Pular para o conteúdo

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 109 de 266

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Food insecurity hits nearly 60% of Brazilians, study shows.

      A study from the Brazilian Research Network on Food Sovereignty and Security released Wednesday showed that 58.7% of Brazilians lived with food insecurity, which replicated data not seen since 1993. In other words, 125.2 million people are affected by this issue, while 15% of the population, or about 33 million people, go hungry on a daily basis.
     
     The document also highlighted that this phenomenon was a consequence of the country’s economic crisis and the ensuing labor market situation. The survey consisted of interviews conducted between November 2021 and April this year in 12,745 households across 577 municipalities in all states. Compared to 2018, the increase in the Brazilian population with food insecurity is 60% and since 2020 this figure grew by 7.2%.
     
      It was the second National Survey on Food Insecurity in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil and showed that the daily victims of hunger increased from 19 to 33 million from 2021 to 2022. The most affected areas of the country are the North and Northeast, with 25.7% and 21% of the families involved, respectively. The report also revealed that 60% of households in rural areas are food insecure, with 18.6% of them in the most severe state. Hunger also affected 21.8% of the families of small agricultural producers.

      The study also focused on investigating the relationship between food and race and confirmed that access to food is not a problem for 53.2% of the households of self-declared white people, but this percentage drops to 35% in the homes of self-declared black people. In these families, the percentage of people who suffer from a lack of food on a daily basis increased from 10.4% to 18.1%. The situation worsened in households managed by black women, of which 63% showed some degree of insecurity.

       According to the survey, in 2022, one out of three Brazilians did something that caused shame, sadness or regret in order to obtain food. "We have gone back 30 years in the fight against hunger, it’s scary. But the current indignant movement is far from the indignation of 1993 with 32 million hungry people. We are inert as a society," explained Kiko Afonso, one of the members of the team to conduct the study. 

    From:https://en.mercopress.com/2022/06/09/food-insecurity-hits-nearly-60-of-brazilians-study-shows. Accessed on 07/10/2022
    (URCA/2022.2) Os pesquisadores descobriram em suas entrevistas que a insegurança alimentar: 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 668dcd5a-c1
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, CEDERJ 2011, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Read the text again and answer questions 3, 4 e 5.

    According to the author, the subject discussed in his text

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6697dfa3-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Of the 7.2 billion people on Earth... 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, ENEM 2021, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Of the 7.2 Billion People on Earth, 2015. Disponível em:

    www.washingtonpost.com. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2017.


    Considerando a relação entre o número de habitantes e de línguas faladas no mundo, os dados trazidos pelo infográfico revelam uma

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67157c6d-7c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, ENEM 2021, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension


    Considerando-se o uso difundido do inglês na atualidade, o cartum remete à 

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67188b18-7c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Study: Literary Criticism Is Still Overwhelmingly Male


    By Zach Schonfeld

    Women writers are all over the best-seller lists, but

    literary criticism is still predominantly a male field.


         That’s according to the latest numbers from the volunteer organization VIDA: Women in the Literary Arts, which works for gender and racial parity in the literary world. This year’s report covers prestigious publications like The New York Review of Books, which published 227 male reviewers last year but only 54 female reviewers, and The London Review of Books, which published 146 male critics and 44 women during the same period. The Paris Review “made great strides toward gender parity” in 2013, the report notes, but then slid and published substantially fewer women than men in 2014.


         As The Guardian points out, those figures are especially striking when you consider that women are more avid readers than men in the U.K., where some of the biggest offenders are based.


         The figures are not all disheartening. Major magazines like The New Yorker, The Atlantic and Harper’s all showed increases in the number of women published in 2014.


         That data are valuable (without VIDA, the figures would likely go untallied), and the broader awareness even more so. Top editors likely know gender disparity is an issue, but they’re more likely to pay attention to it when an organization like VIDA is paying attention to them.


    SCHONFELD, Z. Disponível em: www.newsweek.com.
    Acesso em: 15 abr. 2015 (adaptado). 

    No texto, o autor lança mão de palavras como “literary ”, “male” e “female” para apresentar uma matéria jornalística cujo tema está relacionado ao(à)
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 671b969e-7c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Most people know of the Karen people from television documentaries, magazines and encyclopedias as the “long-neck” or “giraffe” tribe. But the women who wear these brass rings on their neck belong to a sub-group of the Karen known as the Padaung. Whatever the origin of the custom one of the more common reasons it continues today, particularly in Thailand, is tourism. Although the Padaung have migrated to Thailand in only the last ten years, they have become the most popular “attraction” for hill-tribe trekking tourists. Some have written of this as exploitation of the Padaung; many westerners liken the experience of visiting one of these villages to visiting a human zoo. Some tour operators in Thailand now refuse to take tourists into such villages, while some tourists boycott those operators that do.

    Disponível em: www.peoplesoftheworld.org. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2017.
    O texto que versa sobre a prática do uso de argolas no pescoço por mulheres de uma tribo que migrou para a Tailândia tem por finalidade
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 671e65c3-7c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

         In contemporary black popular culture, rap music has become one of the spaces where black vernacular speech is used in a manner that invites dominant mainstream culture to listen — to hear — and, to some extent, be transformed. However, one of the risks of this attempt at cultural translation is that it will trivialize black vernacular speech. When young white kids imitate this speech in ways that suggest it is the speech of those who are stupid or who are only interested in entertaining or being funny, then the subversive power of this speech is undermined.

    HOOKS, B. Teaching to Transgress. New York: Routledge, 1994.
    De acordo com Bell Hooks, intelectual negra estadunidense, o poder subversivo do rap consiste na possibilidade de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 672135b9-7c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                   An increasing body of evidence suggests that the time we spend on our smartphones is interfering with our sleep, self-esteem, relationships, memory, attention spans, creativity, productivity and problem-solving and decision-making skills. But there is another reason for us to rethink our relationships with our devices. By chronically raising levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone, our phones may be threatening our health and shortening our lives.

              If they happened only occasionally, phone-induced cortisol spikes might not matter. But the average American spends four hours a day staring at their smartphone and keeps it within arm’s reach nearly all the time, according to a tracking app called Moment.

             “Your cortisol levels are elevated when your phone is in sight or nearby, or when you hear it or even think you hear it,” says David Greenfield, professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction. “It’s a stress response, and it feels unpleasant, and the body’s natural response is to want to check the phone to make the stress go away.”

              But while doing so might soothe you for a second, it probably will make things worse in the long run. Any time you check your phone, you’re likely to find something else stressful waiting for you, leading to another spike in cortisol and another craving to check your phone to make your anxiety go away. This cycle, when continuously reinforced, leads to chronically elevated cortisol levels. And chronically elevated cortisol levels have been tied to an increased risk of serious health problems, including depression, obesity, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, fertility issues, high blood pressure, heart attack, dementia and stroke.



    (Catherine Price. www.nytimes.com, 24.04.2019. Adaptado.)

    According to the text, smartphones may
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67404cfb-d8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                   An increasing body of evidence suggests that the time we spend on our smartphones is interfering with our sleep, self-esteem, relationships, memory, attention spans, creativity, productivity and problem-solving and decision-making skills. But there is another reason for us to rethink our relationships with our devices. By chronically raising levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone, our phones may be threatening our health and shortening our lives.

              If they happened only occasionally, phone-induced cortisol spikes might not matter. But the average American spends four hours a day staring at their smartphone and keeps it within arm’s reach nearly all the time, according to a tracking app called Moment.

             “Your cortisol levels are elevated when your phone is in sight or nearby, or when you hear it or even think you hear it,” says David Greenfield, professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction. “It’s a stress response, and it feels unpleasant, and the body’s natural response is to want to check the phone to make the stress go away.”

              But while doing so might soothe you for a second, it probably will make things worse in the long run. Any time you check your phone, you’re likely to find something else stressful waiting for you, leading to another spike in cortisol and another craving to check your phone to make your anxiety go away. This cycle, when continuously reinforced, leads to chronically elevated cortisol levels. And chronically elevated cortisol levels have been tied to an increased risk of serious health problems, including depression, obesity, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, fertility issues, high blood pressure, heart attack, dementia and stroke.



    (Catherine Price. www.nytimes.com, 24.04.2019. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “But there is another reason for us to rethink our relationships with our devices”, o termo sublinhado introduz uma

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67433c5e-d8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                   An increasing body of evidence suggests that the time we spend on our smartphones is interfering with our sleep, self-esteem, relationships, memory, attention spans, creativity, productivity and problem-solving and decision-making skills. But there is another reason for us to rethink our relationships with our devices. By chronically raising levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone, our phones may be threatening our health and shortening our lives.

              If they happened only occasionally, phone-induced cortisol spikes might not matter. But the average American spends four hours a day staring at their smartphone and keeps it within arm’s reach nearly all the time, according to a tracking app called Moment.

             “Your cortisol levels are elevated when your phone is in sight or nearby, or when you hear it or even think you hear it,” says David Greenfield, professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction. “It’s a stress response, and it feels unpleasant, and the body’s natural response is to want to check the phone to make the stress go away.”

              But while doing so might soothe you for a second, it probably will make things worse in the long run. Any time you check your phone, you’re likely to find something else stressful waiting for you, leading to another spike in cortisol and another craving to check your phone to make your anxiety go away. This cycle, when continuously reinforced, leads to chronically elevated cortisol levels. And chronically elevated cortisol levels have been tied to an increased risk of serious health problems, including depression, obesity, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, fertility issues, high blood pressure, heart attack, dementia and stroke.



    (Catherine Price. www.nytimes.com, 24.04.2019. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do segundo parágrafo “If they happened only occasionally”, o termo sublinhado refere-se a:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67463cf8-d8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                   An increasing body of evidence suggests that the time we spend on our smartphones is interfering with our sleep, self-esteem, relationships, memory, attention spans, creativity, productivity and problem-solving and decision-making skills. But there is another reason for us to rethink our relationships with our devices. By chronically raising levels of cortisol, the body’s main stress hormone, our phones may be threatening our health and shortening our lives.

              If they happened only occasionally, phone-induced cortisol spikes might not matter. But the average American spends four hours a day staring at their smartphone and keeps it within arm’s reach nearly all the time, according to a tracking app called Moment.

             “Your cortisol levels are elevated when your phone is in sight or nearby, or when you hear it or even think you hear it,” says David Greenfield, professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction. “It’s a stress response, and it feels unpleasant, and the body’s natural response is to want to check the phone to make the stress go away.”

              But while doing so might soothe you for a second, it probably will make things worse in the long run. Any time you check your phone, you’re likely to find something else stressful waiting for you, leading to another spike in cortisol and another craving to check your phone to make your anxiety go away. This cycle, when continuously reinforced, leads to chronically elevated cortisol levels. And chronically elevated cortisol levels have been tied to an increased risk of serious health problems, including depression, obesity, metabolic syndrome, Type 2 diabetes, fertility issues, high blood pressure, heart attack, dementia and stroke.



    (Catherine Price. www.nytimes.com, 24.04.2019. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do último parágrafo “while doing so might soothe you for a second”, o termo sublinhado equivale, em português, a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67490555-d8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Faculdade de Medicina de Marília 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the chart,

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 674be88a-d8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2011, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension “Sino-African business partnerships involve several mutual advantages.” (lines 78-79). In line with the issues presented in the text, the alternative that supports this statement is.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 675e8014-26
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    One of the things that made an incredible impression on me in the film was Frida’s comfort in and celebration of her own unique beauty. She didn’t try to fit into conventional ideas or images about womanhood or what makes someone or something beautiful. Instead, she fully inhabited her own unique gifts, not particularly caring what other people thought. She was magnetic and beautiful in her own right. She painted for years, not to be a commercial success or to be discovered, but to express her own inner pain, joy, family, love and culture. She absolutely and resolutely was who she was. The trueness of her own unique vision and her ability to stand firmly in her own truth was what made her successful in the end.

    HUTZLER, L. Disponível em: www.etbscreenwriting.com. Acesso em: 6 maio 2013.


    A autora desse comentário sobre o filme Frida mostra-se impressionada com o fato de a pintora

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67670b64-cb
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, ENEM 2017, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension


    Nesse texto publicitário são utilizados recursos verbais e não verbais para transmitir a mensagem. Ao associar os termos anyplace e regret à imagem do texto, constata-se que o tema da propaganda é a importância da

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 676ceec0-cb
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    • Leia o texto e responda às questões:
    How has Princess Diana's death changed the Royal Family?
    The death of Princess Diana in 1997, and the public's response to it, shook the House of Windsor.

