Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
23.294 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 790 de 1165.
Não era um pássaro nem um avião. (l. 1)
A primeira frase do texto remete às perguntas feitas por personagens que observavam intrigados o voo do Super-homem em suas muitas histórias: É um pássaro? É um avião? Não! É o Super-homem!
Essa primeira frase configura um recurso da linguagem conhecido como:
A imagem acima, “A Escola de Atenas”, é considerada uma das maiores obras de arte renascentista. Foi elaborada sob a forma de afresco, realizado entre os anos de 1506-1510, sob encomenda do Vaticano para ornar um dos aposentos do palácio principal. Rafael Sanzio soube representar de modo magistral o espírito de sua época. No centro do afresco, as figuras dos filósofos Platão e Aristóteles bem como de outros sábios da Antiguidade. Considerando o contexto histórico retratado na obra e as proposições que se seguem, marque a alternativa CORRETA.
I – A realização da grandiosa obra foi em parte possível
pela prática do mecenato, que propiciava ao artista
as condições materiais para a produção de obras de
arte e de inventos científicos.
II – A técnica da perspectiva, a valorização do volume
dos corpos pelo contraste claro-escuro, e a utilização, no original, de cores vivas revelam a preocupação em representar as pinturas da forma mais realista
possível.
III – Apesar da crença em um conhecimento racional do mundo, os intelectuais desse contexto acreditavam na existência de Deus, que dotou o homem de raciocínio para desvendar as leis do universo.
IV – Os intelectuais renascentistas buscaram inspiração
nos padrões estéticos e nos conhecimentos produzidos
pelos clássicos greco-romanos da Antiguidade.
O termo independente de x no desenvolvimento
de 
é
Considere o circuito abaixo, onde a fem vale ε = 2,0 V,e todos os resistores têm o mesmo valor de resistência,R = 10 Ω.
A corrente elétrica que percorre o trecho entre os pontos
A e B é, em amperes:
Um pêndulo é formado por uma esfera de 2,0 kg que está presa à extremidade de um fio ideal de comprimento 0,80 m, cuja outra extremidade está presa a um ponto fixo, como mostrado na figura. A esfera é solta a partir do repouso, com o fio esticado na posição horizontal.
Dado que g = 10 m/s2
e não há atrito ou resistência do ar,
calcule em m/s a velocidade com que a esfera chega ao
ponto mais baixo de sua trajetória.
Um objeto é colocado em frente a um espelho côncavo, na posição tal como mostrada na figura.
Marque a resposta correta:
Uma caixa de massa 10 kg, inicialmente em repouso em uma superfície horizontal sem atrito, começa a ser puxada por uma força constante de módulo F = 10 N, como mostrado na figura.
A velocidade da caixa após 2,0 segundos é, em m/s:
Considere:
√2 = 1,4 e √3 = 1,7
sen 30º = ½
cos 30º = √3/2
The text ‘Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers?’ has been extracted from a text published in the periodical International Affairs, issue nº 89. The issue, as stated by the editors in an introductory article, ‘… has been divided into two parts. Part one comprises case-studies of three rising powers — Brazil, India and China — while the articles in part two cover the various actors and entities that have reason and/or ability to attempt to manage the rise of new powers. (…) These multiple actors may be grouped into four categories…’
The following definitions were given in the introductory article for each of the categories:
1. This group comprises states and groupings of states that have acquired, over the past decades, the role of agendasetters as Great Powers. They have exerted defining influence in shaping the rules and norms of global governance. Despite their relative decline (especially with reference to the rising powers), they still have enough power to act as gatekeepers to the inner sanctums of international regimes.
2. In this category are the countries that represent the proverbial grass that gets trampled when elephants fight. They often form the unfortunate terrain on which scrambles for power can occur, but are also occasionally able to exercise powerful leverage by providing the follower base that aspiring leaders seek, and legitimize claims to greater power by securing for those leaders the backing of large numbers.
3. As the shift in the balance of power that we see under way today is not occurring simply between states, this category includes businesses and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have emerged as repositories and brokers of power, effectively harnessed by states at different levels of the hierarchy and harnessing them to serve their own causes in turn.
4. This category recognizes that most international organizations, regimes and networks are seldom ‘actors’ in their own right. But different organizations, networks and regimes, even when made up of similar memberships, show different degrees of adaptability and reform in response to the needs and demands posed by rising powers.
The text ‘Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers?’ has been extracted from a text published in the periodical International Affairs, issue nº 89. The issue, as stated by the editors in an introductory article, ‘… has been divided into two parts. Part one comprises case-studies of three rising powers — Brazil, India and China — while the articles in part two cover the various actors and entities that have reason and/or ability to attempt to manage the rise of new powers. (…) These multiple actors may be grouped into four categories…’
The following definitions were given in the introductory article for each of the categories:
1. This group comprises states and groupings of states that have acquired, over the past decades, the role of agendasetters as Great Powers. They have exerted defining influence in shaping the rules and norms of global governance. Despite their relative decline (especially with reference to the rising powers), they still have enough power to act as gatekeepers to the inner sanctums of international regimes.
2. In this category are the countries that represent the proverbial grass that gets trampled when elephants fight. They often form the unfortunate terrain on which scrambles for power can occur, but are also occasionally able to exercise powerful leverage by providing the follower base that aspiring leaders seek, and legitimize claims to greater power by securing for those leaders the backing of large numbers.
3. As the shift in the balance of power that we see under way today is not occurring simply between states, this category includes businesses and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have emerged as repositories and brokers of power, effectively harnessed by states at different levels of the hierarchy and harnessing them to serve their own causes in turn.
4. This category recognizes that most international organizations, regimes and networks are seldom ‘actors’ in their own right. But different organizations, networks and regimes, even when made up of similar memberships, show different degrees of adaptability and reform in response to the needs and demands posed by rising powers.
In the definition transcribed in number 1 , the fragment “Despite their relative decline (…) they still have enough power to act as gatekeepers to the inner sanctums of international regimes.” means that
The text ‘Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers?’ has been extracted from a text published in the periodical International Affairs, issue nº 89. The issue, as stated by the editors in an introductory article, ‘… has been divided into two parts. Part one comprises case-studies of three rising powers — Brazil, India and China — while the articles in part two cover the various actors and entities that have reason and/or ability to attempt to manage the rise of new powers. (…) These multiple actors may be grouped into four categories…’
The following definitions were given in the introductory article for each of the categories:
1. This group comprises states and groupings of states that have acquired, over the past decades, the role of agendasetters as Great Powers. They have exerted defining influence in shaping the rules and norms of global governance. Despite their relative decline (especially with reference to the rising powers), they still have enough power to act as gatekeepers to the inner sanctums of international regimes.
2. In this category are the countries that represent the proverbial grass that gets trampled when elephants fight. They often form the unfortunate terrain on which scrambles for power can occur, but are also occasionally able to exercise powerful leverage by providing the follower base that aspiring leaders seek, and legitimize claims to greater power by securing for those leaders the backing of large numbers.
3. As the shift in the balance of power that we see under way today is not occurring simply between states, this category includes businesses and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have emerged as repositories and brokers of power, effectively harnessed by states at different levels of the hierarchy and harnessing them to serve their own causes in turn.
4. This category recognizes that most international organizations, regimes and networks are seldom ‘actors’ in their own right. But different organizations, networks and regimes, even when made up of similar memberships, show different degrees of adaptability and reform in response to the needs and demands posed by rising powers.
The sequence that matches the category with its definition is:
