Questões do ENEM: com imagem

Resultados

23.294 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 412 de 1165.

• 62AA645B-B0

  Português

  Coesão e coerênciaPUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Os textos a seguir servirão de base para a realização da questão.

  
  Texto I

  Desafio da nossa época é lidar com a abundância

  Leandro Narloch, Folha de S.Paulo - 25.abr.2018 às 9h06

  
  A abundância, quem diria, se tornou um problema. A humanidade passou milênios tentando sobreviver à fome, ao desabrigo e à escassez: hoje precisa aprender a lidar com excesso.

  Temos alimentos demais, bugigangas demais, roupas, carros, embalagens, papéis, remédios, drogas, livros, filmes, eletrônicos e diversões demais. Ainda estamos aprendendo a viver no meio de tantas coisas.

  
  

  

  Artista faz intervenção na avenida Paulista sobre consumismo

  Marcus Leoni - 10.jan.2016/Folhapress

  
  

  
  

  É uma delícia de problema, é claro. Até o século 18, a teoria malthusiana fazia sentido. O crescimento da população levava à escassez de comida e assim à diminuição da poluição. Crises de fome ceifavam multidões todos os séculos.

  A Revolução Industrial nos fez escapar dessa armadilha. Produzindo mais com menos esforço, operamos um milagre: a população explodiu e a riqueza também. A fome, até então uma condição natural da humanidade, se tornou uma anomalia. 

  Luxos que antes eram reservados a reis ou milionários (chás ou janelas com vidros e cortinas, por exemplo) entraram na casa de trabalhadores comuns.

  É claro que boa parte do mundo ainda enfrenta a fome e a escassez. Mas não é por falta de conhecimento que isso acontece. Pelo contrário, o caminho da prosperidade já está mais ou menos mapeado e pavimentado.

  A abundância é um tipo de problema chique, que todo mundo gostaria de ter. Como o da grã-fina que está cansada de passar as férias em Paris. Mas ainda assim é um problema.

  Muitas más notícias que os jornais publicam hoje são produtos da abundância: o trânsito, a obesidade, a poluição, o lixo, o tempo que crianças gastam em frente a telas. Não só crianças, mas os adultos — que em média tocam 2600 vezes no celular por dia.

  As pessoas parecem meio perdidas entre tanto conforto e atrações que desviam a atenção. Se perdem em realizações imediatas de consumo, sem foco e força de vontade para perseguir grandes desejos ou objetivos mais ousados.

  Se o problema já é grave hoje, imagine no futuro. O autocontrole será cada vez mais necessário. Nossos filhos e netos terão que aprender desde cedo a se controlar diante do excesso de comida, de drogas, de opções de vida e de diversão.

  O mundo capitalista já resolveu o problema da escassez: precisa agora de uma educação para a abundância.

  
  

  Leandro Narloch - Jornalista, mestre em filosofia e autor do Guia Politicamente Incorreto da História do Brasil, entre outros.

  Disponível em: <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/colunas/leandro-narloch/2018/04/desafio-da-nossa-epoca-e-lidar-com-a-abundancia.shtml> . Acesso em: 25 abr. 2018.

  
  

  
  

  Texto 2

  

  Texto de Gilmar Machado, publicado em 8 jan. 2018.

  Disponível em: <https://www.humorpolitico.com.br/

  tag/meio-ambiente/> . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2018.

  
  

  
  
  

  Texto 3 

  
  

  Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades

  Ana Tereza Caceres Cortez - Professora adjunta do Departamento de Geografia

  Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas - IGCE/Unesp, Rio Claro
  

  
  

  Um dos símbolos do sucesso das economias capitalistas modernas é a abundância dos bens de consumo, continuamente produzidos pelo sistema industrial. Essa fartura passou a receber uma conotação negativa, sendo objeto de críticas que consideram o consumismo um dos principais problemas das sociedades industriais modernas.

  
  

  Consumismo é o ato de consumir produtos ou serviços, muitas vezes, sem consciência. Há várias discussões a respeito do tema, entre elas o tipo de papel que a propaganda e a publicidade exercem nas pessoas, induzindo-as ao consumo, mesmo que não necessitem de um produto comprado. Muitas vezes, as pessoas compram produtos que não têm utilidade para elas, ou até mesmo coisas desnecessárias apenas por vontade de comprar, evidenciando até uma doença.

