Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
So far, there has been no evidence to indicate
that the president has
Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
- Filtrando por
- LinguagensRemover este filtro
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionRemover este filtro
- Limpar tudo
Resultados
4.335 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 135 de 217.
1CEEC734-B8 1CD9DB91-B8 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2015FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosOne of the accusations against the head of the Brazilian Senate is that he1CD6F43B-B8 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2015FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosThe text refers to Ms. Rousseff as a1CD3204F-B8 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosOne of the facts mentioned in the text about the political reality in Brazil is that34F91879-B2 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTechnology isn’t working
The digital revolution has yet to fulfil its promise of higher productivity and better jobs
If there is a technological revolution in progress, rich economies could be forgiven for wishing it would go away. Workers in America, Europe and Japan have been through a difficult few decades. In the 1970s the blistering growth after the second world war vanished in both Europe and America. In the early 1990s Japan joined the slump, entering a prolonged period of economic stagnation. Brief spells of faster growth in intervening years quickly petered out. The rich world is still trying to shake off the effects of the 2008 financial crisis. And now the digital economy, far from pushing up wages across the board in response to higher productivity, is keeping them flat for the mass of workers while extravagantly rewarding the most talented ones.
It seems difficult to square this unhappy experience with the extraordinary technological progress during that period, but the same thing has happened before. Most economic historians reckon there was very little improvement in living standards in Britain in the century after the first Industrial Revolution. And in the early 20th century, as Victorian inventions such as electric lighting came into their own, productivity growth was every bit as slow as it has been in recent decades.
<http://tinyurl.com/lv6rj7b>Acesso em: 18.02.2015. Adaptado.
De acordo com o segundo parágrafo do texto,34F5CEA2-B2 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTechnology isn’t working
The digital revolution has yet to fulfil its promise of higher productivity and better jobs
If there is a technological revolution in progress, rich economies could be forgiven for wishing it would go away. Workers in America, Europe and Japan have been through a difficult few decades. In the 1970s the blistering growth after the second world war vanished in both Europe and America. In the early 1990s Japan joined the slump, entering a prolonged period of economic stagnation. Brief spells of faster growth in intervening years quickly petered out. The rich world is still trying to shake off the effects of the 2008 financial crisis. And now the digital economy, far from pushing up wages across the board in response to higher productivity, is keeping them flat for the mass of workers while extravagantly rewarding the most talented ones.
It seems difficult to square this unhappy experience with the extraordinary technological progress during that period, but the same thing has happened before. Most economic historians reckon there was very little improvement in living standards in Britain in the century after the first Industrial Revolution. And in the early 20th century, as Victorian inventions such as electric lighting came into their own, productivity growth was every bit as slow as it has been in recent decades.
<http://tinyurl.com/lv6rj7b>Acesso em: 18.02.2015. Adaptado.
O termo “the same thing”, em destaque no segundo parágrafo, refere-se a34F28494-B2 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosTechnology isn’t working
The digital revolution has yet to fulfil its promise of higher productivity and better jobs
If there is a technological revolution in progress, rich economies could be forgiven for wishing it would go away. Workers in America, Europe and Japan have been through a difficult few decades. In the 1970s the blistering growth after the second world war vanished in both Europe and America. In the early 1990s Japan joined the slump, entering a prolonged period of economic stagnation. Brief spells of faster growth in intervening years quickly petered out. The rich world is still trying to shake off the effects of the 2008 financial crisis. And now the digital economy, far from pushing up wages across the board in response to higher productivity, is keeping them flat for the mass of workers while extravagantly rewarding the most talented ones.
It seems difficult to square this unhappy experience with the extraordinary technological progress during that period, but the same thing has happened before. Most economic historians reckon there was very little improvement in living standards in Britain in the century after the first Industrial Revolution. And in the early 20th century, as Victorian inventions such as electric lighting came into their own, productivity growth was every bit as slow as it has been in recent decades.
<http://tinyurl.com/lv6rj7b>Acesso em: 18.02.2015. Adaptado.
Pelas informações do texto, um dos resultados da economia digital foi34EF8495-B2 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTechnology isn’t working
The digital revolution has yet to fulfil its promise of higher productivity and better jobs
If there is a technological revolution in progress, rich economies could be forgiven for wishing it would go away. Workers in America, Europe and Japan have been through a difficult few decades. In the 1970s the blistering growth after the second world war vanished in both Europe and America. In the early 1990s Japan joined the slump, entering a prolonged period of economic stagnation. Brief spells of faster growth in intervening years quickly petered out. The rich world is still trying to shake off the effects of the 2008 financial crisis. And now the digital economy, far from pushing up wages across the board in response to higher productivity, is keeping them flat for the mass of workers while extravagantly rewarding the most talented ones.
It seems difficult to square this unhappy experience with the extraordinary technological progress during that period, but the same thing has happened before. Most economic historians reckon there was very little improvement in living standards in Britain in the century after the first Industrial Revolution. And in the early 20th century, as Victorian inventions such as electric lighting came into their own, productivity growth was every bit as slow as it has been in recent decades.
<http://tinyurl.com/lv6rj7b>Acesso em: 18.02.2015. Adaptado.
De acordo com o texto, os efeitos da tecnologia notados na América, Europa e Japão34A90057-B2 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosConsidere o cartum.
<http://tinyurl.com/kl3oyrm>Acesso em: 16.03.2015.
O texto do cartum faz referência direta ao fato de919029BD-B1 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLearn ‘n’ go
How quickly can people learn new skills?
Jan 25th 2014 – from the print edition
In 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee took a ride in one of Google’s driverless cars. The car’s performance, they report, was flawless, boring and, above all, “weird”. Only a few years earlier, “We were sure that computers would not be able to drive cars.” Only humans, they thought, could make sense of the countless, shifting patterns of driving a car – with oncoming1 traffic, changing lights and wayward2 jaywalkers3 .
Machines have mastered driving. And not just driving. In ways that are only now becoming apparent, the authors argue, machines can forecast home prices, design beer bottles, teach at universities, grade exams and do countless other things better and more cheaply than humans. (…)
This will have one principal good consequence, and one bad. The good is bounty4 . Households will spend less on groceries, utilities and clothing; the deaf will be able to hear, the blind to see. The bad is spread5 . The gap is growing between the lucky few whose abilities and skills are enhanced6 by technology, and the far more numerous middle-skilled people competing for the remaining7 jobs that machines cannot do, such as folding towels and waiting at tables. (…) People should develop skills that complement, rather than compete with computers, such as idea generation and complex communication. (…)
<http://tinyurl.com/m2zmazg>Acesso em: 27.07.2015. Adaptado.
Glossário
1oncoming: iminente; próximo.
2wayward: desobediente; instável.
3jaywalker: pedestre imprudente.
4bounty: recompensa.
5spread: propagação; extensão.
6enhanced: aprimorado(a).
7remaining: remanescente.
O pronome relativo whose, em negrito no terceiro parágrafo, refere-se a918A2AA8-B1 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLearn ‘n’ go
How quickly can people learn new skills?
Jan 25th 2014 – from the print edition
In 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee took a ride in one of Google’s driverless cars. The car’s performance, they report, was flawless, boring and, above all, “weird”. Only a few years earlier, “We were sure that computers would not be able to drive cars.” Only humans, they thought, could make sense of the countless, shifting patterns of driving a car – with oncoming1 traffic, changing lights and wayward2 jaywalkers3 .
Machines have mastered driving. And not just driving. In ways that are only now becoming apparent, the authors argue, machines can forecast home prices, design beer bottles, teach at universities, grade exams and do countless other things better and more cheaply than humans. (…)
This will have one principal good consequence, and one bad. The good is bounty4 . Households will spend less on groceries, utilities and clothing; the deaf will be able to hear, the blind to see. The bad is spread5 . The gap is growing between the lucky few whose abilities and skills are enhanced6 by technology, and the far more numerous middle-skilled people competing for the remaining7 jobs that machines cannot do, such as folding towels and waiting at tables. (…) People should develop skills that complement, rather than compete with computers, such as idea generation and complex communication. (…)
<http://tinyurl.com/m2zmazg>Acesso em: 27.07.2015. Adaptado.
Glossário
1oncoming: iminente; próximo.
2wayward: desobediente; instável.
3jaywalker: pedestre imprudente.
4bounty: recompensa.
5spread: propagação; extensão.
6enhanced: aprimorado(a).
7remaining: remanescente.
A respeito das tarefas que as máquinas podem desempenhar, e de acordo com o que é mencionado diretamente no segundo parágrafo, pode-se afirmar corretamente que9187185C-B1 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLearn ‘n’ go
How quickly can people learn new skills?
Jan 25th 2014 – from the print edition
In 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee took a ride in one of Google’s driverless cars. The car’s performance, they report, was flawless, boring and, above all, “weird”. Only a few years earlier, “We were sure that computers would not be able to drive cars.” Only humans, they thought, could make sense of the countless, shifting patterns of driving a car – with oncoming1 traffic, changing lights and wayward2 jaywalkers3 .
Machines have mastered driving. And not just driving. In ways that are only now becoming apparent, the authors argue, machines can forecast home prices, design beer bottles, teach at universities, grade exams and do countless other things better and more cheaply than humans. (…)
This will have one principal good consequence, and one bad. The good is bounty4 . Households will spend less on groceries, utilities and clothing; the deaf will be able to hear, the blind to see. The bad is spread5 . The gap is growing between the lucky few whose abilities and skills are enhanced6 by technology, and the far more numerous middle-skilled people competing for the remaining7 jobs that machines cannot do, such as folding towels and waiting at tables. (…) People should develop skills that complement, rather than compete with computers, such as idea generation and complex communication. (…)
<http://tinyurl.com/m2zmazg>Acesso em: 27.07.2015. Adaptado.
Glossário
1oncoming: iminente; próximo.
2wayward: desobediente; instável.
3jaywalker: pedestre imprudente.
4bounty: recompensa.
5spread: propagação; extensão.
6enhanced: aprimorado(a).
7remaining: remanescente.
