Pular para o conteúdo

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 181 de 266

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T

    Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


        Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


        The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


        Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


        “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

        An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


        The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


        Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


        Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


    From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

    The text mentions situations in which sometimes companies have tried to fund projects in defense of tropical forests, but were prey to circumstances related to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b10f2118-0a
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T

    Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


        Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


        The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


        Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


        “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

        An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


        The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


        Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


        Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


    From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

    Countries that will benefit from the investments of the LEAF coalition, will have to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b11313d0-0a
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T

    Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


        Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


        The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


        Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


        “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

        An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


        The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


        Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


        Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


    From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

    Still about the countries which will receive financial support from the coalition to reduce emissions and deforestation, the text mentions that they will
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1173dc3-0a
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, FGV 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    With respect to the exclusively financial aspects of the brideprice, a South Sudanese cattle farmer would most likely get the biggest benefit from which of the following situations?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b11866bd-15
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T

    Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.


        Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.


        The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.


        Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.


        “The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.” 

        An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.


        The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.


        Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.


        Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.


    From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021

    As for the companies which will be part of the LEAF coalition, they must have the commitment to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b11b9b27-0a
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, FGV 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    The last sentence of the article, “That’s a lot of milk,” most likely refers to which aspect of certain polygamous societies?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b11ba40f-15
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXTO 1:


                   YOUTUBE TO BAN VIDEOS PROMOTING GUN SALES

                                                                By NIRAJ CHOKSHI    MARCH 22, 2018


          YouTube said this week that it would tighten restrictions on some firearm videos, its latest policy announcement since coming under scrutiny after last month’s mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla.

          The video-streaming service, which is owned by Google, said it would ban videos that promote either the construction or sale of firearms and their accessories. The new policy, developed with expert advice over the last four months, will go into effect next month, it said.

          “While we’ve long prohibited the sale of firearms, we recently notified creators of updates we will be making around content promoting the sale or manufacture of firearms and their accessories, specifically, items like ammunition, gatling triggers, and drop-in auto sears,” YouTube said in a statement.

          YouTube, which described the move as part of “regular changes” to policy, notified users in a Monday forum post. The company had previously banned videos showing how to make firearms discharge faster, a technique used by the gunman who killed 58 people in Las Vegas last fall.

          The announcement comes days before planned student-led protests against gun violence on Saturday. It was met with frustration from gun rights advocates.

          “Much like Facebook, YouTube now acts as a virtual public square,” the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a private group representing gun makers, said in a statement. “The exercise of what amounts to censorship, then, can legitimately be viewed as the stifling of commercial free speech, which has constitutional protection. Such actions also impinge on the Second Amendment.”

          The policy shift comes as YouTube and other technology platforms face increased scrutiny after the Parkland shooting, in which 17 people were killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

          Days after that massacre, a video promoting a baseless conspiracy about a shooting survivor became the top-trending video on YouTube, prompting a crackdown on such videos. YouTube’s chief executive also said that the platform planned to fight misinformation by working in partnership with Wikipedia, the nonprofit userrun online encyclopedia. But Wikipedia said it knew nothing about that plan.

          Other businesses have also made changes amid growing pressure following the Parkland attack.

          Dick’s Sporting Goods, Walmart and Kroger all raised the age limit for firearm purchases to 21. The retail chains REI and Mountain Equipment Co-op suspended orders of some popular products because the company that owns those brands, Vista Outdoor, also manufactures assault-style rifles.

          In 2016, Facebook announced a ban on private gun sales on its flagship website as well as on Instagram, the photo-sharing social network it owns. Anti-gun activists have complained that sellers still found ways around Facebook’s ban.

    Available at:<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/business/youtube-gun-ban.h...m_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront>. 

    O serviço de streaming de vídeo You Tube, anunciou a decisão de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b129ada3-ce
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXTO 1:


                   YOUTUBE TO BAN VIDEOS PROMOTING GUN SALES

                                                                By NIRAJ CHOKSHI    MARCH 22, 2018


          YouTube said this week that it would tighten restrictions on some firearm videos, its latest policy announcement since coming under scrutiny after last month’s mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla.

          The video-streaming service, which is owned by Google, said it would ban videos that promote either the construction or sale of firearms and their accessories. The new policy, developed with expert advice over the last four months, will go into effect next month, it said.

          “While we’ve long prohibited the sale of firearms, we recently notified creators of updates we will be making around content promoting the sale or manufacture of firearms and their accessories, specifically, items like ammunition, gatling triggers, and drop-in auto sears,” YouTube said in a statement.

          YouTube, which described the move as part of “regular changes” to policy, notified users in a Monday forum post. The company had previously banned videos showing how to make firearms discharge faster, a technique used by the gunman who killed 58 people in Las Vegas last fall.

          The announcement comes days before planned student-led protests against gun violence on Saturday. It was met with frustration from gun rights advocates.

          “Much like Facebook, YouTube now acts as a virtual public square,” the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a private group representing gun makers, said in a statement. “The exercise of what amounts to censorship, then, can legitimately be viewed as the stifling of commercial free speech, which has constitutional protection. Such actions also impinge on the Second Amendment.”

          The policy shift comes as YouTube and other technology platforms face increased scrutiny after the Parkland shooting, in which 17 people were killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

          Days after that massacre, a video promoting a baseless conspiracy about a shooting survivor became the top-trending video on YouTube, prompting a crackdown on such videos. YouTube’s chief executive also said that the platform planned to fight misinformation by working in partnership with Wikipedia, the nonprofit userrun online encyclopedia. But Wikipedia said it knew nothing about that plan.

          Other businesses have also made changes amid growing pressure following the Parkland attack.

          Dick’s Sporting Goods, Walmart and Kroger all raised the age limit for firearm purchases to 21. The retail chains REI and Mountain Equipment Co-op suspended orders of some popular products because the company that owns those brands, Vista Outdoor, also manufactures assault-style rifles.

          In 2016, Facebook announced a ban on private gun sales on its flagship website as well as on Instagram, the photo-sharing social network it owns. Anti-gun activists have complained that sellers still found ways around Facebook’s ban.

    Available at:<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/business/youtube-gun-ban.h...m_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=5&pgtype=sectionfront>. 

    A palavra “But” em “YouTube’s chief executive also said that the platform planned to fi ght misinformation by working in partnership with Wikipedia, the nonprofi t user-run online encyclopedia. But Wikipedia said it knew nothing about that plan.” (8th paragraph)
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b12d383f-ce
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, FGV 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the information in the article, all of the following most likely contributed to the Great Famine of the fourteenth century except
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b12f345e-15
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXTO 2:


                     Imagem da questão de Inglês, IF Sul - MG 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

     

                                                                                                        24 March 2018


                 Drivers are being temporarily blinded by modern vehicle

                           headlights, according to an RAC survey.


          Two-thirds of drivers say they are "regularly dazzled" by oncoming headlights even though they are dipped, the survey of 2,061 motorists suggests.

          And 67% of those said it can take up to fi ve seconds for their sight to clear with a further 10% claiming the eff ect on their eyes lasts up to 10 seconds.

    The RAC said advances in headlight technology were causing the problem.

          About 15% of those drivers polled said they had nearly suff ered a collision as a result of being dazzled by other drivers using full-beam headlights.


    'Unwanted risk'


          RAC road safety spokesman Pete Williams said: "The intensity and brightness of some new car headlights is clearly causing diffi culty for other road users.

          "Headlight technology has advanced considerably in recent years, but while that may be better for the drivers of those particular vehicles, it is presenting an unwanted, new road safety risk for anyone driving towards them or even trying to pull out at a junction.”

          All cars sold for road use in the UK have to be fi tted with headlamps that conform to standards set by the EU in line with the UN's World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.

          A UN working party is currently looking at the issue of headlight glare with its next meeting due to be held at the end of next month.

    Available at: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43525525>

    A pesquisa realizada por uma empresa do Reino Unido constatou que os faróis de veículos modernos
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b13111c4-ce
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXTO 2:


                     Imagem da questão de Inglês, IF Sul - MG 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

     

                                                                                                        24 March 2018


                 Drivers are being temporarily blinded by modern vehicle

                           headlights, according to an RAC survey.


          Two-thirds of drivers say they are "regularly dazzled" by oncoming headlights even though they are dipped, the survey of 2,061 motorists suggests.

          And 67% of those said it can take up to fi ve seconds for their sight to clear with a further 10% claiming the eff ect on their eyes lasts up to 10 seconds.

    The RAC said advances in headlight technology were causing the problem.

          About 15% of those drivers polled said they had nearly suff ered a collision as a result of being dazzled by other drivers using full-beam headlights.


    'Unwanted risk'


          RAC road safety spokesman Pete Williams said: "The intensity and brightness of some new car headlights is clearly causing diffi culty for other road users.

          "Headlight technology has advanced considerably in recent years, but while that may be better for the drivers of those particular vehicles, it is presenting an unwanted, new road safety risk for anyone driving towards them or even trying to pull out at a junction.”

          All cars sold for road use in the UK have to be fi tted with headlamps that conform to standards set by the EU in line with the UN's World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations.

          A UN working party is currently looking at the issue of headlight glare with its next meeting due to be held at the end of next month.

    Available at: <http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43525525>

    A referência da palavra “them” em "Headlight technology has advanced considerably in recent years, but while that may be better for the drivers of those particular vehicles, it is presenting an unwanted, new road safety risk for anyone driving towards them or even trying to pull out at a junction.” (6th paragraph) é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b134d08c-ce
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXTO 3:


    THIS SIMPLE MIND TRICK CAN INSTANTLY BOOST

    YOUR WILLPOWER BY

    ELISA ROLAND


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, IF Sul - MG 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension


    A good dose of willpower is often necessary to see any task through, whether it’s sticking to a spending plan or finishing that great American novel.

    And if you want to increase that willpower, you just simply have to believe you have it, suggests a new study supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

    “What matters most is what we think about our willpower,” leader study author Christopher Napolitano, educational psychology professor at the University of Illinois told the University of Illinois News Bureau. “When we view our willpower as limited, it’s similar to a muscle that gets tired and needs rest. If we believe it is a finite resource, we act that way, feeling exhausted and needing breaks between demanding mental tasks, while people who view their willpower as a limitless resource get energized instead.”

    Napolitano and study co-author Veronika Job of the University of Zurich tested the validity of the Implicit Theory of Willpower for Strenuous Mental Activities Scale, a psychological assessment tool. They asked 1,100 Americans and 1,600 Europeans to weigh in on statements such as “After a strenuous mental activity, your energy is depleted, and you must rest to get it refueled again.”

    Although there was little difference between men and women overall, Americans were more likely to admit to needing breaks after completing mentally challenging tasks, while European participants became more invigorated to keep going.

    Based on the findings, Napolitano suggests that the key to amp up your willpower is to believe that you have an abundant supply of it.

    “Your feelings about your willpower affect the way you behave—but these feelings are changeable,” he said. “Changing your beliefs about the nature of your self-control can have positive effects on development, leading to healthier behaviors and perceptions of others.”

    Now that you have the drive, make sure you have the other winning attributes all successful people have in common.

    Available at: <https://www.rd.com/advice/work-career/trick-boost-willpower/>.


    Verifique se as sentenças abaixo são verdadeiras ou falsas de acordo com o texto:


    ( ) Um novo estudo sugere que a chave para aumentar sua força de vontade é acreditar que você tem uma oferta abundante dela.

    ( ) Pessoas que acreditam que sua força de vontade é finita não conseguem realizar tarefas mentais mais exigentes.

    ( ) O estudo revelou que os Americanos eram propensos a admitir a necessidade de pausas após a conclusão de tarefas mentalmente desafiadoras.

    ( ) Segundo Napolitano, os sentimentos sobre a força de vontade afetam a maneira como um indivíduo se comporta, porém esses sentimentos não são mutáveis.


    Assinale a sequência correta:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1387dbb-ce
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: A questão refere-se ao texto abaixo.

                          Victoria and Albert: how a royal love changed culture

                                                                                                               By Lucinda Hawksley 

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UCS 2015, Preposições | Prepositions

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UCS 2015, Preposições | Prepositions 


    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150623-victoria-albert-cultural-impact>.

    Acesso em: 3 ago. 15. (Parcial e adaptado.)

    Assinale a alternativa que completa correta e respectivamente as lacunas do texto nas linhas 02, 07 e 20.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1863eb7-a6
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: A questão refere-se ao texto abaixo.

