Questões: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC - SP) — com gabarito

Entre o Ser e as Coisas

Onda e amor, onde amor, ando indagando

ao largo vento e à rocha imperativa,

e a tudo me arremesso, nesse quando

amanhece frescor de coisa viva.

Às almas, não, as almas vão pairando,

e, esquecendo a lição que já se esquiva,

tornam amor humor, e vago e brando

o que é de natureza corrosiva.

N’água e na pedra amor deixa gravados

seus hieróglifos e mensagens, suas

verdades mais secretas e mais nuas.

E nem os elementos encantados

sabem do amor que os punge e que é, pungindo,

uma fogueira a arder no dia findo. 

• O poema acima é de Carlos Drummond de Andrade e integra a obra Claro Enigma. Da leitura dele não se pode concluir que

Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado.

In a unanimous decision with majorn implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

“When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress.

Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

“The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

In: <https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilitie> 30.03.2018

Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado.

In a unanimous decision with majorn implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

“When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress.

Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

“The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

In: <https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilitie> 30.03.2018

O fato que levou à publicação deste texto em março de 2017 foi

The Future of Jobs

http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf Acessado em 19/09/2016

Today, we are at the beginning of a Fourth Industrial Revolution. Developments in genetics, artificial intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, 3D printing and biotechnology, to name just a few, are all building on and amplifying one another. This will lay the foundation for a revolution more comprehensive and all-encompassing than anything we have ever seen. Smart systems — homes, factories, farms, grids or cities — will help tackle problems ranging from supply chain management to climate change. The rise of the sharing economy will allow people to monetize everything from their empty house to their car. 

No que se refere à Quarta Revolução Industrial, o texto acima nos informa que

A palavra “memórias” no título do romance Memórias de um Sargento de Milícias, de Manoel Antônio de Almeida, remete

Considere a ordem em que são empregados os pronomes demonstrativos evidenciados no texto de Hélio Schwartsman e aponte a que se referem.

As autoridades citadas no parágrafo 1

Lendo o título, os subtítulos e o 1º parágrafo do texto, escolha a alternativa que apresenta somente apoiadores da campanha:

Em relação à Nigéria e ao Senegal, o parágrafo 5 diz que

No parágrafo 4, lê-se que o Ebola

Na obra Sentimento do Mundo de Carlos Drummond de Andrade, há uma variedade de temas voltados para a análise do contexto social e político e da condição humana. Assim, indique a alternativa que contém poema que trata dominantemente da questão da liberdade e da opressão.

– Fabiano, você é um homem, exclamou em voz alta.

Conteve-se, notou que os meninos estavam perto, com certeza iam admirar-se ouvindo-o falar só. E, pensando bem, ele não era homem: era apenas um cabra ocupado em guardar coisas dos outros. Vermelho, queimado, tinha os olhos azuis, a barba e os cabelos ruivos; mas como vivia em terra alheia, cuidava de animais alheios, descobria-se, encolhia-se na presença dos brancos e julgava-se cabra.

Olhou em torno, com receio de que, fora os meninos, alguém tivesse percebido a frase imprudente. Corrigiu-a, murmurando:

– Você é um bicho, Fabiano.

Do trecho acima, de Vidas Secas , obra de Graciliano Ramos, pode-se admitir que

Luiz Galvão é personagem do romance Til, de José de Alencar.Dele NÃO é correto afirmar que

A pesquisa de Brian K. Barber.

Amy Chua, em seu livro Batlle Hymm of the Tiger Mother , defende que os pais devem:

No Brasil,

No trecho do segundo parágrafo - But Technology use is evoving so rapidly there that
it can be tough for businesses to keep up. - a palavra there refere-se a

According to the text,