  
  

  Segundo o Dicionário Houaiss, consumismo é “ato, efeito, fato ou prática de consumir (‘comprar em demasia’)” e “consumo ilimitado de bens duráveis, especialmente artigos supérfluos”.

  
  

  O simples “consumo” é entendido como as aquisições racionais, controladas e seletivas baseadas em fatores sociais e ambientais e no respeito pelas gerações futuras. Já o consumismo pode ser definido como uma compulsão para consumir. Mas como fazer para não aderir ao perfil consumista? A fórmula clássica e aparentemente simples é distinguir o essencial do necessário e o necessário do supérfluo. No entanto, é muito difícil estabelecer o limite entre consumo e consumismo, pois a definição de necessidades básicas e supérfluas está intimamente ligada às características culturais da sociedade e do grupo a que pertencemos. O que é básico para uns pode ser supérfluo para outros e vice-versa. 

  
  

  Trecho de CORTEZ, Ana Tereza Caceres. Consumo e desperdício: as duas faces das desigualdades. In:

  CORTEZ, A.T.C.; ORTIGOZA, S.A.G. (Org.). Da produção ao consumo: impactos socioambientais no

  espaço urbano. São Paulo: UNESP; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2009. Disponível em: <http://books.

  scielo.org/id/n9brm/pdf/ortigoza-9788579830075-03.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2018. [Adaptado]
  

  Qual o efeito de sentido da oração intercalada “quem diria”, no primeiro parágrafo do texto 1?

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62aa645b-b0

  A

  Pontuar o paradoxo observado atualmente entre o desabrigo, a escassez e a fome.

  B

  Reforçar admiração pelo fato de o consumo contribuir para resolver a abundância.

  C

  Demonstrar deslumbramento diante do antigo problema da abundância e do atual problema da escassez.

  D

  Assinalar perplexidade em relação à abundância, antes almejada, mas um problema nos dias atuais.

  Responder
• 6272DFEC-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  In relation to the issue raised about “the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools” (paragraph 6) , Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote that the IDEA requires that educational programs should

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6272dfec-b0

  A

  provide special benefits for students with special needs.

  B

  take into consideration each child´s circumstances.

  C

  be able to show at least a spark of progress of each student.

  D

  carefully calculate each child´s individual opportunity of success.

  Responder
• 626AC4FC-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  No excerto do sexto parágrafo “whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater”, a palavra it se refere a

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 626ac4fc-b0

  A

  Federal law.

  B

  family.

  C

  education.

  D

  Supreme Court.

  Responder
• 6264DBFF-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  In the fragment from paragraph 6 “the judge also sided with the school district”, the expression in bold means the same as

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6264dbff-b0

  A

  opposed.

  B

  supported.

  C

  reprimanded.

  D

  confronted.

  Responder
• 625FC97C-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  De acordo com os parágrafos 4 a 6, algumas das ações tomadas pelos pais de Endrew, em razão de sua insatisfação com a escola pública em que o filho estudava, foram:

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 625fc97c-b0

  A

  verificar porque Endrew não mostrava o progresso esperado, reclamar informalmente junto à escola, solicitar o fechamento da instituição.

  B

  discordar do plano de estudo individualizado oferecido a Endrew, matricular o menino em uma escola particular, acompanhar cotidianamente o progresso do filho na nova escola.

  C

  tirar Endrew da escola, matricular o menino em uma outra escola governamental, solicitar o reembolso pelos gastos resultantes da mudança de instituições.

  D

  tirar Endrew da escola, matricular o menino em uma escola particular, solicitar do estado o reembolso pelos gastos com a nova escola.

  Responder
• 625B8749-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, é CORRETO afirmar que, nos Estados Unidos,

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 625b8749-b0

  A

  há o elevadíssimo número de 6,4 milhões de pessoas com necessidades especiais.

  B

  300,000 estudantes abandonam a escola regular todos os anos.

  C

  aproximadamente 13% dos alunos frequentando escola têm algum tipo de deficiência.

  D

  deficiências se tornam mais visíveis em crianças e jovens entre 3 e 21 anos de idade.

  Responder
• 6255539A-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  We understand from paragraph 2 that, concerning the ‘merely more than de minimis’ education programs for the disabled, John G Roberts believes such programs

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6255539a-b0

  A

  have been improving very little year after year, unfortunately.

  B

  offer too little comparing to the education these children deserve.

  C

  have proved a good alternative for children with special needs.

  D

  should be extended until children are old enough to leave school.

  Responder
• 624FFBB2-B0

  Inglês

  Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctionsPUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  No primeiro parágrafo, a palavra instead pode ser CORRETAMENTE traduzida por

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 624ffbb2-b0

  A

  portanto.

  B

  além disso.

  C

  ao invés disso.

  D

  contudo.

  Responder
• 62480DB8-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  No primeiro parágrafo, o verbo must é repetidamente utilizado e indica

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62480db8-b0

  A

  a possibilidade de educação formal para todas as crianças americanas com necessidades especiais.

  B

  uma sugestão para a criação de escolas mais exigentes e de melhor qualidade para crianças com deficiências.

  C

  a necessidade de leis que garantam uma educação ‘ambiciosa’ para todas as crianças americanas.

  D

  a exigência imposta a escolas americanas para que elevem o nível e condições de aprendizagem de crianças com necessidades especiais.

  Responder
• 62431590-B0

  Inglês

  Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Responda a questão de acordo com o texto de Lauren Camera.

  
  

  Supreme Court Expands Rights for Students with Disabilities

  By Lauren Camera, Education Reporter - March 22, 2017. Adaptado. 

  
  

  In a unanimous decision with major implications for students with disabilities, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that schools must provide higher educational standards for children with special needs. Schools must do more than provide a ‘merely more than de minimis’ education for students with disabilities and instead must provide them with an opportunity to make "appropriately ambitious" progress in line with the federal education law.

  “When all is said and done,” wrote Chief Justice John G. Roberts, “a student offered an education program providing a ‘merely more than de minimis’ progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all.” He continued, citing a 1982 Supreme Court ruling on special education: “For children with disabilities, receiving an instruction that aims so low would be equivalent to ‘sitting idly... awaiting the time when they were old enough to drop out.’”

  There are roughly 6.4 million students with disabilities between ages 3 to 21, representing roughly 13 percent of all students, according to Institute for Education Statistics. Each year 300,000 of those students leave school and just 65 percent of students with disabilities complete high school.

  The case which culminated in the Supreme Court decision originated with an autistic boy in Colorado named Endrew. His parents pulled him out of school in 5th grade because they disagreed with his individualized education plan. Under federal law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), schools must work with families to develop individualized learning plans for students with disabilities.

  While Endrew had been making progress in the public schools, his parents felt his plan for that year simply replicated goals from years past. As a result, they enrolled him in a private school where, they argued, Endrew made academic and social progress. 

  Seeking tuition reimbursement*, they filed a complaint with the state’s department of education in which they argued that Endrew had been denied a "free appropriate public education". The school district won the suit, and when his parents filed a lawsuit in federal district court, the judge also sided with the school district. In the Supreme Court case, Endrew and his family asked for clarification about the type of education benefits the federal law requires of schools, specifically, whether it requires ‘merely more than de minimis’, or something greater.

  “The IDEA demands more,” Roberts wrote in the opinion. “It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.” 

  *reimbursement – a sum paid to cover money that has been spent or lost.

  In:<https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2017-03-22/supreme-court-expands-rights-for-students-with-disabilities> 30.03.2018
  

  
  

  O fato que levou à publicação deste texto em março de 2017 foi

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62431590-b0

  A

  o caso do menino Endrew, que moveu a opinião pública americana e comoveu o país.

  B

  uma nova deliberação definindo com maior precisão o conceito de ‘necessidades especiais’.

  C

  decisão pela Suprema Corte Americana quanto a novos padrões de qualidade de ensino para crianças com deficiências.

  D

  estatísticas recentes apontando números inesperadamente altos de pessoas com deficiência nos Estados Unidos.

  Responder
• 6233C2C2-B0

  Conhecimentos Gerais

  Segurança PúblicaPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Brasil tem maior número de assassinatos no campo desde 2003; Pará lidera o ranking de mortes

  A violência no campo no Brasil é a maior desde 2003, segundo o relatório da Comissão Pastoral da Terra (CPT), divulgado nesta segunda-feira (16). Em 2017, foram 70 assassinatos, um aumento de 15% em relação ao número de 2016. O Pará liderou o ranking de violência, com 21 assassinatos no ano passado.

  Dos 70 assassinatos em 2017, 28 ocorreram em massacres, o que corresponde a 40% do total. Desde 1985 a 2017, foram registrados 46 massacres no país com 220 vítimas. No período, o Pará registrou 26 massacres, que vitimaram 125 pessoas.
  

  Fonte notícia: <https://g1.globo.com/pa/para/noticia/para-lidera-o-ranking-de-

  mortes-no-campo-com-125-assassinatos.ghtml>

  
  

  

  Ao compararmos a notícia ao lado, datada de março de 2018, com o mapa, que apresenta o período de 1985-1996, podemos CONCLUIR que:

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6233c2c2-b0

  A

  A violência no campo está disseminada em todo o território brasileiro de maneira bastante uniforme, desde o final do século passado. Os massacres ocorridos corroboram com a ideia da precariedade ou ausência do poder público nas áreas citadas.

  B

  O texto evidencia os massacres, que são ações planejadas entre marginais, ligados ao narcotráfico, devido à rota da cocaína que passa, principalmente, pelo estado do Pará.

  C

  Existe uma evidente contradição entre o texto e o mapa, apesar de tratarem do mesmo tema – a violência no campo. O texto destaca o Pará como estado mais violento, mas o mapa mostra uma distribuição mais igualitária dos assassinatos no campo.

  D

  O mapa e o texto se complementam e mostram que a situação de violência continua existindo no campo e concentrada, principalmente, no norte do país, destacando o estado do Pará, desde 1985 até 2017.

  Responder
• 62241A94-B0

  Conhecimentos Gerais

  Questões SociaisPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  
  

  

  
  

  “A fome é a expressão biológica de males sociológicos”, frase de Josué de Castro, médico pernambucano que estudou a questão da fome no Brasil em seu livro de 1964

  – “Geografia da fome”.

  Após a interpretação dos gráficos e contando com o auxílio da frase de Josué de Castro, assinale a alternativa que melhor justifica o tema fome:
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62241a94-b0

  A

  O aumento dos famintos tem uma relação direta e dependente com o aumento da população absoluta no mundo, fortalecendo a teoria de Thomas Malthus, que defende a abstinência sexual, para evitar o aumento populacional e, por consequência, evitar o aumento da fome.

  B

  O cruzamento dos gráficos apresenta, no primeiro momento, certa contradição, pois o aumento do número de famintos é acompanhado pelo aumento da produção de grãos, que serviriam para a alimentação dos famintos. Mas isso não acontece, evidenciando um caráter perverso no âmbito social.

  C

  A falta de infraestrutura, guerras e conflitos internos dificulta a assistência e ajuda dos países ricos aos mais necessitados, sendo esses os principais motivos para o aumento da insegurança alimentar no planeta. A superação dos problemas citados assegurará a eliminação da fome em nível global.

  D

  A produção de grãos não se relaciona diretamente com o consumo humano, pois é direcionada, principalmente, para ração e produção de energia. O problema da fome está relacionado, sobretudo aos desastres naturais e grandes períodos de seca ao redor do mundo, diminuindo, significativamente, a produção de alimentos.

  Responder
• 622089EB-B0

  Geografia

  ClimaPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Cinturões de vento surgem porque o Sol aquece a superfície mais intensamente no equador, onde os raios solares são quase perpendiculares ao terreno. O Sol aquece a Terra menos intensamente em latitudes altas, pois aí os raios incidem obliquamente na superfície. O ar quente, que é menos denso que o frio, ascende no equador e segue em direção aos polos, descendo gradualmente à medida que esfria. O ar desce até atingir o nível do solo nos subtrópicos, a aproximadamente 30ºS e 30ºN, depois flui de volta pela superfície terrestre em direção ao equador, (...).

  
  

  (Para entender a Terra, 6ª edição-2013, página 538, editora bookman).

