Pular para o conteúdo

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

Resultados

577 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 21 de 29.

  • A91BA04C-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The word in bold can be replaced by the word(s) in parentheses, without change in meaning, in
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a91ba04c-b0
  • A915E423-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    In the fragments “Organisations funding bakeries and local councils were forced to rely on him to transfer hard currency into Eastern Ghouta.” (lines 57-59)” and “The government has financed its huge deficits by printing money and eating up its foreign reserves.” (lines 85-87), rely on and eat up mean, respectively,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a915e423-b0
  • A9030649-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017Muito difícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The expression “darkest hour” in the fragment “their country’s darkest hour” (lines 103) makes reference to the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a9030649-b0
  • A8F47CBA-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The comparison established between Mr. Manfoush and the legendary character Robin Hood in the fragment “People see him as a sort of Robin Hood character” (lines 73-74) is due to the fact that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8f47cba-b0
  • A8F0731B-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    According to paragraph 7 (lines 63-70), one can state that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8f0731b-b0
  • A8EA8133-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    According to paragraph 6 (lines 56-62), Mr. Manfoush’s profits increased even more because
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8ea8133-b0
  • A8E63871-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The phrase “such competition” (line 51) in the context of the paragraph in which it is inserted refers to the competition between the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8e63871-b0
  • A8E2120A-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    From the fragment “When these peaked in the winter of 2003, […], Mr. Manfoush’s profits - and those of his patrons in the regime – rocketed.” (lines 40-48), one can infer that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8e2120a-b0
  • A8DE4F8F-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    According to paragraph 4 (lines 25-37), the deal Mr. Manfoush made with the Syrian regime included
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8de4f8f-b0
  • A8DA761D-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Based on the information presented in paragraph 3 (lines 17-24), one can say that all the issues below contributed to Mr. Manfoush’s wealth from 2003 onwards, EXCEPT the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8da761d-b0
  • A8D2B25D-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The fragment “This has proved effective at isolating, containing and stranding rebel redoubts into submission without consuming too much of the regime’s dwindling manpower. The sieges have generated lots of money, too” (lines 12 -16) is structured by
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8d2b25d-b0
  • A8CD8361-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    In the subtitle of the text “For Syria’s new elite, peace might be bad for business” the implied idea is that peace is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8cd8361-b0
  • A8C8F3A4-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2017Muito difícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionFigura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    The main objective of the text is to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a8c8f3a4-b0
  • F320013F-B0

    Inglês

    Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects
    PUC - SP · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2017, Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspectsIn a unanimous decision with majorn implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress.

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In: <https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilitie> 30.03.2018

    No excerto do sexto parágrafo “whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater”, a palavra it se refere a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f320013f-b0
  • F3172A03-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    De acordo com os parágrafos 4 a 6, algumas das ações tomadas pelos pais de Endrew, em razão de sua insatisfação com a escola pública em que o filho estudava, foram:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f3172a03-b0
  • F312C1BF-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2017FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, é CORRETO afirmar que, nos Estados Unidos,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f312c1bf-b0
  • F30CA4B6-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionIn a unanimous decision with majorn implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress.

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In: <https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilitie> 30.03.2018

    We understand from paragraph 2 that, concerning the ‘merely more than de minimis’ education programs for the disabled, John G Roberts believes such programs
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f30ca4b6-b0
  • F2FC5368-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2017DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionIn a unanimous decision with majorn implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress.

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In: <https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilitie> 30.03.2018

    O fato que levou à publicação deste texto em março de 2017 foi
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f2fc5368-b0