Pular para o conteúdo

Questões do ENEM: Linguagens

Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

Resultados

18.995 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 277 de 950.

  • 60DCDA68-09

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UEA · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Leia os versos do poema “Os estatutos do homem”, de Thiago de Mello, para responder às questões 32 e 33.


    Artigo 12

    Decreta-se que nada será obrigado nem proibido.

    Tudo será permitido,

    sobretudo brincar com os rinocerontes

    e caminhar pelas tardes

    com uma imensa begônia na lapela.

    (Estatutos do homem, 1986.)


    No poema, expressam uma regra geral e um exemplo dessa regra, respectivamente,

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 60dcda68-09
  • 60D9E0A0-09

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UEA · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O aparecimento de elementos de linguagem poética, fantasiosa, no interior de um formato tipicamente jurídico reafirma
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 60d9e0a0-09
  • 60D5EAFB-09

    Literatura

    Arcadismo
    UEA · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Nos anos em que atuaram estes escritores, a poesia brasileira percorreu os meandros do extremo subjetivismo, à Byron e à Musset. Alguns poetas adolescentes, mortos antes de tocarem a plena juventude, darão exemplo de toda uma temática emotiva de amor e morte, dúvida e ironia, entusiasmo e tédio.

    (Alfredo Bosi. História concisa da literatura brasileira, 2006. Adaptado.)

    O texto refere-se
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 60d5eafb-09
  • 60C50C3C-09

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UEA · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Considere o poema de Chacal para responder à questão.


    Beijo beijos

    qual o sentido da palavra beijo?

    ato de tocar com os lábios em alguém

    ou alguma coisa, fazendo leve sucção; ósculo?

    ou aquele que o cauã reymond deu na mariana

    ximenes na novela?

    ou aquele que você deu no daniel que só você sentiu?

    que é diferente do que eu dei na dolores que nunca

    vou esquecer.

    já a gabi, sempre que sai de casa, dá em sua mãe

    um beijo automático

    parecido com os dois beijos de cumprimento que eu

    dou numa garota

    se estiver no rio, um em são paulo ou três em minas

    gerais.

    diferente ainda do beijo de despedida apaixonado que

    você deu no julinho

    quando ele foi para a austrália

    diferente do derradeiro beijo no leito de morte que o

    luís deu na laís, sua avó

    ou do beijo da traição de judas ou do beijo que a

    princesa deu no sapo.

    diante de tantos sentidos diferentes da palavra beijo,

    a melhor forma de saber o que significa é ir direto ao

    assunto:

    língua pra que te quero!

    (Murundum, 2012.)

    Os dois últimos versos do poema
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 60c50c3c-09
  • 60C16F53-09

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    UEA · 2018Muito fácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Considere o poema de Chacal para responder à questão.


    Beijo beijos

    qual o sentido da palavra beijo?

    ato de tocar com os lábios em alguém

    ou alguma coisa, fazendo leve sucção; ósculo?

    ou aquele que o cauã reymond deu na mariana

    ximenes na novela?

    ou aquele que você deu no daniel que só você sentiu?

    que é diferente do que eu dei na dolores que nunca

    vou esquecer.

    já a gabi, sempre que sai de casa, dá em sua mãe

    um beijo automático

    parecido com os dois beijos de cumprimento que eu

    dou numa garota

    se estiver no rio, um em são paulo ou três em minas

    gerais.

    diferente ainda do beijo de despedida apaixonado que

    você deu no julinho

    quando ele foi para a austrália

    diferente do derradeiro beijo no leito de morte que o

    luís deu na laís, sua avó

    ou do beijo da traição de judas ou do beijo que a

    princesa deu no sapo.

    diante de tantos sentidos diferentes da palavra beijo,

    a melhor forma de saber o que significa é ir direto ao

    assunto:

    língua pra que te quero!

    (Murundum, 2012.)

    Em grande parte da primeira estrofe, o eu lírico
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 60c16f53-09
  • 7A2AF7AA-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    Assinale a alternativa cujo trecho evidencia a posição atual da autora sobre o desafio apresentado no título.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a2af7aa-07
  • 7A265900-07

    Inglês

    Palavras conectivas | Connective words
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Palavras conectivas | Connective words

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do sétimo parágrafo “However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue”, o termo sublinhado pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido, por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a265900-07
  • 7A22BE7A-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    De acordo com o quinto e o sexto parágrafos, um dos benefícios dos dados médicos disponíveis na internet é
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a22be7a-07
  • 7A1E9DEB-07

    Inglês

    Tradução | Translation
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Tradução | Translation

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do quinto parágrafo “as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent”, o termo sublinhado equivale, em português, a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a1e9deb-07
  • 7A1AD14F-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    De acordo com o quarto parágrafo, a profissão médica contribui para que as pessoas recorram à internet em vez de recorrer a médicos. A justificativa apresentada é que
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a1ad14f-07
  • 7A174830-07

    Inglês

    Tradução | Translation
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Tradução | Translation

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do quarto parágrafo “the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source”, a expressão sublinhada equivale, em português, a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a174830-07
  • 7A141CC3-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No terceiro parágrafo, o termo “expertise” está entre aspas para
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a141cc3-07
  • 7A10751B-07

    Inglês

    Verbos modais | Modal verbs
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Verbos modais | Modal verbs

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “I’d recommended that she try a medicine”, o termo sublinhado pode ser corretamente substituído por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a10751b-07
  • 7A0D0E0F-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you”, o termo sublinhado refere-se
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a0d0e0f-07
  • 7A0990C5-07

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o texto para responder à questão. 

    The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Centro Universitário São Camilo 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

         “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options. 
          “Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.
         More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.
         In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.
         But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.
        The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.
         However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.
          Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.

    (Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling and
    Mental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and the
    University Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
    Em seu texto, a autora
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a0990c5-07
  • 79BE2771-07

    Português

    Coesão e coerência
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o trecho do livro A dança do universo, do físico brasileiro Marcelo Gleiser, para responder à questão.

         Na dedicatória de seu livro O progresso da sabedoria (1605) a Jaime I, sir Francis Bacon declara: “de todas as pessoas ainda vivas que conheci, sua Majestade é o melhor exemplo de um homem que representa a opinião de Platão, de que todo conhecimento é apenas memória”. Embora Platão tenha provavelmente escrito essas linhas como uma alegoria à sua crença na imortalidade da alma, e Bacon, como parte de um astuto plano para obter certos favores do rei, podemos nos referir a elas como uma alegoria à enorme importância que o pensamento grego exerceu e exerce no desenvolvimento da cultura ocidental.
          Após derrotar os persas em uma série de conflitos durante as primeiras décadas do século V a.C., a civilização grega viveu um século e meio de grande esplendor, inspirada pela liderança de Péricles, que governou Atenas por 32 anos, de 461 a 429. Nem mesmo as amargas disputas entre Atenas, Esparta e outros Estados, que acabaram resultando na Guerra do Peloponeso, entre 431 e 404, conseguiram ofuscar o incrível nível de sofisticação atingido durante esse período. Nas palavras de H. G. Wells, “durante esse período o pensamento e o impulso criativo e artístico dos gregos ascenderam a níveis que os transformaram numa fonte de luz para o resto da História”. Que essa luz tenha continuado a brilhar através dos tempos, sobrevivendo a séculos de intolerância religiosa e muitas guerras, é a prova concreta de coragem intelectual daqueles que acreditam que a busca do conhecimento é o antídoto contra a cegueira causada pela repressão e pelo medo.

    (A dança do universo, 2006. Adaptado.)
    “Embora Platão tenha provavelmente escrito essas linhas como uma alegoria à sua crença na imortalidade da alma, e Bacon, como parte de um astuto plano para obter certos favores do rei, podemos nos referir a elas como uma alegoria à enorme importância que o pensamento grego exerceu e exerce no desenvolvimento da cultura ocidental.” (1° parágrafo)

    Tendo em vista as relações de sentido estabelecidas entre as orações que compõem esse período, a conjunção sublinhada pode ser substituída, sem prejuízo para o sentido, por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 79be2771-07
  • 79BA2E33-07

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o trecho do livro A dança do universo, do físico brasileiro Marcelo Gleiser, para responder à questão.

