Questões de Inglês do ENEM
Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.
Resultados
624 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 12 de 32.
F1F380E9-D7 Can our technological connectedness trump the risks of our biological and geographic connectedness? That’s one reason Nathan Wolfe has pushed GVF (Globe Viral Forecasting) to pioneer what he calls digital epidemiology, which uses the resources of the Internet to make predictive sense of the viral chatter picked up in the field. He and his team are setting up a bioinformatics strategy that could mine data from Internet searches and social media to pinpoint new outbreaks as they dawn – and potentially predict which newly discovered viruses might pose real threats to humanity. That work is culminating in a project called Epidemic IQ that will, Wolfe hopes, provide the ability to predict new pandemics the way the CIA might predict a terrorist attack.Current global disease control efforts focus largely on attempting to stop pandemics after they have already emerged. This fire brigade approach, which generally involves drugs, vaccines, and behavioral change, has severe limitations. Just as we discovered in the 1960s that it is better to prevent heart attacks than try to treat them, we realize that it’s better to stop pandemics before they spread and that effort should increasingly be focused on viral forecasting and pandemic prevention.“We’re finally beginning to understand why pandemics happen instead of just reacting to them”, Wolfe says. What’s needed is a global effort to scale up that kind of proactive work to ensure that every hot spot has surveillance running for new pathogens in animals and in human beings and that it has its own GVF-type group to do the work. Viruses don’t respect borders – whether between nations or between species – and in a world where airlines act like bloodlines, global health is only as strong as its weakest link. We got lucky with the relatively weak swine-flu pandemic in 2009, but history tells us our luck won’t last. “We sit here dodging bullets left and right, assuming we have an invisible shield”, says Wolfe. “But you can’t dodge bullets forever.”WALSH, Bryan.Virus hunter. Disponível em: <content.time.com/time/subscriber/l>. Acesso em: mai. 2018. Adaptado.
Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False). Considering the strategy set up by Nathan Wolfe and his team to handle the problem of pandemics, it’s correct to say that they aim to( ) ignore the next pandemics before it happens.( ) make the most of the Internet resources so as to better deal with them.( ) detect potential lethal viruses at their source.( ) disregard any information gotten through social media.The correct sequence, from top to bottom, isD8EC2649-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
The aim of mindfulness is not quieting the mind, or attempting to achieve a state of eternal calm. The goal is simple: we’re aiming to pay attention to the present moment, without judgment. Easier said than done, we know. When we notice judgments arise during our practice, we can make a mental note of them, and let them pass. Return to observing the present moment as it is. That’s the practice. The work is to just keep doing it. Results will accrue.Disponível em:<https://www.mindful.org/what-is-mindfulness/> . Acesso em: abr. 2018. Adaptado.The suitable definition of the phrase “Easier said than done” is
D8E63691-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
The aim of mindfulness is not quieting the mind, or attempting to achieve a state of eternal calm. The goal is simple: we’re aiming to pay attention to the present moment, without judgment. Easier said than done, we know. When we notice judgments arise during our practice, we can make a mental note of them, and let them pass. Return to observing the present moment as it is. That’s the practice. The work is to just keep doing it. Results will accrue.Disponível em:<https://www.mindful.org/what-is-mindfulness/> . Acesso em: abr. 2018. Adaptado.According to the text, mindfulness emphasizes that we should try to
D8E29692-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
Big U.S. tobacco companies are all developing e-cigarettes. The battery-powered gadgets feature a glowing tip and a heating element that turns liquid nicotine and flavorings into a cloud of vapor that users inhale. Some past research has suggested that using e-cigarettes may help smokers cut down on use of traditional tobacco products, or even transition entirely away from tobacco – an idea aggressively marketed by e-cigarette and tobacco companies.But a recent European study says that smokers who also use e-cigarettes may be half as likely to give up tobacco as smokers who never vape at all.
Researchers analyzed data from a 2014 survey of more than 13,000 current or former smokers in the European Union. About 2,500 had tried vaping at least once; 46% of the participants were former smokers and 19% currently or previously used e-cigarettes. The study revealed that people smoked an average of about 14 cigarettes a day when they didn’t vape, and around 16 cigarettes a day when they did.“This is important because e-cigarettes are widely promoted as a smoking cessation tool”, said senior author Stanton Glantz of California, San Francisco. “And, while there is no question that some smokers do successfully quit with e-cigarettes, they keep many more people smoking”, he added.“Most adult smokers express a desire to quit, and many try and fail”, said Samir Soneji, a health policy researcher in New Hampshire. “E-cigarettes might seem like an appealing cessation tool because the devices in some ways mimic the smoking, but nicotine gum or patches may be more effective.”RAPAPORT, Lisa. Disponível em: <http://www.foxnews.com>. Acesso em: abr. 2018. Adaptado.
About the role of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, the study has found out that e-cigarette usersD8DF6A52-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
Big U.S. tobacco companies are all developing e-cigarettes. The battery-powered gadgets feature a glowing tip and a heating element that turns liquid nicotine and flavorings into a cloud of vapor that users inhale. Some past research has suggested that using e-cigarettes may help smokers cut down on use of traditional tobacco products, or even transition entirely away from tobacco – an idea aggressively marketed by e-cigarette and tobacco companies.But a recent European study says that smokers who also use e-cigarettes may be half as likely to give up tobacco as smokers who never vape at all.
Researchers analyzed data from a 2014 survey of more than 13,000 current or former smokers in the European Union. About 2,500 had tried vaping at least once; 46% of the participants were former smokers and 19% currently or previously used e-cigarettes. The study revealed that people smoked an average of about 14 cigarettes a day when they didn’t vape, and around 16 cigarettes a day when they did.“This is important because e-cigarettes are widely promoted as a smoking cessation tool”, said senior author Stanton Glantz of California, San Francisco. “And, while there is no question that some smokers do successfully quit with e-cigarettes, they keep many more people smoking”, he added.“Most adult smokers express a desire to quit, and many try and fail”, said Samir Soneji, a health policy researcher in New Hampshire. “E-cigarettes might seem like an appealing cessation tool because the devices in some ways mimic the smoking, but nicotine gum or patches may be more effective.”RAPAPORT, Lisa. Disponível em: <http://www.foxnews.com>. Acesso em: abr. 2018. Adaptado.
Considering the recent European study about e-cigarettes, fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).( ) Over thirteen thousand people took part in the survey.( ) All the participants had been cigarette smokers at some point.( ) The smokers in the study used more cigarettes a day when they vaped.( ) None of the participants had tried e-cigarettes before the survey.The correct sequence, from top to bottom, isD8DBC180-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
Big U.S. tobacco companies are all developing e-cigarettes. The battery-powered gadgets feature a glowing tip and a heating element that turns liquid nicotine and flavorings into a cloud of vapor that users inhale. Some past research has suggested that using e-cigarettes may help smokers cut down on use of traditional tobacco products, or even transition entirely away from tobacco – an idea aggressively marketed by e-cigarette and tobacco companies.But a recent European study says that smokers who also use e-cigarettes may be half as likely to give up tobacco as smokers who never vape at all.
Researchers analyzed data from a 2014 survey of more than 13,000 current or former smokers in the European Union. About 2,500 had tried vaping at least once; 46% of the participants were former smokers and 19% currently or previously used e-cigarettes. The study revealed that people smoked an average of about 14 cigarettes a day when they didn’t vape, and around 16 cigarettes a day when they did.“This is important because e-cigarettes are widely promoted as a smoking cessation tool”, said senior author Stanton Glantz of California, San Francisco. “And, while there is no question that some smokers do successfully quit with e-cigarettes, they keep many more people smoking”, he added.“Most adult smokers express a desire to quit, and many try and fail”, said Samir Soneji, a health policy researcher in New Hampshire. “E-cigarettes might seem like an appealing cessation tool because the devices in some ways mimic the smoking, but nicotine gum or patches may be more effective.”RAPAPORT, Lisa. Disponível em: <http://www.foxnews.com>. Acesso em: abr. 2018. Adaptado.About e-cigarettes, it’s correct to say that they
11562C74-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
A new study published in Current Biology is investigating why you get poor sleep in unfamiliar places. It suggests that when people sleep in an unfamiliar place, one hemisphere of the brain stays more awake as a way to keep watch for potential danger possibly a remnant of the days when Homo sapiens had to guard their territory every night.
