Pular para o conteúdo

Prova

Prova de 2019: Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE) — questões com gabarito

711 questões da prova de 2019 de Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE), em Português, Inglês, Sociologia, Biologia e mais matérias. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 711 questões
  • 13 matérias

Resultados: 76 questões

Página 1 de 4

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    The sentence “It has changed dramatically over the centuries since it first arrived on the shores of Britain from the north of Europe” (lines 104-107) contains a conjunction that introduces a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ee8d7f8-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    In the sentences “Such statistics can never fully represent the diversity of experiences that speakers of the language have” (lines 71-74) and “…changes that have occurred in the populations of those who speak the language.” (lines 52-54), the underlined clauses are classified as
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ed88bac-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Passado progressivo | Past continuous

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Passado progressivo | Past continuous

    The underlined verb forms in“(He) heard positive reports” (line 49), “who was also pursuing”(line 50), and “I open the blinds” (lines 89-90) are
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0c98d1a6-f9
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T


    I Used to Fear Being a Nobody. Then I Left

    Social Media.


    By Bianca Brooks


    “What’s happening?”

         I stare blankly at the little box as I try to think of something clever for my first tweet. I settle on what’s at the top of my mind: “My only #fear is being a nobody.” How could I know this exchange would begin a dialogue that would continue nearly every day for the next nine years of my life?

         I began using Twitter in 2010 as a newly minted high school freshman. Though it began as a hub for my quirky adolescent thoughts, over the years it became an archive of my emotional and intellectual voice — a kind of virtual display for the evolution of my politics and artistic identity. But after nine years, it was time to close the archive. My wanting to share my every waking thought became eclipsed by a desire for an increasingly rare commodity — a private life.

         Though I thought disappearing from social media would be as simple as logging off, my refusal to post anything caused a bit of a stir among my small but loyal following. I began to receive emails from strangers asking me where I had gone and when I would return. One message read: “Not to be over familiar, but you have to come back eventually. You’re a writer after all. How will we read your writing?” Another follower inquired, “Where will you go?” 

         The truth is I have not gone anywhere. I am, in fact, more present than ever

         Over time, I have begun to sense these messages reveal more than a lack of respect for privacy. I realize that to many millennials, a life without a social media presence is not simply a private life; it is no life at all: We possess a widespread, genuine fear of obscurity.

         When I consider the near-decade I have spent on social media, this worry makes sense. As with many in my generation, Twitter was my entry into conversations happening on a global scale; long before my byline graced any publication, tweeting was how I felt a part of the world. Twitter functions much like an echo chamber dependent on likes and retweets, and gaining notoriety is as easy as finding someone to agree with you. For years I poured my opinions, musings and outrage onto my timeline, believing I held an indispensable place in a vital sociopolitical experiment. 

         But these passionate, public observations were born of more than just a desire to speak my mind — I was measuring my individual worth in constant visibility. Implicit in my follower’s question “Where will you go?” is the resounding question “How will we know where you’ve gone?” Privacy is considered a small exchange for the security of being well known and well liked. 

         After all, a private life boasts no location markers or story updates. The idea that the happenings of our lives would be constrained to our immediate families, friends and real-life communities is akin to social death in a world measured by followers, views, likes and shares.

         I grow weary when I think of this as the new normal for what is considered to be a fruitful personal life. Social media is no longer a mere public extension of our private socialization; it has become a replacement for it. What happens to our humanity when we relegate our real lives to props for the performance of our virtual ones? 

         For one, a predominantly online existence can lull us into a dubious sense of having enacted concrete change, simply because of a tweet or Instagram post. As “hashtag activism” has obscured longstanding traditions of assembly and protest, there’s concern that a failure to transition from the keyboard to in-person organization will effectively stall or kill the momentum of political movements. (See: Occupy Wall Street.) 

         The sanctity of our most intimate experiences is also diminished. My grandfather Charles Shaw — a notable musician whose wisdoms and jazz scene tales I often shared on Twitter — passed away last year. Rather than take adequate time to privately mourn the loss of his giant influence in my life alongside those who loved him most, I quickly posted a lengthy tribute to him to my followers. At the time I thought, “How will they remember him if I don’t acknowledge his passing?”

         Perhaps at the root of this anxiety over being forgotten is an urgent question of how one ought to form a legacy; with the rise of automation, a widening wealth gap and an unstable political climate, it is easy to feel unimportant. It is almost as if the world is too big and we are much too small to excel in it in any meaningful way. We feel we need as many people as possible to witness our lives, so as not to be left out of a story that is being written too fast by people much more significant than ourselves.

         “The secret of a full life is to live and relate to others as if they might not be there tomorrow, as if you might not be there tomorrow,” the writer Anais Nin said. “This feeling has become a rarity, and rarer every day now that we have reached a hastier and more superficial rhythm, now that we believe we are in touch with a greater amount of people. This is the illusion which might cheat us of being in touch deeply with the one breathing next to us.”

         I think of those words and at once any fear of obscurity is eclipsed by much deeper ones — the fear of forgoing the sacred moments of life, of never learning to be completely alone, of not bearing witness to the incredible lives of those who surround me.

         I observe the world around me. It is big and moving fast. “What’s happening?” I think to myself. 

         I’m just beginning to find out. 


    From:www.nytimes.com/Oct. 1, 2019

    As a concluding note, the author acknowledges that, after leaving social media, she
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ce6eeac5-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T


    I Used to Fear Being a Nobody. Then I Left

    Social Media.


    By Bianca Brooks


    “What’s happening?”

         I stare blankly at the little box as I try to think of something clever for my first tweet. I settle on what’s at the top of my mind: “My only #fear is being a nobody.” How could I know this exchange would begin a dialogue that would continue nearly every day for the next nine years of my life?

         I began using Twitter in 2010 as a newly minted high school freshman. Though it began as a hub for my quirky adolescent thoughts, over the years it became an archive of my emotional and intellectual voice — a kind of virtual display for the evolution of my politics and artistic identity. But after nine years, it was time to close the archive. My wanting to share my every waking thought became eclipsed by a desire for an increasingly rare commodity — a private life.

         Though I thought disappearing from social media would be as simple as logging off, my refusal to post anything caused a bit of a stir among my small but loyal following. I began to receive emails from strangers asking me where I had gone and when I would return. One message read: “Not to be over familiar, but you have to come back eventually. You’re a writer after all. How will we read your writing?” Another follower inquired, “Where will you go?” 

         The truth is I have not gone anywhere. I am, in fact, more present than ever

         Over time, I have begun to sense these messages reveal more than a lack of respect for privacy. I realize that to many millennials, a life without a social media presence is not simply a private life; it is no life at all: We possess a widespread, genuine fear of obscurity.

         When I consider the near-decade I have spent on social media, this worry makes sense. As with many in my generation, Twitter was my entry into conversations happening on a global scale; long before my byline graced any publication, tweeting was how I felt a part of the world. Twitter functions much like an echo chamber dependent on likes and retweets, and gaining notoriety is as easy as finding someone to agree with you. For years I poured my opinions, musings and outrage onto my timeline, believing I held an indispensable place in a vital sociopolitical experiment. 

         But these passionate, public observations were born of more than just a desire to speak my mind — I was measuring my individual worth in constant visibility. Implicit in my follower’s question “Where will you go?” is the resounding question “How will we know where you’ve gone?” Privacy is considered a small exchange for the security of being well known and well liked. 

         After all, a private life boasts no location markers or story updates. The idea that the happenings of our lives would be constrained to our immediate families, friends and real-life communities is akin to social death in a world measured by followers, views, likes and shares.

         I grow weary when I think of this as the new normal for what is considered to be a fruitful personal life. Social media is no longer a mere public extension of our private socialization; it has become a replacement for it. What happens to our humanity when we relegate our real lives to props for the performance of our virtual ones? 

         For one, a predominantly online existence can lull us into a dubious sense of having enacted concrete change, simply because of a tweet or Instagram post. As “hashtag activism” has obscured longstanding traditions of assembly and protest, there’s concern that a failure to transition from the keyboard to in-person organization will effectively stall or kill the momentum of political movements. (See: Occupy Wall Street.) 

         The sanctity of our most intimate experiences is also diminished. My grandfather Charles Shaw — a notable musician whose wisdoms and jazz scene tales I often shared on Twitter — passed away last year. Rather than take adequate time to privately mourn the loss of his giant influence in my life alongside those who loved him most, I quickly posted a lengthy tribute to him to my followers. At the time I thought, “How will they remember him if I don’t acknowledge his passing?”

         Perhaps at the root of this anxiety over being forgotten is an urgent question of how one ought to form a legacy; with the rise of automation, a widening wealth gap and an unstable political climate, it is easy to feel unimportant. It is almost as if the world is too big and we are much too small to excel in it in any meaningful way. We feel we need as many people as possible to witness our lives, so as not to be left out of a story that is being written too fast by people much more significant than ourselves.

         “The secret of a full life is to live and relate to others as if they might not be there tomorrow, as if you might not be there tomorrow,” the writer Anais Nin said. “This feeling has become a rarity, and rarer every day now that we have reached a hastier and more superficial rhythm, now that we believe we are in touch with a greater amount of people. This is the illusion which might cheat us of being in touch deeply with the one breathing next to us.”

         I think of those words and at once any fear of obscurity is eclipsed by much deeper ones — the fear of forgoing the sacred moments of life, of never learning to be completely alone, of not bearing witness to the incredible lives of those who surround me.

         I observe the world around me. It is big and moving fast. “What’s happening?” I think to myself. 

         I’m just beginning to find out. 


    From:www.nytimes.com/Oct. 1, 2019

    Considering the idea of living a “full life”, Bianca Brooks believes that the fast and superficial rhythm of today’s reality may prevent us from
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ce6bf18e-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    T E X T


    I Used to Fear Being a Nobody. Then I Left

    Social Media.


    By Bianca Brooks


    “What’s happening?”

         I stare blankly at the little box as I try to think of something clever for my first tweet. I settle on what’s at the top of my mind: “My only #fear is being a nobody.” How could I know this exchange would begin a dialogue that would continue nearly every day for the next nine years of my life?

         I began using Twitter in 2010 as a newly minted high school freshman. Though it began as a hub for my quirky adolescent thoughts, over the years it became an archive of my emotional and intellectual voice — a kind of virtual display for the evolution of my politics and artistic identity. But after nine years, it was time to close the archive. My wanting to share my every waking thought became eclipsed by a desire for an increasingly rare commodity — a private life.

         Though I thought disappearing from social media would be as simple as logging off, my refusal to post anything caused a bit of a stir among my small but loyal following. I began to receive emails from strangers asking me where I had gone and when I would return. One message read: “Not to be over familiar, but you have to come back eventually. You’re a writer after all. How will we read your writing?” Another follower inquired, “Where will you go?” 

         The truth is I have not gone anywhere. I am, in fact, more present than ever

         Over time, I have begun to sense these messages reveal more than a lack of respect for privacy. I realize that to many millennials, a life without a social media presence is not simply a private life; it is no life at all: We possess a widespread, genuine fear of obscurity.

         When I consider the near-decade I have spent on social media, this worry makes sense. As with many in my generation, Twitter was my entry into conversations happening on a global scale; long before my byline graced any publication, tweeting was how I felt a part of the world. Twitter functions much like an echo chamber dependent on likes and retweets, and gaining notoriety is as easy as finding someone to agree with you. For years I poured my opinions, musings and outrage onto my timeline, believing I held an indispensable place in a vital sociopolitical experiment. 

         But these passionate, public observations were born of more than just a desire to speak my mind — I was measuring my individual worth in constant visibility. Implicit in my follower’s question “Where will you go?” is the resounding question “How will we know where you’ve gone?” Privacy is considered a small exchange for the security of being well known and well liked. 

         After all, a private life boasts no location markers or story updates. The idea that the happenings of our lives would be constrained to our immediate families, friends and real-life communities is akin to social death in a world measured by followers, views, likes and shares.

         I grow weary when I think of this as the new normal for what is considered to be a fruitful personal life. Social media is no longer a mere public extension of our private socialization; it has become a replacement for it. What happens to our humanity when we relegate our real lives to props for the performance of our virtual ones? 

         For one, a predominantly online existence can lull us into a dubious sense of having enacted concrete change, simply because of a tweet or Instagram post. As “hashtag activism” has obscured longstanding traditions of assembly and protest, there’s concern that a failure to transition from the keyboard to in-person organization will effectively stall or kill the momentum of political movements. (See: Occupy Wall Street.) 

         The sanctity of our most intimate experiences is also diminished. My grandfather Charles Shaw — a notable musician whose wisdoms and jazz scene tales I often shared on Twitter — passed away last year. Rather than take adequate time to privately mourn the loss of his giant influence in my life alongside those who loved him most, I quickly posted a lengthy tribute to him to my followers. At the time I thought, “How will they remember him if I don’t acknowledge his passing?”

         Perhaps at the root of this anxiety over being forgotten is an urgent question of how one ought to form a legacy; with the rise of automation, a widening wealth gap and an unstable political climate, it is easy to feel unimportant. It is almost as if the world is too big and we are much too small to excel in it in any meaningful way. We feel we need as many people as possible to witness our lives, so as not to be left out of a story that is being written too fast by people much more significant than ourselves.

         “The secret of a full life is to live and relate to others as if they might not be there tomorrow, as if you might not be there tomorrow,” the writer Anais Nin said. “This feeling has become a rarity, and rarer every day now that we have reached a hastier and more superficial rhythm, now that we believe we are in touch with a greater amount of people. This is the illusion which might cheat us of being in touch deeply with the one breathing next to us.”

         I think of those words and at once any fear of obscurity is eclipsed by much deeper ones — the fear of forgoing the sacred moments of life, of never learning to be completely alone, of not bearing witness to the incredible lives of those who surround me.

         I observe the world around me. It is big and moving fast. “What’s happening?” I think to myself. 

         I’m just beginning to find out. 


    From:www.nytimes.com/Oct. 1, 2019

    For the author herself, Twitter was the platform for important things in her life, including the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ce600458-b8
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Presente simples | Simple present

    In terms of tense, the verbs in the sentence “The attitudes people have towards the language are a part of their own personal history.” (lines 78-80) are respectively in the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ee5c98b-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Presente perfeito | Present perfect

    In terms of tense, the underlined verbs in the sentences “Other loanwords, however, have become completely naturalized” (lines 38-40) and “English has, over its lifetime, absorbed influences from countless sources” (lines 43-45) are respectively in the 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ee2cbd5-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Passado perfeito | Past perfect

    In the sentence “The influence from this contact can be seen most clearly in the way that English is full of what are known as loanwords.” (lines 12-15), at least one of the verbs is in the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5edfa577-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice

    In terms of voice, the underlined verbs in the sentence “The term loanword, or borrowing, is used to refer to an item of vocabulary from one language which has been adopted into the vocabulary of another.” (lines 15-19) are respectively in the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5edcb99d-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    The sentence “it is a politically charged social practice embedded in the histories of the people who use it.” (lines 100-102) contains a/an
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ed481c6-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    The sentence “It has changed in terms of its lexis (vocabulary), its orthography (spelling) and its semantics (meaning).” (lines 3-5) is classified as
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ec868a9-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    The sentence “if the language becomes too diverse it will not remain mutually comprehensible across different social groups.” (lines 127-130) contains a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ebfb65d-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Decisions made by institutions and governments as to the use of a language such as English
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ebb7cc0-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    The text mentions one of the reasons for the changes that have happened in the English language over the years, which is the
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5eb85bd2-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the text, the position that the English language occupies in the world today
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5eb54890-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the text, due to the huge changes English has had since it first came from the north of Europe to the British land,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ead720a-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Some of the loanwords used by English speakers have become so popular that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ea997e1-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the text, the English language has
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ea585a0-ff
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UECE 2019, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    As to the statistics related to English, it is correct to say that they
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5ea20e2d-ff