  
  

  

  Imagem relacionada à circulação geral da atmosfera. Retirado do site:

  <https://www.internetgeography.net/topics/what-is-global-atmospheric-circulation/>

  
  

  
  

  Os ventos são elementos climáticos importantes na formação das paisagens naturais do planeta. Utilizando seus conhecimentos sobre o tema, a imagem acima e o fragmento de texto apresentado, assinale a alternativa que apresenta, respectivamente, uma paisagem natural comum e característica das latitudes próximas dos 30º, e a denominação dos ventos que fluem de volta, rumo ao equador.
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 622089eb-b0

  A

  mata tropical e ventos de leste

  B

  floresta temperada e ventos contra-alísios

  C

  vegetação de altitude e brisas marítimas

  D

  desertos e ventos alísios

  Responder
• 61D8B529-B0

  Biologia

  VertebradosPUC - SP · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  

  
  

  O ornitorrinco, assim como a equidna, é um mamífero monotremado. Além de ser ovíparo esse animal
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 61d8b529-b0

  A

  não alimenta seus filhotes com leite materno, diferentemente do coelho.

  B

  cria seus filhotes no interior do marsúpio, até que atinjam certo tempo de vida.

  C

  possui placenta, como o coelho, mas a utiliza para produzir ovos.

  D

  possui cloaca, onde desembocam os sistemas genital, urinário e digestório.

  Responder
• 61C0E62A-B0

  Biologia

  Ecologia e ciências ambientaisPUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Um dos processos mais simples de tratamento de esgoto é realizado nas chamadas lagoas de estabilização. Nelas, os efluentes entram por uma extremidade, passam vários dias em seu interior, e saem por outra extremidade. Durante esse período, a matéria orgânica do esgoto sofre degradação por parte de bactérias aeróbicas. Entretanto, para que o oxigênio da água não se acabe devido ao intenso consumo bacteriano, faz-se necessária a presença de algas no local. Por esse motivo, a lagoa deve estar situada em local sem sombreamento, totalmente exposta à luz do sol. A dinâmica desse processo está representada na figura a seguir.

  
  

  

  Adaptado a partir de <https://i0.wp.com/www.thewatertreatments.com/

  wp-content/uploads/2009/11/algae-bacteria-simbiosis.gif?w=421>

  Imagens: Freepik.com

  
  

  A respeito do processo ocorrido nas lagoas de estabilização, é CORRETO afirmar que
  
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 61c0e62a-b0

  A

  a relação existente entre bactérias e algas é uma modalidade de cadeia alimentar com produtores e consumidores primários.

  B

  a depuração da água resulta, basicamente, de um sistema em que há interdependência entre respiração aeróbica e fotossíntese.

  C

  o calor do sol é essencial como estímulo para a absorção, por parte das algas, das moléculas de CO2 e NH3 presentes na água.

  D

  na ausência de luz solar, o sentido das setas, no esquema, é invertido, o que explica a ineficiência do processo de depuração da água nessa circunstância.

  Responder
• 61B72E60-B0

  Química

  Cinética QuímicaPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  A velocidade de uma reação pode ser medida pela concentração de um reagente ou de um produto em diferentes instantes de tempo. Para isso é necessário procurar uma propriedade mensurável, ou de um reagente ou de um produto. Por exemplo, é possível medir a decomposição do peróxido de hidrogênio recolhendo e medindo o volume de gás liberado. A velocidade média da reação leva em conta a estequiometria da reação. Assim, a velocidade da reação média é a mesma, sendo calculada através do consumo de um reagente, ou da formação de um produto. Observe o gráfico abaixo que representa a decomposição do peróxido de hidrogênio.

  
  

  Considerando a reação de decomposição do peróxido de hidrogênio e o gráfico representado abaixo, avalie as afirmativas apresentadas abaixo e assinale a alternativa CORRETA.

  
  

  I. A curva em verde representa o consumo de peróxido de hidrogênio.

  II. A curva em azul representa a produção de oxigênio.

  III. A velocidade média de decomposição da água oxigenada pode ser representada por: -Δ[H₂O₂]/ Δt

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 61b72e60-b0

  A

  As afirmativas I e II estão corretas.

  B

  As afirmativas I e III estão corretas.

  C

  As afirmativas I, II e III estão corretas.

  D

  Apenas a afirmativa I está correta.

  Responder
• 619100FC-B0

  Química

  Cadeias Carbônicas: Características e Classificações do Átomo do Carbono, Tipos de Ligação e Hibridação. Tipos de Cadeias Carbônicas e Fórmulas. Séries: Homóloga, Isóloga e Heteróloga.PUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  O Tamiflu ou fosfato de oseltamivir, utilizado para o tratamento da gripe, é produzido do composto ativo do anis-estrelado, também conhecido como ácido shikimico. Esse ácido é um potente antiviral. Sua fórmula estrutural está representada abaixo.

