Questões do ENEM: Linguagens e Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing

Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

Resultados

31 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 1 de 2.

  • 858BA03C-04

    Literatura

    Gênero Épico ou Narrativo
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Considere os dois excertos que seguem.


    I

    E disse: “Ó gente ousada, mais que quantas

    No mundo cometeram grandes cousas,

    Tu, que por guerras cruas, tais e tantas,

    E por trabalhos vãos nunca repousas (...)”


    (Os Lusíadas, Luís de Camões, canto V)

    II
    Aqui ao leme sou mais do que eu:
    Sou um povo que quer o mar que é teu;
    E mais que o mostrengo, que me a alma teme
    E roda nas trevas do fim do mundo,
    Manda a vontade, que me ata ao leme,
    De El-Rei D. João Segundo!

    (Mensagem, de Fernando Pessoa, 2.ª parte)


    Em I, o Gigante Adamastor fala aos navegantes portugueses que queriam, pioneiramente, atravessar o Cabo das Tormentas a caminho das Índias; em II, o timoneiro fala ao mostrengo o porquê de a embarcação lusitana estar enfrentando os perigos do mar. A partir dos excertos e dos comentários, assinale a afirmação que esteja incorreta.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 858ba03c-04
  • 856D06AB-04

    Português

    Figuras de Linguagem
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2019DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Segundo Massaud Moisés, em seu Dicionário de Termos Literários, a figura de linguagem denominada hipálage “designa um expediente retórico mediante o qual uma palavra troca o lugar que logicamente ocuparia na sequência frásica por outro, junto de um termo ao qual se vincula gramaticalmente.” Esse procedimento acima descrito só não ocorre na passagem:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 856d06ab-04
  • 4D544213-FD

    Inglês

    Preposições | Prepositions
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
        Theodor Seuss “Ted” Geisel was an American author, political cartoonist, poet, animator, book publisher, and artist, best known for authoring more than 60 children’s books under the pen name Doctor Seuss (abbreviated Dr. Seuss). As World War II began, he turned to political cartoons, drawing over 400 in two years as editorial cartoonist for the left-leaning New York City daily newspaper. He strongly supports US entry into the war. This is one of his creations from 1941:

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
    The use of the prepositions “up” and “out” after “chewed” and "spit" change the original meanings of the verbs. With them, the new meaning:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d544213-fd
  • 4D510432-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
        Theodor Seuss “Ted” Geisel was an American author, political cartoonist, poet, animator, book publisher, and artist, best known for authoring more than 60 children’s books under the pen name Doctor Seuss (abbreviated Dr. Seuss). As World War II began, he turned to political cartoons, drawing over 400 in two years as editorial cartoonist for the left-leaning New York City daily newspaper. He strongly supports US entry into the war. This is one of his creations from 1941:

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
    The cartoon:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d510432-fd
  • 4D4DEECB-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Beyonce, colorism, and why all of this needs to end


    by Ernest Owens


        Yes, the Super Bowl was on fire. As one who is very critical of halftime show performances, I cannot deny that Beyoncé brought the energy and attention. All of this led to her releasing her tour dates for the Mrs. Carter Show. As excited as I was to actually buy these tickets, something turned me off. The poster.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018


       If you haven’t seen the photographs for Beyonce’s new world tour, you probably wouldn’t even recognize her. You will see an image of what looks like a Victorian white woman in the Elizabethan era. Her (prosthetic) blonde hair puffed and extended to reveal a face that is almost as white as snow. Lips red and her skin powdered. This is not the same bronze Beyonce that I saw rocking the stage in an all female band with her darker Destiny’s Child counterparts. I was only left with memories of previous patterns that the multi-Grammy award winning artist had done in previous years in regards to her skin. And I asked myself the question: why, Bey?

         Let’s not act like this is something new. Over the years, it seems as though Beyonce has gotten lighter as she has gotten older. No, this is not genetics and let’s not pretend her skin color in her first Destiny’s Child album cover matches that of her latest album. Whether it is that highly controversial Revlon advertisement or her own album cover art, Beyonce has consistently been called out on alterations done to her pigments.

        What does this say about our society for black women? It tells me that, an independent, confident and successful woman of color still struggles to have the confidence to fully embrace the skin she is in. If one of the most powerful women in entertainment feels she has to lighten her skin for projection, what does that say for the rest of us?

        Believe it or not, colorism, the stigma associated with skin complexion, has been an ill that has not yet been dissolved by the black community. What was first given to us by slave masters in separating the house slaves from the field ones, has now taken place in how we objectify our women and each other.

        This is pretty problematic in many ways. It’s first of all self-loathing and unnecessary for today’s times. The fact that our nation had an African-American first lady with a complexion that isn’t on the lighter side of the spectrum, nor does it try to be, shows a compelling advancement in appreciation for all women of color in many ways.

         Furthermore, the only reason why such stigma in our country continues is contributed to our own behavior that is shaped by the influential people of color around us. It devastated me when I saw that Sammy Sosa had lightened his skin. As successful as he was in a field that was not necessarily fixated on male skin complexion, it saddened me to see him do it. In many ways, it even made me reflect back on the transition of the late great Michael Jackson and what explanations he had for such a more pale white appearance.

        And why does all of this matter? Because I grew up hearing stories of young dark black girls getting their faces scrubbed with skin lightening soaps out of their free will. Tales of young women being abandoned by their mothers because they were too dark.

