Questões: Centro de Estudos Superiores de Maceió - Centro Universitário — com gabarito

New Parents Don’t Get Enough Sleep for Six Years After a Child Is Born

Those first three months with a newborn can be rough, but researchers say sleep deprivation is an issue with parents for years. New parents are sometimes shocked to discover how little sleep they get in the first six months after a baby is born. They might also be discouraged to learn that their sleep patterns might not return to normal until that newborn is ready for kindergarten.

A new study published in the journal Sleep found that both parental sleep satisfaction and sleep duration sharply declined after childbirth, hitting their lowest point when a baby is 3 months old.

Women’s sleep duration and quality were far more affected than men, whether or not they breastfed their child. Women lost an average of one hour of sleep nightly compared to what they got prior to pregnancy, while men lost about 15 minutes of sleep per night.

Even four to six years after childbirth, mothers were getting 20 minutes less sleep per night than before they became pregnant, while fathers were still getting 15 minutes less sleep.

“The short-term effects of childbirth on parental sleep is well known. Our study just confirmed these effects,” Lemola told Healthline. “However, it was largely unexpected to find decreased sleep duration and sleep satisfaction six years after birth.”

Sleep was more affected among first-time parents than among parents with more than one child.

The findings were based on interviews of 4,659 parents who had a child between 2008 and 2015.

“While having children is a major source of joy for most parents, it is possible that increased demands and responsibilities associated with the role as a parent lead to shorter sleep and decreased sleep quality even up to six years after birth of the first child,” said Lemola.

Lemola said that future research would be required to determine how parents can cope with sleep loss and regain their sleep patterns sooner.

Adaptado de: <https://www.healthline.com/health-news/newparents-dont-get-sound-sleep-for-6-years#The-bottom-line> Acessado em 04 de março de 2019

New Parents Don’t Get Enough Sleep for Six Years After a Child Is Born

Those first three months with a newborn can be rough, but researchers say sleep deprivation is an issue with parents for years. New parents are sometimes shocked to discover how little sleep they get in the first six months after a baby is born. They might also be discouraged to learn that their sleep patterns might not return to normal until that newborn is ready for kindergarten.

A new study published in the journal Sleep found that both parental sleep satisfaction and sleep duration sharply declined after childbirth, hitting their lowest point when a baby is 3 months old.

Women’s sleep duration and quality were far more affected than men, whether or not they breastfed their child. Women lost an average of one hour of sleep nightly compared to what they got prior to pregnancy, while men lost about 15 minutes of sleep per night.

Even four to six years after childbirth, mothers were getting 20 minutes less sleep per night than before they became pregnant, while fathers were still getting 15 minutes less sleep.

“The short-term effects of childbirth on parental sleep is well known. Our study just confirmed these effects,” Lemola told Healthline. “However, it was largely unexpected to find decreased sleep duration and sleep satisfaction six years after birth.”

Sleep was more affected among first-time parents than among parents with more than one child.

The findings were based on interviews of 4,659 parents who had a child between 2008 and 2015.

“While having children is a major source of joy for most parents, it is possible that increased demands and responsibilities associated with the role as a parent lead to shorter sleep and decreased sleep quality even up to six years after birth of the first child,” said Lemola.

Lemola said that future research would be required to determine how parents can cope with sleep loss and regain their sleep patterns sooner.

Adaptado de: <https://www.healthline.com/health-news/newparents-dont-get-sound-sleep-for-6-years#The-bottom-line> Acessado em 04 de março de 2019

Read the graph below and answer the following question.

According to the graph above we can assert that

Read the text below and answer the following question.

Can Cellular Agriculture Feed the World?

    Within 20 years, there will be 2 billion more people than today — over 9 billion people in total. The impact to the environment could be severe. Just feeding that population using current methods is problematic.

    On average, cattle ranchers need 100 times more land than corn growers to produce a gram of food. So, if that hungry world continues to eat meat like we do, the demand for land — and fresh water — will be alarming, not to mention the environmental impact of raising so many animals. Meat production aside, the large-scale monoculture of crops like corn usually results in damaging terrestrial pollution from pesticides and soil depletion. The impact to the oceans is equally perilous.

   Instead of farming animals, fish and plants, cellular agriculture grows the proteins and nutrients we consume from a culture, cell by cell. With this alternative approach, the consumable meat and plant tissues produced don’t need to be harvested from animals or plants. It’s food production on an industrial scale.

  The technology to do this is not new. Growing meat from a scaffold embedded in growth culture is no different in theory than making bread from yeast. The vast majority of insulin for diabetics is already manufactured by genetically engineered bacteria, as is the rennet used to culture cheese. In the past 10 years, this approach has been pioneered with a variety of foodstuffs: milk, eggs, beef, chicken, fish — even coffee.

    To succeed, cellular agriculture must overcome 6,000 years of established dependence on traditional agriculture, and it has to do so via one of the most finicky human senses: taste. No one will eat manufactured meat or fish if it doesn’t have the same sensual satisfaction generated by the grown version. So, in addition to all the technical challenges in creating edible tissues from cultures, the startups pioneering this approach are working diligently to make their products tasty.

   The possibilities for cellular agriculture are seemingly limitless; it may be possible to grow human organs for transplant using the method. But it is still early days.

Adaptado de: <https://earth911.com/business-policy/cellular-agriculture/> Acessado em 19 de outubro de 2018.

Nós, os brasileiros.

    Uma editora europeia me pede que traduza poemas de autores estrangeiros sobre o Brasil.

    Como sempre, eles falam da floresta amazônica, uma floresta muito pouco real, aliás. Um bosque poético, com “mulheres de corpos alvíssimos espreitando entre os troncos das árvores e olhos de serpentes hirtas acariciando esses corpos como dedos amorosos”. Não faltam flores azuis, rios cristalinos e tigres mágicos. Traduzo os poemas por dever de ofício, mas com uma secreta – e nunca realizada – vontade de inserir ali um grãozinho de realidade.

     Nas minhas idas ao Exterior, onde convivi, sobretudo com escritores, professores e estudantes universitários – portanto, gente razoavelmente culta –, fui invariavelmente surpreendida com a profunda ignorância a respeito de quem, como e o que somos.

    – A senhora é brasileira? Comentaram espantados alunos de uma Universidade americana famosa: – Mas a senhora é loira!

     Depois de ler, num Congresso de escritores em Amsterdã, um trecho de um de meus romances traduzidos em inglês, ouvi de um senhor, dono de um antiquário famoso, que segurou comovido minhas duas mãos:

     – Que maravilha! Nunca imaginei que no Brasil houvesse pessoas cultas!

     Pior ainda, no Canadá, alguém exclamou incrédulo:

     – Escritora brasileira? Ué, mas no Brasil existem editoras?

    A culminância foi a observação de uma crítica berlinense, num artigo sobre um romance meu editado por lá, acrescentando, a alguns elogios, a grave restrição: “porém não parece livro brasileiro, pois não fala nem de plantas, nem de índios, nem de bichos.”

   Diante dos três poemas sobre o Brasil, esquisitos para qualquer brasileiro, pensei mais uma vez que esse desconhecimento não se deve apenas à natural alienação estrangeira quanto ao geograficamente fora de seus interesses, mas também é culpa nossa. Pois o que mais exportamos de nós é o exótico e o folclórico.

    Em uma feira do livro de Frankfurt, no espaço brasileiro, o que se via eram livros (não muito bem arrumados), muita caipirinha na mesa, e televisões mostrando carnaval, futebol, praias e ... matos.

    E eu, mulher essencialmente urbana, escritora das geografias interiores de meus personagens neuróticos, me senti tão deslocada quanto um macaco em uma loja de cristais. Mesmo que tentasse explicar, ninguém acreditaria que eu era tão brasileira quanto qualquer negra de origem africana vendendo acarajé nas ruas de Salvador. Porque o Brasil é tudo isso.

    E nem a cor de meu cabelo e olhos, nem meu sobrenome, nem os livros que li na infância, nem o idioma que falei naquele tempo, além do português, me fazem menos nascida e vivida nesta terra de tão surpreendentes misturas: imensa, desaproveitada, instigante e (por que ter medo da palavra?) maravilhosa!

(Lya Luft. Pensar é transgredir. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2009, p. 49-51)