    Twenty years on, there's been a coup at the palace. It was bloodless. All the royals remain standing. But the power has shifted.
    The departure, earlier this month, of the Queen's dedicated senior official Sir Christopher Geidt has meant her eldest son can exert more control over the monarchy's direction of travel.
    The comings and goings of courtiers excite those on the inside and leave outsiders cold.
    However, recent changes should cheer Prince Charles. The heir who's waited and waited is more content and less anguished.
    He's still driven by a desire to deliver change but the royal prophet in the wilderness on climate change has been embraced by the mainstream.
    A prince once derided for talking to plants is praised for trying to save the planet.
    With each year that passes, his mother will do less and he will do more.
    There are fewer clouds on his horizon. It's a horizon that was once obscured by the War of the Waleses:
    his televised admission of adultery, and his leaked comments about tampons.

    Lasting influence

    And yet, and yet. Whatever accommodation he reached with his first wife in life hasn't survived her death. Diana haunts Charles.
    A recent YouGov poll commissioned by the Press Association suggested that the number of people who believe the Prince of Wales has made a positive contribution to the Royal Family has fallen over the past four years, down from 60% to 36%.
    This polling took place at a time when it was hard to escape references to Charles's painful past.
    Newspapers and television channels have reflected at length on the influence of Diana, Princess of Wales, an influence that stretched from fashion to the British monarchy.
    It's been a month of coverage that must have perplexed anyone under the age of 25 and would have confused a visiting Martian.
    Charles's many supporters will argue that Diana's adverse impact on his popularity will recede with each passing year. But 20 years on, her influence still registers.(...)

    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41094816/. Acesso em: Agosto de 2017)


    Escolha a alternativa FALSA sobre o texto:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 679aeb2a-b3
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    • Leia o texto e responda às questões:
    How has Princess Diana's death changed the Royal Family?
    The death of Princess Diana in 1997, and the public's response to it, shook the House of Windsor.

    Twenty years on, there's been a coup at the palace. It was bloodless. All the royals remain standing. But the power has shifted.
    The departure, earlier this month, of the Queen's dedicated senior official Sir Christopher Geidt has meant her eldest son can exert more control over the monarchy's direction of travel.
    The comings and goings of courtiers excite those on the inside and leave outsiders cold.
    However, recent changes should cheer Prince Charles. The heir who's waited and waited is more content and less anguished.
    He's still driven by a desire to deliver change but the royal prophet in the wilderness on climate change has been embraced by the mainstream.
    A prince once derided for talking to plants is praised for trying to save the planet.
    With each year that passes, his mother will do less and he will do more.
    There are fewer clouds on his horizon. It's a horizon that was once obscured by the War of the Waleses:
    his televised admission of adultery, and his leaked comments about tampons.

    Lasting influence

    And yet, and yet. Whatever accommodation he reached with his first wife in life hasn't survived her death. Diana haunts Charles.
    A recent YouGov poll commissioned by the Press Association suggested that the number of people who believe the Prince of Wales has made a positive contribution to the Royal Family has fallen over the past four years, down from 60% to 36%.
    This polling took place at a time when it was hard to escape references to Charles's painful past.
    Newspapers and television channels have reflected at length on the influence of Diana, Princess of Wales, an influence that stretched from fashion to the British monarchy.
    It's been a month of coverage that must have perplexed anyone under the age of 25 and would have confused a visiting Martian.
    Charles's many supporters will argue that Diana's adverse impact on his popularity will recede with each passing year. But 20 years on, her influence still registers.(...)

    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41094816/. Acesso em: Agosto de 2017)


    Observe a frase retirada do texto e escolha a opção CORRETA:


    “It’s a horizon that was once obscured by the War of the Waleses”

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 679f9433-b3
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    • Leia o texto e responda às questões:
    How has Princess Diana's death changed the Royal Family?
    The death of Princess Diana in 1997, and the public's response to it, shook the House of Windsor.