         Na dedicatória de seu livro O progresso da sabedoria (1605) a Jaime I, sir Francis Bacon declara: “de todas as pessoas ainda vivas que conheci, sua Majestade é o melhor exemplo de um homem que representa a opinião de Platão, de que todo conhecimento é apenas memória”. Embora Platão tenha provavelmente escrito essas linhas como uma alegoria à sua crença na imortalidade da alma, e Bacon, como parte de um astuto plano para obter certos favores do rei, podemos nos referir a elas como uma alegoria à enorme importância que o pensamento grego exerceu e exerce no desenvolvimento da cultura ocidental.
          Após derrotar os persas em uma série de conflitos durante as primeiras décadas do século V a.C., a civilização grega viveu um século e meio de grande esplendor, inspirada pela liderança de Péricles, que governou Atenas por 32 anos, de 461 a 429. Nem mesmo as amargas disputas entre Atenas, Esparta e outros Estados, que acabaram resultando na Guerra do Peloponeso, entre 431 e 404, conseguiram ofuscar o incrível nível de sofisticação atingido durante esse período. Nas palavras de H. G. Wells, “durante esse período o pensamento e o impulso criativo e artístico dos gregos ascenderam a níveis que os transformaram numa fonte de luz para o resto da História”. Que essa luz tenha continuado a brilhar através dos tempos, sobrevivendo a séculos de intolerância religiosa e muitas guerras, é a prova concreta de coragem intelectual daqueles que acreditam que a busca do conhecimento é o antídoto contra a cegueira causada pela repressão e pelo medo.

    (A dança do universo, 2006. Adaptado.)
    Está empregado em sentido figurado o termo sublinhado em:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 79ba2e33-07
  • 79B6812E-07

    Português

    Flexão verbal de modo (indicativo, subjuntivo, imperativo)
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o poema do escritor português Fernando Pessoa para responder à questão. 

    Às vezes, em sonho triste
    Nos meus desejos existe
    Longinquamente um país
    Onde ser feliz consiste
    Apenas em ser feliz.

    Vive-se como se nasce
    Sem o querer nem saber.
    Nessa ilusão de viver
    O tempo morre e renasce
    Sem que o sintamos correr. 

    O sentir e o desejar
    São banidos dessa terra.
    O amor não é amor
    Nesse país por onde erra
    Meu longínquo divagar.

    Nem se sonha nem se vive:
    É uma infância sem fim.
    Parece que se revive
    Tão suave é viver assim
    Nesse impossível jardim.

    (Obra poética, 1997.)
    Os versos “O sentir e o desejar / São banidos dessa terra.” (3a estrofe) podem ser reescritos, sem prejuízo para o seu sentido e respeitando-se a correção gramatical, da seguinte forma:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 79b6812e-07
  • 79B2EFF6-07

    Português

    Coesão e coerência
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018Muito fácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o poema do escritor português Fernando Pessoa para responder à questão. 

    Às vezes, em sonho triste
    Nos meus desejos existe
    Longinquamente um país
    Onde ser feliz consiste
    Apenas em ser feliz.

    Vive-se como se nasce
    Sem o querer nem saber.
    Nessa ilusão de viver
    O tempo morre e renasce
    Sem que o sintamos correr. 

    O sentir e o desejar
    São banidos dessa terra.
    O amor não é amor
    Nesse país por onde erra
    Meu longínquo divagar.

    Nem se sonha nem se vive:
    É uma infância sem fim.
    Parece que se revive
    Tão suave é viver assim
    Nesse impossível jardim.

    (Obra poética, 1997.)
    Em “Sem que o sintamos correr.” (2a estrofe), o termo sublinhado refere-se a
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 79b2eff6-07
  • 79AF40F8-07

    Português

    Figuras de Linguagem
    Centro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o poema do escritor português Fernando Pessoa para responder à questão. 

    Às vezes, em sonho triste
    Nos meus desejos existe
    Longinquamente um país
    Onde ser feliz consiste
    Apenas em ser feliz.

    Vive-se como se nasce
    Sem o querer nem saber.
    Nessa ilusão de viver
    O tempo morre e renasce
    Sem que o sintamos correr. 

    O sentir e o desejar
    São banidos dessa terra.
    O amor não é amor
    Nesse país por onde erra
    Meu longínquo divagar.

    Nem se sonha nem se vive:
    É uma infância sem fim.
    Parece que se revive
    Tão suave é viver assim
    Nesse impossível jardim.

    (Obra poética, 1997.)
    O eu lírico recorre a uma construção paradoxal em:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 79af40f8-07