Pular para o conteúdo
Dicas do ENEMEntrar

Disciplina · Linguagens

Questões de Inglês do ENEM

Questões de Inglês, da área de Linguagens, com gabarito em cada página.

  • 5.311 questões
  • 57 assuntos

Resultados: 5.311 questões

Página 259 de 266

Ordenar porDificuldade
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Instrução: A questão está relacionada ao texto abaixo.



    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Adjetivos | Adjectives

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Adjetivos | Adjectives



    Adaptado de: ÁLVAREZ, J. Snow. In: Castillo-Speed, L. Latina – Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Touchstone, 1995. 

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta termos que, conforme empregados no texto, operam como membros de uma mesma classe de palavras.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5e29c218-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Instrução: A questão está relacionada ao texto abaixo.



    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing



    Adaptado de: ÁLVAREZ, J. Snow. In: Castillo-Speed, L. Latina – Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Touchstone, 1995. 

    Assinale com V (verdadeiro) ou F (falso) as afirmações abaixo, acerca da estrutura do texto.


    ( ) O trecho taught by the Sisters of Charity (l. 03) pode ser substituído por which was taught by the Sisters of Charity, sem prejuízo da correção gramatical e do significado original do texto.

    ( ) O trecho I was put in a special seat (l. 10-11) pode ser substituído por Sister Zoe put me in a special sit, sem prejuízo da correção gramatical e do significado original do texto.

    ( ) A expressão so that (l. 12) pode ser substituída por in order to, sem prejuízo da correção gramatical e do significado original do texto.

    ( ) A oração I follow ed my breath to school (l. 37) faz referência ao fato de a respiração da menina gerar um vapor visível à sua frente, nas manhãs geladas de Nova Iorque.


    A sequência correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5e1d525e-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Instrução: A questão está relacionada ao texto abaixo.



    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension



    Adaptado de: ÁLVAREZ, J. Snow. In: Castillo-Speed, L. Latina – Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Touchstone, 1995. 

    Assinale com V (verdadeiro) ou F (falso) as afirmações abaixo, acerca do texto.


    ( ) Embora já conhecesse e mesmo repetisse a palavra snow, Yolanda nunca entendera do que se tratava, razão pela qual ficou assustada quando viu neve pela primeira vez.

    ( ) Apesar do tom leve, o texto faz uma crítica à forma assustadora com que até mesmo crianças foram envolvidas na paranoia atômica da Guerra Fria.

    ( ) Com carinho, Yolanda lembra a Irmã Zoe pelo esforço da religiosa em fazer com a menina, uma imigrante hispânica, não se sentisse agredida por manifestações xenófobas, em função da crise dos mísseis em Cuba.

    ( ) Apesar de seu favoritismo na infância, Yolanda deixa clara sua reprovação à forma como a Irmã Zoe incutiu medos infundados e gerou traumas nas crianças de sua turma.


    A sequência correta de preenchimento dos parênteses, de cima para baixo, é 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5e147ef3-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Instrução: A questão está relacionada ao texto abaixo.



    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension



    Adaptado de: ÁLVAREZ, J. Snow. In: Castillo-Speed, L. Latina – Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Touchstone, 1995. 

    Assinale a alternativa que resume adequadamente o texto.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5e10d59e-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Instrução: A questão está relacionada ao texto abaixo.



    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Preposições | Prepositions

    Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023, Preposições | Prepositions



    Adaptado de: ÁLVAREZ, J. Snow. In: Castillo-Speed, L. Latina – Women’s voices from the borderlands. New York: Touchstone, 1995. 

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta um conjunto de preposições que poderiam preencher adequadamente a lacuna da linha 01.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 5e080ded-7a
    Abrir questão de Inglês, UFRGS 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Leia o cartum publicado por @successpictures em sua conta no Instagram.



    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Faculdades de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension


    No contexto do cartum, a frase “You always want what you don’t have” pode ser associada ao seguinte ditado popular:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ae18fb6-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
    Leia o pôster de uma campanha da Universidade Cornell sobre a inclusão de pessoas com deficiência.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Faculdades de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension



    De acordo com o pôster, a universidade pretende
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4aded621-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
       British workers are increasingly likely to work into their 70s, according to a research that found the cost of living crisis has left older people with little choice but to stay in employment. There were 446,601 people above the age of 70 still in work in 2022, a rise of 61% compared with 277,926 in 2012, said Rest Less, an online community for the over-50s that offers advice to older workers.
       While most of the over-70s workforce is male, the rise has been more significant among women, most likely in response to the gradual equalisation of pension ages between 2010 and 2020. Women were previously able to retire five years earlier. The number of women working beyond the age of 70 is up 66% since 2012, compared with an increase of 58% for men.
        Stuart Lewis, the chief executive of Rest Less, drew a comparison between older workers and King Charles, but acknowledged that most continue working “for very different reasons” to the hereditary monarch. “At the age of 74, King Charles is a fantastic example of someone who both enjoys, and benefits from, continuing to work post-state pension1 age,” said Lewis. “Our latest analysis shows that there are far more over-70s in the workplace today than a decade ago. Until Covid hit and life expectancy dropped for the first time in a decade, there were more people reaching their state pension age than ever before, which meant there were more experienced people in the workplace than ever before too.”
        Lewis said many of those reaching the theoretical age of retirement were staying in the workplace for lack of any other option. “Like King Charles, many of these people will have no choice but to work, although for very different reasons to the king. We see many older workers today who are struggling to survive amidst the cost of living crisis, with inadequate retirement savings meaning they must work in order to survive financially.” The state pension age in the United Kingdom (UK) is 66 for men and women but is due to start rising from 2026.

    (Rob Davies. www.theguardian.com, 30.04.2023. Adaptado.)

    1      state pension: a regular payment from the government to someone who does not work anymore.
    No trecho do quarto parágrafo “in order to survive financially”, a expressão sublinhada transmite a ideia de 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4adc0a71-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
       British workers are increasingly likely to work into their 70s, according to a research that found the cost of living crisis has left older people with little choice but to stay in employment. There were 446,601 people above the age of 70 still in work in 2022, a rise of 61% compared with 277,926 in 2012, said Rest Less, an online community for the over-50s that offers advice to older workers.
       While most of the over-70s workforce is male, the rise has been more significant among women, most likely in response to the gradual equalisation of pension ages between 2010 and 2020. Women were previously able to retire five years earlier. The number of women working beyond the age of 70 is up 66% since 2012, compared with an increase of 58% for men.
        Stuart Lewis, the chief executive of Rest Less, drew a comparison between older workers and King Charles, but acknowledged that most continue working “for very different reasons” to the hereditary monarch. “At the age of 74, King Charles is a fantastic example of someone who both enjoys, and benefits from, continuing to work post-state pension1 age,” said Lewis. “Our latest analysis shows that there are far more over-70s in the workplace today than a decade ago. Until Covid hit and life expectancy dropped for the first time in a decade, there were more people reaching their state pension age than ever before, which meant there were more experienced people in the workplace than ever before too.”
        Lewis said many of those reaching the theoretical age of retirement were staying in the workplace for lack of any other option. “Like King Charles, many of these people will have no choice but to work, although for very different reasons to the king. We see many older workers today who are struggling to survive amidst the cost of living crisis, with inadequate retirement savings meaning they must work in order to survive financially.” The state pension age in the United Kingdom (UK) is 66 for men and women but is due to start rising from 2026.

    (Rob Davies. www.theguardian.com, 30.04.2023. Adaptado.)

    1      state pension: a regular payment from the government to someone who does not work anymore.
    No trecho do terceiro parágrafo “most continue working”, o termo sublinhado refere-se
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ad8ff8e-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
       British workers are increasingly likely to work into their 70s, according to a research that found the cost of living crisis has left older people with little choice but to stay in employment. There were 446,601 people above the age of 70 still in work in 2022, a rise of 61% compared with 277,926 in 2012, said Rest Less, an online community for the over-50s that offers advice to older workers.
       While most of the over-70s workforce is male, the rise has been more significant among women, most likely in response to the gradual equalisation of pension ages between 2010 and 2020. Women were previously able to retire five years earlier. The number of women working beyond the age of 70 is up 66% since 2012, compared with an increase of 58% for men.
        Stuart Lewis, the chief executive of Rest Less, drew a comparison between older workers and King Charles, but acknowledged that most continue working “for very different reasons” to the hereditary monarch. “At the age of 74, King Charles is a fantastic example of someone who both enjoys, and benefits from, continuing to work post-state pension1 age,” said Lewis. “Our latest analysis shows that there are far more over-70s in the workplace today than a decade ago. Until Covid hit and life expectancy dropped for the first time in a decade, there were more people reaching their state pension age than ever before, which meant there were more experienced people in the workplace than ever before too.”
        Lewis said many of those reaching the theoretical age of retirement were staying in the workplace for lack of any other option. “Like King Charles, many of these people will have no choice but to work, although for very different reasons to the king. We see many older workers today who are struggling to survive amidst the cost of living crisis, with inadequate retirement savings meaning they must work in order to survive financially.” The state pension age in the United Kingdom (UK) is 66 for men and women but is due to start rising from 2026.

    (Rob Davies. www.theguardian.com, 30.04.2023. Adaptado.)

    1      state pension: a regular payment from the government to someone who does not work anymore.
    De acordo com o texto,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ad5e3ef-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
       British workers are increasingly likely to work into their 70s, according to a research that found the cost of living crisis has left older people with little choice but to stay in employment. There were 446,601 people above the age of 70 still in work in 2022, a rise of 61% compared with 277,926 in 2012, said Rest Less, an online community for the over-50s that offers advice to older workers.
       While most of the over-70s workforce is male, the rise has been more significant among women, most likely in response to the gradual equalisation of pension ages between 2010 and 2020. Women were previously able to retire five years earlier. The number of women working beyond the age of 70 is up 66% since 2012, compared with an increase of 58% for men.
        Stuart Lewis, the chief executive of Rest Less, drew a comparison between older workers and King Charles, but acknowledged that most continue working “for very different reasons” to the hereditary monarch. “At the age of 74, King Charles is a fantastic example of someone who both enjoys, and benefits from, continuing to work post-state pension1 age,” said Lewis. “Our latest analysis shows that there are far more over-70s in the workplace today than a decade ago. Until Covid hit and life expectancy dropped for the first time in a decade, there were more people reaching their state pension age than ever before, which meant there were more experienced people in the workplace than ever before too.”
        Lewis said many of those reaching the theoretical age of retirement were staying in the workplace for lack of any other option. “Like King Charles, many of these people will have no choice but to work, although for very different reasons to the king. We see many older workers today who are struggling to survive amidst the cost of living crisis, with inadequate retirement savings meaning they must work in order to survive financially.” The state pension age in the United Kingdom (UK) is 66 for men and women but is due to start rising from 2026.

    (Rob Davies. www.theguardian.com, 30.04.2023. Adaptado.)

    1      state pension: a regular payment from the government to someone who does not work anymore.
    The main purpose of the text is to show that many British workers over 70
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 4ad0edbc-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Faculdades de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension





    In the section “Be more social”, the expression “I will strive” means to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca33fee0-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, Faculdades de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo 2023, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension





    The main purpose of the infographic is to present
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca316c57-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    In the excerpt from the seventh paragraph “which aims to end or even reverse ageing”, the underlined word refers to 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca2e9478-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    No terceiro parágrafo, a expressão “be left jobless” pode ser associada ao seguinte trecho do texto:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca2c2edf-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    O termo “while”, no trecho do terceiro parágrafo “While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless”, é empregado com o mesmo sentido em:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca29b2a0-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    No trecho do terceiro parágrafo “though never before has it happened on this scale”, o termo sublinhado expressa, no contexto apresentado, ideia de 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca271e3e-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    According to the text, in a utopian future empowered by artificial intelligence, AI could be
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca249003-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    No contexto apresentado pelo texto, a frase que indica uma situação hipotética é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca2207d2-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Entre para guardar nos favoritos
         Some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) researchers are calling for a pause on research into AI, claiming that safety issues must first be urgently addressed. If not, the outcomes could be devastating for humanity. Others say any pause in development would not only be impractical to enforce on a global scale, but could also stand in the way of advances that could both improve and save lives.
         The AI that is currently available already has the power to radically alter society, in new ways that we are seeing every day. So how might it progress over the coming years? Are we on the brink of an artificial intelligence-powered utopia or dystopia?
         Firstly, technology has been automating jobs since the Industrial Revolution, though never before has it happened on this scale. Everyone from truck drivers to voice over artists are at risk of being replaced by AI. A recent study found that just over 30 jobs are considered safe from automation in the near future. They range from mechanics to athletes, though they represent just a sliver of the current labour market. While new jobs will be created, there is a significant chance that the majority of the population will be left jobless. This could either lead to:
         Utopia: A new leisure class emerges, living off a universal basic income funded by taxes on robots and the companies that operate them.
        Dystopia: Mass unemployment results in social unrest, similar to the way laid off factory workers trashed the machines that replaced them. With so many jobs at risk and the potential for huge wealth inequality, some fear it could ultimately result in societal collapse.
        Secondly, artificial intelligence is already contributing to major scientific advances, dramatically accelerating the time it takes to make discoveries. It has been used to invent millions of materials that did not previously exist, find potential drug molecules 1,000 times faster than previous methods, and improve our understanding of the universe. This could either lead to:
          Utopia: Cancer and all other life-threatening diseases are cured, leading to a new age of health and prosperity. Scientists are already using AI tools to make breakthroughs in longevity medicine, which aims to end or even reverse ageing.
         Dystopia: The same AI-enabled technology could be used for malevolent purposes, creating entirely new diseases and viruses. These could be used as bioweapons, capable of devastating populations that don’t have access to cures or the tech needed to develop them.


    (Anthony Cuthbertson. www.independent.co.uk, 03.05.2023. Adaptado.)
    The text aims to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ca1f8ec9-75
    Abrir questão de Inglês, prova de 2023