Português
Interpretação de TextosUERJ · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e com imagem
Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
Resultados
9.490 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 164 de 475.
745F9B8D-6E 326B7B1D-58 Inglês
Sinônimos | SynonymsUNESP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
No trecho do quarto parágrafo “emotions may be the key to changing minds”, o termo sublinhado pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido no texto, por:32682656-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
O trecho do terceiro parágrafo “we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise” quer dizer que as pessoas32651A38-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
No trecho do segundo parágrafo “but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children”, o termo sublinhado refere-se a3261C907-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
According to the second paragraph, the link between vaccines and autism325EB061-58 Inglês
Vocabulário | VocabularyUNESP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt”, o termo sublinhado indica sentido de325B76FE-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosIn today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!”
Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.
Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.
So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.
(Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)
De acordo com o texto, as pessoas32582CFD-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.
No último quadrinho do cartum 1, por meio da fala “If you don’t pursue the truth, you’ll never recognize the lies”, o personagem325519C7-58 Inglês
Tradução | TranslationUNESP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.
Na fala do terceiro quadrinho do cartum 1 “Well, if it goes against my biases and beliefs, it’s fake”, o termo sublinhado equivale, em português, a3252234A-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.
In the cartoon 1, the animal324F10A7-58 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUNESP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.
Os homens dos cartuns 1 e 2320EE0A4-58 Português
Interpretação de TextosUNESP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosExamine a tira do cartunista André Dahmer.
O conselho presente na primeira fala sugere falta de
56BC1126-07 Inglês
Verbos | VerbsCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
(http://gocomics.com)In the second panel, the word “would” indicatesA8628E77-02 Português
Interpretação de TextosUEG · 2017FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o poema e observe a imagem a seguir para responder à questão.
PICASSO, Pablo. Guernica (1937). In: PROENÇA, Graça. História da Arte. 17. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2008. p. 257.
ANDRADE, Carlos Drummond de. Disponível em:<http://trabalhohistoriagce.blogspot.com/p/poesias.html>. Acesso em: 24 mar. 2017.
Tanto o poema quanto a pinturaA85F7847-02 Literatura
Escolas LiteráriasUEG · 2017FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o poema e observe a imagem a seguir para responder à questão.
PICASSO, Pablo. Guernica (1937). In: PROENÇA, Graça. História da Arte. 17. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2008. p. 257.
ANDRADE, Carlos Drummond de. Disponível em:<http://trabalhohistoriagce.blogspot.com/p/poesias.html>. Acesso em: 24 mar. 2017.
Em 2017, o quadro cubista “Guernica”, obra emblemática da carreira de Pablo Picasso, completa oitenta anos. A estética cubistaA85C9B11-02 Literatura
Escolas LiteráriasUEG · 2017FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o poema e observe a imagem a seguir para responder à questão.Um sonhoEu tive um sonho esta noite que não quero esquecer,por isso o escrevo tal qual se deu:era que me arrumava para uma festa onde eu ia falar.O meu cabelo limpo refletia vermelhos,o meu vestido era num tom de azul, cheio de panos, lindo,o meu corpo era jovem, as minhas pernas gostavamdo contato da seda. Falava-se, ria-se, preparava-se.Todo movimento era de espera e aguardos, sendoque depois de vestida, vesti por cima um casacoe colhi do próprio sonho, pois de parte algumaeu a vira brotar, uma sempre-viva amarela,que me encantou por seu miolo azul, um azulde céu limpo sem as reverberações, de um azulsem o ‘z’, que o ‘z’ nesta palavra tisna.Não digo azul, digo bleu, a ideia exatade sua seca maciez. Pus a flor no casacoque só para isto existiu, assim como o sonho inteiro.Eu sonhei uma cor.Agora, sei.
PRADO, Adélia. Bagagem. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2007. p. 75.
DALÍ, Salvador. Dalí, aos seis anos, quando acreditava que era uma garotinha, levantando a pele da água para ver um cão dormindo na água do mar (1950). Óleo sobre tela. In: PROENÇA, Graça. História da Arte. 17. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2008. p. 270.
O poema de Adélia Prado é modernista, ao passo que a pintura de Salvador Dalí éA8599A6A-02 Português
Interpretação de TextosUEG · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o poema e observe a imagem a seguir para responder à questão.Um sonhoEu tive um sonho esta noite que não quero esquecer,por isso o escrevo tal qual se deu:era que me arrumava para uma festa onde eu ia falar.O meu cabelo limpo refletia vermelhos,o meu vestido era num tom de azul, cheio de panos, lindo,o meu corpo era jovem, as minhas pernas gostavamdo contato da seda. Falava-se, ria-se, preparava-se.Todo movimento era de espera e aguardos, sendoque depois de vestida, vesti por cima um casacoe colhi do próprio sonho, pois de parte algumaeu a vira brotar, uma sempre-viva amarela,que me encantou por seu miolo azul, um azulde céu limpo sem as reverberações, de um azulsem o ‘z’, que o ‘z’ nesta palavra tisna.Não digo azul, digo bleu, a ideia exatade sua seca maciez. Pus a flor no casacoque só para isto existiu, assim como o sonho inteiro.Eu sonhei uma cor.Agora, sei.
PRADO, Adélia. Bagagem. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2007. p. 75.
DALÍ, Salvador. Dalí, aos seis anos, quando acreditava que era uma garotinha, levantando a pele da água para ver um cão dormindo na água do mar (1950). Óleo sobre tela. In: PROENÇA, Graça. História da Arte. 17. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2008. p. 270.
Tanto o poema quanto a pinturaA8569047-02 Português
Coesão e coerênciaUEG · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Jornal O Popular, p. M7, 09 mar. 2017.Há entre a tirinha de Maurício de Sousa e a conhecida narrativa do Éden, da tradição judaico-cristã, uma relaçãoA852EFA1-02 Português
PontuaçãoUEG · 2017MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia com atenção o texto a seguir para responder à questão.
SIBILIA, Paula. O homem pós-orgânico: a alquimia dos corpos e das almas à luz das tecnologias digitais. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro:Contraponto, 2015. p. 34-36. (Adaptado).
Considere o trecho a seguir.“De maneira crescente, a identificação do consumidor passa pelo seu perfil: uma série de dados sobre sua condição socioeconômica, seus hábitos e suas preferências de consumo” (linhas 16 e 17).No trecho citado, o sinal de dois pontos tem como função introduzirA8502D1E-02 Português
Figuras de LinguagemUEG · 2017FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia com atenção o texto a seguir para responder à questão.
SIBILIA, Paula. O homem pós-orgânico: a alquimia dos corpos e das almas à luz das tecnologias digitais. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro:Contraponto, 2015. p. 34-36. (Adaptado).
O enunciado “metaboliza as forças vitais e as práticas da vida cotidiana com voracidade inaudita” (linha 2), usando termos da biologia para caracterizar a sociedade contemporânea, é construído a partir da seguinte figura de linguagem: