Pular para o conteúdo

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 27 de 266

  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUCTION: Answer question with information from text 1.


    TEXT 1

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RS 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    (Source: The New England Journal of Medicine,

    Number 7, August 13, 2009)

    De acordo com o segundo parágrafo, a atuação dos médicos nas redes sociais NÃO deve ser
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 62809c04-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUCTION: Answer question with information from text 2.


    TEXT 2

    The smell of rain on dry ground


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RS 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    QUINION, Michael. www.worldwidewords.org

    (fragment)

    The text presents a definition for the word
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6283c4e8-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUCTION: Answer question with information from text 2.


    TEXT 2

    The smell of rain on dry ground


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RS 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    QUINION, Michael. www.worldwidewords.org

    (fragment)

    The feeling embedded in the word Alas (line 19) is that of
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 6286f6fd-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    INSTRUCTION: Answer question with information from text 2.


    TEXT 2

    The smell of rain on dry ground


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, PUC - RS 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    QUINION, Michael. www.worldwidewords.org

    (fragment)

    Com base na leitura, conclui-se que o texto 2
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 628aedd3-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).

    About the mummified woman, it’s correct to say:


    ( ) She was rather short.

    ( ) She was an elderly lady when she died.

    ( ) Her legs had been tied with a rope.

    ( ) She was much younger than most Peruvian mummies.


    According to the text, the correct sequence, from top to bottom, is

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d2bced2-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Vocabulário | Vocabulary

    COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    __________ the mummy was very old, the dead body _______


    Based on the text, the alternative that completes the blanks correctly is

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d312bf4-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    It’s stated in the text:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d34bc2c-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    “The woman, named the ‘Lady of Pacopampa’ after the site in the northern highlands” (l. 5-7)


    The expression in bold should be understood as

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d393d43-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions

    COLLYNS, Dan. Peruvian mummy found. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090916_witn_peru_mummy.shtm>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    “contemporary with the better-known Chavin and Cupisnique cultures.” (l. 24-25)


    The word “better” in this sentence is the irregular degree of

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d3caf3f-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    Fill in the parentheses with T (True) or F (False).

    The text has answers to the following questions:


    ( ) Where was the present research published?

    ( ) How many scientists took part in the present expedition?

    ( ) What are Arctic high temperatures an indication of?

    ( ) When did the scientists produce evidence of the warming phenomenon in the Arctic?


    According to the text, the correct sequence, from top to bottom,

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d44a143-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    The only alternative in which the word or expression from the text IS NOT correctly defined is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d47ab91-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Aspectos linguísticos | Linguistic aspects

    BLACK, Richard. Arctic warmest in two millennia. Disponível em:<www.bbc.co.uk/ worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2009/09/090904_witn_arctic.shtml>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.

    Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d4bcbf0-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNICENTRO 2010, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Disponível em: <http://commontragedies.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/mad-as-hell.jpg>Acesso em: 10 jun. 2010.


    The man in this cartoon is angry because

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5d507291-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species

         First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly 40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
         Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
         In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University in Ohio.
         The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
    (Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
    Where was the skeleton found?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c02b68af-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Lucy’s Big Brother Reveals New Facets of her Species

         First came Lucy. Then came Lucy’s baby, an infant of her species. Now comes Lucy’s “big brother”: the partial skeleton of a large male of Australopithecus afarensis, unveiled this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The roughly 40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means “big man” in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of Ethiopia, where it was found. “It was huge – a big man, with long legs”, says lead author Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
         Dated to 3.6 million years ago, the new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy and the second oldest skeleton found of a possible human ancestor. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like those of a modern human than an African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile-Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton also preserves parts not found before in Lucy’s species. “It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula”, says palaeoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
         In 2005, a sharp-eyed member of Haile-Selassie’s team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of lower arm bone on the ground at Woranso-Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy’s grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together in an A. afarensis adult. The team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones. Although they never found the skull or teeth, which are typically used to assign species, the skeleton’s age and similarity to Lucy suggest that it belongs to her species, says co-author Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University in Ohio.
         The robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. Isolated bones of other individuals suggest that some males were even larger, so the new skeleton doesn’t settle a long-standing debate over just how much sexual dimorphism there was in A. afarensis, Lovejoy says. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel-shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors say.
    (Science Magazine, 25 June 2010.)
    Why do palaeoanthropologists believe the skeleton may be a human ancestor?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c0318ff4-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

         Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
         It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times more beer than the average German brewery. 
         This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies. 
         The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer. Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale). 
    (Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)  
    Are the statements true (T) or false (F), according to the text?

    ( ) The United States produces less beer than Germany.
    ( ) The German steel industry is better organized than the German beer industry.
    ( ) The German metalworking industry is more productive than the American metalworking industry.
    ( ) In Germany there are more factories producing beer than in the United States.
    ( ) 43% of the beer sold in the United States is produced in Germany.

    Mark the alternative which presents the correct sequence, from top to bottom.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c03464b3-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

         Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
         It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times more beer than the average German brewery. 
         This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies. 
         The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer. Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale). 
    (Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)  
    Which of these statements DOES NOT CORRESPOND to information given in the text?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c0376c7f-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

         Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
         It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times more beer than the average German brewery. 
         This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies. 
         The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer. Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale). 
    (Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)  
    How does Germany protect its beer industry, according to the text?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c03b2772-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

         Germans make wonderful beer. Yet the productivity of the German beer industry is only 43 percent that of the U.S. beer industry. Meanwhile, the German metalworking and steel industries are equal in productivity to their American counterparts. Since the Germans are evidently capable of organizing industries well, why can’t they do so when it comes to beer?
         It turns out that the German beer industry suffers from small-scale production. There are a thousand tiny beer companies in Germany, shielded from competition with one another because each German brewery has virtually a local monopoly, and they are also shielded from competition with imports. The United States has 67 major beer breweries, producing 23 billion liters of beer per year. All of Germany’s 1,000 breweries combined produce only half as much. Thus the average U.S. brewery produces 31 times more beer than the average German brewery. 
         This fact results from local tastes and German government policies. German beer drinkers are fiercely loyal to their local brand, so there are no national brands in Germany analogous to our Budweiser, Miller, or Coors. Instead, most German beer is consumed within 30 miles of the factory where it is brewed. Therefore, the German beer industry cannot profit from economies of scale. In the beer business, as in other businesses, production costs decrease greatly with scale. The bigger the refrigerating unit for making beer, and the longer the assembly line for filling bottles with beer, the lower the cost of manufacturing beer. Those tiny German beer companies are relatively inefficient. There’s no competition; there are just a thousand local monopolies. 
         The local beer loyalties of individual German drinkers are reinforced by German laws that make it hard for foreign beers to compete in the German market. The German government has so-called beer purity laws that specify exactly what can go into beer. Not surprisingly, those government purity specifications are based on what German breweries put into beer, and not what American, French, and Swedish breweries like to put into beer. Because of those laws, not much foreign beer gets exported to Germany, and because of inefficiency and high prices much less of that wonderful German beer than you would otherwise expect gets sold abroad. (Before you object that German Löwenbräu beer is widely available in the United States, please read the label on the next bottle of Löwenbräu that you drink here: it’s not produced in Germany but in North America, under license, in big factories with North American productivities and efficiencies of scale). 
    (Diamond, J. ,2005. Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: Norton.)  
    According to the text, why does Germany export so little beer to the U.S.?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão c03efc1a-b0
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    From the lists presented below, select the only one that has a sequence of different kinds of meat:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7a89a0ae-b0