    Twenty years on, there's been a coup at the palace. It was bloodless. All the royals remain standing. But the power has shifted.
    The departure, earlier this month, of the Queen's dedicated senior official Sir Christopher Geidt has meant her eldest son can exert more control over the monarchy's direction of travel.
    The comings and goings of courtiers excite those on the inside and leave outsiders cold.
    However, recent changes should cheer Prince Charles. The heir who's waited and waited is more content and less anguished.
    He's still driven by a desire to deliver change but the royal prophet in the wilderness on climate change has been embraced by the mainstream.
    A prince once derided for talking to plants is praised for trying to save the planet.
    With each year that passes, his mother will do less and he will do more.
    There are fewer clouds on his horizon. It's a horizon that was once obscured by the War of the Waleses:
    his televised admission of adultery, and his leaked comments about tampons.

    Lasting influence

    And yet, and yet. Whatever accommodation he reached with his first wife in life hasn't survived her death. Diana haunts Charles.
    A recent YouGov poll commissioned by the Press Association suggested that the number of people who believe the Prince of Wales has made a positive contribution to the Royal Family has fallen over the past four years, down from 60% to 36%.
    This polling took place at a time when it was hard to escape references to Charles's painful past.
    Newspapers and television channels have reflected at length on the influence of Diana, Princess of Wales, an influence that stretched from fashion to the British monarchy.
    It's been a month of coverage that must have perplexed anyone under the age of 25 and would have confused a visiting Martian.
    Charles's many supporters will argue that Diana's adverse impact on his popularity will recede with each passing year. But 20 years on, her influence still registers.(...)

    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41094816/. Acesso em: Agosto de 2017)


    O tempo verbal grifado na seguinte frase “Twenty years on, there's been a coup at the palace” é o:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67a3b472-b3
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    • Leia o texto e responda às questões:
    How has Princess Diana's death changed the Royal Family?
    The death of Princess Diana in 1997, and the public's response to it, shook the House of Windsor.

    Twenty years on, there's been a coup at the palace. It was bloodless. All the royals remain standing. But the power has shifted.
    The departure, earlier this month, of the Queen's dedicated senior official Sir Christopher Geidt has meant her eldest son can exert more control over the monarchy's direction of travel.
    The comings and goings of courtiers excite those on the inside and leave outsiders cold.
    However, recent changes should cheer Prince Charles. The heir who's waited and waited is more content and less anguished.
    He's still driven by a desire to deliver change but the royal prophet in the wilderness on climate change has been embraced by the mainstream.
    A prince once derided for talking to plants is praised for trying to save the planet.
    With each year that passes, his mother will do less and he will do more.
    There are fewer clouds on his horizon. It's a horizon that was once obscured by the War of the Waleses:
    his televised admission of adultery, and his leaked comments about tampons.

    Lasting influence

    And yet, and yet. Whatever accommodation he reached with his first wife in life hasn't survived her death. Diana haunts Charles.
    A recent YouGov poll commissioned by the Press Association suggested that the number of people who believe the Prince of Wales has made a positive contribution to the Royal Family has fallen over the past four years, down from 60% to 36%.
    This polling took place at a time when it was hard to escape references to Charles's painful past.
    Newspapers and television channels have reflected at length on the influence of Diana, Princess of Wales, an influence that stretched from fashion to the British monarchy.
    It's been a month of coverage that must have perplexed anyone under the age of 25 and would have confused a visiting Martian.
    Charles's many supporters will argue that Diana's adverse impact on his popularity will recede with each passing year. But 20 years on, her influence still registers.(...)

    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41094816/. Acesso em: Agosto de 2017)


    Observe a seguinte frase:

    “And yet and yet. Whatever accommodation he reached with his first wife in life hasn't survived her death. Diana haunts Charles”.

    Uma tradução para o termo grifado “Whatever” no context da frase seria:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67a6a56a-b3
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Figura 1 de 3 da questão de Inglês, UFF 2008, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 2 de 3 da questão de Inglês, UFF 2008, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Figura 3 de 3 da questão de Inglês, UFF 2008, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Observe this extract from the text: “The achievements of humanity are impressive and undeniable”. (lines 15-16) More recently, however, there has been a radical change in the way humanity behaves toward the evolution of the planet. Mark the option which best characterizes this attitude.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 67cd5f1f-42