Pular para o conteúdo

Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e com imagem

Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

Resultados

9.490 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 147 de 475.

  • 62AEF901-B0

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    PUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Os textos a seguir servirão de base para a realização da questão.


    Texto I

    Desafio da nossa época é lidar com a abundância

    Leandro Narloch, Folha de S.Paulo - 25.abr.2018 às 9h06


    A abundância, quem diria, se tornou um problema. A humanidade passou milênios tentando sobreviver à fome, ao desabrigo e à escassez: hoje precisa aprender a lidar com excesso.

    Temos alimentos demais, bugigangas demais, roupas, carros, embalagens, papéis, remédios, drogas, livros, filmes, eletrônicos e diversões demais. Ainda estamos aprendendo a viver no meio de tantas coisas.

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Português, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de Textos
    Artista faz intervenção na avenida Paulista sobre consumismo
    Marcus Leoni - 10.jan.2016/Folhapress


    É uma delícia de problema, é claro. Até o século 18, a teoria malthusiana fazia sentido. O crescimento da população levava à escassez de comida e assim à diminuição da poluição. Crises de fome ceifavam multidões todos os séculos.
    A Revolução Industrial nos fez escapar dessa armadilha. Produzindo mais com menos esforço, operamos um milagre: a população explodiu e a riqueza também. A fome, até então uma condição natural da humanidade, se tornou uma anomalia. 
    Luxos que antes eram reservados a reis ou milionários (chás ou janelas com vidros e cortinas, por exemplo) entraram na casa de trabalhadores comuns.
    É claro que boa parte do mundo ainda enfrenta a fome e a escassez. Mas não é por falta de conhecimento que isso acontece. Pelo contrário, o caminho da prosperidade já está mais ou menos mapeado e pavimentado.
    A abundância é um tipo de problema chique, que todo mundo gostaria de ter. Como o da grã-fina que está cansada de passar as férias em Paris. Mas ainda assim é um problema.
    Muitas más notícias que os jornais publicam hoje são produtos da abundância: o trânsito, a obesidade, a poluição, o lixo, o tempo que crianças gastam em frente a telas. Não só crianças, mas os adultos — que em média tocam 2600 vezes no celular por dia.
    As pessoas parecem meio perdidas entre tanto conforto e atrações que desviam a atenção. Se perdem em realizações imediatas de consumo, sem foco e força de vontade para perseguir grandes desejos ou objetivos mais ousados.
    Se o problema já é grave hoje, imagine no futuro. O autocontrole será cada vez mais necessário. Nossos filhos e netos terão que aprender desde cedo a se controlar diante do excesso de comida, de drogas, de opções de vida e de diversão.
    O mundo capitalista já resolveu o problema da escassez: precisa agora de uma educação para a abundância.

    Leandro Narloch - Jornalista, mestre em filosofia e autor do Guia Politicamente Incorreto da História do Brasil, entre outros.
    Disponível em: <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/leandro-narloch/2018/04/desafio-da-nossa-epoca-e-lidar-com-a-abundancia.shtml> . Acesso em: 25 abr. 2018.


    Texto 2
    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Português, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de Textos
    Texto de Gilmar Machado, publicado em 8 jan. 2018.
    Disponível em: <https://www.humorpolitico.com.br/
    tag/meio-ambiente/> . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2018.



    Texto 3 

    Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades
    Ana Tereza Caceres Cortez - Professora adjunta do Departamento de Geografia
    Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas - IGCE/Unesp, Rio Claro

    Um dos símbolos do sucesso das economias capitalistas modernas é a abundância dos bens de consumo, continuamente produzidos pelo sistema industrial. Essa fartura passou a receber uma conotação negativa, sendo objeto de críticas que consideram o consumismo um dos principais problemas das sociedades industriais modernas.

    Consumismo é o ato de consumir produtos ou serviços, muitas vezes, sem consciência. Há várias discussões a respeito do tema, entre elas o tipo de papel que a propaganda e a publicidade exercem nas pessoas, induzindo-as ao consumo, mesmo que não necessitem de um produto comprado. Muitas vezes, as pessoas compram produtos que não têm utilidade para elas, ou até mesmo coisas desnecessárias apenas por vontade de comprar, evidenciando até uma doença.

    Segundo o Dicionário Houaiss, consumismo é “ato, efeito, fato ou prática de consumir (‘comprar em demasia’)” e “consumo ilimitado de bens duráveis, especialmente artigos supérfluos”.

    O simples “consumo” é entendido como as aquisições racionais, controladas e seletivas baseadas em fatores sociais e ambientais e no respeito pelas gerações futuras. Já o consumismo pode ser definido como uma compulsão para consumir. Mas como fazer para não aderir ao perfil consumista? A fórmula clássica e aparentemente simples é distinguir o essencial do necessário e o necessário do supérfluo. No entanto, é muito difícil estabelecer o limite entre consumo e consumismo, pois a definição de necessidades básicas e supérfluas está intimamente ligada às características culturais da sociedade e do grupo a que pertencemos. O que é básico para uns pode ser supérfluo para outros e vice-versa. 

    Trecho de CORTEZ, Ana Tereza Caceres. Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades. In:
    CORTEZ, A.T.C.; ORTIGOZA, S.A.G. (Org.). Da produção ao consumo: impactos socioambientais no
    espaço urbano. São Paulo: UNESP; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2009. Disponível em: <http://books.
    scielo.org/id/n9brm/pdf/ortigoza-9788579830075-03.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018. [Adaptado]
    No terceiro parágrafo do texto 1, o autor alega que a teoria malthusiana fazia sentido até o século XVIII com base na ideia de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62aef901-b0
  • 62AA645B-B0

    Português

    Coesão e coerência
    PUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Os textos a seguir servirão de base para a realização da questão.


    Texto I

    Desafio da nossa época é lidar com a abundância

    Leandro Narloch, Folha de S.Paulo - 25.abr.2018 às 9h06


    A abundância, quem diria, se tornou um problema. A humanidade passou milênios tentando sobreviver à fome, ao desabrigo e à escassez: hoje precisa aprender a lidar com excesso.

    Temos alimentos demais, bugigangas demais, roupas, carros, embalagens, papéis, remédios, drogas, livros, filmes, eletrônicos e diversões demais. Ainda estamos aprendendo a viver no meio de tantas coisas.

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Português, PUC - SP 2018, Coesão e coerência
    Artista faz intervenção na avenida Paulista sobre consumismo
    Marcus Leoni - 10.jan.2016/Folhapress


    É uma delícia de problema, é claro. Até o século 18, a teoria malthusiana fazia sentido. O crescimento da população levava à escassez de comida e assim à diminuição da poluição. Crises de fome ceifavam multidões todos os séculos.
    A Revolução Industrial nos fez escapar dessa armadilha. Produzindo mais com menos esforço, operamos um milagre: a população explodiu e a riqueza também. A fome, até então uma condição natural da humanidade, se tornou uma anomalia. 
    Luxos que antes eram reservados a reis ou milionários (chás ou janelas com vidros e cortinas, por exemplo) entraram na casa de trabalhadores comuns.
    É claro que boa parte do mundo ainda enfrenta a fome e a escassez. Mas não é por falta de conhecimento que isso acontece. Pelo contrário, o caminho da prosperidade já está mais ou menos mapeado e pavimentado.
    A abundância é um tipo de problema chique, que todo mundo gostaria de ter. Como o da grã-fina que está cansada de passar as férias em Paris. Mas ainda assim é um problema.
    Muitas más notícias que os jornais publicam hoje são produtos da abundância: o trânsito, a obesidade, a poluição, o lixo, o tempo que crianças gastam em frente a telas. Não só crianças, mas os adultos — que em média tocam 2600 vezes no celular por dia.
    As pessoas parecem meio perdidas entre tanto conforto e atrações que desviam a atenção. Se perdem em realizações imediatas de consumo, sem foco e força de vontade para perseguir grandes desejos ou objetivos mais ousados.
    Se o problema já é grave hoje, imagine no futuro. O autocontrole será cada vez mais necessário. Nossos filhos e netos terão que aprender desde cedo a se controlar diante do excesso de comida, de drogas, de opções de vida e de diversão.
    O mundo capitalista já resolveu o problema da escassez: precisa agora de uma educação para a abundância.

