Questões do ENEM 2019

Questões aplicadas na prova de 2019, cada uma em página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

Resultados

6.587 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 24 de 330.

  • 6B458DD5-01

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Read the text and asnwer questions:

    HOME

    They rose up like men. We saw them. Like men they stood.

    We shouldn’t have been anywhere near that place. Like most farmland outside Lotus, Georgia, this here one had plenty scary warning signs. The threats hung from wire mesh fences with wooden stakes every fifty or so feet. But when we saw a crawl space that some animal had dug—a coyote maybe, or a coon dog—we couldn’t resist. Just kids we were. The grass was shoulder high for her and waist high for me so, looking out for snakes, we crawled through it on our bellies. The reward was worth the harm grass juice and clouds of gnats did to our eyes, because there right in front of us, about fifty yards off, they stood like men. Their raised hooves crashing and striking, their manes tossing back from wild white eyes. They bit each other like dogs but when they stood, reared up on their hind legs, their forelegs around the withers of the other, we held our breath in wonder. One was rust-colored, the other deep black, both sunny with sweat. The neighs were not as frightening as the silence following a kick of hind legs into the lifted lips of the opponent. Nearby, colts and mares, indifferent, nibbled grass or looked away. Then it stopped. The rust-colored one dropped his head and pawed the ground while the winner loped off in an arc, nudging the mares before him.

    As we elbowed back through the grass looking for the dug-out place, avoiding the line of parked trucks beyond, we lost our way. Although it took forever to re-sight the fence, neither of us panicked until we heard voices, urgent but low. I grabbed her arm and put a finger to my lips. Never lifting our heads, just peeping through the grass, we saw them pull a body from a wheelbarrow and throw it into a hole already waiting. One foot stuck up over the edge and quivered, as though it could get out, as though with a little effort it could break through the dirt being shoveled in. We could not see the faces of the men doing the burying, only their trousers; but we saw the edge of a spade drive the jerking foot down to join the rest of itself. When she saw that black foot with its creamy pink and mud-streaked sole being whacked into the grave, her whole body began to shake. I hugged her shoulders tight and tried to pull her trembling into my own bones because, as a brother four years older, I thought I could handle it. The men were long gone and the moon was a cantaloupe by the time we felt safe enough to disturb even one blade of grass and move on our stomachs, searching for the scooped-out part under the fence. When we got home we expected to be whipped or at least scolded for staying out so late, but the grown-ups did not notice us. Some disturbance had their attention.

    Since you’re set on telling my story, whatever you think and whatever you write down, know this: I really forgot about the burial. I only remembered the horses. They were so beautiful. So brutal. And they stood like men.

    SOURCE: Excerpted from MORRISON, Toni. Home (2012), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2012.

    In the excerpt: “The grass was shoulder high for her and waist high for me so, looking out for snakes, we crawled through it on our bellies.” We can understand that:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b458dd5-01
  • 6B41DC49-01

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Read the text and asnwer questions:

    HOME

    They rose up like men. We saw them. Like men they stood.

    We shouldn’t have been anywhere near that place. Like most farmland outside Lotus, Georgia, this here one had plenty scary warning signs. The threats hung from wire mesh fences with wooden stakes every fifty or so feet. But when we saw a crawl space that some animal had dug—a coyote maybe, or a coon dog—we couldn’t resist. Just kids we were. The grass was shoulder high for her and waist high for me so, looking out for snakes, we crawled through it on our bellies. The reward was worth the harm grass juice and clouds of gnats did to our eyes, because there right in front of us, about fifty yards off, they stood like men. Their raised hooves crashing and striking, their manes tossing back from wild white eyes. They bit each other like dogs but when they stood, reared up on their hind legs, their forelegs around the withers of the other, we held our breath in wonder. One was rust-colored, the other deep black, both sunny with sweat. The neighs were not as frightening as the silence following a kick of hind legs into the lifted lips of the opponent. Nearby, colts and mares, indifferent, nibbled grass or looked away. Then it stopped. The rust-colored one dropped his head and pawed the ground while the winner loped off in an arc, nudging the mares before him.

    As we elbowed back through the grass looking for the dug-out place, avoiding the line of parked trucks beyond, we lost our way. Although it took forever to re-sight the fence, neither of us panicked until we heard voices, urgent but low. I grabbed her arm and put a finger to my lips. Never lifting our heads, just peeping through the grass, we saw them pull a body from a wheelbarrow and throw it into a hole already waiting. One foot stuck up over the edge and quivered, as though it could get out, as though with a little effort it could break through the dirt being shoveled in. We could not see the faces of the men doing the burying, only their trousers; but we saw the edge of a spade drive the jerking foot down to join the rest of itself. When she saw that black foot with its creamy pink and mud-streaked sole being whacked into the grave, her whole body began to shake. I hugged her shoulders tight and tried to pull her trembling into my own bones because, as a brother four years older, I thought I could handle it. The men were long gone and the moon was a cantaloupe by the time we felt safe enough to disturb even one blade of grass and move on our stomachs, searching for the scooped-out part under the fence. When we got home we expected to be whipped or at least scolded for staying out so late, but the grown-ups did not notice us. Some disturbance had their attention.

    Since you’re set on telling my story, whatever you think and whatever you write down, know this: I really forgot about the burial. I only remembered the horses. They were so beautiful. So brutal. And they stood like men.

    SOURCE: Excerpted from MORRISON, Toni. Home (2012), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2012.

    Considering the text, answer the question: Who were they in: “Like men they stood.” (1st line)
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b41dc49-01
  • 6B3D7B1B-01

    Literatura

    Arcadismo
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Read the text and asnwer questions:

    HOME

    They rose up like men. We saw them. Like men they stood.

    We shouldn’t have been anywhere near that place. Like most farmland outside Lotus, Georgia, this here one had plenty scary warning signs. The threats hung from wire mesh fences with wooden stakes every fifty or so feet. But when we saw a crawl space that some animal had dug—a coyote maybe, or a coon dog—we couldn’t resist. Just kids we were. The grass was shoulder high for her and waist high for me so, looking out for snakes, we crawled through it on our bellies. The reward was worth the harm grass juice and clouds of gnats did to our eyes, because there right in front of us, about fifty yards off, they stood like men. Their raised hooves crashing and striking, their manes tossing back from wild white eyes. They bit each other like dogs but when they stood, reared up on their hind legs, their forelegs around the withers of the other, we held our breath in wonder. One was rust-colored, the other deep black, both sunny with sweat. The neighs were not as frightening as the silence following a kick of hind legs into the lifted lips of the opponent. Nearby, colts and mares, indifferent, nibbled grass or looked away. Then it stopped. The rust-colored one dropped his head and pawed the ground while the winner loped off in an arc, nudging the mares before him.

    As we elbowed back through the grass looking for the dug-out place, avoiding the line of parked trucks beyond, we lost our way. Although it took forever to re-sight the fence, neither of us panicked until we heard voices, urgent but low. I grabbed her arm and put a finger to my lips. Never lifting our heads, just peeping through the grass, we saw them pull a body from a wheelbarrow and throw it into a hole already waiting. One foot stuck up over the edge and quivered, as though it could get out, as though with a little effort it could break through the dirt being shoveled in. We could not see the faces of the men doing the burying, only their trousers; but we saw the edge of a spade drive the jerking foot down to join the rest of itself. When she saw that black foot with its creamy pink and mud-streaked sole being whacked into the grave, her whole body began to shake. I hugged her shoulders tight and tried to pull her trembling into my own bones because, as a brother four years older, I thought I could handle it. The men were long gone and the moon was a cantaloupe by the time we felt safe enough to disturb even one blade of grass and move on our stomachs, searching for the scooped-out part under the fence. When we got home we expected to be whipped or at least scolded for staying out so late, but the grown-ups did not notice us. Some disturbance had their attention.

    Since you’re set on telling my story, whatever you think and whatever you write down, know this: I really forgot about the burial. I only remembered the horses. They were so beautiful. So brutal. And they stood like men.

    SOURCE: Excerpted from MORRISON, Toni. Home (2012), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2012.

    Assinale a alternativa correta sobre a produção literária brasileira ao longo do Século XIX.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b3d7b1b-01
  • 6B3992D6-01

    Literatura

    Escolas Literárias
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho abaixo é um fragmento do capítulo de abertura do romance Memórias póstumas de Brás Cubas, de Machado de Assis.

    A partir da leitura do trecho de abertura do romance Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas, indique qual característica elencada abaixo está completamente ausente do trecho.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b3992d6-01
  • 6B324867-01

    Literatura

    Escolas Literárias
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho abaixo é um fragmento do capítulo de abertura do romance Memórias póstumas de Brás Cubas, de Machado de Assis.
    Imagem da questão de Literatura, da prova de 2019
    Imagem da questão de Literatura, da prova de 2019

    Considere as seguintes observações sobre a vida e a obra de Machado de Assis.

    I. Machado de Assis teve uma origem humilde: foi neto de escravos alforriados e filho de Francisco José de Assis, um pintor de paredes, e de Maria Leopoldina Machado de Assis, portuguesa açoriana que se dedicava a serviços domésticos. Mediante uma carreira dedicada às letras, ao jornalismo e ao funcionalismo público, Machado de Assis viveu ao longo do tempo uma trajetória de ascensão social.
    II. Durante décadas de dedicação à vida literária, uma importante faceta de Machado de Assis foi a composição de crônicas, publicadas em jornais e revistas brasileiros. Nas suas crônicas, Machado escrevia sobre uma gama de temas, da vida cotidiana a fatos políticos da sua época.
    III. Em 1897 realizou-se a sessão inaugural, no Rio de Janeiro, da Academia Brasileira de Letras, que teve como seu primeiro presidente Machado de Assis.

    Assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b324867-01
  • 6B2EC2F4-01

    Literatura

    Escolas Literárias
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho abaixo é um fragmento do capítulo de abertura do romance Memórias póstumas de Brás Cubas, de Machado de Assis.
    Imagem da questão de Literatura, da prova de 2019
    Imagem da questão de Literatura, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b2ec2f4-01
  • 6B2A55BE-01

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    O trecho abaixo é um fragmento do capítulo de abertura do romance Memórias póstumas de Brás Cubas, de Machado de Assis.
    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019
    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b2a55be-01
  • 6B268AAA-01

    Português

    Adjetivos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b268aaa-01
  • 6B22E7D0-01

    Português

    Artigos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa correta
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b22e7d0-01
  • 6B1F0AC0-01

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa que indica a relação sinonímica INCORRETA, tendo em vista o emprego das palavras no texto.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b1f0ac0-01
  • 6B1BC137-01

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Assinale a alternativa correta sobre o texto
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b1bc137-01
  • 6B17CD73-01

    Português

    Figuras de Linguagem
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019Muito fácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Sobre o texto é correto afirmar que:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b17cd73-01
  • 6B101098-01

    Português

    Interpretação de Textos
    Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos

    Texto para a questão.

    Imagem da questão de Português, da prova de 2019

    Depreende-se corretamente da leitura do texto que:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6b101098-01
  • 82D9DCC5-FF

    Inglês

    Palavras conectivas | Connective words
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    Analyse the items usage in the text. Mark the one which is a modifier.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82d9dcc5-ff
  • 82D65C32-FF

    Inglês

    Vocabulário | Vocabulary
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    For Instance (L22) sets:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82d65c32-ff
  • 82D28F99-FF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    The goal of the standards movement is to:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82d28f99-ff
  • 82CF2342-FF

    Inglês

    Vocabulário | Vocabulary
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    “Meet” (L22) does NOT mean:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82cf2342-ff
  • 82CA78A0-FF

    Inglês

    Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    The text states that:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82ca78a0-ff
  • 82C7052D-FF

    Inglês

    Palavras conectivas | Connective words
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Science Education in the United States of America

    (Audrey B. Champagne.)

        Science education in the United States of America is in the midst of an unprecedented reform movement-unprecedented because the movement is driven by national standards developed with support from the federal government. The standards for science education are redefining the character of science education from kindergarten to the postgraduate education of scientists and science teachers. Unlike the education in most countries of the world, education of students in kindergarten through grade twelve in the United States is not the responsibility of the federal government but is controlled by the individual states. States have the right to regulate all elements of the curriculum-the content all students are expected to learn, the structural organization of programs across all grades, the structural organization of the yearly curriculum in each subject, teaching methods, and textbooks. Historically, and even now, the states jealously guard all their rights and resist efforts by the federal government to exercise control over matters that are the responsibility of the states. The federal government's involvement in education has been to identify matters of national priority and to provide funds and other resources to the states to meet the national priorities. So, for instance, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the United States felt that its perceived preeminence in scientific research and its national safety were threatened, science education was identified as a national priority. The primary purpose of the federal government's initiatives was to encourage and upgrade the science education of young people who would become practicing scientists. This effort was not perceived by the states as an erosion of their rights because it was a response to a threat to the nation and was targeted on the science education of a relatively few students. The current situation is quite different.
        The federal government's underwriting of the development of national standards for education has the potential for shifting the control of the curriculum from the states to the federal government. This initiative, supported by the National Association of Governors, is the result of the concern of political, business and industrial leaders with the poor quality of education across the nation and with the effect this poor quality has on the U.S. position in the world economy. The goal of the standards movement from the prospective of political, business, and industrial leaders is to strengthen education so that the schools will produce graduates with the knowledge and skills required of them to be productive in the workplace.
       The pedagogy and attitudes of many teachers and professors alike has been that science is for the few. So little concern or effort was applied to make science interesting or to make learning it easy. Consequently, only highly motivated and highly intelligent students survived science courses. Thus it appears education in the natural sciences develops individuals who reason well, are critical thinkers, are creative problem solvers-in short, are intelligent. But, we must ask, does education in the natural sciences produce smarter people or do smart people survive science as it is taught? While historically the answer to the question may well have been survival, the national standards are based on the beliefs that science is for all and can produce smarter people.

    (Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ608194.pdf. Adapted.)
    “Thus” (L52) introduces a/an:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82c7052d-ff
  • 82C391BD-FF

    Química

    Cadeias Carbônicas: Características e Classificações do Átomo do Carbono, Tipos de Ligação e Hibridação. Tipos de Cadeias Carbônicas e Fórmulas. Séries: Homóloga, Isóloga e Heteróloga.
    Faculdades Integradas Aparício Carvalho · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
    Considerando o parametilbenzenol, conhecido usualmente como orto-cresol, assinale o número de carbonos, o tipo de ligação, a função e a massa molar, em g/mol, respectivamente:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 82c391bd-ff