Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2010FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
As to the relationship between Vargas Llosa and García Márquez, the text says that they
Questões de Inglês do ENEM
Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.
Resultados
5.311 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 245 de 266.
5949B9E6-A6
As to the relationship between Vargas Llosa and García Márquez, the text says that they571B8607-A6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
According to the text, Gabriel García Márquez, Julio Cortázar and Carlos Fuentes are considered writers who52C4198C-A6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
As to the Sweedish Academy selection of Vargas Llosa, it is said that politically speaking, it5099382A-A6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUECE · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
According to the text, reactions to the annoucement of Vargas Llosa’s Nobel in his home country included4CDF1F21-73 Inglês
Adjetivos | AdjectivesUDESC · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
The correct syllable division of the word “modified” (line 8) is:4B22A173-73 Inglês
Vocabulário | VocabularyUDESC · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
“thwart” (line 5) is used in the text as:4983939D-73 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUDESC · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
According to the text:47E7AA4E-73 Inglês
Pronome possessivo adjetivo | Possessive adjectiveUDESC · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
“its” (line 8) refers to:4649E882-73 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUDESC · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
According to the text, the Pentagon is going over to the dark side of computer warfare, this means that it is going to:4491F04B-73 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUDESC · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Mark (T) for true or (F) for false, according to the text.
( ) There are no roses in her cheeks.
( ) She speaks like music.
( ) There is no love she believes.
( ) The sun can be compared to her eyes.
( ) He doesn’t love her.
Mark the correct sequence.429A0ADA-73 Inglês
Vocabulário | VocabularyUDESC · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
In the poem, Shakespeare refers to her “cheeks” (line 6). What part of the body they are in?40A023D0-73 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUDESC · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
The words: “dun” (line 3), “reeks” (line 8), “hath” (line 10), “treads” (line 12) are used in the text as:3F00F25A-73 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUDESC · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
In the sentence “My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground:” (line 12), Shakespeare expresses that:C526ED96-6F Inglês
Adjetivos | AdjectivesUEG · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosAs questões de 4 a 6 referem-se às imagens e aos textos abaixo.
Texto A
Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has
the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and
that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice
before killing for fear of losing their own life.
The death penalty certainly "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of
incapacitation, similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Both as a
deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.
Disponível em:
. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Texto B
Before I get into comedic related issues, a quick statement on the death penalty (due to some Facebook chatter
on my page). I am against the death penalty in all cases. The recent revelation in Texas that an innocent man
was executed for arson and capital murder in 2004 for allegedly setting fire to his home, which killed his two
young children should be huge news. Can you imagine the man’s anguish (he never pleaded guilty)? But I am
against it even when the person is actually guilty (yes even if DNA and videotape corroborate it). I think it is
barbaric. China, parts of the Middle East and the U.S. are the world’s executors. No one else I believe.
Disponível em:
. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Tendo-se por base a estrutura das partes verbais das imagens e dos textos utilizados, é CORRETO afirmar:C3FA6D50-6F Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosAs questões de 4 a 6 referem-se às imagens e aos textos abaixo.
Texto A
Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has
the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and
that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice
before killing for fear of losing their own life.
The death penalty certainly "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of
incapacitation, similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Both as a
deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.
Disponível em:. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Texto B
Before I get into comedic related issues, a quick statement on the death penalty (due to some Facebook chatter
on my page). I am against the death penalty in all cases. The recent revelation in Texas that an innocent man
was executed for arson and capital murder in 2004 for allegedly setting fire to his home, which killed his two
young children should be huge news. Can you imagine the man’s anguish (he never pleaded guilty)? But I am
against it even when the person is actually guilty (yes even if DNA and videotape corroborate it). I think it is
barbaric. China, parts of the Middle East and the U.S. are the world’s executors. No one else I believe.
Disponível em:. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
De acordo com as ideias expressas pelas imagens e pelos textos acima, é CORRETO afirmar:C2D0C638-6F Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosAs questões de 4 a 6 referem-se às imagens e aos textos abaixo.
Texto A
Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has
the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and
that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice
before killing for fear of losing their own life.
The death penalty certainly "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of
incapacitation, similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Both as a
deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.
Disponível em:. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Texto B
Before I get into comedic related issues, a quick statement on the death penalty (due to some Facebook chatter
on my page). I am against the death penalty in all cases. The recent revelation in Texas that an innocent man
was executed for arson and capital murder in 2004 for allegedly setting fire to his home, which killed his two
young children should be huge news. Can you imagine the man’s anguish (he never pleaded guilty)? But I am
against it even when the person is actually guilty (yes even if DNA and videotape corroborate it). I think it is
barbaric. China, parts of the Middle East and the U.S. are the world’s executors. No one else I believe.
Disponível em:. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Levando-se em conta as imagens e os textos acima, é CORRETO afirmar:C18A6031-6F Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto abaixo e responda às questões de 1 a 3.
Hitting Children is Wrong and the Law Must Say So - NowEnding corporal punishment is an issue which touches most people very personally. Most of us were hit as
children; most parents have hit their growing children. So far, globally, only about 17 states have completely
prohibited all corporal punishment, with six or seven more committed to do so. In this region, I know that at least
two – Brazil and Costa Rica – have had prohibition Bills presented to their Parliaments.
At the first two Regional Consultations for the UN Secretary General’s Study, in the Caribbean and two weeks
ago in South Asia, clear recommendations to prohibit all corporal punishment, including in the family, were
adopted. But I still heard government officials and NGOs and others making more excuses: “We must wait until
there is more support for parents; more training for teachers; smaller classes. Let’s educate first and then
change the law…” and so on. From children’s perspective this is intolerable. From the perspective of
international human rights law it is illegal. Why should children wait? Would we wait to prohibit violence against
women until we can provide full employment and universal anger management classes for men? Would we wait
to ban hitting of elderly confused relatives until we have full-time nursing care, and full training for all carers,
available for them?
No more excuses: this UN Study provides the opportunity to move quickly on, to put in the past the idea that
states should authorise violence against children and instead focus on giving priority to ending all violence
against children. State governments and all of us have to take a deep breath and stop deceiving ourselves -
hitting children is wrong and the law must say so - now.
NEWELL, Peter. Disponível em:
. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Considerando os aspectos estruturais do texto, é CORRETO afirmar:C04F8CEE-6F Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto abaixo e responda às questões de 1 a 3.
Hitting Children is Wrong and the Law Must Say So - NowEnding corporal punishment is an issue which touches most people very personally. Most of us were hit as
children; most parents have hit their growing children. So far, globally, only about 17 states have completely
prohibited all corporal punishment, with six or seven more committed to do so. In this region, I know that at least
two – Brazil and Costa Rica – have had prohibition Bills presented to their Parliaments.
At the first two Regional Consultations for the UN Secretary General’s Study, in the Caribbean and two weeks
ago in South Asia, clear recommendations to prohibit all corporal punishment, including in the family, were
adopted. But I still heard government officials and NGOs and others making more excuses: “We must wait until
there is more support for parents; more training for teachers; smaller classes. Let’s educate first and then
change the law…” and so on. From children’s perspective this is intolerable. From the perspective of
international human rights law it is illegal. Why should children wait? Would we wait to prohibit violence against
women until we can provide full employment and universal anger management classes for men? Would we wait
to ban hitting of elderly confused relatives until we have full-time nursing care, and full training for all carers,
available for them?
No more excuses: this UN Study provides the opportunity to move quickly on, to put in the past the idea that
states should authorise violence against children and instead focus on giving priority to ending all violence
against children. State governments and all of us have to take a deep breath and stop deceiving ourselves -
hitting children is wrong and the law must say so - now.
NEWELL, Peter. Disponível em:. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
Com base nas ideias e opiniões expressas no texto, é CORRETO afirmar:BEFC11FB-6F Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto abaixo e responda às questões de 1 a 3.
Hitting Children is Wrong and the Law Must Say So - NowEnding corporal punishment is an issue which touches most people very personally. Most of us were hit as
children; most parents have hit their growing children. So far, globally, only about 17 states have completely
prohibited all corporal punishment, with six or seven more committed to do so. In this region, I know that at least
two – Brazil and Costa Rica – have had prohibition Bills presented to their Parliaments.
At the first two Regional Consultations for the UN Secretary General’s Study, in the Caribbean and two weeks
ago in South Asia, clear recommendations to prohibit all corporal punishment, including in the family, were
adopted. But I still heard government officials and NGOs and others making more excuses: “We must wait until
there is more support for parents; more training for teachers; smaller classes. Let’s educate first and then
change the law…” and so on. From children’s perspective this is intolerable. From the perspective of
international human rights law it is illegal. Why should children wait? Would we wait to prohibit violence against
women until we can provide full employment and universal anger management classes for men? Would we wait
to ban hitting of elderly confused relatives until we have full-time nursing care, and full training for all carers,
available for them?
No more excuses: this UN Study provides the opportunity to move quickly on, to put in the past the idea that
states should authorise violence against children and instead focus on giving priority to ending all violence
against children. State governments and all of us have to take a deep breath and stop deceiving ourselves -
hitting children is wrong and the law must say so - now.
NEWELL, Peter. Disponível em:. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2010. (Adaptado).
De acordo com o conteúdo do texto, é CORRETO afirmar:4E826370-6D Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEG · 2010MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Considerando as ideias presentes no texto e os aspectos da língua inglesa, é CORRETO afirmar que