Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2021
- URCA
- Dificuldade: Fácil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 412805E5-6A
Observe o quadrinho e assinale a alternativa CORRETA:

(@leandro_assis_ilustra, Instagram)
Área do conhecimento
Todas as questões de Linguagens do banco, com gabarito em cada página. Combine com ano, disciplina e dificuldade para montar sua lista de estudo.
Observe o quadrinho e assinale a alternativa CORRETA:

(@leandro_assis_ilustra, Instagram)

De acordo com o texto, considere as afirmativas a seguir.
I. Brincos poderão ser usados para monitorar a saúde de seus usuários.
II. Brincos terão função semelhante aos fones com technologia Bluetooth.
III. Calçados servirão como geradores de energia.
IV. Botões funcionarão como sensores de temperatura corporal.
V. Botões terão influência sobre outras tecnologias portáteis.
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta apenas afirmativas corretas.
Teen Texting: Girls versus Boys
By Victoria Stern

A new study from the American Psychological Association evaluated how 211 girls and 192 boys communicated via text and found notable gender differences in overall behavior and compulsive use:
• Teenage girls use texting for social connection, whereas boys mostly use it to convey information.
• Boys and girls send about the same number of texts every day, but girls are more likely to become compulsive texters.
• Teenage girls who compulsively text see a steeper decline in their grades than their compulsive male counterparts. The researchers suggest the social content of girls' messages may be more likely to distract them from their academic tasks.
• Compulsive texting also appears to affect girls' mental health more than boys', perhaps because girls are more prone to text about negative feelings and to ruminate on those feelings.
Disponível em: : <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/teen-texting-girls-versus-boys/> .Acesso em: jan. 2016 (fragmento).

Leia o trecho a seguir e responda o que se pede:
“Negrinha abriu a boca, como o cuco, e fechou os olhos. A patroa então, com uma colher, tirou da água “pulando” o ovo e zás! na boca da pequena. E antes que o urro de dor saísse, prática que era D. Inácia nesse castigo, suas mãos amordaçaram-na até que o ovo arrefecesse. Negrinha urrou surdamente, pelo nariz. Esperneou. Mas só. Nem os vizinhos chegaram a perceber aquilo. Depois:
— Diga nomes feios aos mais velhos outra vez!! Ouviu, peste??”
(LOBATO, Monteiro. Negrinha. Disponível em <https://cs.ufgd.edu.br/download/Negrinha-de-Monteiro- Lobato.pdf>)
Assinale a alternativa que indica a classe
gramatical e o processo de formação da palavra
destacada:


Considere as afirmações a seguir e assinale a alternativa CORRETA:
1. O Romantismo Brasileiro, tendo como traço reconhecido o esforço de buscar uma fisionomia nacional que se distanciasse da literatura europeia, investiu no aportuguesamento da língua.
2. Nossos escritores românticos eram unânimes quanto ao reconhecimento da importância da contribuição de africanos e índios, como marca que nos diferenciava da literatura europeia.
3. Álvares de Azevedo negava a importância do
elemento indígena para a consolidação da
literatura nacional brasileira.

Texto 1
Part of President Obama’s Speech at Rutgers Commencement 2016
Facts, evidence, reason, logic, an understanding of science — these are good things. These are qualities you want in people making policy. These are qualities you want to continue to cultivate in yourselves as citizens. That might seem obvious. That’s why we honor Bill Moyers or Dr. Burnell. We traditionally have valued those things. But if you were listening to today’s political debate, you might wonder where this strain of anti-intellectualism came from.
So, Class of 2016, let me be as clear as I can be. In politics and in life, ignorance is not a virtue. It’s not cool to not know what you’re talking about. That’s not keeping it real, or telling it like it is. That’s not challenging political correctness. That’s just not knowing what you’re talking about.
You know, it’s interesting that if we get sick, we actually want to make sure the doctors have gone to medical school, they know what they’re talking about. If we get on a plane, we say we really want a pilot to be able to pilot the plane. The rejection of facts, the rejection of reason and science — that is the path to decline.
From: shorturl.at/deAIX. Accessed on 04/01/2020
Texto 1
Part of President Obama’s Speech at Rutgers Commencement 2016
Facts, evidence, reason, logic, an understanding of science — these are good things. These are qualities you want in people making policy. These are qualities you want to continue to cultivate in yourselves as citizens. That might seem obvious. That’s why we honor Bill Moyers or Dr. Burnell. We traditionally have valued those things. But if you were listening to today’s political debate, you might wonder where this strain of anti-intellectualism came from.
So, Class of 2016, let me be as clear as I can be. In politics and in life, ignorance is not a virtue. It’s not cool to not know what you’re talking about. That’s not keeping it real, or telling it like it is. That’s not challenging political correctness. That’s just not knowing what you’re talking about.
You know, it’s interesting that if we get sick, we actually want to make sure the doctors have gone to medical school, they know what they’re talking about. If we get on a plane, we say we really want a pilot to be able to pilot the plane. The rejection of facts, the rejection of reason and science — that is the path to decline.
From: shorturl.at/deAIX. Accessed on 04/01/2020
Texto 1
Part of President Obama’s Speech at Rutgers Commencement 2016
Facts, evidence, reason, logic, an understanding of science — these are good things. These are qualities you want in people making policy. These are qualities you want to continue to cultivate in yourselves as citizens. That might seem obvious. That’s why we honor Bill Moyers or Dr. Burnell. We traditionally have valued those things. But if you were listening to today’s political debate, you might wonder where this strain of anti-intellectualism came from.
So, Class of 2016, let me be as clear as I can be. In politics and in life, ignorance is not a virtue. It’s not cool to not know what you’re talking about. That’s not keeping it real, or telling it like it is. That’s not challenging political correctness. That’s just not knowing what you’re talking about.
You know, it’s interesting that if we get sick, we actually want to make sure the doctors have gone to medical school, they know what they’re talking about. If we get on a plane, we say we really want a pilot to be able to pilot the plane. The rejection of facts, the rejection of reason and science — that is the path to decline.
From: shorturl.at/deAIX. Accessed on 04/01/2020
Texto 2
Boris Johnson should have taken his own medicine - The British prime minister tested positive for Covid-19 and went into isolation, but not before doing untold damage and setting a bad example.

Boris Johnson, the prime minister of Britain, on Friday announced that he had tested positive for the coronavirus. In a brief video released on Twitter, he shared the basics: Having developed “mild symptoms — that’s to say, a temperature and a persistent cough” — he underwent testing and received the bad news. He will now be “selfisolating” until the illness has run its course.
Looking mostly healthy, if typically disheveled, Mr. Johnson stressed that he would continue to “lead the national fightback” from his home via teleconferencing. He urged the British public to abide by the three-week lockdown put into place on Monday.
The more effectively people stick with social distancing, the faster the nation and its National Health Service (N.H.S.) will “bounce back,” he said, before closing with the plea, “Stay at home, protect the N.H.S and save lives.” It was a responsible, no- drama message. If only the prime minister had displayed such leadership sooner, he — and who knows how many others — might have been spared this illness.
From: shorturl.at/dKV23. Accessed on 03/27/2020