  
  

  

  
  

  Sobre esse composto, é CORRETO afirmar que
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 619100fc-b0

  A

  é um composto aromático.

  B

  possui apenas carbonos secundários e terciários.

  C

  possui cadeia carbônica homocíclica.

  D

  possui cadeia carbônica ramificada.

  Responder
• 618A3C1F-B0

  Química

  Principais Funções Orgânicas: Funções Nitrogenadas: Amina, Amida, Nitrila, Isonitrila e Nitro Composto.PUC - SP · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Pesquisadores dos Estados Unidos e da China desenvolveram um material sintético que, em princípio, reproduziria as propriedades mecânicas de tecidos biológicos como cartilagens e tendões melhor do que outros materiais hoje em teste. (...) O novo material foi obtido a partir da combinação de aramida e álcool polivinílico. Conhecidas pelo nome comercial de Kevlar, material usado em coletes à prova de balas, as fibras nanométricas de aramida são resistentes a calor, pressão e tensão, enquanto o álcool polivinílico é um polímero solúvel em água.

  
  

  Fonte: <http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/2018/02/15/uma-possivel-fonte-para-repor-cartilagens/>

  
  

  

  Fonte: <http://qnint.sbq.org.br/sbq_uploads/layers/imagem2030;jpg>

  
  

  A figura ao lado representa as cadeias de Kevlar. Sobre esse composto é CORRETO afirmar que

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 618a3c1f-b0

  A

  é um polímero que possui amina como função orgânica.

  B

  é uma poliamida aromática.

  C

  apresenta ligações de hidrogênio, a mais fraca das interações intermoleculares, unindo as cadeias.

  D

  pertence à função orgânica nitrocompostos.

  Responder
• 6183ADE2-B0

  Física

  DinâmicaPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Quando necessário, adote os valores da tabela:

  • módulo da aceleração da gravidade: 10 m.s^-2

  • calor específico da água: 1,0 cal.g-1. ºC^-1

  • densidade da água: 1 g.cm^-3

  • 1cal = 4,0 J

  • π = 3

  Determine os valores aproximados para os coeficientes de atrito estático entre as superfícies dos blocos A e B, representado por μ1, e entre as superfícies do bloco B e do plano inclinado, representado por μ2,respectivamente, para que não haja qualquer movimento relativo entre os blocos e entre eles e o plano inclinado. Considere ideais a polia e o fio que une os blocos B e C.

  
  

  Dados:

  
  

  massa de A = mA = 30,0kg

  massa de B = mB = 50,0kg

  massa de C = mC = 100,0kg

  senα = 0,50

  cosα = 0,90

  
  

  
  

  
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6183ade2-b0

  A

  0,56 e 0,83

  B

  0,63 e 0,50

  C

  0,50 e 0,63

  D

  0,56 e 0,93

  Responder
• 61799768-B0

  Física

  CinemáticaPUC - SP · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

  Quando necessário, adote os valores da tabela:

  • módulo da aceleração da gravidade: 10 m.s^-2

  • calor específico da água: 1,0 cal.g-1. ºC^-1

  • densidade da água: 1 g.cm^-3

  • 1cal = 4,0 J

  • π = 3

  Dois ciclistas percorrem uma longa trajetória retilínea e horizontal de tal modo que estão sempre alinhados, conforme indica a figura. Num dado instante t1, sabe-se que o módulo da força resultante sobre o ciclista 1 é constante e vale 30N e que o módulo da força resultante sobre o ciclista 2, também constante, vale 40N.

  Nesse mesmo instante, o módulo da velocidade do ciclista 1 é 5 vezes maior do que o módulo da velocidade do ciclista 2 e o módulo da velocidade relativa do ciclista 1 em relação ao ciclista 2 vale 43,2km/h. Determine, no instante t = t1+10s, o módulo aproximado, em unidades do SI, da velocidade do centro de massa do sistema de corpos constituído pelos 2 ciclistas e suas respectivas bicicletas.

  
  

  Dados:

  massa do ciclista 1 + bicicleta 1 = 100kg

  massa do ciclista 2 + bicicleta 2 = 80kg

  
  

  

  Fonte: <https://pt.123rf.com/photo_50708411.html>
  

  Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 61799768-b0

  A

  10,3

  B

  13,6

  C

  14,3

  D

  15,4

  Responder