Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
23.294 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 426 de 1165.
A autora da crônica cria duas categorias para classificar os sons com que nos deparamos no dia a dia: sons magnânimos e sons cotidianos. Leia os trechos da crônica apresentados a seguir e escreva SM se o trecho pertencer à categoria do som magnânimo ou SC se fizer parte da categoria do som cotidiano.
( ) “O sinal da hora do recreio.” (linha 56)
( ) “O primeiro eu te amo dito por quem você também começou a amar.” (linhas 61-62)
( ) “[...] o barulho da chave abrindo a fechadura da porta. Seu filho voltou.” (linhas 19-20)
( ) “[...] o recado na secretária eletrônica de alguém que já morreu.” (linhas 23-25)
( ) “O toque do interfone quando se aguarda ansiosamente a chegada do namorado.” (linhas 49-50)
A sequência correta, de cima para baixo, é:
Observe as imagens das duas charges de Angelo Agostini publicadas no periódico Vida Fluminense. Ambas oferecem representações sobre a Guerra do Paraguai, que causaram forte impacto na opinião pública. A imagem I retrata Solano López como o “Nero do século XIX”; a imagem II figura um soldado brasileiro que retorna dos campos de batalha.
Sobre as imagens, é correto afirmar, respectivamente:
Produzida no contexto da implantação da ordem republicana
no Brasil, esta imagem
Examine a tabela.
Os dados da tabela referem‐se a anos transcorridos durante a
Ditadura Militar no Brasil. O desempenho econômico nesse
período entrelaçou‐se ao panorama político do país. Nesse
sentido, é correto afirmar:
Esta imagem é a reprodução de
What time isit? Thatsimple question probably is asked more often today than ever. In our clock‐studded, cell‐phone society, the answer is never more than a glance away, and so we can blissfully partition our daysinto eversmaller incrementsfor ever more tightly scheduled tasks, confident that we will always know it is 7:03 P.M.
Modern scientific revelations about time, however, make the question endlessly frustrating. If we seek a precise knowledge of the time, the elusive infinitesimal of “now” dissolves into a scattering flock of nanoseconds. Bound by the speed of light and the velocity of nerve impulses, our perceptions of the present sketch the world as it was an instant ago—for all that our consciousness pretends otherwise, we can never catch up.
Even in principle, perfect synchronicity escapes us. Relativity dictates that, like a strange syrup, time flows slower on moving trains than in the stations and faster in the mountains than in the valleys. The time for our wristwatch or digital screen is not exactly the same as the time for our head.
Our intuitions are deeply paradoxical. Time heals all wounds, but it is also the great destroyer. Time is relative but also relentless. There is time for every purpose under heaven, but there is never enough.
Scientific American, October 24, 2014. Adaptado.
What time isit? Thatsimple question probably is asked more often today than ever. In our clock‐studded, cell‐phone society, the answer is never more than a glance away, and so we can blissfully partition our daysinto eversmaller incrementsfor ever more tightly scheduled tasks, confident that we will always know it is 7:03 P.M.
Modern scientific revelations about time, however, make the question endlessly frustrating. If we seek a precise knowledge of the time, the elusive infinitesimal of “now” dissolves into a scattering flock of nanoseconds. Bound by the speed of light and the velocity of nerve impulses, our perceptions of the present sketch the world as it was an instant ago—for all that our consciousness pretends otherwise, we can never catch up.
Even in principle, perfect synchronicity escapes us. Relativity dictates that, like a strange syrup, time flows slower on moving trains than in the stations and faster in the mountains than in the valleys. The time for our wristwatch or digital screen is not exactly the same as the time for our head.
Our intuitions are deeply paradoxical. Time heals all wounds, but it is also the great destroyer. Time is relative but also relentless. There is time for every purpose under heaven, but there is never enough.
Scientific American, October 24, 2014. Adaptado.
What time isit? Thatsimple question probably is asked more often today than ever. In our clock‐studded, cell‐phone society, the answer is never more than a glance away, and so we can blissfully partition our daysinto eversmaller incrementsfor ever more tightly scheduled tasks, confident that we will always know it is 7:03 P.M.
Modern scientific revelations about time, however, make the question endlessly frustrating. If we seek a precise knowledge of the time, the elusive infinitesimal of “now” dissolves into a scattering flock of nanoseconds. Bound by the speed of light and the velocity of nerve impulses, our perceptions of the present sketch the world as it was an instant ago—for all that our consciousness pretends otherwise, we can never catch up.
Even in principle, perfect synchronicity escapes us. Relativity dictates that, like a strange syrup, time flows slower on moving trains than in the stations and faster in the mountains than in the valleys. The time for our wristwatch or digital screen is not exactly the same as the time for our head.
Our intuitions are deeply paradoxical. Time heals all wounds, but it is also the great destroyer. Time is relative but also relentless. There is time for every purpose under heaven, but there is never enough.
Scientific American, October 24, 2014. Adaptado.
Examine o anúncio.
No contexto do anúncio, a frase “A diferença tem que ser só
uma letra” pressupõe a
Com base no texto, é correto afirmar:
