Pular para o conteúdo

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 95 de 266

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Which skin colour are you? The human swatch chart

    that confronts racism

    In 1933, in a book called The Masters and the Slaves, the Brazilian anthropologist Gilberto Freyre wrote: “Every Brazilian, even the light-skinned, fair-haired one, carries about him on his soul, when not on soul and body alike, the shadow, or at least the birthmark, of the aborigine or the negro.” This was forefront in the mind of the French artist Pierre David when he moved to Brazil in 2009. “When I was in the streets, I could see so many skin colours”, he says. He decided to make a human colour chart, like one you would find in the paint section of B&Q shop, but showing the gradations and shades of our skin colour. The project, called Nuancier or “swatches”, was first shown at the Museu de Arte Moderna in Salvador – Bahia, and is now on show in his native France. “Brazil has a better attitude to skin colour than other developed nations”, he says. “There's no doubt, because the concept of skin colour difference was recognised very early in their history. Now, it even appears on identity documents.”

    Yet Nuancier, David says, is still a critique of racism, in Brazil and around the world. “This work may seem provocative – to classify men by colour, to industrially produce the colour of an individual so it can be store-bought. But this is a demonstration of the commodification of bodies. It denounces racism anywhere it is found in the world.”

    SEYMOUR, T. Disponível em: www.theguardian.com. Acesso em: 21 out. 2015 (adaptado).


    O artista francês Pierre David, ao evidenciar seu encantamento com a diversidade de cores de peles no Brasil, no projeto Nuancier, também

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 59abb2f9-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Monks embrace web to reach recruits

    Stew Milne for The New York Times


    The Benedictine monks at the Portsmouth Abbey in Portsmouth have a problem. They are aging and their numbers have fallen to 12, from a peak of about 24 in 1969. So the monks have taken to the Internet with an elaborate ad campaign featuring videos, a blog and even a Gregorian chant ringtone. “If this is the way the younger generation are looking things up and are communicating, then this is the place to be”, said Abbot Caedmon Holmes, who has been in charge of the abbey since 2007. That place is far from the solitary lives that some may think monks live. In fact, in this age of social media, the monks have embraced what may be the most popular form of public self-expression: a Facebook page, where they have uploaded photos and video testimonials. Some monks will even write blogs.

    MILNE, S. Disponível em: www.nytimes.com. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2012 (adaptado).


    A internet costuma ser um veículo de comunicação associado às camadas mais jovens da população, embora não exclusivamente a elas. Segundo o texto, a razão que levou os religiosos a fazerem uma campanha publicitária na internet foi o(a)

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 59aed3a9-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, ENEM 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension


    Tendo em vista a procura por atividades de lazer em períodos de recesso escolar, esse fôlde

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 59b25bbd-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Most people today have a mobile phone. In fact, many people can't imagine how they ever got along without a portable phone. However, many people also complain about cell phone users. People complain about other people loudly discussing personal matters in public places. They complain when cell phones ring in movie theaters and concert halls. They complain about people driving too slow, and not paying attention to where they are going because they are talking on a cell phone. And they complain about people walking around talking to people who aren't there.

    Whenever a new communications technology becomes popular, it changes the way society is organized. Society has to invent rules for the polite way to use the new devices. Our social etiquette, our rules of politeness for cell phones, is still evolving.

    Disponível em: www.indianchild.com. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2012 (adaptado).


    O uso de celulares em lugares públicos tem sido prática corrente. O texto aponta que essa prática tem gerado

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 59b5ec18-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2012, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    The author defines “neoteny” as (L. 42)

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 59eccc27-4b
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UFRN 2012, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    O blog informa que a Encyclopaedia Britannica contará com líderes da empresa para
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a019868-59
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    O texto a seguir é referência para a questão.


    More Than Just Children's Books


    Krumulus, a small bookstore in Germany, has everything a kid could want: parties, readings, concerts, plays, puppet shows, workshops and book clubs.

    “I knew it was going to be very difficult to open a bookstore, everyone tells you you're crazy, there will be no future,” says Anna Morlinghaus, Krumulus's founder. Still, she wanted to try. A month before her third son was born, she opened the store in Berlin's Kreuzberg district.

    BERLIN — On a recent Saturday afternoon, a hush fell in the bright, airy “reading-aloud” room at Krumulus, a small children's bookstore in Berlin, as Sven Wallrodt, one of the store's employees, stood up to speak. Brandishing a newly published illustrated children's book about the life of Johannes Gutenberg, the inventor of the printing press, he looked at the crowd of eager, mo stly school-aged children and their parents. “Welcome to this book presentation”, he said. “If you fall asleep, snore quietly”. Everyone laughed, but no one fell asleep. An hour later, the children followed Wallrodt down to the bookstore's basement workshop, whe re he showed them how Gutenberg fit leaden block letters into a metal plate. Then the children printed their own bookmark using a technique similar to Gutenberg's, everyone was thrilled.

    (Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/20/books/berlin-germany-krumulus.html)


    In relation to the owner of the bookshop, it is correct to say that:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a28702a-bf
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UFF 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    EXEMPLIFICATION is used by the author of the text to develop his argumentation. In paragraph 7, through the use of exemplification, the author
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a2ca69e-47
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    O texto a seguir é referência para a questão.


    More Than Just Children's Books


    Krumulus, a small bookstore in Germany, has everything a kid could want: parties, readings, concerts, plays, puppet shows, workshops and book clubs.

    “I knew it was going to be very difficult to open a bookstore, everyone tells you you're crazy, there will be no future,” says Anna Morlinghaus, Krumulus's founder. Still, she wanted to try. A month before her third son was born, she opened the store in Berlin's Kreuzberg district.

    BERLIN — On a recent Saturday afternoon, a hush fell in the bright, airy “reading-aloud” room at Krumulus, a small children's bookstore in Berlin, as Sven Wallrodt, one of the store's employees, stood up to speak. Brandishing a newly published illustrated children's book about the life of Johannes Gutenberg, the inventor of the printing press, he looked at the crowd of eager, mo stly school-aged children and their parents. “Welcome to this book presentation”, he said. “If you fall asleep, snore quietly”. Everyone laughed, but no one fell asleep. An hour later, the children followed Wallrodt down to the bookstore's basement workshop, whe re he showed them how Gutenberg fit leaden block letters into a metal plate. Then the children printed their own bookmark using a technique similar to Gutenberg's, everyone was thrilled.

    (Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/20/books/berlin-germany-krumulus.html)


    Taking into consideration the last sentence of the text, it is correct to say that after the workshop everybody was: 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a330873-bf
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    O texto a seguir é referência para a questão.

    How the American Dream has changed

    The phrase ‘American Dream’ was officially coined just under 90 years ago in a book called The Epic of America by James Truslow Adams. He argued it was “that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.”

    Today: No single American Dream?

    For some today the American Dream means a chance for fame and celebrity, while for others it means succeeding through the old adage of family values and hard work. Still others believe that the American Dream just represents a world closed to all but the elite with their wealth and contacts […]. Meanwhile, surveys have found that almost half of all millennials believe the American Dream is dead. In an ever-changing country, the idea of what the American Dream means to different people is changing too.

    (Disponível em: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/what-the-american-dream-looked-like-the-decade-you-were-born/ss-AABbxjy)

    According to the text, it is correct to say that James Truslow Adams:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a44bdc2-bf
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    O texto a seguir é referência para a questão.

    How the American Dream has changed

    The phrase ‘American Dream’ was officially coined just under 90 years ago in a book called The Epic of America by James Truslow Adams. He argued it was “that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.”

    Today: No single American Dream?

    For some today the American Dream means a chance for fame and celebrity, while for others it means succeeding through the old adage of family values and hard work. Still others believe that the American Dream just represents a world closed to all but the elite with their wealth and contacts […]. Meanwhile, surveys have found that almost half of all millennials believe the American Dream is dead. In an ever-changing country, the idea of what the American Dream means to different people is changing too.

    (Disponível em: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/what-the-american-dream-looked-like-the-decade-you-were-born/ss-AABbxjy)

    According to the part of the text that starts with “For some today the American Dream…”, how many different meanings can be related to the American Dream today?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a493efd-bf
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo. 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense - Rio Grande do Sul 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta o principal objetivo do texto.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a4ba71f-db
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo. 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense - Rio Grande do Sul 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    O “phrasal verb” “put off” (l. 02) é sinônimo de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a4f83f6-db
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo. 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense - Rio Grande do Sul 2018, Caso genitivo | Genitive case

    Considere o emprego do ´s nas seguintes afirmações.

    I - “Th brain's neuroplasticity” (l. 02) é a contração de “has”.

    II - “It´s often said” (l. 04) é a contração de “is”.

    III - “one 's brain” (l. 28) é a contração do “genitive case”.


    Quais estão corretas?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a53f822-db
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo. 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense - Rio Grande do Sul 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Segundo o professor Albert Costa (l. 13 a l. 17),
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a578643-db
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder à questão, considere o texto abaixo. 


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-rio-grandense - Rio Grande do Sul 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta o significado do provérbio “you can´t teach an old dog n w tricks” (l. 04).
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a5b1d2b-db
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Argentina defaults – Eighth time unlucky

    Cristina Fernández argues that her country's latest default is different. She is missing the point.

    Aug 2nd 2014

         ARGENTINA'S first bond, issued in 1824, was supposed to have had a lifespan of 46 years. Less than four years later, the government defaulted. Resolving the ensuing stand-off with creditors took 29 years. Since then seven more defaults have followed, the most recent this week, when Argentina failed to make a payment on bonds issued as partial compensation to victims of the previous default, in 2001.

         Most investors think they can see a pattern in all this, but Argentina’s president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, insists the latest default is not like the others. Her government, she points out, had transferred the full $539m it owed to the banks that administer the bonds. It is America’s courts (the bonds were issued under American law) that blocked the payment, at the behest of the tiny minority of owners of bonds from 2001 who did not accept the restructuring Argentina offered them in 2005 and again in 2010. These “hold-outs”, balking at the 65% haircut the restructuring entailed, not only persuaded a judge that they should be paid in full but also got him to freeze payments on the restructured bonds until Argentina coughs up.

        Argentina claims that paying the hold-outs was impossible. It is not just that they are “vultures" as Argentine officials often put it, who bought the bonds for cents on the dollar after the previous default and are now holding those who accepted the restructuring (accounting for 93% of the debt) to ransom. The main problem is that a clause in the restructured bonds prohibits Argentina from offering the hold-outs better terms without paying everyone else the same. Since it cannot afford to do that, it says it had no choice but to default.

         Yet it is not certain that the clause requiring equal treatment of all bondholders would have applied, given that Argentina would not have been paying the hold-outs voluntarily, but on the courts' orders. Moreover, some owners of the restructured bonds had agreed to waive their rights; had Argentina made a concerted effort to persuade the remainder to do the same, it might have succeeded. Lawyers and bankers have suggested various ways around the clause in question, which expires at the end of the year. But Argentina's government was slow to consider these options or negotiate with the hold-outs, hiding instead behind indignant nationalism.

         Ms Fernández is right that the consequences of America's court rulings have been perverse, unleashing a big financial dispute in an attempt to solve a relatively small one. But hers is not the first government to be hit with an awkward verdict. Instead of railing against it, she should have tried to minimise the harm it did. Defaulting has helped no one: none of the bondholders will now be paid, Argentina looks like a pariah again, and its economy will remain starved of loans and investment.

         Happily, much of the damage can still be undone. It is not too late to strike a deal with the hold-outs or back an ostensibly private effort to buy out their claims. A quick fix would make it easier for Argentina to borrow again internationally. That, in turn, would speed development of big oil and gas deposits, the income from which could help ease its money troubles.

       More important, it would help to change perceptions of Argentina as a financial rogue state. Over the past year or so Ms Fernández seems to have been trying to rehabilitate Argentina's image and resuscitate its faltering economy. She settled financial disputes with government creditors and with Repsol, a Spanish oil firm whose Argentine assets she had expropriated in 2012. This week's events have overshadowed all that. For its own sake, and everyone else's, Argentina should hold its nose and do a deal with the hold-outs.

    (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21610263. Adapted)


    The excerpt from the fourth paragraph – had Argentina made a concerted effort to persuade the remainder to do the same, it might have succeeded. – denotes an idea of
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a64e47e-3c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UFT 2011, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions



    Mark the CORRECT answer according to the poem:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a651e50-0f
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Argentina defaults – Eighth time unlucky

    Cristina Fernández argues that her country's latest default is different. She is missing the point.

    Aug 2nd 2014

         ARGENTINA'S first bond, issued in 1824, was supposed to have had a lifespan of 46 years. Less than four years later, the government defaulted. Resolving the ensuing stand-off with creditors took 29 years. Since then seven more defaults have followed, the most recent this week, when Argentina failed to make a payment on bonds issued as partial compensation to victims of the previous default, in 2001.

         Most investors think they can see a pattern in all this, but Argentina’s president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, insists the latest default is not like the others. Her government, she points out, had transferred the full $539m it owed to the banks that administer the bonds. It is America’s courts (the bonds were issued under American law) that blocked the payment, at the behest of the tiny minority of owners of bonds from 2001 who did not accept the restructuring Argentina offered them in 2005 and again in 2010. These “hold-outs”, balking at the 65% haircut the restructuring entailed, not only persuaded a judge that they should be paid in full but also got him to freeze payments on the restructured bonds until Argentina coughs up.

        Argentina claims that paying the hold-outs was impossible. It is not just that they are “vultures" as Argentine officials often put it, who bought the bonds for cents on the dollar after the previous default and are now holding those who accepted the restructuring (accounting for 93% of the debt) to ransom. The main problem is that a clause in the restructured bonds prohibits Argentina from offering the hold-outs better terms without paying everyone else the same. Since it cannot afford to do that, it says it had no choice but to default.

         Yet it is not certain that the clause requiring equal treatment of all bondholders would have applied, given that Argentina would not have been paying the hold-outs voluntarily, but on the courts' orders. Moreover, some owners of the restructured bonds had agreed to waive their rights; had Argentina made a concerted effort to persuade the remainder to do the same, it might have succeeded. Lawyers and bankers have suggested various ways around the clause in question, which expires at the end of the year. But Argentina's government was slow to consider these options or negotiate with the hold-outs, hiding instead behind indignant nationalism.

         Ms Fernández is right that the consequences of America's court rulings have been perverse, unleashing a big financial dispute in an attempt to solve a relatively small one. But hers is not the first government to be hit with an awkward verdict. Instead of railing against it, she should have tried to minimise the harm it did. Defaulting has helped no one: none of the bondholders will now be paid, Argentina looks like a pariah again, and its economy will remain starved of loans and investment.

         Happily, much of the damage can still be undone. It is not too late to strike a deal with the hold-outs or back an ostensibly private effort to buy out their claims. A quick fix would make it easier for Argentina to borrow again internationally. That, in turn, would speed development of big oil and gas deposits, the income from which could help ease its money troubles.

       More important, it would help to change perceptions of Argentina as a financial rogue state. Over the past year or so Ms Fernández seems to have been trying to rehabilitate Argentina's image and resuscitate its faltering economy. She settled financial disputes with government creditors and with Repsol, a Spanish oil firm whose Argentine assets she had expropriated in 2012. This week's events have overshadowed all that. For its own sake, and everyone else's, Argentina should hold its nose and do a deal with the hold-outs.

    (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21610263. Adapted)


    The word hers, as used in the second sentence of the fifth paragraph, refers to the Argentine
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a711c00-3c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Argentina defaults – Eighth time unlucky

    Cristina Fernández argues that her country's latest default is different. She is missing the point.

    Aug 2nd 2014

         ARGENTINA'S first bond, issued in 1824, was supposed to have had a lifespan of 46 years. Less than four years later, the government defaulted. Resolving the ensuing stand-off with creditors took 29 years. Since then seven more defaults have followed, the most recent this week, when Argentina failed to make a payment on bonds issued as partial compensation to victims of the previous default, in 2001.

         Most investors think they can see a pattern in all this, but Argentina’s president, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, insists the latest default is not like the others. Her government, she points out, had transferred the full $539m it owed to the banks that administer the bonds. It is America’s courts (the bonds were issued under American law) that blocked the payment, at the behest of the tiny minority of owners of bonds from 2001 who did not accept the restructuring Argentina offered them in 2005 and again in 2010. These “hold-outs”, balking at the 65% haircut the restructuring entailed, not only persuaded a judge that they should be paid in full but also got him to freeze payments on the restructured bonds until Argentina coughs up.

        Argentina claims that paying the hold-outs was impossible. It is not just that they are “vultures" as Argentine officials often put it, who bought the bonds for cents on the dollar after the previous default and are now holding those who accepted the restructuring (accounting for 93% of the debt) to ransom. The main problem is that a clause in the restructured bonds prohibits Argentina from offering the hold-outs better terms without paying everyone else the same. Since it cannot afford to do that, it says it had no choice but to default.

         Yet it is not certain that the clause requiring equal treatment of all bondholders would have applied, given that Argentina would not have been paying the hold-outs voluntarily, but on the courts' orders. Moreover, some owners of the restructured bonds had agreed to waive their rights; had Argentina made a concerted effort to persuade the remainder to do the same, it might have succeeded. Lawyers and bankers have suggested various ways around the clause in question, which expires at the end of the year. But Argentina's government was slow to consider these options or negotiate with the hold-outs, hiding instead behind indignant nationalism.

         Ms Fernández is right that the consequences of America's court rulings have been perverse, unleashing a big financial dispute in an attempt to solve a relatively small one. But hers is not the first government to be hit with an awkward verdict. Instead of railing against it, she should have tried to minimise the harm it did. Defaulting has helped no one: none of the bondholders will now be paid, Argentina looks like a pariah again, and its economy will remain starved of loans and investment.

         Happily, much of the damage can still be undone. It is not too late to strike a deal with the hold-outs or back an ostensibly private effort to buy out their claims. A quick fix would make it easier for Argentina to borrow again internationally. That, in turn, would speed development of big oil and gas deposits, the income from which could help ease its money troubles.

       More important, it would help to change perceptions of Argentina as a financial rogue state. Over the past year or so Ms Fernández seems to have been trying to rehabilitate Argentina's image and resuscitate its faltering economy. She settled financial disputes with government creditors and with Repsol, a Spanish oil firm whose Argentine assets she had expropriated in 2012. This week's events have overshadowed all that. For its own sake, and everyone else's, Argentina should hold its nose and do a deal with the hold-outs.

    (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21610263. Adapted)


    According to the sixth paragraph,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5a768bed-3c