Pular para o conteúdo

Instituição

Questões: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) — com gabarito

667 questões de Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), de 2005 a 2021. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 667 questões
  • 13 provas

Resultados: 667 questões

Página 25 de 34

  • Ciências da Natureza

    Biologia

    O Brasil é apontado por cientistas de todo o mundo como um dos países de maior biodiversidade do planeta. Sobre essa diversidade de organismos, foram feitas as afirmações seguintes.


    I. A diversidade é produto de processos evolutivos media- dos por mecanismos de seleção natural. II. Assim como a especiação, a colonização de novas áreas é um processo que aumenta a biodiversidade.

    III. A alta biodiversidade nos trópicos surgiu porque os solos são muito ricos em nutrientes nessas regiões e, por isso, permitem a instalação de florestas de grande porte.

    IV. Existem grupos de organismos em que o número de espécies ainda não é totalmente conhecido no Brasil, como os insetos. Em contrapartida, estima-se que todos os vertebrados de nossa fauna já estejam catalogados.

    V. Extinção, perda de habitat e competição com espécies introduzidas (não- nativas) estão entre os fatores que conduzem à perda da biodiversidade. Estão corretas:


    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão db72f372-28
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Biologia

    Cientistas sul- coreanos clonam pela primeira vez um cachorro, utilizando uma célula obtida da orelha do pai genético. Os cientistas tiraram material genético da célula e o colocaram em um óvulo esvaziado do seu núcleo, posteriormente estimulado para que se dividisse e virasse um embrião dentro da mãe adotiva, da raça Labrador. O animal clonado, da raça Afgham, recebeu o nome de Snuppy, e nasceu 60 dias após.

    (Folha de S.Paulo, 03.08.2005.)

    A partir do texto e do que se conhece sobre clonagem, podemos afirmar corretamente que:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d9c83923-28
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Biologia

    Numa célula animal, a seqüência temporal da participação das organelas citoplasmáticas, desde a tomada do alimento até a disponibilização da energia, é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d8f240c4-28
  • Matemática

    Matemática

    A figura indica algumas das dimensões de um bloco de concreto formado a partir de um cilindro circular oblíquo, com uma base no solo, e de um semicilindro.

    Figura 1 de 2 da questão de Matemática, UNIFESP 2005, Cilindro

    Dado que o raio da circunferência da base do cilindro oblíquo mede 10 cm, o volume do bloco de concreto, em Figura 2 de 2 da questão de Matemática, UNIFESP 2005, Cilindro, é
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d59e6adc-28
  • Matemática

    Matemática

    Na figura, o segmento AC é perpendicular à reta r. Sabe- se que o ângulo AÔB, com O sendo um ponto da reta r, será máximo quando O for o ponto onde r tangencia uma circun- ferência que passa por A e B.

    Imagem da questão de Matemática, UNIFESP 2005, Geometria Plana

    Se AB representa uma estátua de 3,6 m sobre um pedestal BC de 6,4 m, a distância OC, para que o ângulo AÔB de visão da estátua seja máximo, é

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d4c909ee-28
  • Matemática

    Matemática

    As permutações das letras da palavra PROVA foram listadas em ordem alfabética, como se fossem palavras de cinco letras em um dicionário. A 73ª palavra nessa lista é

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d067ef77-28
  • Matemática

    Matemática

    André aplicou parte de seus R$ 10.000,00 a 1,6% ao mês, e o restante a 2% ao mês. No final de um mês, recebeu um total de R$ 194,00 de juros das duas aplicações. O valor absoluto da diferença entre os valores aplicados a 1,6% e a 2% é

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão cd0a52f5-28
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

        Remember the good old days, when you could have a heated-yet-enjoyable debate with your friends about things that didn’t matter that much — times when you could be a true fan of the Manchester United soccer team when you didn’t come from the city of Manchester?

        How things have changed.

        Now disagreements feel deadly serious. Like when your colleague pronounces that wearing a face mask in public is a threat to his liberty. Or when you see that one of your friends has just tweeted that, actually, all lives matter. Before you know it, you’re feeling angry and forming harsh new judgments about your colleagues and friends. Let’s take a collective pause and breathe: there are some ways we can all try to have more civil disagreements in this febrile age of culture wars.

    1. ‘Coupling’ and ‘decoupling’

        The first is to consider how inclined people are to ‘couple’ or ‘decouple’ topics involving wider political and social factors. Swedish data analyst John Nerst has used the terms to describe the contrasting ways in which people approach contentious issues. Those of us more inclined to ‘couple’ see them as inextricably related to a broader matrix of factors, whereas those more predisposed to ‘decouple’ prefer to consider an issue in isolation. To take a crude example, a decoupler might consider in isolation the question of whether a vaccine provides a degree of immunity to a virus; a coupler, by contrast, would immediately see the issue as inextricably entangled in a mesh of factors, such as pharmaceutical industry power and parental choice.

    2.____________________

        Most of us are deeply committed to our beliefs, especially concerning moral and social issues, such that when we’re presented with facts that contradict our beliefs, we often choose to dismiss those facts, rather than update our beliefs.

        A study at Arizona State University, U.S., analysed more than 100,000 comments on a forum where users post their views on an issue and invite others to persuade them to change their mind. The researchers found that regardless of the kind of topic, people were more likely to change their mind when confronted with more evidence-based arguments. “Our work may suggest that while attitude change is hard-won, providing facts, statistics and citations for one’s arguments can convince people to change their minds,” they concluded.

    3. Just be nicer?

        Finally, it’s easier said than done, but let’s all try to be more respectful of and attentive to each other’s positions. We should do this not just for virtuous reasons, but because the more we create that kind of a climate, the more open-minded and intellectually flexible we will all be inclined to be. And then hopefully, collectively, we can start having more constructive disagreements — even in our present very difficult times.

    (Christian Jarrett. www.bbc.com, 14.10.2020. Adaptado.)

    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNIFESP 2021, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    A afirmação da figura que melhor dialoga com o conteúdo do último parágrafo do texto de Christian Jarrett é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d7b21665-72
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

        Remember the good old days, when you could have a heated-yet-enjoyable debate with your friends about things that didn’t matter that much — times when you could be a true fan of the Manchester United soccer team when you didn’t come from the city of Manchester?

        How things have changed.

        Now disagreements feel deadly serious. Like when your colleague pronounces that wearing a face mask in public is a threat to his liberty. Or when you see that one of your friends has just tweeted that, actually, all lives matter. Before you know it, you’re feeling angry and forming harsh new judgments about your colleagues and friends. Let’s take a collective pause and breathe: there are some ways we can all try to have more civil disagreements in this febrile age of culture wars.

    1. ‘Coupling’ and ‘decoupling’

        The first is to consider how inclined people are to ‘couple’ or ‘decouple’ topics involving wider political and social factors. Swedish data analyst John Nerst has used the terms to describe the contrasting ways in which people approach contentious issues. Those of us more inclined to ‘couple’ see them as inextricably related to a broader matrix of factors, whereas those more predisposed to ‘decouple’ prefer to consider an issue in isolation. To take a crude example, a decoupler might consider in isolation the question of whether a vaccine provides a degree of immunity to a virus; a coupler, by contrast, would immediately see the issue as inextricably entangled in a mesh of factors, such as pharmaceutical industry power and parental choice.

    2.____________________

        Most of us are deeply committed to our beliefs, especially concerning moral and social issues, such that when we’re presented with facts that contradict our beliefs, we often choose to dismiss those facts, rather than update our beliefs.

        A study at Arizona State University, U.S., analysed more than 100,000 comments on a forum where users post their views on an issue and invite others to persuade them to change their mind. The researchers found that regardless of the kind of topic, people were more likely to change their mind when confronted with more evidence-based arguments. “Our work may suggest that while attitude change is hard-won, providing facts, statistics and citations for one’s arguments can convince people to change their minds,” they concluded.

    3. Just be nicer?

        Finally, it’s easier said than done, but let’s all try to be more respectful of and attentive to each other’s positions. We should do this not just for virtuous reasons, but because the more we create that kind of a climate, the more open-minded and intellectually flexible we will all be inclined to be. And then hopefully, collectively, we can start having more constructive disagreements — even in our present very difficult times.

    (Christian Jarrett. www.bbc.com, 14.10.2020. Adaptado.)
    The subtitle that most closely represents the content of the fifth and sixth paragraphs is:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d7a3be58-72
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

        Remember the good old days, when you could have a heated-yet-enjoyable debate with your friends about things that didn’t matter that much — times when you could be a true fan of the Manchester United soccer team when you didn’t come from the city of Manchester?

        How things have changed.

        Now disagreements feel deadly serious. Like when your colleague pronounces that wearing a face mask in public is a threat to his liberty. Or when you see that one of your friends has just tweeted that, actually, all lives matter. Before you know it, you’re feeling angry and forming harsh new judgments about your colleagues and friends. Let’s take a collective pause and breathe: there are some ways we can all try to have more civil disagreements in this febrile age of culture wars.

    1. ‘Coupling’ and ‘decoupling’

        The first is to consider how inclined people are to ‘couple’ or ‘decouple’ topics involving wider political and social factors. Swedish data analyst John Nerst has used the terms to describe the contrasting ways in which people approach contentious issues. Those of us more inclined to ‘couple’ see them as inextricably related to a broader matrix of factors, whereas those more predisposed to ‘decouple’ prefer to consider an issue in isolation. To take a crude example, a decoupler might consider in isolation the question of whether a vaccine provides a degree of immunity to a virus; a coupler, by contrast, would immediately see the issue as inextricably entangled in a mesh of factors, such as pharmaceutical industry power and parental choice.

    2.____________________

        Most of us are deeply committed to our beliefs, especially concerning moral and social issues, such that when we’re presented with facts that contradict our beliefs, we often choose to dismiss those facts, rather than update our beliefs.

        A study at Arizona State University, U.S., analysed more than 100,000 comments on a forum where users post their views on an issue and invite others to persuade them to change their mind. The researchers found that regardless of the kind of topic, people were more likely to change their mind when confronted with more evidence-based arguments. “Our work may suggest that while attitude change is hard-won, providing facts, statistics and citations for one’s arguments can convince people to change their minds,” they concluded.

    3. Just be nicer?

        Finally, it’s easier said than done, but let’s all try to be more respectful of and attentive to each other’s positions. We should do this not just for virtuous reasons, but because the more we create that kind of a climate, the more open-minded and intellectually flexible we will all be inclined to be. And then hopefully, collectively, we can start having more constructive disagreements — even in our present very difficult times.

    (Christian Jarrett. www.bbc.com, 14.10.2020. Adaptado.)
    In the fragment from the fourth paragraph “Those of us more inclined to ‘couple’ see them as inextricably related to a broader matrix of factors”, the underlined term refers most specifically to
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d7994fc4-72
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

        Remember the good old days, when you could have a heated-yet-enjoyable debate with your friends about things that didn’t matter that much — times when you could be a true fan of the Manchester United soccer team when you didn’t come from the city of Manchester?

        How things have changed.

        Now disagreements feel deadly serious. Like when your colleague pronounces that wearing a face mask in public is a threat to his liberty. Or when you see that one of your friends has just tweeted that, actually, all lives matter. Before you know it, you’re feeling angry and forming harsh new judgments about your colleagues and friends. Let’s take a collective pause and breathe: there are some ways we can all try to have more civil disagreements in this febrile age of culture wars.

    1. ‘Coupling’ and ‘decoupling’

        The first is to consider how inclined people are to ‘couple’ or ‘decouple’ topics involving wider political and social factors. Swedish data analyst John Nerst has used the terms to describe the contrasting ways in which people approach contentious issues. Those of us more inclined to ‘couple’ see them as inextricably related to a broader matrix of factors, whereas those more predisposed to ‘decouple’ prefer to consider an issue in isolation. To take a crude example, a decoupler might consider in isolation the question of whether a vaccine provides a degree of immunity to a virus; a coupler, by contrast, would immediately see the issue as inextricably entangled in a mesh of factors, such as pharmaceutical industry power and parental choice.

    2.____________________

        Most of us are deeply committed to our beliefs, especially concerning moral and social issues, such that when we’re presented with facts that contradict our beliefs, we often choose to dismiss those facts, rather than update our beliefs.

        A study at Arizona State University, U.S., analysed more than 100,000 comments on a forum where users post their views on an issue and invite others to persuade them to change their mind. The researchers found that regardless of the kind of topic, people were more likely to change their mind when confronted with more evidence-based arguments. “Our work may suggest that while attitude change is hard-won, providing facts, statistics and citations for one’s arguments can convince people to change their minds,” they concluded.

    3. Just be nicer?

        Finally, it’s easier said than done, but let’s all try to be more respectful of and attentive to each other’s positions. We should do this not just for virtuous reasons, but because the more we create that kind of a climate, the more open-minded and intellectually flexible we will all be inclined to be. And then hopefully, collectively, we can start having more constructive disagreements — even in our present very difficult times.

    (Christian Jarrett. www.bbc.com, 14.10.2020. Adaptado.)
    The first and second paragraphs mainly illustrate
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d786f0d6-72
  • Linguagens

    Literatura

    Este movimento surge como momento de negação profunda e revolucionária, porque visava a redefinir não só a atitude poética, mas o próprio lugar do homem no mundo e na sociedade. Concebe de maneira nova o papel do artista e o sentido da obra de arte, pretendendo liquidar a convenção universalista dos herdeiros de Grécia e Roma em benefício de um sentimento novo, embebido de inspirações locais, procurando o único em lugar do perene.

    (Antonio Candido. Formação da literatura brasileira, 2013. Adaptado.)

    O texto refere-se ao movimento
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão d7821f8e-72
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Para responder à questão, leia o trecho do livro O homem cordial, de Sérgio Buarque de Holanda.

       Já se disse, numa expressão feliz, que a contribuição brasileira para a civilização será de cordialidade — daremos ao mundo o “homem cordial”. A lhaneza1 no trato, a hospitalidade, a generosidade, virtudes tão gabadas por estrangeiros que nos visitam, representam, com efeito, um traço definido do caráter brasileiro, na medida, ao menos, em que permanece ativa e fecunda a influência ancestral dos padrões de convívio humano, informados no meio rural e patriarcal. Seria engano supor que essas virtudes possam significar “boas maneiras”, civilidade. São antes de tudo expressões legítimas de um fundo emotivo extremamente rico e transbordante. Na civilidade há qualquer coisa de coercitivo — ela pode exprimir-se em mandamentos e em sentenças. Entre os japoneses, onde, como se sabe, a polidez envolve os aspectos mais ordinários do convívio social, chega a ponto de confundir-se, por vezes, com a reverência religiosa. Já houve quem notasse este fato significativo, de que as formas exteriores de veneração à divindade, no cerimonial xintoísta, não diferem essencialmente das maneiras sociais de demonstrar respeito.
       Nenhum povo está mais distante dessa noção ritualista da vida do que o brasileiro. Nossa forma ordinária de convívio social é, no fundo, justamente o contrário da polidez. Ela pode iludir na aparência — e isso se explica pelo fato de a atitude polida consistir precisamente em uma espécie de mímica deliberada de manifestações que são espontâneas no “homem cordial”: é a forma natural e viva que se converteu em fórmula. Além disso a polidez é, de algum modo, organização de defesa ante a sociedade. Detém-se na parte exterior, epidérmica do indivíduo, podendo mesmo servir, quando necessário, de peça de resistência. Equivale a um disfarce que permitirá a cada qual preservar intatas sua sensibilidade e suas emoções.
       Por meio de semelhante padronização das formas exteriores da cordialidade, que não precisam ser legítimas para se manifestarem, revela-se um decisivo triunfo do espírito sobre a vida. Armado dessa máscara, o indivíduo consegue manter sua supremacia ante o social. E, efetivamente, a polidez implica uma presença contínua e soberana do indivíduo.
        No “homem cordial”, a vida em sociedade é, de certo modo, uma verdadeira libertação do pavor que ele sente em viver consigo mesmo, em apoiar-se sobre si próprio em todas as circunstâncias da existência. Sua maneira de expansão para com os outros reduz o indivíduo, cada vez mais, à parcela social, periférica, que no brasileiro — como bom americano — tende a ser a que mais importa. Ela é antes um viver nos outros.
    (O homem cordial, 2012.)
    1 lhaneza: afabilidade. 
    Está empregado em sentido figurado o termo sublinhado em:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f592997e-fc
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Para responder à questão, leia o trecho do livro O homem cordial, de Sérgio Buarque de Holanda.

