Matemática
PolinômiosUEA · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosUma das raízes da equação polinomial
x3
+ (k + 1)x2
+ (k + 9)x + 9 = 0 é x1
= –1. As outras duas
raízes são iguais. A soma das três raízes, para k > 0, é igual a
Questões do ENEM 2018
Questões aplicadas na prova de 2018, cada uma em página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
Resultados
6.600 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 7 de 330.
6070300A-09 606B605A-09 Matemática
ProbabilidadeUEA · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosDeseja-se formar uma comissão composta de três membros. Sabendo-se que as escolhas devem ser feitas dentre um grupo de 10 pessoas, o número de diferentes comissões que poderão ser formadas é igual a7A4F95BE-07 Física
EletricidadeCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosA figura representa um circuito elétrico de lâmpadas utilizadas na decoração de árvores de natal.
Se na lâmpada 6 for instalado um dispositivo de pisca-pisca, quando ela se apagar, certamente se apagarão as lâmpadas
7A474854-07 Física
EletricidadeCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosA experiência realizada com o tubo de Crookes foi importante para a descoberta do elétron. Quando duas placas metálicas eletrizadas foram acopladas, uma positivamente e outra negativamente, desviaram os raios luminosos emitidos por qualquer gás colocado no interior do tubo, atraído pela placa positiva e repelido pela negativa.A figura representa o tubo de Crookes, no qual há dois pares de placas, sendo um par disposto horizontalmente (P1, P2) e o outro par, disposto verticalmente (P3, P4).
Para que o raio luminoso emitido pelo gás ilumine a parte vermelha do tubo, as placas P1, P2, P3 e P4 devem estar eletrizadas, respectivamente, com cargas de sinais
7A42B5E8-07 Física
Ondas e Propriedades OndulatóriasCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosA figura representa um tanque cheio de água sobre cuja superfície se propaga uma onda de amplitude A e comprimento de onda λ. Quando essa onda passa por um obstáculo de duas fendas (1 e 2) ocorrem dois fenômenos (F1 e F2).
A denominação dos fenômenos F1 e F2, a grandeza indicada em X e o valor da amplitude da onda em P são, respectivamente,
7A3F5075-07 Física
Instrumentos ÓpticosCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosUma lupa converge os raios solares a uma distância de 20 cm do centro óptico da lente. Nessa situação, a distância focal da lente é igual a7A3BF167-07 Física
DinâmicaCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018Muito fácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTrês recipientes, A, B e C, de mesmo volume e hermeticamente fechados, contêm gases ideais. A massa total do gás e a velocidade média das moléculas contidas em cada um dos recipientes estão indicadas na tabela.
Sabendo-se que a temperatura de um gás ideal é diretamente proporcional à energia cinética média de suas moléculas, a relação entre as temperaturas TA, TB e TC é
7A388F02-07 Física
CalorimetriaCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosUma escala termométrica R foi criada para uso em laboratório. Nela, o valor de 0 °R equivale à temperatura de –20 °C e o valor de 100 °R equivale à temperatura de 40 °C.Nessa escala, a temperatura de 66 °R, corresponde à temperatura de7A3484FF-07 Física
Estática e HidrostáticaCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosA figura ilustra a experiência de Torricelli, realizada para medir a pressão atmosférica, utilizando um tubo cheio de mercúrio e comparando a pressão nos pontos B e C.
Considere que o tubo da experiência esteja preenchido por um líquido de densidade desconhecida, que a altura h seja 50 cm, que a aceleração da gravidade seja 10m/s2 e que a pressão atmosférica local seja 1 × 105 Pa. A densidade desse líquido dentro do tubo é de
7A313A39-07 Física
DinâmicaCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosDo alto de uma escada (ponto A) um bloco, de dimensão desprezível e massa igual a 1 kg, foi solto sobre um aparelho de ginástica conhecido como jump (uma pequena cama elástica). Esse aparelho, apoiado na altura da linha de referência, pode ser considerado uma mola ideal de constante elástica igual a 7600 N/m. Quando ele não está deformado, possui altura igual a 30 cm.
Considere que a deformação causada pelo bloco ao cair sobre o jump foi de 10 cm e que a aceleração da gravidade local seja 10 m/s². Nessas condições, a altura H, em relação à linha de referência, é de
7A2E545E-07 Física
CinemáticaCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosUm carro de competição percorre metade de um circuito com velocidade média de 200 km/h. Na segunda metade do circuito, o desempenho do carro melhora e sua velocidade média passa a ser 300 km/h. A velocidade média desse carro quando ele completa todo o circuito é de7A2AF7AA-07 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age
“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
Assinale a alternativa cujo trecho evidencia a posição atual da autora sobre o desafio apresentado no título.7A265900-07 Inglês
Palavras conectivas | Connective wordsCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No trecho do sétimo parágrafo “However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue”, o termo sublinhado pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido, por7A22BE7A-07 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
De acordo com o quinto e o sexto parágrafos, um dos benefícios dos dados médicos disponíveis na internet é7A1E9DEB-07 Inglês
Tradução | TranslationCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No trecho do quinto parágrafo “as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent”, o termo sublinhado equivale, em português, a7A1AD14F-07 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
De acordo com o quarto parágrafo, a profissão médica contribui para que as pessoas recorram à internet em vez de recorrer a médicos. A justificativa apresentada é que7A174830-07 Inglês
Tradução | TranslationCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No trecho do quarto parágrafo “the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source”, a expressão sublinhada equivale, em português, a7A141CC3-07 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No terceiro parágrafo, o termo “expertise” está entre aspas para7A10751B-07 Inglês
Verbos modais | Modal verbsCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “I’d recommended that she try a medicine”, o termo sublinhado pode ser corretamente substituído por7A0D0E0F-07 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro Universitário São Camilo · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosLeia o texto para responder à questão.The challenge of doctor-patient relations in the internet age“Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you,” my patient said. My patient, a 19-year-old student, had already taken time off from school because of her anxiety. I was her psychiatrist, with over two decades of experience treating university students, and had just explained my diagnostic impressions based on a lengthy evaluation. I’d recommended that she try a medicine I expected would help. I’d also laid out the risks and benefits of other treatment options.“Do you have additional questions I can answer?” I asked. I wanted to let her know that’s why I was there, to cull the research, to help make sense of it. “No, I like to go online and look for myself,” she said.More and more, I see students turning away from the expertise that a live person can offer and instead turning to the vast and somehow more objective-seeming “expertise” of the digital world.In an age when journalism we don’t like can be dismissed as “fake news,” suggesting that the information we do like is most credible, regardless of its source, it’s not hard to understand why young people do this. The medical profession itself, under managed care, has played a role as well, providing less time for doctor-patient interactions and undermining the chances that a personal relationship and trust can develop. Under the guise of efficiency, medical test results are now often released directly to patients, sometimes before or even without the benefit of any interpretation.But there’s danger in trusting data over people, as there is in thinking the expertise of all people is equivalent. When it comes to health, digital natives may not be learning how to navigate effectively. And the consequences could be harmful.The availability of health data on the internet has its benefits. Online, for example, we can find explanations and solutions for symptoms we might be too embarrassed, or afraid, to discuss with another person, in person. Or, for lifethreatening diseases, we can locate clinical trials our doctors may not be aware of.However, there’s also a lot of misleading information, and information that’s simply untrue. The internet is full of people selling things – supplements, treatment regimens that have not been rigorously tested, even prescription medications – and making false promises that have not been scrutinized by regulatory agencies. Sometimes, as in the case of some websites that promote “an anorexic diet” for “aggressive” weight loss, the information can encourage life-threatening behavior.Years ago, when we discussed paternalism versus patient autonomy in my medical school ethics class, I came down strongly in favor of autonomy. Who but the patient could best decide what was right for him or her? But years of clinical – and personal – experience have taught me that information in and of itself is insufficient. Judgment is also indispensable, especially in complex situations, and the capacity for good judgment rests within people, not data sets.(Doris Iarovici is a psychiatrist at Harvard University’s Counseling andMental Health Services and the author of Mental Health Issues and theUniversity Student. www.nytimes.com, 01.03.2018. Adaptado.)
No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “Let me do some research and I’ll get back to you”, o termo sublinhado refere-se