                          Victoria and Albert: how a royal love changed culture

                                                                                                               By Lucinda Hawksley 

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UCS 2015, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UCS 2015, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 


    Disponível em: <http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150623-victoria-albert-cultural-impact>.

    Acesso em: 3 ago. 15. (Parcial e adaptado.)

    Assinale a alternativa em que o termo noted melhor substitui o vocábulo sublinhado, sem prejuízo para o sentido da oração.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b18b7d5d-a6
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UFTM 2012, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension



    Brazil’s income distribution has improved over the last decades due to

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1a6b5bc-59
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXT I

    Google Instant promises live search results

    by Maggie Shiels
    Technology reporter,
    BBC News, Silicon Valley

        
        “Google has speeded up its internet search engine by launching a product called Instant that displays results as soon as users type in queries.
         The service predicts a user's query and modifies the displayed results as more letters are typed into the search box.
         The company described it as ‘search at the speed of thought’.
        Previously Google's suggested search terms and did not reveal results until the ‘enter’ key was hit or the ‘search’ button was clicked.
    Google Instant goes live in the next week and on mobile devices by autumn.
         The service will initially be rolled out in the US, UK, Spain, Germany, France and Russia.
           Challenge to Microsoft?
         In a demo event held at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art, Marissa Mayer, Google's vice-president of search products and user experience, typed in ‘sfm’ into the search box to demonstrate the new service.
        As she typed, results appeared instantly for ‘SF MOMA’ - the first predicted search result. In another demo, when the letter ‘w’ was entered, a list of links offering the ‘weather’ appeared along with images showing the temperature.
        ‘We've actually predicting what query you are likely to do and we're giving you results for that,’ said Ms Mayer.
           Google estimates that the typical user spends nine seconds entering a query and 15 seconds looking for answers.
            The company says Google Instant could shave between two and five seconds off a typical web search.
        ‘Google is betting all they have that speed is everything,’ Harry McCracken of technology blog Technologizer.com told the BBC.
         ‘Saving one or two seconds isn't that big of a deal. One of my instant thoughts is that I am going to see results I don't want because until I type enough that it knows what I want, it is going to show me links I am not interested in.’
         Technology commentator Robert Scoble said that the new feature would present a real challenge to Microsoft search engine Bing, which has been slowly chipping away at Google's lead in the search market.
        ‘Playing with it, it dramatically changes the way I do searches. I think it is a pretty major leap forward but this means that Bing becomes far less interesting and they now have to step up,’ said Mr. Scoble.
         Microsoft currently commands around 11% of the US search market compared to Google's 66%, according to research firm Comscore.
         Bing has gradually increased its market share since launch, although its growth has recently slowed.”


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newstechnology-11239037. 

    Read the sentences below and judge them (T) TRUE or (F) FALSE:


    I. Google Instant makes the queries faster.

    II. With Google Instant query results will be revealed before the enter button is hit.

    III. Search terms will not be suggested anymore.

    IV. Mobile users will not have access until autumn.

    V. Initially the service will not be available for the British people.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1d8c9d8-e8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXT I

    Google Instant promises live search results

    by Maggie Shiels
    Technology reporter,
    BBC News, Silicon Valley

        
        “Google has speeded up its internet search engine by launching a product called Instant that displays results as soon as users type in queries.
         The service predicts a user's query and modifies the displayed results as more letters are typed into the search box.
         The company described it as ‘search at the speed of thought’.
        Previously Google's suggested search terms and did not reveal results until the ‘enter’ key was hit or the ‘search’ button was clicked.
    Google Instant goes live in the next week and on mobile devices by autumn.
         The service will initially be rolled out in the US, UK, Spain, Germany, France and Russia.
           Challenge to Microsoft?
         In a demo event held at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art, Marissa Mayer, Google's vice-president of search products and user experience, typed in ‘sfm’ into the search box to demonstrate the new service.
        As she typed, results appeared instantly for ‘SF MOMA’ - the first predicted search result. In another demo, when the letter ‘w’ was entered, a list of links offering the ‘weather’ appeared along with images showing the temperature.
        ‘We've actually predicting what query you are likely to do and we're giving you results for that,’ said Ms Mayer.
           Google estimates that the typical user spends nine seconds entering a query and 15 seconds looking for answers.
            The company says Google Instant could shave between two and five seconds off a typical web search.
        ‘Google is betting all they have that speed is everything,’ Harry McCracken of technology blog Technologizer.com told the BBC.
         ‘Saving one or two seconds isn't that big of a deal. One of my instant thoughts is that I am going to see results I don't want because until I type enough that it knows what I want, it is going to show me links I am not interested in.’
         Technology commentator Robert Scoble said that the new feature would present a real challenge to Microsoft search engine Bing, which has been slowly chipping away at Google's lead in the search market.
        ‘Playing with it, it dramatically changes the way I do searches. I think it is a pretty major leap forward but this means that Bing becomes far less interesting and they now have to step up,’ said Mr. Scoble.
         Microsoft currently commands around 11% of the US search market compared to Google's 66%, according to research firm Comscore.
         Bing has gradually increased its market share since launch, although its growth has recently slowed.”


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newstechnology-11239037. 

    By saying “We’ve actually been predicting what query you are likely to do and we’re giving you results for that”, Google’s vice-president means:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1dbb1da-e8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXT I

    Google Instant promises live search results

    by Maggie Shiels
    Technology reporter,
    BBC News, Silicon Valley

        
        “Google has speeded up its internet search engine by launching a product called Instant that displays results as soon as users type in queries.
         The service predicts a user's query and modifies the displayed results as more letters are typed into the search box.
         The company described it as ‘search at the speed of thought’.
        Previously Google's suggested search terms and did not reveal results until the ‘enter’ key was hit or the ‘search’ button was clicked.
    Google Instant goes live in the next week and on mobile devices by autumn.
         The service will initially be rolled out in the US, UK, Spain, Germany, France and Russia.
           Challenge to Microsoft?
         In a demo event held at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art, Marissa Mayer, Google's vice-president of search products and user experience, typed in ‘sfm’ into the search box to demonstrate the new service.
        As she typed, results appeared instantly for ‘SF MOMA’ - the first predicted search result. In another demo, when the letter ‘w’ was entered, a list of links offering the ‘weather’ appeared along with images showing the temperature.
        ‘We've actually predicting what query you are likely to do and we're giving you results for that,’ said Ms Mayer.
           Google estimates that the typical user spends nine seconds entering a query and 15 seconds looking for answers.
            The company says Google Instant could shave between two and five seconds off a typical web search.
        ‘Google is betting all they have that speed is everything,’ Harry McCracken of technology blog Technologizer.com told the BBC.
         ‘Saving one or two seconds isn't that big of a deal. One of my instant thoughts is that I am going to see results I don't want because until I type enough that it knows what I want, it is going to show me links I am not interested in.’
         Technology commentator Robert Scoble said that the new feature would present a real challenge to Microsoft search engine Bing, which has been slowly chipping away at Google's lead in the search market.
        ‘Playing with it, it dramatically changes the way I do searches. I think it is a pretty major leap forward but this means that Bing becomes far less interesting and they now have to step up,’ said Mr. Scoble.
         Microsoft currently commands around 11% of the US search market compared to Google's 66%, according to research firm Comscore.
         Bing has gradually increased its market share since launch, although its growth has recently slowed.”


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newstechnology-11239037. 

    Choose the alternative that best completes the sentence:


    According to Google, it takes _________ seconds for a typical user to do a web search.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1deb9ac-e8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXT I

    Google Instant promises live search results

    by Maggie Shiels
    Technology reporter,
    BBC News, Silicon Valley

        
        “Google has speeded up its internet search engine by launching a product called Instant that displays results as soon as users type in queries.
         The service predicts a user's query and modifies the displayed results as more letters are typed into the search box.
         The company described it as ‘search at the speed of thought’.
        Previously Google's suggested search terms and did not reveal results until the ‘enter’ key was hit or the ‘search’ button was clicked.
    Google Instant goes live in the next week and on mobile devices by autumn.
         The service will initially be rolled out in the US, UK, Spain, Germany, France and Russia.
           Challenge to Microsoft?
         In a demo event held at San Francisco's Museum of Modern Art, Marissa Mayer, Google's vice-president of search products and user experience, typed in ‘sfm’ into the search box to demonstrate the new service.
        As she typed, results appeared instantly for ‘SF MOMA’ - the first predicted search result. In another demo, when the letter ‘w’ was entered, a list of links offering the ‘weather’ appeared along with images showing the temperature.
        ‘We've actually predicting what query you are likely to do and we're giving you results for that,’ said Ms Mayer.
           Google estimates that the typical user spends nine seconds entering a query and 15 seconds looking for answers.
            The company says Google Instant could shave between two and five seconds off a typical web search.
        ‘Google is betting all they have that speed is everything,’ Harry McCracken of technology blog Technologizer.com told the BBC.
         ‘Saving one or two seconds isn't that big of a deal. One of my instant thoughts is that I am going to see results I don't want because until I type enough that it knows what I want, it is going to show me links I am not interested in.’
         Technology commentator Robert Scoble said that the new feature would present a real challenge to Microsoft search engine Bing, which has been slowly chipping away at Google's lead in the search market.
        ‘Playing with it, it dramatically changes the way I do searches. I think it is a pretty major leap forward but this means that Bing becomes far less interesting and they now have to step up,’ said Mr. Scoble.
         Microsoft currently commands around 11% of the US search market compared to Google's 66%, according to research firm Comscore.
         Bing has gradually increased its market share since launch, although its growth has recently slowed.”


    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newstechnology-11239037. 

    In the sentence, “I think it is a pretty major leap forward but this means that Bing becomes far less interesting and they now have to step up”, the verb “to step up” would best be replaced by:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1e3c198-e8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    TEXT II

    Starting a new job
    by Rose Walker


        “You just got the phone call and the position is yours. It’s been a long time since you have started a new job and you need to prepare yourself for it. Will you really like your new position? How will the people treat you and can you get along with them? These are some of the questions that might run through your mind when you start a new job.
        Before you start your new position you need to get in the right frame of mind, so you can do the best job you can do.
        The first step in preparation for this new journey is to let all your fears go. Don’t walk into a new job with fear. This will keep you from being productive. Having negative thoughts about your new job will become a reality and this will cause problems right there. Stay in the same frame of mind you had when you applied for the position. This was something that you obviously wanted to do and was excited about doing. Keep those same thoughts and attitude when you actually start working your new job. By keeping that attitude you will eliminate a lot of your problems in the beginning with this new position. Your way of thinking will become your way of acting. Do a thorough research on your new company so you can understand what they do and how you will play a part in it.
        Have a good understanding about the company in full detail so it will give you that ease you need to have for you to succeed. This will allow you to have the confidence you will need to start this new job and you won’t feel so lost when you start interacting with your co-workers. Having the right attitude will allow you to get along with your co-workers even better. Everyone when they start a new job is considered the new kid on the block. This can make you feel left out right there, since everyone usually know everyone else and already have a comfort zone with each other. You have to let them know by being in the right frame of mind when you start that you can work with each and every one of them. If you come in with that fear, it’s going to seem like you are a unfriendly person and automatically no one will want to have anything to do with you. This will be a bad way to start off on your new job. You plan to be there for awhile and communicating with your co-workers on a daily base.
        Your attitude and the way you present yourself in the beginning is very important. It will determine how your relationship will be throughout the job. Getting along with your boss and coworkers is important, it can help you to succeed or be one of the causes to make you want to leave.
        Starting a new job can be a wonderful experience. Sure all of us are nervous about stepping into a new environment and meeting and dealing with new people. That’s what’s so exciting about it, everything is new. You have to look at it as a new journey in your life and not a dreaded trip that you have to make. Erase all those negative thoughts and fears you have so you can go in with a positive attitude that will let you be a positive person. Let this be a new spectacular and fantastic time in your life. When you stop and prepare yourself mentally for your new job, you will be a success at it.”


    http://www.essortment.com/all/startinganew_rbph.htm
    Read the sentences below and judge them (T) TRUE or (F) FALSE:


    I. It’s not important to have a good understanding about the new company.

    II. Your way of thinking will become your way of acting.

    III. The first step in preparation for a new job is to let your fears go.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão b1ed634a-e8