Física
Gravitação UniversalUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosConsidere os seguintes instrumentos de
observação e registro astronômico,
identifique-os de acordo com a sequência
apresentada e assinale a alternativa correta.
Questões do ENEM: Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG)
Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.
Resultados
716 questões encontradas. Mostrando a página 5 de 36.
37D044A1-9C 37CE32D8-9C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.Considering Damian Carrington’s opinion on the movie Don’t look up, mark the INCORRECT option.37CC671D-9C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that “Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists”. Mark the option which best describes the meaning of Nina’s statement.37CA4B7B-9C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.Consider the following excerpt: “The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord”. Taking into account the context the excerpt was taken from, mark the option which best defines the expression “to strike a chord”.37C83904-9C Inglês
Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active VoiceUEMG · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.Consider the following excerpts taken from the text and mark the option which presents a verb form in the passive voice.37C61C44-9C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.37C3FEA8-9C Inglês
Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehensionUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosDon’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster filmCritics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their viewsRarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’[…]Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’[…]After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work.The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.[…]Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’[…]How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.[…]Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.[…]The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.37C1CF21-9C Literatura
Escolas LiteráriasUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosO texto a seguir é um excerto da obra Iracema, do escritor do Romantismo brasileiro José de Alencar.[...]Iracema saiu do banho: o aljôfar d’água ainda a roreja, como à doce mangaba que corou em manhã de chuva. Enquanto repousa, empluma das penas do gará as flechas de seu arco, e concerta com o sabiá da mata, pousado no galho próximo, o canto agreste.A graciosa ará, sua companheira e amiga, brinca junto dela. Às vezes sobe aos ramos da árvore e de lá chama a virgem pelo nome; outras remexe o uru de palha matizada, onde traz a selvagem seus perfumes, os alvos fios do crautá, as agulhas da juçara com que tece a renda, e as tintas de que matiza o algodão.Rumor suspeito quebra a doce harmonia da sesta. Ergue a virgem os olhos, que o sol não deslumbra; sua vista perturba-se.Diante dela e todo a contemplá-la está um guerreiro estranho, se é guerreiro e não algum mau espírito da floresta. Tem nas faces o branco das areias que bordam o mar; nos olhos o azul triste das águas profundas. Ignotas armas e tecidos ignotos cobrem-lhe o corpo.[...]ALENCAR, José de. Iracema. São Paulo: Ática, 2004.Considerando esse excerto da obra e o contexto de toda a narrativa, assim como as características do Romantismo, analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa correta.I. Iracema é uma obra romântica, exercendo, portanto, a função de literatura crítica, denunciando a desumanidade e o apagamento cultural dos nativos implicados no processo de colonização.II. A representação da natureza no contexto do Romantismo ocorre de maneira idealizada, ressaltando as belezas do Brasil, o que indica a presença de um nacionalismo ufanista na obra.III. O protagonismo feminino verificado em Iracema visa à representação da mulher como figura emancipada, dona de seu destino, surgindo heroínas independentes do poder masculino.IV. A linguagem é um aspecto fundamental no Romantismo, de modo que, embora o texto de Iracema seja em prosa, observam-se marcas líricas, com aguçado tom poético, na construção da narrativa.V. Em Iracema, o colono surge como herói da narrativa, sendo o par romântico da nativa, reforçando o discurso de harmonia entre os colonos e os indígenas.
37BF6771-9C Literatura
Escolas LiteráriasUEMG · 2022FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosCom base no seguinte excerto de Vidas Secas, assinale a alternativa correta.
[...]
Na planície avermelhada os juazeiros alargavam duas manchas verdes. Os infelizes tinham caminhado o dia inteiro, estavam cansados e famintos. Ordinariamente andavam pouco, mas como haviam repousado bastante na areia do rio seco, a viagem progredira bem três léguas. Fazia horas que procuravam uma sombra. A folhagem dos juazeiros apareceu longe, através dos galhos pelados da catinga rala.
Arrastaram-se para lá, devagar, sinha Vitória com o filho mais novo escanchado no quarto e o baú de folha na cabeça, Fabiano sombrio, cambaio, o aió a tiracolo, a cuia pendurada numa correia presa ao cinturão, a espingarda de pederneira no ombro. O menino mais velho e a cachorra Baleia iam atrás.
Os juazeiros aproximaram-se, recuaram, sumiram-se. O menino mais velho pôs-se a chorar, sentou-se no chão.
[...]
RAMOS, Graciliano. Vidas Secas. 144ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2020.
37BD3BDA-9C Português
Interpretação de TextosUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosTexto I
Laerte.
Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.
Texto II
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Luiz Vaz de Camões
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,
Tomando sempre novas qualidades.
Continuamente vemos novidades,
Diferentes em tudo da esperança;
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,
E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.
O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,
Que já coberto foi de neve fria,
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.
E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:
Que não se muda já como soía.
Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.
Glossário:
Soía: costumava
Com base no conteúdo e nos aspectos textuais dos Textos I e II, assinale a alternativa correta.37BB1839-9C Português
Análise sintáticaUEMG · 2022MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosTexto I
Laerte.
Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.
Texto II
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Luiz Vaz de Camões
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,
Tomando sempre novas qualidades.
Continuamente vemos novidades,
Diferentes em tudo da esperança;
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,
E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.
O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,
Que já coberto foi de neve fria,
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.
E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:
Que não se muda já como soía.
Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.
Glossário:
Soía: costumava
Analise o excerto a seguir, extraído do Texto II, e assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.
“Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;”.
37B90248-9C Português
AdvérbiosUEMG · 2022DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTexto I
Laerte.
Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.
Texto II
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Luiz Vaz de Camões
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,
Tomando sempre novas qualidades.
Continuamente vemos novidades,
Diferentes em tudo da esperança;
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,
E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.
O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,
Que já coberto foi de neve fria,
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.
E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:
Que não se muda já como soía.
Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.
Glossário:
Soía: costumava
Assinale a alternativa correta a respeito de elementos linguísticos presentes no Texto II.37B28EA6-9C Português
Interpretação de TextosUEMG · 2022DifícilEntre para guardar nos favoritosTexto I
Laerte.
Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.
Texto II
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades
Luiz Vaz de Camões
Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,
Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;
Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,
Tomando sempre novas qualidades.
Continuamente vemos novidades,
Diferentes em tudo da esperança;
Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,
E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.
O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,
Que já coberto foi de neve fria,
E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.
E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,
Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:
Que não se muda já como soía.
Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.
Glossário:
Soía: costumava
Considerando a forma e o conteúdo dos Textos I e II, analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa que aponta a(s) correta(s).I. A charge da cartunista Laerte e o poema de estrutura não fixa de Camões relacionam-se de modo intertextual, uma vez que abordam uma mesma temática: mudanças.II. O poema de Camões apresenta um eu lírico que se centra nas mudanças ocorridas na natureza, conforme se observa nos versos “O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto/ Que já coberto foi de neve fria”.III. Na charge, apesar desta retratar um contexto positivo para a personagem ao evidenciar que todo fim (primeiro quadrinho) traz com ele um recomeço (terceiro quadrinho), Laerte convoca o leitor a refletir sobre a temática da solidão, já que apresenta a personagem solitária nos dois ambientes ilustrados.IV. Com foco no indivíduo, a charge sugere que a mudança está em cada um, independente do local onde se estiver; já o poema propõe uma reflexão mais coletiva sobre o tema, como se pode confirmar no verso “Todo o mundo é composto de mudança”.CF00BF7B-00 Química
Equilíbrio QuímicoUEMG · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosA transformação do gás NO2(g) no gás N2O4 (g) é uma reação reversível, cujo equilíbrio químico é representado pela equação2 NO2(g) ⇄ N2O4(g)O sistema estará fora do equilíbrio químico, se essa reação ocorrer
CEFC2318-00 Química
Propriedades Físicas dos Compostos Orgânicos: Polaridade das Ligações e Moléculas, Forças Intermoleculares, Ponto de Fusão e Ponto de Ebulição, Solubilização das Substâncias Orgânicas.UEMG · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosOs sabões e detergentes atuam, dissolvidos em água, em limpezas que a água sozinha não conseguiria realizar. A estrutura representada abaixo corresponde a um sabão. Nela, há uma longa cadeia carbônica e uma extremidade iônica:
Os sabões são capazes de remover gorduras, ao contrário da água, porque a
CEF7BCD6-00 Química
Termoquímica: Energia Calorífica, Calor de reação, Entalpia, Equações e Lei de Hess.UEMG · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosA recuperação de lesões musculares envolve, geralmente, o tratamento com bolsas de água quente. Há bolsas que funcionam mediante a dissolução exotérmica de uma substância química em água. Na bolsa, há dois compartimentos: a substância fica num compartimento seco e a água fica no outro compartimento. Ao golpear a bolsa, o compartimento que contém água se rompe, a substância se dissolve, liberando calor e a temperatura aumenta.Considere a dissolução do cloreto de cálcio, utilizado para compressas quentes.CaCl 2(s) + H2O(l) → Ca2+ (aq) + 2 Cl – (aq). ∆H = - 82,8 kJ / mol.A dissolução de 1,0 mol de CaCl 2(s) libera 82,8 kJ de energia. Esse calor eleva a temperatura de 1,0 L de água de 20°C para 40°C. A dissolução de 0,5 mol de CaCl 2(s) em 1,0 L de água eleva a temperatura de 20°C para
CEF3BDFA-00 Química
Interações Atômicas: Ligações Iônicas, Ligações Covalentes e Ligações Metálicas. Ligas Metálicas.UEMG · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosOs elementos de números atômicos 14 e 16 combinam com o elemento de número atômico 8, formando as substâncias de fórmulas SiO2 e SO2, respectivamente. O dióxido de silício é um sólido cuja temperatura de fusão é maior que 1500 °C, enquanto o dióxido de enxofre é um gás à temperatura ambiente.Considerando as propriedades descritas, o dióxido de silício e o dióxido de enxofre são, respectivamente, substâncias do tipoCEF019C6-00 Química
Teoria Atômica: Modelo atômico de Dalton, Thomson, Rutherford, Rutherford-BohrUEMG · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosPor volta de 1803, John Dalton apresentou o modelo de que a matéria seria formada por átomos indivisíveis. No fim do século XIX, começaram a aparecer evidências de que o átomo não era a menor partícula constituinte da matéria. Em 1897, foi apresentado um modelo que demonstrava a existência de partículas negativas no átomo.Quem propôs este modelo?CEEC5F5E-00 Matemática
Sistemas LinearesUEMG · 2019MédioEntre para guardar nos favoritosNo plano, o sistema
representa um par de retasCEE8BB4B-00 Matemática
Geometria EspacialUEMG · 2019FácilEntre para guardar nos favoritosNa figura estão representadas uma pirâmide de base triangular e uma seção ABE dessa pirâmide.
Sobre essa pirâmide, constata-se que