        If this is the reality that had more implications back in the early 20th century than it does now, please stop it. Stop trying to explain why you are dating the ebony skin girl. Stop making it seem exceptional that a girl of a darker complexion is actually attractive. Celebrities, stop putting extraneous powders and lighteners on your skin: we all know what you used to look like and we still love you. And people of color: let’s not continue to perpetuate an oppressive cycle of self-loathing of our appearance and heritage. If this can be accomplished, then perhaps even in our own race we can truly make our lives not be judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.


    (adapted from www.huffingtonpost.com, 14/02/2013)

    The pronoun “it” in the phrase “nor does it try to be”, bold faced, in paragraph 6 refers to:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d4deecb-fd
  • 4D4A505A-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Beyonce, colorism, and why all of this needs to end


    by Ernest Owens


        Yes, the Super Bowl was on fire. As one who is very critical of halftime show performances, I cannot deny that Beyoncé brought the energy and attention. All of this led to her releasing her tour dates for the Mrs. Carter Show. As excited as I was to actually buy these tickets, something turned me off. The poster.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018


       If you haven’t seen the photographs for Beyonce’s new world tour, you probably wouldn’t even recognize her. You will see an image of what looks like a Victorian white woman in the Elizabethan era. Her (prosthetic) blonde hair puffed and extended to reveal a face that is almost as white as snow. Lips red and her skin powdered. This is not the same bronze Beyonce that I saw rocking the stage in an all female band with her darker Destiny’s Child counterparts. I was only left with memories of previous patterns that the multi-Grammy award winning artist had done in previous years in regards to her skin. And I asked myself the question: why, Bey?

         Let’s not act like this is something new. Over the years, it seems as though Beyonce has gotten lighter as she has gotten older. No, this is not genetics and let’s not pretend her skin color in her first Destiny’s Child album cover matches that of her latest album. Whether it is that highly controversial Revlon advertisement or her own album cover art, Beyonce has consistently been called out on alterations done to her pigments.

        What does this say about our society for black women? It tells me that, an independent, confident and successful woman of color still struggles to have the confidence to fully embrace the skin she is in. If one of the most powerful women in entertainment feels she has to lighten her skin for projection, what does that say for the rest of us?

        Believe it or not, colorism, the stigma associated with skin complexion, has been an ill that has not yet been dissolved by the black community. What was first given to us by slave masters in separating the house slaves from the field ones, has now taken place in how we objectify our women and each other.

        This is pretty problematic in many ways. It’s first of all self-loathing and unnecessary for today’s times. The fact that our nation had an African-American first lady with a complexion that isn’t on the lighter side of the spectrum, nor does it try to be, shows a compelling advancement in appreciation for all women of color in many ways.

         Furthermore, the only reason why such stigma in our country continues is contributed to our own behavior that is shaped by the influential people of color around us. It devastated me when I saw that Sammy Sosa had lightened his skin. As successful as he was in a field that was not necessarily fixated on male skin complexion, it saddened me to see him do it. In many ways, it even made me reflect back on the transition of the late great Michael Jackson and what explanations he had for such a more pale white appearance.

        And why does all of this matter? Because I grew up hearing stories of young dark black girls getting their faces scrubbed with skin lightening soaps out of their free will. Tales of young women being abandoned by their mothers because they were too dark.

        If this is the reality that had more implications back in the early 20th century than it does now, please stop it. Stop trying to explain why you are dating the ebony skin girl. Stop making it seem exceptional that a girl of a darker complexion is actually attractive. Celebrities, stop putting extraneous powders and lighteners on your skin: we all know what you used to look like and we still love you. And people of color: let’s not continue to perpetuate an oppressive cycle of self-loathing of our appearance and heritage. If this can be accomplished, then perhaps even in our own race we can truly make our lives not be judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.


    (adapted from www.huffingtonpost.com, 14/02/2013)

    According the article:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d4a505a-fd
  • 4D46E6A4-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Beyonce, colorism, and why all of this needs to end


    by Ernest Owens


        Yes, the Super Bowl was on fire. As one who is very critical of halftime show performances, I cannot deny that Beyoncé brought the energy and attention. All of this led to her releasing her tour dates for the Mrs. Carter Show. As excited as I was to actually buy these tickets, something turned me off. The poster.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018


       If you haven’t seen the photographs for Beyonce’s new world tour, you probably wouldn’t even recognize her. You will see an image of what looks like a Victorian white woman in the Elizabethan era. Her (prosthetic) blonde hair puffed and extended to reveal a face that is almost as white as snow. Lips red and her skin powdered. This is not the same bronze Beyonce that I saw rocking the stage in an all female band with her darker Destiny’s Child counterparts. I was only left with memories of previous patterns that the multi-Grammy award winning artist had done in previous years in regards to her skin. And I asked myself the question: why, Bey?

         Let’s not act like this is something new. Over the years, it seems as though Beyonce has gotten lighter as she has gotten older. No, this is not genetics and let’s not pretend her skin color in her first Destiny’s Child album cover matches that of her latest album. Whether it is that highly controversial Revlon advertisement or her own album cover art, Beyonce has consistently been called out on alterations done to her pigments.

        What does this say about our society for black women? It tells me that, an independent, confident and successful woman of color still struggles to have the confidence to fully embrace the skin she is in. If one of the most powerful women in entertainment feels she has to lighten her skin for projection, what does that say for the rest of us?

        Believe it or not, colorism, the stigma associated with skin complexion, has been an ill that has not yet been dissolved by the black community. What was first given to us by slave masters in separating the house slaves from the field ones, has now taken place in how we objectify our women and each other.

        This is pretty problematic in many ways. It’s first of all self-loathing and unnecessary for today’s times. The fact that our nation had an African-American first lady with a complexion that isn’t on the lighter side of the spectrum, nor does it try to be, shows a compelling advancement in appreciation for all women of color in many ways.

         Furthermore, the only reason why such stigma in our country continues is contributed to our own behavior that is shaped by the influential people of color around us. It devastated me when I saw that Sammy Sosa had lightened his skin. As successful as he was in a field that was not necessarily fixated on male skin complexion, it saddened me to see him do it. In many ways, it even made me reflect back on the transition of the late great Michael Jackson and what explanations he had for such a more pale white appearance.

        And why does all of this matter? Because I grew up hearing stories of young dark black girls getting their faces scrubbed with skin lightening soaps out of their free will. Tales of young women being abandoned by their mothers because they were too dark.

        If this is the reality that had more implications back in the early 20th century than it does now, please stop it. Stop trying to explain why you are dating the ebony skin girl. Stop making it seem exceptional that a girl of a darker complexion is actually attractive. Celebrities, stop putting extraneous powders and lighteners on your skin: we all know what you used to look like and we still love you. And people of color: let’s not continue to perpetuate an oppressive cycle of self-loathing of our appearance and heritage. If this can be accomplished, then perhaps even in our own race we can truly make our lives not be judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.


    (adapted from www.huffingtonpost.com, 14/02/2013)

    The author of the article criticizes the fact that the producers:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d46e6a4-fd
  • 4D433AC4-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Beyonce, colorism, and why all of this needs to end


    by Ernest Owens


        Yes, the Super Bowl was on fire. As one who is very critical of halftime show performances, I cannot deny that Beyoncé brought the energy and attention. All of this led to her releasing her tour dates for the Mrs. Carter Show. As excited as I was to actually buy these tickets, something turned me off. The poster.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018


       If you haven’t seen the photographs for Beyonce’s new world tour, you probably wouldn’t even recognize her. You will see an image of what looks like a Victorian white woman in the Elizabethan era. Her (prosthetic) blonde hair puffed and extended to reveal a face that is almost as white as snow. Lips red and her skin powdered. This is not the same bronze Beyonce that I saw rocking the stage in an all female band with her darker Destiny’s Child counterparts. I was only left with memories of previous patterns that the multi-Grammy award winning artist had done in previous years in regards to her skin. And I asked myself the question: why, Bey?

         Let’s not act like this is something new. Over the years, it seems as though Beyonce has gotten lighter as she has gotten older. No, this is not genetics and let’s not pretend her skin color in her first Destiny’s Child album cover matches that of her latest album. Whether it is that highly controversial Revlon advertisement or her own album cover art, Beyonce has consistently been called out on alterations done to her pigments.

        What does this say about our society for black women? It tells me that, an independent, confident and successful woman of color still struggles to have the confidence to fully embrace the skin she is in. If one of the most powerful women in entertainment feels she has to lighten her skin for projection, what does that say for the rest of us?

        Believe it or not, colorism, the stigma associated with skin complexion, has been an ill that has not yet been dissolved by the black community. What was first given to us by slave masters in separating the house slaves from the field ones, has now taken place in how we objectify our women and each other.

        This is pretty problematic in many ways. It’s first of all self-loathing and unnecessary for today’s times. The fact that our nation had an African-American first lady with a complexion that isn’t on the lighter side of the spectrum, nor does it try to be, shows a compelling advancement in appreciation for all women of color in many ways.

         Furthermore, the only reason why such stigma in our country continues is contributed to our own behavior that is shaped by the influential people of color around us. It devastated me when I saw that Sammy Sosa had lightened his skin. As successful as he was in a field that was not necessarily fixated on male skin complexion, it saddened me to see him do it. In many ways, it even made me reflect back on the transition of the late great Michael Jackson and what explanations he had for such a more pale white appearance.

        And why does all of this matter? Because I grew up hearing stories of young dark black girls getting their faces scrubbed with skin lightening soaps out of their free will. Tales of young women being abandoned by their mothers because they were too dark.

        If this is the reality that had more implications back in the early 20th century than it does now, please stop it. Stop trying to explain why you are dating the ebony skin girl. Stop making it seem exceptional that a girl of a darker complexion is actually attractive. Celebrities, stop putting extraneous powders and lighteners on your skin: we all know what you used to look like and we still love you. And people of color: let’s not continue to perpetuate an oppressive cycle of self-loathing of our appearance and heritage. If this can be accomplished, then perhaps even in our own race we can truly make our lives not be judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character.


    (adapted from www.huffingtonpost.com, 14/02/2013)

    The author of the article:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d433ac4-fd
  • 4D4059CB-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    How James Brown Made Black Pride a Hit

    It’s been 50 years since he wrote “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud,” a song that is still necessary.

    By Randall Kennedy

       In the gym at Paul Junior High School in Washington, D.C., in the spring of 1968, not that long before the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., I asked a buddy whether he was interested in a certain girl. He told me that he was not because she was too dark.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
       
       He and I were African-American. (Then we would have called ourselves Negro.) So was she. All of us supported the Civil Rights Movement and idolized Dr. King, yet I did not hold my friend’s colorstruck judgment against him. And he did not state his opinion with embarrassment. We had both internalized our society’s derogation of blackness.
        Indeed, we luxuriated in the denigration, spending hours trading silly, recycled but revealing insults: “Yo mama so black, she blend in with the chalkboard.” “Yeah, well, yo mama so black, she sweats chocolate.”
       It was precisely because of widespread colorism that James Brown’s anthem “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud” posed a challenge, felt so exhilarating, and resonated so powerfully. It still does. Much has changed over the past half century. But, alas, the need to defend blackness against derision continues.
        Various musicians in the 1960s tapped into yearnings for black assertiveness, autonomy and solidarity. Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions sang “We’re a Winner.” Sly and the Family Stone offered “Stand.” Sam Cooke (and Aretha Franklin and Otis Redding) performed “A Change is Gonna Come.” But no entertainer equaled Brown’s vocalization of African-Americans’ newly triumphal sense of self-acceptance.
       That Brown created the song most popularly associated with the Black is Beautiful movement is ironic. He generally stayed away from protest, endorsed the presidential re-election of Richard Nixon, lavishly praised Ronald Reagan, and consistently lauded Strom Thurmond.
       His infrequent sallies into politics usually sounded in patriotic, lift-yourselfup-ism. In the song “America is My Home,” he proclaimed without embarrassment that the United States “is still the best country / And that’s without a doubt.” Alluding to his own trajectory, he challenged dissenters to name any other country in which a person could start out as a poor shoeshine boy but end up as a wealthy celebrity shaking hands with the president.
       At the very time that in “Say It Loud,” Brown seemed to be affirming Negritude, he also sported a “conk” — a distinctive hairdo that involved chemically removing kinkiness on the way to creating a bouffant of straightened hair. Many AfricanAmerican political activists, especially those with a black nationalist orientation, decried the conk as an illustration of racial self-hatred. For a brief period, Brown abandoned the conk and adopted an Afro, but that was only temporary. The conk was part of the characteristic look of “The Godfather of Soul.”
       Even though by 1968 uprisings against white supremacism had been erupting for a decade with great intensity and success — the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Children’s’ Crusade in Birmingham, the protest against disenfranchisement in Selma — prejudice against blackness remained prevalent, including among African-Americans.
       Champions of African-American uplift in the 1960s sought to liberate blackness from the layers of contempt, fear, and hatred with which it had been smeared for centuries. Brown’s anthem poignantly reflected the psychic problem it sought to address. People secure in their status don’t feel compelled to trumpet their pride. At the same time “Say it Loud!” was a rousing instance of a reclamation that took many forms. Instead of celebrating light skin, thin lips, and “good” (i.e., straight) hair, increasing numbers of African-Americans began valorizing dark skin, thick lips and “bad” (i.e., kinky) hair.
        The reclamation of blackness in the sixties made tremendous headway quickly. By 1970 my friend would not have dared to repeat out loud what he had told me unapologetically two years before. Here, as elsewhere, however, changes wrought by the black liberation movement, though impressive, were only partial. Nearly four decades after the release of “Say It Loud,” Professors Jennifer Hochschild and Vesla Weaver, having synthesized the pertinent academic literature, declared authoritatively that compared to their lighter-skinned counterparts, dark-skinned blacks continue to be burdened by lower levels of education, income, and job status. They receive longer prison sentences and are less likely to own homes or to marry. Filmmakers, advertisers, modeling agencies, dating websites and other key gatekeepers demonstrate repeatedly the ongoing pertinence of the old saw: If you’re black get back. If you’re brown, stick around. If you’re white you’re alright.
          Intraracial colorism in Black America is often seen as a topic that should, if possible, be avoided, especially in “mixed company.” That sense of embarrassment three decades ago prompted officials at Morehouse College to demand that Spike Lee cease filming on campus once they learned that his movie was exposing, among other things, black collegiate colorism. The impulse toward avoidance remains strong.
        With racial prejudice against all African-Americans still a potent force, many would just as soon ditch the discussion of “black on black” complexional bias. Colorism, however, remains a baleful reality.
       Half a century after James Brown’s proclamation, it remains imperative to assert what should have been assumed and uncontroversial all along: that black is beautiful and as worthy of pride and care and consideration as any other hue.

    (Adapted from: www.nytimes.com, 20/07/2018)
    As of late 1960s, after the release of “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud”:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d4059cb-fd
  • 4D3D69AD-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    How James Brown Made Black Pride a Hit

    It’s been 50 years since he wrote “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud,” a song that is still necessary.

    By Randall Kennedy

       In the gym at Paul Junior High School in Washington, D.C., in the spring of 1968, not that long before the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., I asked a buddy whether he was interested in a certain girl. He told me that he was not because she was too dark.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
       
       He and I were African-American. (Then we would have called ourselves Negro.) So was she. All of us supported the Civil Rights Movement and idolized Dr. King, yet I did not hold my friend’s colorstruck judgment against him. And he did not state his opinion with embarrassment. We had both internalized our society’s derogation of blackness.
        Indeed, we luxuriated in the denigration, spending hours trading silly, recycled but revealing insults: “Yo mama so black, she blend in with the chalkboard.” “Yeah, well, yo mama so black, she sweats chocolate.”
       It was precisely because of widespread colorism that James Brown’s anthem “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud” posed a challenge, felt so exhilarating, and resonated so powerfully. It still does. Much has changed over the past half century. But, alas, the need to defend blackness against derision continues.
        Various musicians in the 1960s tapped into yearnings for black assertiveness, autonomy and solidarity. Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions sang “We’re a Winner.” Sly and the Family Stone offered “Stand.” Sam Cooke (and Aretha Franklin and Otis Redding) performed “A Change is Gonna Come.” But no entertainer equaled Brown’s vocalization of African-Americans’ newly triumphal sense of self-acceptance.
       That Brown created the song most popularly associated with the Black is Beautiful movement is ironic. He generally stayed away from protest, endorsed the presidential re-election of Richard Nixon, lavishly praised Ronald Reagan, and consistently lauded Strom Thurmond.
       His infrequent sallies into politics usually sounded in patriotic, lift-yourselfup-ism. In the song “America is My Home,” he proclaimed without embarrassment that the United States “is still the best country / And that’s without a doubt.” Alluding to his own trajectory, he challenged dissenters to name any other country in which a person could start out as a poor shoeshine boy but end up as a wealthy celebrity shaking hands with the president.
       At the very time that in “Say It Loud,” Brown seemed to be affirming Negritude, he also sported a “conk” — a distinctive hairdo that involved chemically removing kinkiness on the way to creating a bouffant of straightened hair. Many AfricanAmerican political activists, especially those with a black nationalist orientation, decried the conk as an illustration of racial self-hatred. For a brief period, Brown abandoned the conk and adopted an Afro, but that was only temporary. The conk was part of the characteristic look of “The Godfather of Soul.”
       Even though by 1968 uprisings against white supremacism had been erupting for a decade with great intensity and success — the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Children’s’ Crusade in Birmingham, the protest against disenfranchisement in Selma — prejudice against blackness remained prevalent, including among African-Americans.
       Champions of African-American uplift in the 1960s sought to liberate blackness from the layers of contempt, fear, and hatred with which it had been smeared for centuries. Brown’s anthem poignantly reflected the psychic problem it sought to address. People secure in their status don’t feel compelled to trumpet their pride. At the same time “Say it Loud!” was a rousing instance of a reclamation that took many forms. Instead of celebrating light skin, thin lips, and “good” (i.e., straight) hair, increasing numbers of African-Americans began valorizing dark skin, thick lips and “bad” (i.e., kinky) hair.
        The reclamation of blackness in the sixties made tremendous headway quickly. By 1970 my friend would not have dared to repeat out loud what he had told me unapologetically two years before. Here, as elsewhere, however, changes wrought by the black liberation movement, though impressive, were only partial. Nearly four decades after the release of “Say It Loud,” Professors Jennifer Hochschild and Vesla Weaver, having synthesized the pertinent academic literature, declared authoritatively that compared to their lighter-skinned counterparts, dark-skinned blacks continue to be burdened by lower levels of education, income, and job status. They receive longer prison sentences and are less likely to own homes or to marry. Filmmakers, advertisers, modeling agencies, dating websites and other key gatekeepers demonstrate repeatedly the ongoing pertinence of the old saw: If you’re black get back. If you’re brown, stick around. If you’re white you’re alright.
          Intraracial colorism in Black America is often seen as a topic that should, if possible, be avoided, especially in “mixed company.” That sense of embarrassment three decades ago prompted officials at Morehouse College to demand that Spike Lee cease filming on campus once they learned that his movie was exposing, among other things, black collegiate colorism. The impulse toward avoidance remains strong.
        With racial prejudice against all African-Americans still a potent force, many would just as soon ditch the discussion of “black on black” complexional bias. Colorism, however, remains a baleful reality.
       Half a century after James Brown’s proclamation, it remains imperative to assert what should have been assumed and uncontroversial all along: that black is beautiful and as worthy of pride and care and consideration as any other hue.

    (Adapted from: www.nytimes.com, 20/07/2018)
    The text mentions a certain paradox in Brown’s attitudes. This is because:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d3d69ad-fd
  • 4D3A8C71-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    How James Brown Made Black Pride a Hit

    It’s been 50 years since he wrote “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud,” a song that is still necessary.

    By Randall Kennedy

       In the gym at Paul Junior High School in Washington, D.C., in the spring of 1968, not that long before the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., I asked a buddy whether he was interested in a certain girl. He told me that he was not because she was too dark.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
       
       He and I were African-American. (Then we would have called ourselves Negro.) So was she. All of us supported the Civil Rights Movement and idolized Dr. King, yet I did not hold my friend’s colorstruck judgment against him. And he did not state his opinion with embarrassment. We had both internalized our society’s derogation of blackness.
        Indeed, we luxuriated in the denigration, spending hours trading silly, recycled but revealing insults: “Yo mama so black, she blend in with the chalkboard.” “Yeah, well, yo mama so black, she sweats chocolate.”
       It was precisely because of widespread colorism that James Brown’s anthem “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud” posed a challenge, felt so exhilarating, and resonated so powerfully. It still does. Much has changed over the past half century. But, alas, the need to defend blackness against derision continues.
        Various musicians in the 1960s tapped into yearnings for black assertiveness, autonomy and solidarity. Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions sang “We’re a Winner.” Sly and the Family Stone offered “Stand.” Sam Cooke (and Aretha Franklin and Otis Redding) performed “A Change is Gonna Come.” But no entertainer equaled Brown’s vocalization of African-Americans’ newly triumphal sense of self-acceptance.
       That Brown created the song most popularly associated with the Black is Beautiful movement is ironic. He generally stayed away from protest, endorsed the presidential re-election of Richard Nixon, lavishly praised Ronald Reagan, and consistently lauded Strom Thurmond.
       His infrequent sallies into politics usually sounded in patriotic, lift-yourselfup-ism. In the song “America is My Home,” he proclaimed without embarrassment that the United States “is still the best country / And that’s without a doubt.” Alluding to his own trajectory, he challenged dissenters to name any other country in which a person could start out as a poor shoeshine boy but end up as a wealthy celebrity shaking hands with the president.
       At the very time that in “Say It Loud,” Brown seemed to be affirming Negritude, he also sported a “conk” — a distinctive hairdo that involved chemically removing kinkiness on the way to creating a bouffant of straightened hair. Many AfricanAmerican political activists, especially those with a black nationalist orientation, decried the conk as an illustration of racial self-hatred. For a brief period, Brown abandoned the conk and adopted an Afro, but that was only temporary. The conk was part of the characteristic look of “The Godfather of Soul.”
       Even though by 1968 uprisings against white supremacism had been erupting for a decade with great intensity and success — the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Children’s’ Crusade in Birmingham, the protest against disenfranchisement in Selma — prejudice against blackness remained prevalent, including among African-Americans.
       Champions of African-American uplift in the 1960s sought to liberate blackness from the layers of contempt, fear, and hatred with which it had been smeared for centuries. Brown’s anthem poignantly reflected the psychic problem it sought to address. People secure in their status don’t feel compelled to trumpet their pride. At the same time “Say it Loud!” was a rousing instance of a reclamation that took many forms. Instead of celebrating light skin, thin lips, and “good” (i.e., straight) hair, increasing numbers of African-Americans began valorizing dark skin, thick lips and “bad” (i.e., kinky) hair.
        The reclamation of blackness in the sixties made tremendous headway quickly. By 1970 my friend would not have dared to repeat out loud what he had told me unapologetically two years before. Here, as elsewhere, however, changes wrought by the black liberation movement, though impressive, were only partial. Nearly four decades after the release of “Say It Loud,” Professors Jennifer Hochschild and Vesla Weaver, having synthesized the pertinent academic literature, declared authoritatively that compared to their lighter-skinned counterparts, dark-skinned blacks continue to be burdened by lower levels of education, income, and job status. They receive longer prison sentences and are less likely to own homes or to marry. Filmmakers, advertisers, modeling agencies, dating websites and other key gatekeepers demonstrate repeatedly the ongoing pertinence of the old saw: If you’re black get back. If you’re brown, stick around. If you’re white you’re alright.
          Intraracial colorism in Black America is often seen as a topic that should, if possible, be avoided, especially in “mixed company.” That sense of embarrassment three decades ago prompted officials at Morehouse College to demand that Spike Lee cease filming on campus once they learned that his movie was exposing, among other things, black collegiate colorism. The impulse toward avoidance remains strong.
        With racial prejudice against all African-Americans still a potent force, many would just as soon ditch the discussion of “black on black” complexional bias. Colorism, however, remains a baleful reality.
       Half a century after James Brown’s proclamation, it remains imperative to assert what should have been assumed and uncontroversial all along: that black is beautiful and as worthy of pride and care and consideration as any other hue.

    (Adapted from: www.nytimes.com, 20/07/2018)
    In the second paragraph, the boldfaced sentence: “We had both internalized our society’s derogation of blackness.” means that:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d3a8c71-fd
  • 4D375132-FD

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018Muito difícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    How James Brown Made Black Pride a Hit

    It’s been 50 years since he wrote “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud,” a song that is still necessary.

    By Randall Kennedy

       In the gym at Paul Junior High School in Washington, D.C., in the spring of 1968, not that long before the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., I asked a buddy whether he was interested in a certain girl. He told me that he was not because she was too dark.

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, da prova de 2018
       
       He and I were African-American. (Then we would have called ourselves Negro.) So was she. All of us supported the Civil Rights Movement and idolized Dr. King, yet I did not hold my friend’s colorstruck judgment against him. And he did not state his opinion with embarrassment. We had both internalized our society’s derogation of blackness.
        Indeed, we luxuriated in the denigration, spending hours trading silly, recycled but revealing insults: “Yo mama so black, she blend in with the chalkboard.” “Yeah, well, yo mama so black, she sweats chocolate.”
       It was precisely because of widespread colorism that James Brown’s anthem “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud” posed a challenge, felt so exhilarating, and resonated so powerfully. It still does. Much has changed over the past half century. But, alas, the need to defend blackness against derision continues.
        Various musicians in the 1960s tapped into yearnings for black assertiveness, autonomy and solidarity. Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions sang “We’re a Winner.” Sly and the Family Stone offered “Stand.” Sam Cooke (and Aretha Franklin and Otis Redding) performed “A Change is Gonna Come.” But no entertainer equaled Brown’s vocalization of African-Americans’ newly triumphal sense of self-acceptance.
       That Brown created the song most popularly associated with the Black is Beautiful movement is ironic. He generally stayed away from protest, endorsed the presidential re-election of Richard Nixon, lavishly praised Ronald Reagan, and consistently lauded Strom Thurmond.
       His infrequent sallies into politics usually sounded in patriotic, lift-yourselfup-ism. In the song “America is My Home,” he proclaimed without embarrassment that the United States “is still the best country / And that’s without a doubt.” Alluding to his own trajectory, he challenged dissenters to name any other country in which a person could start out as a poor shoeshine boy but end up as a wealthy celebrity shaking hands with the president.
       At the very time that in “Say It Loud,” Brown seemed to be affirming Negritude, he also sported a “conk” — a distinctive hairdo that involved chemically removing kinkiness on the way to creating a bouffant of straightened hair. Many AfricanAmerican political activists, especially those with a black nationalist orientation, decried the conk as an illustration of racial self-hatred. For a brief period, Brown abandoned the conk and adopted an Afro, but that was only temporary. The conk was part of the characteristic look of “The Godfather of Soul.”
       Even though by 1968 uprisings against white supremacism had been erupting for a decade with great intensity and success — the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Children’s’ Crusade in Birmingham, the protest against disenfranchisement in Selma — prejudice against blackness remained prevalent, including among African-Americans.
       Champions of African-American uplift in the 1960s sought to liberate blackness from the layers of contempt, fear, and hatred with which it had been smeared for centuries. Brown’s anthem poignantly reflected the psychic problem it sought to address. People secure in their status don’t feel compelled to trumpet their pride. At the same time “Say it Loud!” was a rousing instance of a reclamation that took many forms. Instead of celebrating light skin, thin lips, and “good” (i.e., straight) hair, increasing numbers of African-Americans began valorizing dark skin, thick lips and “bad” (i.e., kinky) hair.
        The reclamation of blackness in the sixties made tremendous headway quickly. By 1970 my friend would not have dared to repeat out loud what he had told me unapologetically two years before. Here, as elsewhere, however, changes wrought by the black liberation movement, though impressive, were only partial. Nearly four decades after the release of “Say It Loud,” Professors Jennifer Hochschild and Vesla Weaver, having synthesized the pertinent academic literature, declared authoritatively that compared to their lighter-skinned counterparts, dark-skinned blacks continue to be burdened by lower levels of education, income, and job status. They receive longer prison sentences and are less likely to own homes or to marry. Filmmakers, advertisers, modeling agencies, dating websites and other key gatekeepers demonstrate repeatedly the ongoing pertinence of the old saw: If you’re black get back. If you’re brown, stick around. If you’re white you’re alright.
          Intraracial colorism in Black America is often seen as a topic that should, if possible, be avoided, especially in “mixed company.” That sense of embarrassment three decades ago prompted officials at Morehouse College to demand that Spike Lee cease filming on campus once they learned that his movie was exposing, among other things, black collegiate colorism. The impulse toward avoidance remains strong.
        With racial prejudice against all African-Americans still a potent force, many would just as soon ditch the discussion of “black on black” complexional bias. Colorism, however, remains a baleful reality.
       Half a century after James Brown’s proclamation, it remains imperative to assert what should have been assumed and uncontroversial all along: that black is beautiful and as worthy of pride and care and consideration as any other hue.

    (Adapted from: www.nytimes.com, 20/07/2018)
    An important idea brought by the text is that James Brown’s song “Say It Loud, I’m Black and I’m Proud” was a milestone in the defense of:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4d375132-fd
  • 4CF2184D-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    (...)Pergunto-me se eu deveria caminhar à frente do tempo e esboçar logo um final. Acontece porém que eu mesmo ainda não sei bem como esse isto terminará. E também porque entendo que devo caminhar passo a passo de acordo com um prazo determinado por horas: até um bicho lida com o tempo. E esta também é minha mais primeira condição: a de caminhar paulatinamente apesar da impaciência que tenho em relação a essa moça.

    (Clarice Lispector, A Hora da Estrela)

    O comentário acima, sobre a história de Macabéa, pertence ao narrador Rodrigo S.M. Assinale a afirmação correta. O narrador:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4cf2184d-fd
  • 4CEEC3E2-FD

    Português

    Flexão verbal de modo (indicativo, subjuntivo, imperativo)
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A um passarinho

    Para que vieste
    Na minha janela
    Meter o nariz?
    Se foi por um verso
    Não sou mais poeta
    Ando tão feliz!
    Se é para uma prosa
    Não sou Anchieta
    Nem venho de Assis.
    Deixa-te de histórias
    Some-te daqui!

    (Vinicius de Moraes)

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2018
    Os dois últimos versos trazem a forma verbal no Imperativo Afirmativo, na segunda pessoa do singular (tu). Se estivessem na segunda pessoa do plural (vós), teríamos:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ceec3e2-fd
  • 4CEB6FF6-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A um passarinho

    Para que vieste
    Na minha janela
    Meter o nariz?
    Se foi por um verso
    Não sou mais poeta
    Ando tão feliz!
    Se é para uma prosa
    Não sou Anchieta
    Nem venho de Assis.
    Deixa-te de histórias
    Some-te daqui!

    (Vinicius de Moraes)

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2018
    A partir da leitura do poema e da observação da imagem, assinale a afirmação correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ceb6ff6-fd
  • 4CE7E5F2-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    A zoomorfização na Literatura, a despeito de qualquer outra característica estilística, sempre esteve presente, no entanto, aparece principalmente nas obras com características realistas que, em contraponto àquelas com aspectos mais românticos, têm o intento de retratar as mazelas da sociedade como espelho. (...)
    Fez-se necessário uma Literatura condizente com o real e, para tanto, a zoomorfização de personagens foi utilizada com maior ênfase. Paralelo ao Realismo, o Naturalismo é o momento em que mais se verifica este fenômeno. (Uesla Lima Soares , O Animal Humano: Os paradigmas da zoomorfização social e sua representação literária, Anais do Festival Literário de Paulo Afonso, 2017)
    [O zoomorfismo] ocorre quando “o que é próprio do homem se estende ao animal e permite, por simetria, que o que é próprio do animal se estenda ao homem.”

    (Antonio Cândido, De Cortiço a Cortiço, Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 1991).

    Considere as seguintes afirmações:

    I. A zoomorfização se opôs frontalmente às idealizações românticas, sendo uma característica exclusiva do Naturalismo.
    II. Segundo Antonio Candido, não é possível haver distinção entre ser humano e animal, no sentido de que um cede característica ao outro e vice-versa.
    III. A definição de Antonio Candido sobre zoomorfismo é construída por meio de um processo chamado quiasmo.

    A respeito de tais afirmações, deve-se dizer que:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ce7e5f2-fd
  • 4CE49E9E-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho que segue é da personagem Olga, de Triste Fim de Policarpo Quaresma, romance de Lima Barreto.

        O que mais a impressionou no passeio foi a miséria geral, a falta de cultivo, a pobreza das casas, o ar triste, abatido da gente pobre. (...) Havendo tanto barro, tanta água, por que as casas não eram de tijolos e não tinham telhas? Era sempre aquele sapê sinistro e aquele “sopapo” que deixava ver a trama de varas, como o esqueleto de um doente. Por que ao redor dessas casas não havia culturas, uma horta, um pomar? (...) Não podia ser preguiça só ou indolência. Para o seu gasto, para uso próprio, o homem tem sempre energia para trabalhar relativamente. (...) Seria a terra? Que seria? E todas essas questões desafiavam a sua curiosidade, o seu desejo de saber, e também a sua piedade e simpatia por aqueles párias, maltrapilhos, mal alojados, talvez com fome, sorumbáticos!...

    (Lima Barreto, Triste Fim de Policarpo Quaresma)
    Em Lima Barreto, a sequência grande de perguntas ao longo do texto configura o:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ce49e9e-fd
  • 4CE195C4-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho que segue é da personagem Olga, de Triste Fim de Policarpo Quaresma, romance de Lima Barreto.

        O que mais a impressionou no passeio foi a miséria geral, a falta de cultivo, a pobreza das casas, o ar triste, abatido da gente pobre. (...) Havendo tanto barro, tanta água, por que as casas não eram de tijolos e não tinham telhas? Era sempre aquele sapê sinistro e aquele “sopapo” que deixava ver a trama de varas, como o esqueleto de um doente. Por que ao redor dessas casas não havia culturas, uma horta, um pomar? (...) Não podia ser preguiça só ou indolência. Para o seu gasto, para uso próprio, o homem tem sempre energia para trabalhar relativamente. (...) Seria a terra? Que seria? E todas essas questões desafiavam a sua curiosidade, o seu desejo de saber, e também a sua piedade e simpatia por aqueles párias, maltrapilhos, mal alojados, talvez com fome, sorumbáticos!...

    (Lima Barreto, Triste Fim de Policarpo Quaresma)
    É possível estabelecer um paralelo entre a passagem acima e outros textos da Literatura brasileira por apresentarem reflexões críticas em relação à miséria, similares ao pensamento de Olga. Essa abordagem ocorre nas referências abaixo, exceto em uma.

    Assinale o item cuja obra não é passível de ser relacionada com o exposto acima.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ce195c4-fd
  • 4CDD5EEE-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    (...) O mal du siècle, a indefinível doença que alanceia os românticos, que lhes enlanguesce a vontade, entedia a vida e faz desejar a morte, só poderá ser correctamente entendido no contexto da odisseia do eu romântico, pois que exprime o cansaço e a frustração resultantes da impossibilidade de realizar o absoluto. (...)

    (Vítor Manuel de Aguiar e Silva, Teoria da Literatura, 8.ª edição, Livraria Almedina, Coimbra, 1988)

    A partir das considerações sobre o “mal-do-século”, assinale o item cujo texto não apresente as características apontadas.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4cdd5eee-fd
  • 4CDA2F58-FD

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Considere os textos que seguem.

    Eu tenho um coração maior que o mundo,
    tu, formosa Marília, bem o sabes;
    um coração, e basta,
    onde tu mesma cabes.

    (Tomás Antônio Gonzaga, Marília de Dirceu)

    Não, meu coração não é maior que o mundo. É muito menor. Nele não cabem sequer as minhas dores.

    (Carlos Drummond de Andrade, Sentimento do Mundo)

    Assinale a afirmação correta sobre os dois textos:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4cda2f58-fd