Pular para o conteúdo
Dicas do ENEMEntrar

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 55 de 266

Ordenar porDificuldade
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    Dr. Restak calls attention to the fact that not all memory lapses are really worrying. Among those that people should worry about, he mentions forgetting their
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13a14367-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    To help our spatial memory, we can
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13960c50-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    As to reading abilities, one of the factors that shows memory difficulties is that people tend to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 139192e6-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    Among the many games that are good for our memory, Dr. Restak's favorite is
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 138f7214-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    A positive message in Dr. Restak's new book is that memory decline, as we grow old,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 138d607c-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    In relation to the improvement of working memory, Dr. Restak suggests a number of challenging exercises and activities that can generate great benefits. Among these, he includes the frequent practice of
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 138b3465-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    A Neurologist’s Tips to Protect Your Memory

    Figura 1 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions   
    Figura 2 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions
    Figura 3 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions
    Figura 4 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions
    Figura 5 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions
    Figura 6 de 6 da questão de Inglês, UECE 2022, Preposições | Prepositions 

    Adapted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/
    According to Dr. Restak, a good strategy to learn new things, like words, for example, is to establish an association with a/an
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 13860111-a2
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UECE 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Considering Damian Carrington’s opinion on the movie Don’t look up, mark the INCORRECT option.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ce32d8-9c
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UEMG 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that “Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists”. Mark the option which best describes the meaning of Nina’s statement.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37cc671d-9c
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UEMG 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Consider the following excerpt: “The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord”. Taking into account the context the excerpt was taken from, mark the option which best defines the expression “to strike a chord”. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ca4b7b-9c
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UEMG 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c61c44-9c
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UEMG 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c3fea8-9c
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UEMG 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Essential reading on, and beyond, Indigenous Peoples Day


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    and while there’s truth in those narratives, it’s also critical, (l. 32)


    The linker and while in the fragment above expresses contrast.


    A similar meaning is conveyed in: 

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b248814-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Essential reading on, and beyond, Indigenous Peoples Day


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    to acknowledge what is working in our communities and in our movements. (l. 31)


    The underlined word may be substituted, without significant change in meaning, by the one below:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b20ccae-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Essential reading on, and beyond, Indigenous Peoples Day


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022, Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice

    our people are still being attacked by the many forms of colonization, (l. 29-30)


    The sentence above exhibits the passive voice.


    Another occurrence of the passive voice is underlined below:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b1ccaf1-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Essential reading on, and beyond, Indigenous Peoples Day


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    what is most sacred to us. (l. 22-23)


    Regarding the indigenous peoples, the fragment above refers to the following elements:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b1999b3-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UERJ 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    “Two hundred years ago, Jane Austen lived in a world where single men boasted vast estates; single ladies were expected to speak several languages, sing and play the piano. In both cases, it was, of course, advantageous if you looked good too. So, how much has — or hasn't — changed? Dating apps opaquely outline the demands of today's relationship market; users ruminate long and hard over their choice of pictures and what they write in their biographies to hook in potential lovers, and that's just your own profile. What do you look for in a future partner's profile — potential signifiers of a popular personality, a good job, a nice car? These apps are a poignant reminder of the often classist atitudes we still adopt, as well as the financial and aesthetic expectations we demand from potential partners.

    GALER,S. Disponível em: www.bbc.com, Acesso em: 8 dez. 2047 (adaptado)


    O texto aborda relações interpessoais com o objetivo de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 36c95fd3-63
    Abrir questão de Inglês, ENEM 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    A Guide to Harvard “A Cappella!”


            A cappella is such a big deal on all college campuses these days, I thought I’d write a post about what Harvard has to offer (spoiler alert: many incredibly talented groups)! There are so many groups that we have a cappella jams fairly often, and it’s always a good time to go hear the other groups perform.


            Some of my favorite memories are hanging out with my a cappella group members both on campus and around the country (and soon the world during our summer tour!). The Harvard a cappella community is absurdly diverse and talented – I think every Harvard student should take advantage of all we have on campus and go see a show!


    Disponível em: https://college.harvard.edu. Acesso em: 11 dez. 2017 (adaptado).



    A expressão “a cappella” caracteriza o ato de cantar sem o acompanhamento de instrumentos musicais. A expressão “big deal”, usada com relação a esse tema, indica que

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2549e377-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, ENEM 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

            What is it about Serena that inspires such vitriol? Is it that she dominates in a sport that was once considered to be for the upper crust at country clubs? One would think that Althea Gibson and Arthur Ashe had put that idea to rest decades ago. Is it that she is considered too aggressive on the court? John McEnroe and Boris Becker seem to take the prize for that. Is it because she wins too much? To hate someone merely because he or she is great only speaks to one’s own insecurity. To attempt to and fault with someone because you cannot figure out how or why they win so often only shows that you have already lost. Or is it that she is unapologetically black? A #CarefreeBlackGirl who speaks her mind, supports her people, and whose only real opponent is herself.


    Disponível em: https://theundefeated.com. Acesso em: 28 dez. 2018.



    O texto, que discorre sobre Serena Williams, uma das mais bem-sucedidas atletas do tênis, tem o objetivo de

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 25438364-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, ENEM 2022
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Universidade de Vassouras 2022, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions

    Yet, many people with dental disease may not see a dentist until

    the process has advanced far beyond the point of saving a tooth. (l. 11-12)


    A word with the same semantic value can be found in one of the fragments below:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão e0feef78-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2022