De acordo com o primeiro parágrafo, em 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson e Andrew McAfee918365B4-B1 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFATEC · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLearn ‘n’ go
How quickly can people learn new skills?
Jan 25th 2014 – from the print edition
In 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee took a ride in one of Google’s driverless cars. The car’s performance, they report, was flawless, boring and, above all, “weird”. Only a few years earlier, “We were sure that computers would not be able to drive cars.” Only humans, they thought, could make sense of the countless, shifting patterns of driving a car – with oncoming1 traffic, changing lights and wayward2 jaywalkers3 .
Machines have mastered driving. And not just driving. In ways that are only now becoming apparent, the authors argue, machines can forecast home prices, design beer bottles, teach at universities, grade exams and do countless other things better and more cheaply than humans. (…)
This will have one principal good consequence, and one bad. The good is bounty4 . Households will spend less on groceries, utilities and clothing; the deaf will be able to hear, the blind to see. The bad is spread5 . The gap is growing between the lucky few whose abilities and skills are enhanced6 by technology, and the far more numerous middle-skilled people competing for the remaining7 jobs that machines cannot do, such as folding towels and waiting at tables. (…) People should develop skills that complement, rather than compete with computers, such as idea generation and complex communication. (…)
<http://tinyurl.com/m2zmazg>Acesso em: 27.07.2015. Adaptado.
Glossário
1oncoming: iminente; próximo.
2wayward: desobediente; instável.
3jaywalker: pedestre imprudente.
4bounty: recompensa.
5spread: propagação; extensão.
6enhanced: aprimorado(a).
7remaining: remanescente.
Ainda conforme o primeiro parágrafo, a performance do carro desenvolvido pelo Google foi avaliada por Erik Brynjolfsson e Andrew McAfee como913F463F-B1 Inglês
Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspectsFATEC · 2015FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto em que um termo foi retirado.
Rio 2016 unveils innovative Olympic torch
The innovative design, which is _________________ by the warmth of the Brazilian people, features moveable segments that expand vertically to reveal the colours of Brazil when the Olympic flame is passed from one torchbearer to another. The triangular shape of the torch, meanwhile, alludes to the three Olympic Values of excellence, friendship and respect, while the floating effect of its different segments represents the efforts of the athletes.
<http://tinyurl.com/qee99wp>Acesso em: 28.07.2015. Adaptado.
A forma verbal que melhor completa o parágrafo de modo a tornar a sentença gramaticalmente correta é1DF06EC4-B0 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFGV · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Adapted from The Economist, January 24, 2015.
In paragraph 5, “That” in the sentence “That has much to do with events elsewhere in the world” most likely refers to the1DD7731B-B0 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFGV · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Adapted from Natural History, March 2015.
According to the information in the article, the fact that zebra striping patterns can vary in accordance with geographical area may indicate that1DD2919F-B0 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFGV · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosAdapted from Natural History, March 2015.
At the end of paragraph 4, when Brenda Larison says, “It’s something I want to follow up on,” she most likely means that1DC892AE-B0 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFGV · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosAdapted from Natural History, March 2015.
With respect to the Food and Agricultural Organization, which of the following is most supported by the information in the article?1DBD2FE5-B0 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFGV · 2015DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosAdapted from Natural History, March 2015.
The information in the article most supports which of the following?45085DBA-3C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2015MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosOxfam study finds richest 1% is likely to control half of global wealth by 2016By Patricia CohenJanuary 19, 2015
The richest 1 percent is likely to control more than half of the globe’s total wealth by next year, the anti-poverty charity Oxfam reported in a study released on Monday. The warning about deepening global inequality comes just as the world’s business elite prepare to meet this week at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.The 80 wealthiest people in the world altogether own $1.9 trillion, the report found, nearly the same amount shared by the 3.5 billion people who occupy the bottom half of the world’s income scale. (Last year, it took 85 billionaires to equal that figure.) And the richest 1 percent of the population controls nearly half of the world’s total wealth, a share that is also increasing.The type of inequality that currently characterizes the world’s economies is unlike anything seen in recent years, the report explained. “Between 2002 and 2010 the total wealth of the poorest half of the world in current U.S. dollars had been increasing more or less at the same rate as that of billionaires,” it said. “However since 2010, it has been decreasing over that time.”Winnie Byanyima, the charity’s executive director, noted in a statement that more than a billion people lived on less than $1.25 a day. “Do we really want to live in a world where the 1 percent own more than the rest of us combined?” Ms. Byanyima said. “The scale of global inequality is quite simply staggering.”Investors with interests in finance, insurance and health saw the biggest windfalls, Oxfam said. Using data from Forbes magazine’s list of billionaires, it said those listed as having interests in the pharmaceutical and health care industries saw their net worth jump by 47 percent. The charity credited those individuals’ rapidly growing fortunes in part to multimillion-dollar lobbying campaigns to protect and enhance their interests.(www.nytimes.com. Adaptado.)
A partir das informações apresentadas sobre o relatório da Oxfam, a resposta esperada por Winnie Byanyima à sua pergunta “Do we really want to live in a world where the 1 percent own more than the rest of us combined?” seria: