Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5DADE28A-DC
The sentence that does NOT make sense according to the comic strip is
Instituição
Questões: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie — com gabarito
558 questões de Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, de 2010 a 2019. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.
- 558 questões
- 9 provas
Provas desta banca
Ano completo
The sentence that does NOT make sense according to the comic strip is- Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Código da questão: 5DA22607-DC
Female Prisoners Post Sexy Pictures of Themselves on Social NetworkESTELITA HASS CARAZZAIDetainees
FROM CURITIBAAt least two detainees have taken pictures and published them on social networking sites from inside Guarapuava Public Jail, in the state of Paraná.
The pictures, taken on a phone, were found by prison guards and posted online last April.
The 30 year-old detainees are in jail after being accused of drug trafficking. Both are serving provisional sentences, and are yet to be convicted.
One has been in jail since April, and the other for a year.
Detainees are not granted possession of cell phones, and, due to this breach, they were awarded a disciplinary sanction and have since been prevented from receiving visits or food sent by family members for 30 days.
Additionally, this occurrence may prevent them from shortening their sentences if they are eventually convicted.
They appear posing in underwear on concrete beds in the female dormitory, which is decorated with animal print.
After the prison guards discovered the images, they inspected the room the two women shared and found the cell phone used to take the pictures.
“This unfortunately happens. Detainees can hide things very well”, the prison chief, Altemir Nascimento, said.
According to Nascimento, 40 cell phones have been seized so far this year in the prison (which also houses men).
CELL PHONE THROWING
The location of the prison in downtown Guarapuava makes matters worse. According to the prison chief, during sunbathing, pedestrians toss cell phones over the wall.
“Cell phones and drugs are thrown over the wall. This happens regularly. On every sunny day two or three items are thrown”, Nascimento said.
At the beginning of the year, in order to bring the “deliveries” to a halt, the prison chief decided to install a protective net over the patio. Since then 77 cell phones have been caught on the net.
http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/ - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5D968B4A-DC
The Rolling Stones Impose High Ticket Prices for U.S. Tour“Is that a lot?” says Mick JaggerBy Jerry Hopkins November 15, 1969
Mick Jagger performing on stage circa 1969.LOS ANGELES—The Rolling Stones have returned to the United States for their first tour in more than three years.
It begins with two evening shows at the Forum in Los Angeles November 8th, with tickets priced from $5.50 to $8.50. (This compares to a $7.50 top price for a Blind Faith concert in the same arena, a $6.50 top for the Doors. And in both those concerts, tickets started at $3.50.) In arranging this show, a previously-set hockey game between the Los Angeles Kings and the New York Rangers was rescheduled – at the request of the man who owns both the Forum and the Kings.
Acts appearing at the concerts here will include Terry Reid, who will appear on all the dates, and the Ike and Tina Turner Revue. Negotiations were continuing to have Ike and Tina, B. B. King and Chuck Berry join the Stones in several other cities.
Promoters of the L.A. concerts said the gross for the evening would exceed $275,000 if the Stones filled the 18,000 seats in the Forum both shows. Similar grosses, on a per show basis, were expected throughout the tour, with the Stones getting guarantees of $25,000 a concert and up, against take home percentages running close to $60,000.Although figures such as these are not unusual for tours by groups of this magnitude, they did bring strong criticism from, among others, Ralph Gleason in the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Can the Rolling Stones actually need all that money?” Gleason asked. “If they really dig the black musicians as much as every note they play and every syllable they utter indicates, is it possible to take out a show with, say, Ike and Tina and some of the older men like Howlin’ Wolf and let them share in the loot? How much can the Stones take back to Merrie England after taxes, anyway? How much must the British manager and the American manager and the agency rake off the top?”
“Paying five, six and seven dollars for a Stones concert at the Oakland Coliseum for, say, an hour of the Stones seen a quarter of a mile away because the artists demand such outrageous fees that they can only be obtained under these circumstances, says a very bad thing to me about the artists’ attitude towards the public. It says they despise their own audience.”
When Mick Jagger was confronted by this criticism at a press conference at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel, he left the door slightly open to giving a free concert sometime during the 13-city, 18-concert tour, but his tone didn’t seem too promising.
“There has been talk of that,” he said. “I should think toward the end. We’ll have to see how things go. I don’t want to plan that right now, ‘cause we’re gonna be here some while. We’ve got time for all that. I don’t want to say that’s what we want to do or not do. I’m leaving it rather blurry. I’m not committing myself.”
And about the ticket cost, he strongly indicated that if some people thought prices were high, they might have been a lot worse.
“We were offered a lot of money to do some very good dates – money in front in Europe, before we left, really a lot of bread. We didn’t accept because we thought they’d be too expensive on the basis of the money we’d get. We didn’t say that unless we walk out of America with X dollars, we ain’t gonna come. We’re really not into that sort of economic scene. Either you’re gonna sing and all that crap, or you’re gonna be an economist. I really don’t know whether this is more expensive than recent tours by local bands. I don’t know how much people can afford. I’ve no idea. Is that a lot? You’ll have to tell me.”
www.rollingstone.comThe question that the promoters were asked and whose answer can be found in the phrase from $5.50 to $8.50 was probably: - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5D929B9F-DC
The text explains thatThe Rolling Stones Impose High Ticket Prices for U.S. Tour“Is that a lot?” says Mick JaggerBy Jerry Hopkins November 15, 1969
Mick Jagger performing on stage circa 1969.LOS ANGELES—The Rolling Stones have returned to the United States for their first tour in more than three years.
It begins with two evening shows at the Forum in Los Angeles November 8th, with tickets priced from $5.50 to $8.50. (This compares to a $7.50 top price for a Blind Faith concert in the same arena, a $6.50 top for the Doors. And in both those concerts, tickets started at $3.50.) In arranging this show, a previously-set hockey game between the Los Angeles Kings and the New York Rangers was rescheduled – at the request of the man who owns both the Forum and the Kings.
Acts appearing at the concerts here will include Terry Reid, who will appear on all the dates, and the Ike and Tina Turner Revue. Negotiations were continuing to have Ike and Tina, B. B. King and Chuck Berry join the Stones in several other cities.
Promoters of the L.A. concerts said the gross for the evening would exceed $275,000 if the Stones filled the 18,000 seats in the Forum both shows. Similar grosses, on a per show basis, were expected throughout the tour, with the Stones getting guarantees of $25,000 a concert and up, against take home percentages running close to $60,000.Although figures such as these are not unusual for tours by groups of this magnitude, they did bring strong criticism from, among others, Ralph Gleason in the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Can the Rolling Stones actually need all that money?” Gleason asked. “If they really dig the black musicians as much as every note they play and every syllable they utter indicates, is it possible to take out a show with, say, Ike and Tina and some of the older men like Howlin’ Wolf and let them share in the loot? How much can the Stones take back to Merrie England after taxes, anyway? How much must the British manager and the American manager and the agency rake off the top?”
“Paying five, six and seven dollars for a Stones concert at the Oakland Coliseum for, say, an hour of the Stones seen a quarter of a mile away because the artists demand such outrageous fees that they can only be obtained under these circumstances, says a very bad thing to me about the artists’ attitude towards the public. It says they despise their own audience.”
When Mick Jagger was confronted by this criticism at a press conference at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel, he left the door slightly open to giving a free concert sometime during the 13-city, 18-concert tour, but his tone didn’t seem too promising.
“There has been talk of that,” he said. “I should think toward the end. We’ll have to see how things go. I don’t want to plan that right now, ‘cause we’re gonna be here some while. We’ve got time for all that. I don’t want to say that’s what we want to do or not do. I’m leaving it rather blurry. I’m not committing myself.”
And about the ticket cost, he strongly indicated that if some people thought prices were high, they might have been a lot worse.
“We were offered a lot of money to do some very good dates – money in front in Europe, before we left, really a lot of bread. We didn’t accept because we thought they’d be too expensive on the basis of the money we’d get. We didn’t say that unless we walk out of America with X dollars, we ain’t gonna come. We’re really not into that sort of economic scene. Either you’re gonna sing and all that crap, or you’re gonna be an economist. I really don’t know whether this is more expensive than recent tours by local bands. I don’t know how much people can afford. I’ve no idea. Is that a lot? You’ll have to tell me.”
www.rollingstone.com - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5D8F94F3-DC
According to the text, the Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones Impose High Ticket Prices for U.S. Tour“Is that a lot?” says Mick JaggerBy Jerry Hopkins November 15, 1969
Mick Jagger performing on stage circa 1969.LOS ANGELES—The Rolling Stones have returned to the United States for their first tour in more than three years.
It begins with two evening shows at the Forum in Los Angeles November 8th, with tickets priced from $5.50 to $8.50. (This compares to a $7.50 top price for a Blind Faith concert in the same arena, a $6.50 top for the Doors. And in both those concerts, tickets started at $3.50.) In arranging this show, a previously-set hockey game between the Los Angeles Kings and the New York Rangers was rescheduled – at the request of the man who owns both the Forum and the Kings.
Acts appearing at the concerts here will include Terry Reid, who will appear on all the dates, and the Ike and Tina Turner Revue. Negotiations were continuing to have Ike and Tina, B. B. King and Chuck Berry join the Stones in several other cities.
Promoters of the L.A. concerts said the gross for the evening would exceed $275,000 if the Stones filled the 18,000 seats in the Forum both shows. Similar grosses, on a per show basis, were expected throughout the tour, with the Stones getting guarantees of $25,000 a concert and up, against take home percentages running close to $60,000.Although figures such as these are not unusual for tours by groups of this magnitude, they did bring strong criticism from, among others, Ralph Gleason in the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Can the Rolling Stones actually need all that money?” Gleason asked. “If they really dig the black musicians as much as every note they play and every syllable they utter indicates, is it possible to take out a show with, say, Ike and Tina and some of the older men like Howlin’ Wolf and let them share in the loot? How much can the Stones take back to Merrie England after taxes, anyway? How much must the British manager and the American manager and the agency rake off the top?”
“Paying five, six and seven dollars for a Stones concert at the Oakland Coliseum for, say, an hour of the Stones seen a quarter of a mile away because the artists demand such outrageous fees that they can only be obtained under these circumstances, says a very bad thing to me about the artists’ attitude towards the public. It says they despise their own audience.”
When Mick Jagger was confronted by this criticism at a press conference at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel, he left the door slightly open to giving a free concert sometime during the 13-city, 18-concert tour, but his tone didn’t seem too promising.
“There has been talk of that,” he said. “I should think toward the end. We’ll have to see how things go. I don’t want to plan that right now, ‘cause we’re gonna be here some while. We’ve got time for all that. I don’t want to say that’s what we want to do or not do. I’m leaving it rather blurry. I’m not committing myself.”
And about the ticket cost, he strongly indicated that if some people thought prices were high, they might have been a lot worse.
“We were offered a lot of money to do some very good dates – money in front in Europe, before we left, really a lot of bread. We didn’t accept because we thought they’d be too expensive on the basis of the money we’d get. We didn’t say that unless we walk out of America with X dollars, we ain’t gonna come. We’re really not into that sort of economic scene. Either you’re gonna sing and all that crap, or you’re gonna be an economist. I really don’t know whether this is more expensive than recent tours by local bands. I don’t know how much people can afford. I’ve no idea. Is that a lot? You’ll have to tell me.”
www.rollingstone.com - Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5D884946-DC
Texto para a questãoA Esmeralda e o Camafeu
Joaquim Manoel de Macedo, A Moreninha.A partir do fragmento selecionado, pode-se afirmar que a prosa de Joaquim Manoel de Macedo
I. é marcada por enredos cheios de peripécias e final feliz.
II. é composta com uma linguagem simples, estilo fluente e leve.
III. é elaborada em torno de objetividade temática, com negação do sentimentalismo.
Assinale a alternativa correta. - Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 5D84C930-DC
Texto para a questãoNo excerto, está presente:A Esmeralda e o CamafeuJoaquim Manoel de Macedo, A Moreninha. - Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2014
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Código da questão: 5D79D48A-DC
Textos para a questãoSete anos de pastor Jacob servia01 Sete anos de pastor Jacob servia
02 Labão, pai de Raquel, serrana bela;
03 Mas não servia ao pai, servia a ela,
04 E a ela só por prêmio pretendia.
05 Os dias, na esperança de um só dia,
06 Passava, contentando-se com vê-la;
07 Porém o pai, usando de cautela,
08 Em lugar de Raquel lhe dava Lia.
09 Vendo o triste pastor que com enganos
10 Lhe fora assim negada a sua pastora,
11 Como se a não tivera merecida;
12 Começa de servir outros sete anos,
13 Dizendo – Mais servira, se não fora
14 Para tão longo amor tão curta a vida.Luís de CamõesSunetto Crassico01 Sette anno di pastore, Giacó servia Labó,
02 Padre da Raffaela, serrana bella,
03 Ma non servia o pai, che illo non era trouxa nó!
04 Servia a Raffaela p’ra si gazá c’oella.
05 I os dia, na speranza di un dia só,
06 Apassava spiano na gianella;
07 Ma o páio, fugino da gombinaçó,
08 Deu a Lia inveiz da Raffaela.
09 Quano o Giacó adiscobri o ingano,
10 E che tigna gaido na sparella,
11 Ficô c’um brutto d’um garó di arara,
12 I incominciô di servi otros sette anno
13 Dizeno: Si o Labó non fossi o pai d’ella
14 Io pigava elli i li quibrava a gara.Juó BananereA partir de Sete anos de pastor Jacob servia é INCORRETO afirmar que: - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2013
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: D1F91A70-DC
According to the cartoon,
- Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2013
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: D1F4DC49-DC
Django Unchained review:
A truly wild Western with a killer line-up
Review of Oscar-nominated film by Sunday Mirror film critic Mark Adam.
SONY PICTURESTHE STARS
Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Samuel L Jackson, Walton Goggins, Kerry Washington.
THE STORY
Two years before the start of the Civil War, the unlikely partnership of German bounty hunter Dr King Schultz (Waltz) and Django (Foxx) – the slave he recently freed – set about making money tracking and killing outlaws.
But Django also has plans to rescue his wife Broomhilda (Washington) from charismatic but cruel Mississippi plantation owner Calvin Candie (DiCaprio).
THE VERDICT
When Quentin Tarantino decides to make a Western, you know it’s going to be epic, violent, funny, exciting and challenging. And this wonderfully irreverent and distinctively bloody take on the wild Wild West hits the spot, brimming with delightfully oddball characters and racy style.
This is obviously not your run-of-the-mill cowboy tale. Instead, Tarantino flies close to controversy by setting his story against the violent and brutal backdrop of the slave trade.
As usual his casting is spot on. Waltz (who won an Oscar for his evil Nazi role in Tarantino’s last film Inglourious Basterds) is smooth perfection as a German dentist/bounty hunter and is wonderfully complemented by Jamie Foxx’s steely-eyed former slave.
The early bonding scenes of them tracking redneck villains (Django relishes the fact he can make money killing “white folk”) are amusingly and snappily shot.
Initially, Tarantino pokes fun at the rampant and casual racism of the period – hilariously so in a scene involving a Ku Klux Klan mob complaining about eye holes in their hoods??– but things turn nastier when Schultz and Django attempt to rescue Broomhilda.
Leonardo DiCaprio has a fine old time as the brutal Candie and absolutely oozes slippery cruelty. But he manages to be out-acted by Tarantino regular Samuel L Jackson, playing an elderly slave and close confidant of Candie who is as menacing and controlling as his supposed master.
The meanings of the words “bounty hunter”, “run-of-the-mill” and “redneck” in the text are, respectively, - Linguagens
Inglês
- Adjetivos | Adjectives
- Prova de 2013
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: D1EC026E-DC
Behind the Meaning of the Pope’s Names
The new pope’s choice of ‘Francis’ hints at the direction of his reign.Enter Pope Francis. The first Jesuit pope. The first from Latin America. It is, indeed, a historic moment for the papacy. Those who waited for a leader from the new Catholic world will no doubt be __( I )__ by the choice, but his new status as the leader of a global church requires a different persona and a new mode of action. The new pope speaks not only for Argentina, Latin America, and the Jesuits, but also for the entire Roman Catholic world.
The first Jesuit pope. The first from Latin America. (Enrique Marcarian/Reuters)It is precisely for this reason that cardinals shed their names along with their brightly __( II )__ vestments. Historically, the tradition of selecting a new papal name dates back to the sixth century, when Pope John II swapped his awkwardly __( III )__ name Mercurius for the solidly Christian John. At the same time the selection of religious names is more than an opportunity to symbolically cast aside individual identity. Papal names chart a course for the future by summoning up the past. The new pope assumes either the mantle of religious heroes and leaders from days gone by or the virtues of the Innocents and the Piuses. The selection of the name both forges a new identity and signals how the pope wishes to be seen and remembered. It is, in essence, not only the answer to the __( IV )__ question “Who do you want to be when you grow up?” but also a way of preemptively writing one’s own reviews.
Traditionally popes have been __( V )__ of reaching too high, of appearing too self-congratulatory. The office of the pope is built, literally and metaphorically, on the legacy of St. Peter, the apostle of Christ, whose remains lie beneath the papal seat in the Vatican. But there has been no Pope Peter II. Thus far, no pope has had the audacity to present himself as standing in continuity with the favored disciple of Jesus. Nor would Pope Francis have been able to select the name of the founder of his own order. A Pope Ignatius—after Jesuit founder Ignatius of Loyola—would have appeared self-serving.
At first blush, Pope Francis’s selection of a previously __( VI )__ papal name—he is no 23rd anything—marks a break with the past and augurs well for those looking for a move away from deeply entrenched institutionalism. The new pope symbolically clears the deck for a new period of Catholic history. For a church desperately in need of an administrative makeover, it creates a nominally blank slate for the pale-garbed pontiff.NewsweekThe adjectives that properly fill in blanks I, II, III, IV, V and VI, in the text, are - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2013
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: D1E6F3BF-DC
Behind the Meaning of the Pope’s NamesThe article clearly states that
The new pope’s choice of ‘Francis’ hints at the direction of his reign.Enter Pope Francis. The first Jesuit pope. The first from Latin America. It is, indeed, a historic moment for the papacy. Those who waited for a leader from the new Catholic world will no doubt be __( I )__ by the choice, but his new status as the leader of a global church requires a different persona and a new mode of action. The new pope speaks not only for Argentina, Latin America, and the Jesuits, but also for the entire Roman Catholic world.
The first Jesuit pope. The first from Latin America. (Enrique Marcarian/Reuters)It is precisely for this reason that cardinals shed their names along with their brightly __( II )__ vestments. Historically, the tradition of selecting a new papal name dates back to the sixth century, when Pope John II swapped his awkwardly __( III )__ name Mercurius for the solidly Christian John. At the same time the selection of religious names is more than an opportunity to symbolically cast aside individual identity. Papal names chart a course for the future by summoning up the past. The new pope assumes either the mantle of religious heroes and leaders from days gone by or the virtues of the Innocents and the Piuses. The selection of the name both forges a new identity and signals how the pope wishes to be seen and remembered. It is, in essence, not only the answer to the __( IV )__ question “Who do you want to be when you grow up?” but also a way of preemptively writing one’s own reviews.
Traditionally popes have been __( V )__ of reaching too high, of appearing too self-congratulatory. The office of the pope is built, literally and metaphorically, on the legacy of St. Peter, the apostle of Christ, whose remains lie beneath the papal seat in the Vatican. But there has been no Pope Peter II. Thus far, no pope has had the audacity to present himself as standing in continuity with the favored disciple of Jesus. Nor would Pope Francis have been able to select the name of the founder of his own order. A Pope Ignatius—after Jesuit founder Ignatius of Loyola—would have appeared self-serving.
At first blush, Pope Francis’s selection of a previously __( VI )__ papal name—he is no 23rd anything—marks a break with the past and augurs well for those looking for a move away from deeply entrenched institutionalism. The new pope symbolically clears the deck for a new period of Catholic history. For a church desperately in need of an administrative makeover, it creates a nominally blank slate for the pale-garbed pontiff.Newsweek - Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2013
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: D1D0DA24-DC
Texto para a questão
Texto IEsses Moços01 Esses moços, pobres moços
02 Ah! Se soubessem o que eu sei
03 Não amavam...
04 Não passavam aquilo que eu já passei
05 Por meus olhos
06 Por meus sonhos
07 Por meu sangue, tudo enfim
08 É que eu peço a esses moços
09 Que acreditem em mim
10 Se eles julgam
11 Que há um lindo futuro
12 Só o amor nesta vida conduz
13 Saibam que deixam o céu por ser escuro
14 E vão ao inferno
15 À procura de luz
16 Eu também tive nos meus belos dias
17 Essa mania que muito me custou
18 E só as mágoas eu trago hoje em dia
19 E essas rugas o amor me deixou!Lupicínio Rodrigues (1948)Texto II
Capítulo LXXIII / O contrarregra
Machado de Assis, Dom Casmurro (1899)
Obs.: dandy (dândi): homem elegante, que se traja com apuroSobre o trecho do Texto II era a trombeta do juízo final e soou a tempo; assim faz o Destino, que é o seu próprio contrarregra (linhas 01-03), é correto afirmar que - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: E8ADA13C-DD
The following text refers to question:
According to the song review,
- Linguagens
Inglês
- Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: E8A9964A-DD
The following text refers to question:
The verb that properly fills in blank I in the text is - Linguagens
Literatura
- Escolas Literárias
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: E893EA5C-DD
Assinale a alternativa correta. - Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: E88F75A4-DD
Considerados os seus principais traços estilísticos, o texto I exemplifica:
- Linguagens
Português
- Interpretação de Textos
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: E88BBA23-DD
A proposta estética expressa no texto II realiza-se em I por meio dos seguintes expedientes estilísticos, EXCETO: - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 02F4B658-DB
The following advertisement refers to question.
The pronoun who in “80% of those who are blind don’t have to be” can be replaced by - Linguagens
Inglês
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Prova de 2012
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
- Dificuldade: Difícil
- Com imagem
- Código da questão: 02EF9B7F-DB
The following advertisement refers to question.
According to the ad,