Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e com imagem
Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
Resultados
9.490 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 140 de 475.
A3A43767-BB A3A067D6-BB Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosFill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).
About the research mentioned in the text, it’s correct to say:
( ) Fitness trackers have shown to be ineffective in weight loss plans.
( ) A wearable fitness tracker can help people keep weight off after it’s gone.
( ) All the participants were asked to join some kind of activity likely to help in weight loss.
( ) The people using wearables managed to lose weight faster and more substantially than the others.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is
A39D3DB8-BB Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn the sentence “it does mean that…” (l. 8), the verb form “does” has been used
A39A622A-BB Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosKeving Hall says that when a person loses a lot of weight,
A395F78A-BB Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosAccording to the text, some people have trouble losing weight due to
A3931D97-BB Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
NAIDOO, Kovin, Disponível em: . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2018.
Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).
According to this quote by Professor Kovin Naidoo, it’s correct to say:
( ) Eye disability plays a minor role on an individual’s poverty status.
( ) Poor vision puts students at a disadvantage in the classroom.
( ) Poor eye health can lead to or worsen poverty.
( ) Vision impairment and poverty are linked to each other.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is
A366CFED-BB Português
Classificação dos verbos (Regulares, Irregulares, Defectivos, Abundantes, Unipessoais, Pronominais)Universidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Considerando-se os recursos linguísticos na tessitura do poema, é correto afirmar:A363BD03-BB Português
Interpretação de TextosUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
A alternativa que está improcedente em relação à análise do poema éA35F8978-BB Português
Análise sintáticaUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTEXTO:
Importância de se preservar a identidade cultural do Brasil. Disponível
em: http://www.saaesp.org.br/arquivos/2117>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.
“há que se destacar que não se podem esquecer os aspectos particulares da cultura” (l. 6-8)Em relação à passagem destacada do texto, é correto afirmar:A35BA88B-BB Português
Interpretação de TextosUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTEXTO:
Importância de se preservar a identidade cultural do Brasil. Disponível
em: http://www.saaesp.org.br/arquivos/2117>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.
A construção de uma identidade nacional, segundo o texto, é de responsabilidade, sobremaneira, de umaA3582B4C-BB Português
Interpretação de TextosUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosTEXTO:
Importância de se preservar a identidade cultural do Brasil. Disponível
em: http://www.saaesp.org.br/arquivos/2117>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.
Percebe-se, pela leitura do texto, que a difícil sedimentação de uma cultura nacional está intrinsecamente vinculado àA3543E15-BB Português
Interpretação de TextosUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosTEXTO:
Importância de se preservar a identidade cultural do Brasil. Disponível
em: http://www.saaesp.org.br/arquivos/2117>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2018.
Segundo as ideias do texto, a questão da identidade nacional brasileira é bastante discutida e de difícil consenso.A alternativa que melhor justifica essa opinião éF2C8D93B-B9 Português
Interpretação de TextosUERJ · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
A articulação do primeiro com o segundo parágrafo revela o seguinte eixo principal da argumentação do crítico:
F2B0C797-B9 Português
Interpretação de TextosUERJ · 2018Muito fácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTrês teses sobre o avanço da febre amarela
NATHALIA PASSARINHO
Adaptado de bbc.com, 06/02/2018.
Adaptado de Almanak Administrativo, Mercantil e Industrial do Rio de Janeiro (RJ) – 1844 a 1885
Os relatos sobre as ondas epidêmicas de febre amarela na cidade do Rio de Janeiro apareceram com frequência nos periódicos, especialmente a partir da década de 1850.
De acordo com o documento acima, no início da década de 1870, o alastramento da doença era associado ao seguinte fator:
241C2781-B9 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, o assassino da freira e defensora da floresta amazônica, Dorothy Stang,2418F0F8-B9 Inglês
Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctionsUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
No trecho do segundo parágrafo – That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in southeastern Guatemala – a expressão em destaque introduz2415A625-B9 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
No trecho do segundo parágrafo – Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around – a expressão em destaque equivale, em português, a2411A80D-B9 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
Leia o segundo parágrafo, em que se responde à pergunta “Why is Latin America so deadly?”. De acordo com o mesmo parágrafo, a resposta é:240E9AAA-B9 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
No trecho do primeiro parágrafo – Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there –, o termo em destaque se refere a240BD61F-B9 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Virtual de São Paulo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
De acordo com o primeiro parágrafo, a ONG Global Witness afirma que, em 2015,