its 6th anniversary

    2_-10.png (374×265)

    UNHCR 2020 Youth With Refugees Art Contest.
    ©UNHCR/Faida
    “Statelessness” and “awareness” are nouns formed from adjectives by adding a suffix.

    The nouns below that are formed from adjectives are
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d6d1fff0-c0
  • 13A7C619-A2

    Inglês

    Substantivos e compostos | Nouns and compounds
    UECE · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    1_- 6.png (340×105)   
    7_- 32.png (355×466)
    33_- 67.png (353×627)
    68_- 99.png (356×574)
    100_- 128.png (360×518)
    129_- 138.png (359×178) 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    In the sentence “Over his decades of treating patients, Dr. Restak has noticed that fiction requires active engagement with the text” (lines 96-98), there is a/an
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13a7c619-a2
  • 96C1CFFB-74

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    UECE · 2021FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2021

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ 2021/sep/27/

    The underlined words in “extreme heatwaves” (line 13), “current pledges” (lines 14- 15), “polluting countries” (line 32) function respectively as
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 96c1cffb-74
  • DC5E8D6F-6E

    Inglês

    Falso Cognatos | False Cognates
    Universidade de Pernambuco · 2021MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2021
    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2021
    Considere a análise linguística elaborada para o texto e assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão dc5e8d6f-6e
  • 7E63FFD7-92

    Inglês

    Substantivos e compostos | Nouns and compounds
    UECE · 2020MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Americans May Add Five Times More Plastic to the Oceans Than Thought

    The United States is using more
    plastic than ever, and waste exported for
    recycling is often mishandled, according
    to a new study.
    The United States contribution
    to coastal plastic pollution worldwide is
    significantly larger than previously
    thought, possibly by as much as five
    times, according to a study published
    Friday. The research, published in Science
    Advances, is the sequel to a 2015 paper
    by the same authors. Two factors
    contributed to the sharp increase:
    Americans are using more plastic than
    ever and the current study included
    pollution generated by United States
    exports of plastic waste, while the earlier
    one did not.
    The United States, which does
    not have sufficient infrastructure to
    handle its recycling demands at home,
    exports about half of its recyclable waste.
    Of the total exported, about 88 percent
    ends up in countries considered to have
    inadequate waste management.
    “When you consider how much
    of our plastic waste isn’t actually
    recyclable because it is low-value,
    contaminated or difficult to process, it’s
    not surprising that a lot of it ends up
    polluting the environment,” said the
    study’s lead author, Kara Lavender Law,
    research professor of oceanography at
    Sea Education Association, in a
    statement.
    The study estimates that in
    2016, the United States contributed
    between 1.1 and 2.2 million metric tons of
    plastic waste to the oceans through a
    combination of littering, dumping and 
    mismanaged exports. At a minimum,
    that’s almost double the total estimated
    waste in the team’s previous study. At the
    high end, it would be a fivefold increase
    over the earlier estimate.
    Nicholas Mallos, a senior
    director at the Ocean Conservancy and an
    author of the study, said the upper
    estimate would be equal to a pile of
    plastic covering the area of the White
    House Lawn and reaching as high as the
    Empire State Building.
    The ranges are wide partly
    because “there’s no real standard for
    being able to provide good quality data on
    collection and disposal of waste in
    general,” said Ted Siegler, a resource
    economist at DSM Environmental
    Solutions, a consulting firm, and an
    author of the study. Mr. Siegler said the
    researchers had evaluated waste-disposal
    practices in countries around the world
    and used their “best professional
    judgment” to determine the lowest and
    highest amounts of plastic waste likely to
    escape into the environment. They settled
    on a range of 25 percent to 75 percent.
    Tony Walker, an associate
    professor at the Dalhousie University
    School for Resource and Environmental
    Studies in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said that
    analyzing waste data can amount to a
    “data minefield” because there are no
    data standards across municipalities.
    Moreover, once plastic waste is shipped
    overseas, he said, data is often not
    recorded at all.
    Nonetheless, Dr. Walker, who
    was not involved in the study, said it
    could offer a more accurate accounting of
    plastic pollution than the previous study,
    which likely underestimated the United
    States’ contribution. “They’ve put their
    best estimate, as accurate as they can be
    with this data,” he said, and used ranges,
    which underscores that the figures are
    estimates.
    Of the plastics that go into the
    United States recycling system, about 9
    percent of the country’s total plastic
    waste, there is no guarantee that they’ll
    be remade into new consumer goods. New
    plastic is so inexpensive to manufacture
    that only certain expensive, high-grade
    plastics are profitable to recycle within the
    United States, which is why roughly half
    of the country’s plastic waste was shipped
    abroad in 2016, the most recent year for
    which data is available.
    Since 2016, however, the
    recycling landscape has changed. China
    and many countries in Southeast Asia
    have stopped accepting plastic waste
    imports. And lower oil prices have further
    reduced the market for recycled plastic.
    “What the new study really underscores is
    we have to get a handle on source
    reduction at home,” Mr. Mallos said. “That
    starts with eliminating unnecessary and
    problematic single-use plastics.”

    From: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/
    The words “recycling” (line 3), “littering” (line 40), and “being” (line 55) are respectively used as
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7e63ffd7-92
  • AD3CAE94-FA

    Inglês

    Infinitivo e gerúndio | Infinitive and gerund
    Faculdade da Saúde e Ecologia Humana · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Trump administration officials on healthcare

         President Donald Trump’s main healthcare policy initiative has been working to fulfill his campaign promise to repeal and replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act(ACA), commonly known as Obamacare. He expressed his support for the House and Senate bills that proposed modifying parts of the ACA. The House passed its bill — the American Health Care Act of 2017 — but members of the Senate have been unable to agree on a final replacement plan, leaving most of the provisions of the ACA in place. Republicans did take one step towards changing the ACA by eliminating the law's individual mandate, which took effect in January 2019. In October 2017, the Trump administration took actions to modify the ACA. Trump issued an executive order directing members of his Cabinet to create rules that would allow small businesses to collectively buy health insurance through association health plans, expand shortterm health coverage, and expand the use of Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). The order did not make direct changes to existing health insurance rules; instead, it directed agencies to consider new rules that would be subject to a notice and comment period. Trump said that he is still committed to passing a bill to repeal and replace the ACA. Before signing the executive order on October 12, 2017, Trump said, “Today is only the beginning. In the coming months, we plan to take new measures to provide our people with even more relief and more freedom. (…) And we’re going to also pressure Congress very strongly to finish the repeal and the replace of Obamacare once and for all. We will have great healthcare in our country..”.
    (Available in: https://ballotpedia.org. Adapted.)
    Mark the gerund which is used as a noun:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ad3cae94-fa
  • 257AE4FB-E6

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    faculdade independente do Nordeste · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2019

    Identifique a classe gramatical das palavras que estão em negrito no texto:

    I- “factory”   II- “employs”   III- “watches”   IV- “profit”   V- “revolutionary”


    Marque a alternativa que possui a seqüência correta das respostas:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 257ae4fb-e6
  • 4F6B08A5-B9

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    UECE · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    TEXTO

    The Future Of Work: 5 Important Ways Jobs

    Will Change In The 4th Industrial Revolution


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2019

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2019Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2019

    Fonte:

    https://www.forbes.com/2019/07/15

    The text includes the ing-words “learning” (line 06), “transforming” (line 08), “unnerving” (line 09), “working” (line 60), and “thinking” (line 110) whose grammatical functions are respectively
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4f6b08a5-b9
  • 73059880-B5

    Inglês

    Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions
    IFN-MG · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    TEXTO 01 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018

    No fragmento do TEXTO 01 ―Butthe social media story extends well be yond Facebook‖, (linha 12) podese encontrar os seguintes elementos, EXCETO:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 73059880-b5
  • B8F58964-10

    Inglês

    Plural dos substantivos | Plural of nouns
    IF-MT · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018

    Considerando o vocabulário e a estrutura da língua inglesa contidos no texto, assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b8f58964-10
  • F80D839C-A6

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    UEMG · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

                Brazil must legalise drugs – its existing policy just destroys lives


          For decades, guns and imprisonment have been the hallmarks of Brazil’s war against the drug trafficking. But the only way to beat the gangs is to stop creating criminals, says a top Brazilian judge

          “The war raging in Rocinha, Latin America’s largest favela, has already been lost. Rooted in a dispute between gangs for control of drug trafficking, it has disrupted the daily life of the community in Rio de Janeiro since mid-September. With the sound of shots coming from all sides, schools and shops are constantly forced to close. Recently, a stray bullet killed a Spanish tourist. The war is not the only thing being lost.

          For decades, Brazil has had the same drug policy approach. Police, weapons and numerous arrests. It does not take an expert to conclude the obvious: the strategy has failed. Drug trafficking and consumption have only increased. […]

          In a case still before the Brazilian supreme court, I voted for decriminalising the possession of marijuana for private consumption. […] 

          Drugs are an issue that has a profound impact on the criminal justice system, and it is legitimate for the supreme court to participate in the public debate. So here are the reasons for my views.

          First, drugs are bad and it is therefore the role of the state and society to discourage consumption, treat dependents and repress trafficking. The rationale behind legalisation is rooted in the belief that it will help in achieving these goals.

          Second, the war on drugs has failed. Since the 1970s, under the influence and leadership of the US, the world has tackled this problem with the use of police forces, armies, and armaments. The tragic reality is that 40 years, billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of prisoners and thousands of deaths later, things are worse. At least in countries like Brazil.

          Third, as the American economist Milton Friedman argued, the only result of criminalisation is ensuring the trafficker’s monopoly. 

          With these points in mind, what would legalisation achieve?

          In most countries in North America and Europe, the greatest concern of the authorities is users and the impact drugs have on their lives and on society. These are all important considerations. In Brazil, however, the principal focus must be ending the dominance drug dealers exercise over poor communities. Gangs have become the main political and economic power in thousands of modest neighbourhoods in Brazil. This scenario prevents a family of honest and hard-working people from educating their children away from the influence of criminal factions, who intimidate, co-opt and exercise an unfair advantage over any lawful activity. Crucially, this power of trafficking comes from illegality.

           Another benefit of legalisation would be to prevent the mass incarceration of impoverished young people with no criminal record who are arrested for trafficking because they are caught in possession of negligible amounts of marijuana. A third of detainees in Brazil are imprisoned for drug trafficking. Once arrested, young prisoners will have to join one of the factions that control the penitentiaries – and on that day, they become dangerous.

          […]

          We cannot be certain that a progressive and cautious policy of decriminalisation and legalisation will be successful. What we can affirm is that the existing policy of criminalisation has failed. We must take chances; otherwise, we risk simply accepting a terrible situation. As the Brazilian navigator Amyr Klink said: “The worst shipwreck is not setting off at all.” 

    Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/nov/15/brazil-must-legalise-drugs-existing-policy-destroys-lives-luis-roberto-barroso-supreme-court-judge> . Acesso em: 14 nov. 2017.

    In the excerpt “Recently, a stray bullet killed a Spanish tourist”, the expression “stray bullet” is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f80d839c-a6
  • F80A1DA4-A6

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    UEMG · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

                Brazil must legalise drugs – its existing policy just destroys lives


          For decades, guns and imprisonment have been the hallmarks of Brazil’s war against the drug trafficking. But the only way to beat the gangs is to stop creating criminals, says a top Brazilian judge

          “The war raging in Rocinha, Latin America’s largest favela, has already been lost. Rooted in a dispute between gangs for control of drug trafficking, it has disrupted the daily life of the community in Rio de Janeiro since mid-September. With the sound of shots coming from all sides, schools and shops are constantly forced to close. Recently, a stray bullet killed a Spanish tourist. The war is not the only thing being lost.

          For decades, Brazil has had the same drug policy approach. Police, weapons and numerous arrests. It does not take an expert to conclude the obvious: the strategy has failed. Drug trafficking and consumption have only increased. […]

          In a case still before the Brazilian supreme court, I voted for decriminalising the possession of marijuana for private consumption. […] 

          Drugs are an issue that has a profound impact on the criminal justice system, and it is legitimate for the supreme court to participate in the public debate. So here are the reasons for my views.

          First, drugs are bad and it is therefore the role of the state and society to discourage consumption, treat dependents and repress trafficking. The rationale behind legalisation is rooted in the belief that it will help in achieving these goals.

          Second, the war on drugs has failed. Since the 1970s, under the influence and leadership of the US, the world has tackled this problem with the use of police forces, armies, and armaments. The tragic reality is that 40 years, billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of prisoners and thousands of deaths later, things are worse. At least in countries like Brazil.

          Third, as the American economist Milton Friedman argued, the only result of criminalisation is ensuring the trafficker’s monopoly. 

          With these points in mind, what would legalisation achieve?

          In most countries in North America and Europe, the greatest concern of the authorities is users and the impact drugs have on their lives and on society. These are all important considerations. In Brazil, however, the principal focus must be ending the dominance drug dealers exercise over poor communities. Gangs have become the main political and economic power in thousands of modest neighbourhoods in Brazil. This scenario prevents a family of honest and hard-working people from educating their children away from the influence of criminal factions, who intimidate, co-opt and exercise an unfair advantage over any lawful activity. Crucially, this power of trafficking comes from illegality.

           Another benefit of legalisation would be to prevent the mass incarceration of impoverished young people with no criminal record who are arrested for trafficking because they are caught in possession of negligible amounts of marijuana. A third of detainees in Brazil are imprisoned for drug trafficking. Once arrested, young prisoners will have to join one of the factions that control the penitentiaries – and on that day, they become dangerous.

          […]

          We cannot be certain that a progressive and cautious policy of decriminalisation and legalisation will be successful. What we can affirm is that the existing policy of criminalisation has failed. We must take chances; otherwise, we risk simply accepting a terrible situation. As the Brazilian navigator Amyr Klink said: “The worst shipwreck is not setting off at all.” 

    Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/nov/15/brazil-must-legalise-drugs-existing-policy-destroys-lives-luis-roberto-barroso-supreme-court-judge> . Acesso em: 14 nov. 2017.

    Consider the following excerpt: “Since the 1970s, under the influence and leadership of the US, the world has tackled this problem with the use of police forces, armies, and armaments.” Mark the option which best describes the use of some words in the excerpt.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f80a1da4-a6
  • E44BDABC-B0

    Inglês

    Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions
    UDESC · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2017
    I have a confession. I’m addicted to reality TV. I can’t get enough of it.

    Very soon the new series of ITV’s Love Island will be starting and I’m literally counting down the days until it’s on my TV screen. It’s a show that sends single people abroad to live in a luxurious villa in the sun. The audience at home then watches their highs and lows, their arguments and how their relationships and friendships form and fall apart.

    Love Island is just the tip of a huge reality TV iceberg. Other popular British programmes (which I also love) include I’m a Celebrity ... Get me Out of Here!, Big Brother and Geordie Shore. All these shows have something in common: people seem to either love them or hate them.

    Perhaps we love them so much because they actually use real people instead of characters. Series and films with actors are great to watch but they aren’t real and we’re aware of that. With reality TV we can become more invested and more interested because the ‘characters’ are real and (usually) not acting.

    Maybe we love reality TV because the people featured more often than not show the extremes of our society. Shows featuring ‘normal’ people or non-celebrities often include people with intense personalities who are bound to clash. Big Brotherwhich follows the lives of people living in a house together away from the outside world, always includes contestants with a range of personalities. It can be fascinating for us viewers to watch real people who perhaps wouldn’t usually interact with each other as they try to live together.

    However, reality TV isn’t popular with everyone. Some people consider it sad to watch it. I’ve often heard people say that if you watch reality TV, it’s a sign that your own life is boring. Why watch someone else’s life when you have your own to live? Why would you want to sit at home and watch someone else arguing about silly things on the TV?

    Some people don’t like reality TV because they believe it doesn’t show true reality. The people in these programmes are regularly accused of acting and you often see a phrase flash up somewhere during the opening or closing credits informing that parts are scripted or set up. Viewers can feel cheated that the ‘reality’ they are watching isn’t completely real after all.

    Whether you love or hate reality TV, it cannot be denied that this genre has increased in popularity over time, and while I understand it can be set up sometimes, I’m still so excited for Love Island to be back on our screens!

    (Accessed on August 14th, 2017) http://learnenglishteens.britishcouncil.org/magazine By Megan Blogger
    Mark the correct alternative according to the use of the underlined words in the Text.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e44bdabc-b0
  • E434B1B0-B0

    Inglês

    Adjetivos | Adjectives
    UDESC · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2017

    Mark the right alternative according to the use of the words in the text.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e434b1b0-b0
  • BB2AC026-F7

    Inglês

    Substantivos contáveis e incontáveis | Countable and uncountable
    UEG · 2016MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão.


    The Internet of Things


       The “Internet of Things” (IoT) is becoming an increasingly growing topic of conversation both in the workplace and outside of it. It’s a concept that not only has the potential to impact how we live but also how we work. But what exactly is the “Internet of Things” and what impact is it going to have on you, if any? There are a lot of complexities around the “Internet of Things” but we want to stick to the basics. Lots of technical and policyrelated conversations are being had but many people are still just trying to grasp the foundation of what the heck these conversations are about.

      Let’s start with understanding a few things. 

      Broadband Internet is becoming more widely available, the cost of connecting is decreasing, more devices are being created with Wi-Fi capabilities and sensors built into them, technology costs are going down, and smartphone penetration is sky-rocketing. All of these things are creating a “perfect storm” for the IoT.

      So What Is The Internet of Things?  

    Simply put, this is the concept of basically connecting any device with an on and off switch to the Internet (and/or to each other). This includes everything from cellphones, coffee makers, washing machines, headphones, lamps, wearable devices and almost anything else you can think of.

      So what now?

      The new rule for the future is going to be, “Anything that can be connected, will be connected.”







    Analisando-se os aspectos estruturais do texto, verifica-se que
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão bb2ac026-f7