    Leandro Narloch - Jornalista, mestre em filosofia e autor do Guia Politicamente Incorreto da História do Brasil, entre outros.
    Disponível em: <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/leandro-narloch/2018/04/desafio-da-nossa-epoca-e-lidar-com-a-abundancia.shtml> . Acesso em: 25 abr. 2018.


    Texto 2
    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Português, PUC - SP 2018, Coesão e coerência
    Texto de Gilmar Machado, publicado em 8 jan. 2018.
    Disponível em: <https://www.humorpolitico.com.br/
    tag/meio-ambiente/> . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2018.



    Texto 3 

    Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades
    Ana Tereza Caceres Cortez - Professora adjunta do Departamento de Geografia
    Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas - IGCE/Unesp, Rio Claro

    Um dos símbolos do sucesso das economias capitalistas modernas é a abundância dos bens de consumo, continuamente produzidos pelo sistema industrial. Essa fartura passou a receber uma conotação negativa, sendo objeto de críticas que consideram o consumismo um dos principais problemas das sociedades industriais modernas.

    Consumismo é o ato de consumir produtos ou serviços, muitas vezes, sem consciência. Há várias discussões a respeito do tema, entre elas o tipo de papel que a propaganda e a publicidade exercem nas pessoas, induzindo-as ao consumo, mesmo que não necessitem de um produto comprado. Muitas vezes, as pessoas compram produtos que não têm utilidade para elas, ou até mesmo coisas desnecessárias apenas por vontade de comprar, evidenciando até uma doença.

    Segundo o Dicionário Houaiss, consumismo é “ato, efeito, fato ou prática de consumir (‘comprar em demasia’)” e “consumo ilimitado de bens duráveis, especialmente artigos supérfluos”.

    O simples “consumo” é entendido como as aquisições racionais, controladas e seletivas baseadas em fatores sociais e ambientais e no respeito pelas gerações futuras. Já o consumismo pode ser definido como uma compulsão para consumir. Mas como fazer para não aderir ao perfil consumista? A fórmula clássica e aparentemente simples é distinguir o essencial do necessário e o necessário do supérfluo. No entanto, é muito difícil estabelecer o limite entre consumo e consumismo, pois a definição de necessidades básicas e supérfluas está intimamente ligada às características culturais da sociedade e do grupo a que pertencemos. O que é básico para uns pode ser supérfluo para outros e vice-versa. 

    Trecho de CORTEZ, Ana Tereza Caceres. Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades. In:
    CORTEZ, A.T.C.; ORTIGOZA, S.A.G. (Org.). Da produção ao consumo: impactos socioambientais no
    espaço urbano. São Paulo: UNESP; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2009. Disponível em: <http://books.
    scielo.org/id/n9brm/pdf/ortigoza-9788579830075-03.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018. [Adaptado]
    Qual o efeito de sentido da oração intercalada “quem diria”, no primeiro parágrafo do texto 1?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62aa645b-b0
  • 6272DFEC-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    In relation to the issue raised about “the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools” (paragraph 6) , Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote that the IDEA requires that educational programs should
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6272dfec-b0
  • 626AC4FC-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    No excerto do sexto parágrafo “whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater”, a palavra it se refere a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 626ac4fc-b0
  • 6264DBFF-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    In the fragment from paragraph 6 “the judge also sided with the school district”, the expression in bold means the same as
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6264dbff-b0
  • 625FC97C-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    De acordo com os parágrafos 4 a 6, algumas das ações tomadas pelos pais de Endrew, em razão de sua insatisfação com a escola pública em que o filho estudava, foram:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 625fc97c-b0
  • 625B8749-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, é CORRETO afirmar que, nos Estados Unidos,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 625b8749-b0
  • 6255539A-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    We understand from paragraph 2 that, concerning the ‘merely more than de minimis’ education programs for the disabled, John G Roberts believes such programs
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6255539a-b0
  • 624FFBB2-B0

    Inglês

    Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions
    PUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    No primeiro parágrafo, a palavra instead pode ser CORRETAMENTE traduzida por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 624ffbb2-b0
  • 62480DB8-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    No primeiro parágrafo, o verbo must é repetidamente utilizado e indica
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62480db8-b0
  • 62431590-B0

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.


    Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

    By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - SP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

    “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

    There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

    The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

    While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

    Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

    “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

    *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

    In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018


    O fato que levou à publicação deste texto em março de 2017 foi
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62431590-b0
  • 267C8C49-AF

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UNEMAT · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto 01


    O tempo é        

     O tempo é qualquer coisa      

    que ninguém toma nas mãos

     e beija no mesmo instante     

                                          (ou um instante depois).


    Texto 02

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNEMAT 2018, Interpretação de Textos

    PERSONA, Lucinda Nogueira. Entre uma noite e outra. Cuiabá, MT: Entrelinhas, 2014. p. 33.

    A persistência da memória. Salvador Dali. Disponível em: noticias.universia.com/ destaques/noticias/2012/01/07/903289/conhecaa-persistencia-da-memoria-salvador-dali.html Acesso em: fev. 2018.

    Comparando o que aborda o poema O tempo é, da poetisa Lucinda Nogueira Persona, e os sentidos presentes na tela A persistência da memória, do artista plástico Salvador Dali, assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 267c8c49-af
  • 266C096C-AF

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UNEMAT · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNEMAT 2018, Interpretação de Textos

    Maurício de Sousa. Disponível em aliteranda.files.w ordpress.com. Acesso em: nov. 2015. 

    Na leitura da tirinha há uma quebra de expectativa que produz um efeito humorístico.


    Assinale a alternativa que corresponde a este funcionamento.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 266c096c-af
  • 2667633D-AF

    Português

    Funções morfossintáticas da palavra QUE
    UNEMAT · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNEMAT 2018, Funções morfossintáticas da palavra QUE

    Maurício de Sousa. Disponível em aliteranda.files.w ordpress.com. Acesso em: nov. 2015. 

    Considere o seguinte trecho: “[...] e então, adicionam-se duas colheres de açúcar mascavo e mexe-se a calda por dois minutos [...]”.


    A partir das palavras em destaque e das noções de variação linguística, assinale a alternativa correta.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2667633d-af
  • 265C53B1-AF

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UNEMAT · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNEMAT 2018, Interpretação de Textos

    CJ. Politicopatas. Disponível em: http://f.i.uol.com.br/folha/cartum/images/17214223.jpeg Acesso em ago. 2017

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta o motivo que produz o efeito de humor na tirinha.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 265c53b1-af
  • 26594E14-AF

    Português

    Coesão e coerência
    UNEMAT · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Português, UNEMAT 2018, Coesão e coerência

    CJ. Politicopatas. Disponível em: http://f.i.uol.com.br/folha/cartum/images/17214223.jpeg Acesso em ago. 2017

    Nas três primeiras falas das personagens da tira Politicopatas, de CJ, o verbo ir é empregado em locuções verbais, ou seja, funciona como auxiliar do verbo principal.

    Considerando os verbos principais estudar, brincar, dar, assinale a alternativa que equivale à substituição das locuções verbais da tirinha pelos verbos principais, de acordo com a norma padrão da língua portuguesa.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 26594e14-af
  • 0887C906-AF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Animals' popularity 'a disadvantage'

    By Mary HaltonScience reporter, BBC News
    13 April 2018

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43742646
    According to the ideas expressed in the last paragraph (lines 45-46), one infers that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0887c906-af
  • 0880BB83-AF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Animals' popularity 'a disadvantage'

    By Mary HaltonScience reporter, BBC News
    13 April 2018

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43742646
    According to paragraph 14 (lines 42-44), it is correct to infer that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 0880bb83-af
  • 087CEDF4-AF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Animals' popularity 'a disadvantage'

    By Mary HaltonScience reporter, BBC News
    13 April 2018

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43742646
    The fragment "This is just the first step" (lines 39-40) refers to the fact that companies would have to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 087cedf4-af
  • 087849EC-AF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    PUC - RJ · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Animals' popularity 'a disadvantage'

    By Mary HaltonScience reporter, BBC News
    13 April 2018

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RJ 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43742646
    According to Dr Sarah Durant, in paragraph 9 (lines 27-30), it is INCORRECT to state that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 087849ec-af