This phenomenon is known as unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, and it’s seen in marine animals and some birds. This is the first study to suggest that the human brain may also be hard-wired to function in a similar way, although on a smaller scale. Humans, unlike sparrows, don’t usually sleep with one eye open. However, when in new surroundings, one hemisphere of the brain may stay at least a little bit awake – great for waking quickly if an intruder shows up, but with a resulting groggy feeling the next morning.
The group of researchers recruited sleep study participants, and conducted neuroimaging along with polysomnography, a standard test used in sleep labs to monitor brain waves, oxygen level in blood, heart rate, breathing, and eye and leg movements. They discovered that only the brain’s right hemisphere was consistently engaged in slow-wave, or deep, sleep. The left hemisphere – the side responsible for logical thinking and reasoning – had what the researchers called “enhanced vigilance”, which also made the entire brain more responsive to sound.
The researchers tried a test where they targeted sounds to the left and right ear. They found that on the first night, 80 percent of the arousals from deep sleep occurred when sound was made to target the right ear (the brain’s left hemisphere). On day two, that number dropped to about 50 percent.FIRGER, Jessica. Disponível em: <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/ jessica-figer>. Acesso em: set. 2018. Adaptado.
The word or expression from the text has not been correctly defined in1152FA6F-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
A new study published in Current Biology is investigating why you get poor sleep in unfamiliar places. It suggests that when people sleep in an unfamiliar place, one hemisphere of the brain stays more awake as a way to keep watch for potential danger possibly a remnant of the days when Homo sapiens had to guard their territory every night.The scientists found out that
This phenomenon is known as unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, and it’s seen in marine animals and some birds. This is the first study to suggest that the human brain may also be hard-wired to function in a similar way, although on a smaller scale. Humans, unlike sparrows, don’t usually sleep with one eye open. However, when in new surroundings, one hemisphere of the brain may stay at least a little bit awake – great for waking quickly if an intruder shows up, but with a resulting groggy feeling the next morning.
The group of researchers recruited sleep study participants, and conducted neuroimaging along with polysomnography, a standard test used in sleep labs to monitor brain waves, oxygen level in blood, heart rate, breathing, and eye and leg movements. They discovered that only the brain’s right hemisphere was consistently engaged in slow-wave, or deep, sleep. The left hemisphere – the side responsible for logical thinking and reasoning – had what the researchers called “enhanced vigilance”, which also made the entire brain more responsive to sound.
The researchers tried a test where they targeted sounds to the left and right ear. They found that on the first night, 80 percent of the arousals from deep sleep occurred when sound was made to target the right ear (the brain’s left hemisphere). On day two, that number dropped to about 50 percent.FIRGER, Jessica. Disponível em: <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/ jessica-figer>. Acesso em: set. 2018. Adaptado.
114FDC36-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
A new study published in Current Biology is investigating why you get poor sleep in unfamiliar places. It suggests that when people sleep in an unfamiliar place, one hemisphere of the brain stays more awake as a way to keep watch for potential danger possibly a remnant of the days when Homo sapiens had to guard their territory every night.In order to monitor the participants’ brains, the researchers
This phenomenon is known as unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, and it’s seen in marine animals and some birds. This is the first study to suggest that the human brain may also be hard-wired to function in a similar way, although on a smaller scale. Humans, unlike sparrows, don’t usually sleep with one eye open. However, when in new surroundings, one hemisphere of the brain may stay at least a little bit awake – great for waking quickly if an intruder shows up, but with a resulting groggy feeling the next morning.
The group of researchers recruited sleep study participants, and conducted neuroimaging along with polysomnography, a standard test used in sleep labs to monitor brain waves, oxygen level in blood, heart rate, breathing, and eye and leg movements. They discovered that only the brain’s right hemisphere was consistently engaged in slow-wave, or deep, sleep. The left hemisphere – the side responsible for logical thinking and reasoning – had what the researchers called “enhanced vigilance”, which also made the entire brain more responsive to sound.
The researchers tried a test where they targeted sounds to the left and right ear. They found that on the first night, 80 percent of the arousals from deep sleep occurred when sound was made to target the right ear (the brain’s left hemisphere). On day two, that number dropped to about 50 percent.FIRGER, Jessica. Disponível em: <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/ jessica-figer>. Acesso em: set. 2018. Adaptado.
114ADE55-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosQuestão
A new study published in Current Biology is investigating why you get poor sleep in unfamiliar places. It suggests that when people sleep in an unfamiliar place, one hemisphere of the brain stays more awake as a way to keep watch for potential danger possibly a remnant of the days when Homo sapiens had to guard their territory every night.According to the text, fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).
This phenomenon is known as unihemispheric slow-wave sleep, and it’s seen in marine animals and some birds. This is the first study to suggest that the human brain may also be hard-wired to function in a similar way, although on a smaller scale. Humans, unlike sparrows, don’t usually sleep with one eye open. However, when in new surroundings, one hemisphere of the brain may stay at least a little bit awake – great for waking quickly if an intruder shows up, but with a resulting groggy feeling the next morning.
The group of researchers recruited sleep study participants, and conducted neuroimaging along with polysomnography, a standard test used in sleep labs to monitor brain waves, oxygen level in blood, heart rate, breathing, and eye and leg movements. They discovered that only the brain’s right hemisphere was consistently engaged in slow-wave, or deep, sleep. The left hemisphere – the side responsible for logical thinking and reasoning – had what the researchers called “enhanced vigilance”, which also made the entire brain more responsive to sound.
The researchers tried a test where they targeted sounds to the left and right ear. They found that on the first night, 80 percent of the arousals from deep sleep occurred when sound was made to target the right ear (the brain’s left hemisphere). On day two, that number dropped to about 50 percent.FIRGER, Jessica. Disponível em: <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/ jessica-figer>. Acesso em: set. 2018. Adaptado.
The study mentioned in the text says that, when we sleep in a new location,
( ) half of our brain may remain alert.
( ) we behave exactly like sparrows.
( ) the left hemisphere of our brain is less asleep than the right.
( ) our brain’s vigilance is a way to protect us from unknown dangers.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is1146EEBB-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Disponível em: <https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/26963-if-you-can-t-flythen-run-if-you-can-t-run>. Acesso em: set. 2018.According to this quote by Martin Luther King Jr.104D70CF-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Feevale · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
The word “marginalized” (line 7) CANNOT be replaced by
104A1B19-D6 Inglês
Verbos | VerbsUniversidade Feevale · 2018FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Choose the alternative that indicates the same verb tense as in “Pimp My Carroça took to the streets of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Curitiba” (line 17).1046EDB4-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Feevale · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Considering the sentence “They provide a heavy, honest and essential work that benefits the entire population.”, (lines 3-4), the word honest can be replaced without changing meaning by1043C7D0-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Feevale · 2018Muito difícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Com base no texto, considere verdadeiras (V) ou falsas (F) as afirmações que seguem.
( ) A maioria dos catadores é autônomo e coleta lixo das ruas para vender aos depósitos de sucatas, geralmente a preços baixos.
( ) Grafiteiros são artistas que somente pintam muros nas grandes capitais.
( ) Os catadores são invisíveis, exclusivamente, na sociedade brasileira.
Marque a alternativa que preenche corretamente os parênteses, de cima para baixo.
10408301-D6 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUniversidade Feevale · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritos
Sobre o texto, fazem-se as seguintes afirmações.
I- Os super-heróis também existem na vida real.
II- Os catadores brasileiros não são essenciais à população.
III- A desigualdade social, o desemprego e o lixo em abundância fizeram surgir a ocupação de catadores no Brasil.
Marque a alternativa correta.
97283134-D5 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro de Estudos Superiores de Maceió - Centro Universitário · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosRead the graph below and answer the following question.

Adaptado de: <https://brainly.com/question/2608462> Acessado em 18 de outubro de 2018.
According to the graph above it is true to assert that972483ED-D5 Inglês
Sinônimos | SynonymsCentro de Estudos Superiores de Maceió - Centro Universitário · 2018MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosAll of the following are a synonym of shrink except for97219A4F-D5 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro de Estudos Superiores de Maceió - Centro Universitário · 2018DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosRead the text below and answer the following question.Redefining the KilogramThe kilogram is shrinking.The official object that defines the mass of a kilogram is a tiny, 139-year-old cylinder of platinum and iridium that resides in a triple-locked vault near Paris. Because it is so important, scientists almost never take it out; instead they use copies called working standards. But the last time they did inspect the real kilogram, they found it is roughly five parts in 100 million heavier than all the working standards, which have been leaving behind a few atoms of metal every time they are put on scales. This is one of the reasons the kilogram may soon be redefined not by a physical object but through calculations based on fundamental constants.“This [shrinking] is the kind of thing that happens when you have an object that needs to be conserved in order to have a standard,” says Peter Mohr, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), who serves on the committee that oversees the International System of Units (SI). “Fundamental constants, on the other hand, are not going to change over time.”The redefinition of the kilogram will be part of a planned larger overhaul to make SI units fully dependent on constants of nature. Representatives from 57 countries will vote on the proposed change this month at a conference in Versailles, France, and the new rules are expected to pass.What will happen to the old kilogram artifacts after the redefinition? Rather than packing them off to museums, scientists plan to keep studying how they fare over time. “There is so much measurement history on these,” says physicist Stephan Schlamminger of NIST. “It would be irresponsible to not continue to measure them.”Adaptado de: <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/redefining-thekilogram/> Acessado em 10 de outubro de 2018.The artifact that represents the kilogram
971E9335-D5 Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionCentro de Estudos Superiores de Maceió - Centro Universitário · 2018Muito difícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosRead the text below and answer the following question.Redefining the KilogramThe kilogram is shrinking.The official object that defines the mass of a kilogram is a tiny, 139-year-old cylinder of platinum and iridium that resides in a triple-locked vault near Paris. Because it is so important, scientists almost never take it out; instead they use copies called working standards. But the last time they did inspect the real kilogram, they found it is roughly five parts in 100 million heavier than all the working standards, which have been leaving behind a few atoms of metal every time they are put on scales. This is one of the reasons the kilogram may soon be redefined not by a physical object but through calculations based on fundamental constants.“This [shrinking] is the kind of thing that happens when you have an object that needs to be conserved in order to have a standard,” says Peter Mohr, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), who serves on the committee that oversees the International System of Units (SI). “Fundamental constants, on the other hand, are not going to change over time.”The redefinition of the kilogram will be part of a planned larger overhaul to make SI units fully dependent on constants of nature. Representatives from 57 countries will vote on the proposed change this month at a conference in Versailles, France, and the new rules are expected to pass.What will happen to the old kilogram artifacts after the redefinition? Rather than packing them off to museums, scientists plan to keep studying how they fare over time. “There is so much measurement history on these,” says physicist Stephan Schlamminger of NIST. “It would be irresponsible to not continue to measure them.”Adaptado de: <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/redefining-thekilogram/> Acessado em 10 de outubro de 2018.The Kilogram as we know it