Banco de questões
Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
A ilustração abaixo faz parte do projeto “Coisa de Mulher”. Segundo Raquel Vitorelo, artista que criou o projeto em 2015, a proposta “consiste na criação de ilustrações que buscam resgatar e homenagear mulheres históricas, mostrando que ‘coisa de mulher’ é muito mais do que somos levados a acreditar, trazendo assim evidência de que a história é construída por mulheres de todos os tipos, em todas as áreas do conhecimento, do esporte e das artes”.
Considerando as possíveis relações entre a campanha “Coisa de Mulher” e o texto I, avalie as afirmações abaixo.
I- A ilustração, ao utilizar como slogan a expressão “coisa de mulher”, opõe-se à noção de gênero apresentada no texto I, pois reafirma que existem papéis exclusivamente femininos.
II- Assim como no texto I, a referência a Simone de Beauvoir na ilustração problematiza a noção naturalizada acerca do que é ser mulher, mostrando que essa é uma construção histórica e social.
III- A campanha “Coisa de mulher” estabelece uma relação de confronto com o mito da Mulher, trazendo, por meio de suas ilustrações, a “existência múltipla das mulheres” em oposição ao “Eterno Feminino único e cristalizado”.
Julga-se como correto o que se apresenta em:
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
Em relação à tirinha acima, NÃO está correto o que se afirma em:
Um objeto de massa m = 10,0kg é acelerado para cima em um plano inclinado de 37°, sem atrito, por uma força F constante e aplicada ao longo do plano. Partindo do repouso na base, ele cobre uma distância de 24,0m, ao longo do plano, em 4,0s.
Considerando-se que sen 37° = 0,6 e cos 37° = 0,8m, é correto afirmar:
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
Texto II
Estrelas além do tempo
Alex Gonçalves
Após todas as discussões sobre representatividade que permearam o último ano hollywoodiano, “Estrelas Além do Tempo” [2016] se apresenta para o público com um timing perfeito. Há tempos não nos víamos inseridos em um cenário no qual as ideologias reacionárias estão tão evidentes, assim como os protestos em busca pela igualdade. Portanto, nada melhor do que a ficção para nos relembrar de outros períodos também nefastos que não calaram a atuação de heróis anônimos.
No caso de “Estrelas Além do Tempo”, temos uma história que enaltece três figuras reais da NASA até então mantidas anônimas. Tratam-se de Katherine G. Johnson (Taraji P. Henson), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) e Mary Jackson (Janelle Monáe), três mulheres negras essenciais para o sucesso da missão do astronauta John Glenn (Glen Powell) em alcançar a lua.
Entretanto, estamos aqui nos não tão distantes anos 1960, em uma Virgínia segregada e com poucos afroamericanos exercendo profissões que exigem um perfil lógico. Por isso mesmo, as vidas de Katherine, Dorothy e Mary foram triplamente difíceis justamente pela raça e gênero a que pertencem.
Sempre unidas antes e após o expediente de trabalho, essas mulheres enfrentam sozinhas em suas competências os preconceitos que impedem as suas evoluções. Solicitada pelo departamento comandado por Al Harrison (Kevin Costner) para fazer os cálculos que devem assegurar o sucesso da decolagem do foguete que lançará John Glenn às alturas, Katherine é diariamente hostilizada pelos colegas, todos homens e brancos. Já em seu setor, Dorothy tem todos os seus pedidos de promoção sabotados pelo intermédio de Vivian (Kirsten Dunst), enquanto Mary não consegue desempenhar a função de engenheira por ser impedida de ingressar em uma universidade.
Mesmo com todas essas circunstâncias, elas não desistirão de provar as singularidades que possuem, visualizando os obstáculos não como limites, mas como incentivos para continuarem perseverando. Temos com isso aquele modelo de narrativa cinematográfica que encanta desde os tempos do tramp de Charlie Chaplin, no qual a vontade para ganhar um lugar ao sol é maior do que as adversidades.
Diretor de “Um Santo Vizinho”, Theodore Melfi se apropria do texto de Allison Schroeder compreendendo muito bem as características desse cinema inspirado e inspirador, contornando com traços ficcionais uma história real para ser efetivo principalmente em seus gritos de protesto. É especialmente arrebatadora a explosão de Katherine ao finalmente externar a sua humilhação ao precisar se prestar a um trajeto de mais de um quilômetro para ir ao banheiro exclusivo para negros. Não ficam muito atrás o fervor de Dorothy e Mary em se provarem extremamente capazes de enfrentar novos desafios.
Além do mais, Melfi conduz com uma fluidez invejável algo que, em teoria, não tem qualquer encanto. Mesmo o mais avesso aos raciocínios de exatas se verão imediatamente hipnotizados com números e fórmulas que se revelam não somente como uma ciência complexa, como também como instrumentos sociais que só engrenam quando os seus operadores se reconhecem como semelhantes.
Publicado em 09/02/2017.
Disponível em:<http://cineresenhas.com.br/2017/02/09/resenha-critica-estrelas-alem-do-tempo-2016/>. Acesso em: 30/03/2018.
As leis de Newton não podem, de maneira alguma, ser deduzidas matematicamente. Elas são generalizações de observações experimentais do movimento real de objetos materiais e da maneira que as forças aplicadas afetam tais movimentos. Elas são, portanto, leis naturais que descrevem o comportamento do mundo externo e não axiomas matemáticos.
Com base nos conhecimentos sobre a Dinâmica, é correto afirmar:
Texto II
Estrelas além do tempo
Alex Gonçalves
Após todas as discussões sobre representatividade que permearam o último ano hollywoodiano, “Estrelas Além do Tempo” [2016] se apresenta para o público com um timing perfeito. Há tempos não nos víamos inseridos em um cenário no qual as ideologias reacionárias estão tão evidentes, assim como os protestos em busca pela igualdade. Portanto, nada melhor do que a ficção para nos relembrar de outros períodos também nefastos que não calaram a atuação de heróis anônimos.
No caso de “Estrelas Além do Tempo”, temos uma história que enaltece três figuras reais da NASA até então mantidas anônimas. Tratam-se de Katherine G. Johnson (Taraji P. Henson), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) e Mary Jackson (Janelle Monáe), três mulheres negras essenciais para o sucesso da missão do astronauta John Glenn (Glen Powell) em alcançar a lua.
Entretanto, estamos aqui nos não tão distantes anos 1960, em uma Virgínia segregada e com poucos afroamericanos exercendo profissões que exigem um perfil lógico. Por isso mesmo, as vidas de Katherine, Dorothy e Mary foram triplamente difíceis justamente pela raça e gênero a que pertencem.
Sempre unidas antes e após o expediente de trabalho, essas mulheres enfrentam sozinhas em suas competências os preconceitos que impedem as suas evoluções. Solicitada pelo departamento comandado por Al Harrison (Kevin Costner) para fazer os cálculos que devem assegurar o sucesso da decolagem do foguete que lançará John Glenn às alturas, Katherine é diariamente hostilizada pelos colegas, todos homens e brancos. Já em seu setor, Dorothy tem todos os seus pedidos de promoção sabotados pelo intermédio de Vivian (Kirsten Dunst), enquanto Mary não consegue desempenhar a função de engenheira por ser impedida de ingressar em uma universidade.
Mesmo com todas essas circunstâncias, elas não desistirão de provar as singularidades que possuem, visualizando os obstáculos não como limites, mas como incentivos para continuarem perseverando. Temos com isso aquele modelo de narrativa cinematográfica que encanta desde os tempos do tramp de Charlie Chaplin, no qual a vontade para ganhar um lugar ao sol é maior do que as adversidades.
Diretor de “Um Santo Vizinho”, Theodore Melfi se apropria do texto de Allison Schroeder compreendendo muito bem as características desse cinema inspirado e inspirador, contornando com traços ficcionais uma história real para ser efetivo principalmente em seus gritos de protesto. É especialmente arrebatadora a explosão de Katherine ao finalmente externar a sua humilhação ao precisar se prestar a um trajeto de mais de um quilômetro para ir ao banheiro exclusivo para negros. Não ficam muito atrás o fervor de Dorothy e Mary em se provarem extremamente capazes de enfrentar novos desafios.
Além do mais, Melfi conduz com uma fluidez invejável algo que, em teoria, não tem qualquer encanto. Mesmo o mais avesso aos raciocínios de exatas se verão imediatamente hipnotizados com números e fórmulas que se revelam não somente como uma ciência complexa, como também como instrumentos sociais que só engrenam quando os seus operadores se reconhecem como semelhantes.
Publicado em 09/02/2017.
Disponível em:<http://cineresenhas.com.br/2017/02/09/resenha-critica-estrelas-alem-do-tempo-2016/>. Acesso em: 30/03/2018.
“Entretanto, estamos aqui nos não tão distantes anos 1960, em uma Virgínia segregada e com poucos afro-americanos exercendo profissões que exigem um perfil lógico. Por isso mesmo, as vidas de Katherine, Dorothy e Mary foram triplamente difíceis justamente pela raça e gênero a que pertencem.”
No trecho acima, os termos grifados indicam relações semânticas de:
T E X T
Britain, Norway and the United States join forces with businesses to protect tropical forests.
Britain, Norway and the United States said Thursday they would join forces with some of the world’s biggest companies in an effort to rally more than $1 billion for countries that can show they are lowering emissions by protecting tropical forests. The goal is to make intact forests more economically valuable than they would be if the land were cleared for timber and agriculture.
The initiative comes as the world loses acre after acre of forests to feed global demand for soy, palm oil, timber and cattle. Those forests, from Brazil to Indonesia, are essential to limiting the linked crises of climate change and a global biodiversity collapse. They are also home to Indigenous and other forest communities. Amazon, Nestlé, Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline and Salesforce are among the companies promising money for the new initiative, known as the LEAF Coalition.
Last year, despite the global downturn triggered by the pandemic, tropical deforestation was up 12 percent from 2019, collectively wiping out an area about the size of Switzerland. That destruction released about twice as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as cars in the United States emit annually.
“The LEAF Coalition is a groundbreaking example of the scale and type of collaboration that is needed to fight the climate crisis and achieve net-zero emissions globally by 2050,” John Kerry, President Biden’s senior climate envoy, said in a statement. “Bringing together government and privatesector resources is a necessary step in supporting the large-scale efforts that must be mobilized to halt deforestation and begin to restore tropical and subtropical forests.”
An existing global effort called REDD+ has struggled to attract sufficient investment and gotten mired in bureaucratic slowdowns. This initiative builds on it, bringing private capital to the table at the country or state level. Until now, companies have invested in forests more informally, sometimes supporting questionable projects that prompted accusations of corruption and “greenwashing,” when a company or brand portrays itself as an environmental steward but its true actions don’t support the claim.
The new initiative will use satellite imagery to verify results across wide areas to guard against those problems. Monitoring entire jurisdictions would, in theory, prevent governments from saving forestland in one place only to let it be cut down elsewhere.
Under the plan, countries, states or provinces with tropical forests would commit to reducing deforestation and degradation. Each year or two, they would submit their results, calculating the number of tons of carbon dioxide reduced by their efforts. An independent monitor would verify their claims using satellite images and other measures. Companies and governments would contribute to a pool of money that would pay the national or regional government at least $10 per ton of reduced carbon dioxide.
Companies will not be allowed to participate unless they have a scientifically sound plan to reach net zero emissions, according to Nigel Purvis, the chief executive of Climate Advisers, a group affiliated with the initiative. “Their number one obligation to the world from a climate standpoint is to reduce their own emissions across their supply chains, across their products, everything,” Mr. Purvis said. He also emphasized that the coalition’s plans would respect the rights of Indigenous and forest communities.
From: www.nytimes.com/April 22, 2021