       Já se disse, numa expressão feliz, que a contribuição brasileira para a civilização será de cordialidade — daremos ao mundo o “homem cordial”. A lhaneza1 no trato, a hospitalidade, a generosidade, virtudes tão gabadas por estrangeiros que nos visitam, representam, com efeito, um traço definido do caráter brasileiro, na medida, ao menos, em que permanece ativa e fecunda a influência ancestral dos padrões de convívio humano, informados no meio rural e patriarcal. Seria engano supor que essas virtudes possam significar “boas maneiras”, civilidade. São antes de tudo expressões legítimas de um fundo emotivo extremamente rico e transbordante. Na civilidade há qualquer coisa de coercitivo — ela pode exprimir-se em mandamentos e em sentenças. Entre os japoneses, onde, como se sabe, a polidez envolve os aspectos mais ordinários do convívio social, chega a ponto de confundir-se, por vezes, com a reverência religiosa. Já houve quem notasse este fato significativo, de que as formas exteriores de veneração à divindade, no cerimonial xintoísta, não diferem essencialmente das maneiras sociais de demonstrar respeito.
       Nenhum povo está mais distante dessa noção ritualista da vida do que o brasileiro. Nossa forma ordinária de convívio social é, no fundo, justamente o contrário da polidez. Ela pode iludir na aparência — e isso se explica pelo fato de a atitude polida consistir precisamente em uma espécie de mímica deliberada de manifestações que são espontâneas no “homem cordial”: é a forma natural e viva que se converteu em fórmula. Além disso a polidez é, de algum modo, organização de defesa ante a sociedade. Detém-se na parte exterior, epidérmica do indivíduo, podendo mesmo servir, quando necessário, de peça de resistência. Equivale a um disfarce que permitirá a cada qual preservar intatas sua sensibilidade e suas emoções.
       Por meio de semelhante padronização das formas exteriores da cordialidade, que não precisam ser legítimas para se manifestarem, revela-se um decisivo triunfo do espírito sobre a vida. Armado dessa máscara, o indivíduo consegue manter sua supremacia ante o social. E, efetivamente, a polidez implica uma presença contínua e soberana do indivíduo.
        No “homem cordial”, a vida em sociedade é, de certo modo, uma verdadeira libertação do pavor que ele sente em viver consigo mesmo, em apoiar-se sobre si próprio em todas as circunstâncias da existência. Sua maneira de expansão para com os outros reduz o indivíduo, cada vez mais, à parcela social, periférica, que no brasileiro — como bom americano — tende a ser a que mais importa. Ela é antes um viver nos outros.
    (O homem cordial, 2012.)
    1 lhaneza: afabilidade. 
    Dentre os seguintes termos empregados no primeiro parágrafo, considerados no contexto, o que tem sentido mais genérico é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f58fb1ad-fc
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Para responder à questão, leia o trecho do livro O homem cordial, de Sérgio Buarque de Holanda.

       Já se disse, numa expressão feliz, que a contribuição brasileira para a civilização será de cordialidade — daremos ao mundo o “homem cordial”. A lhaneza1 no trato, a hospitalidade, a generosidade, virtudes tão gabadas por estrangeiros que nos visitam, representam, com efeito, um traço definido do caráter brasileiro, na medida, ao menos, em que permanece ativa e fecunda a influência ancestral dos padrões de convívio humano, informados no meio rural e patriarcal. Seria engano supor que essas virtudes possam significar “boas maneiras”, civilidade. São antes de tudo expressões legítimas de um fundo emotivo extremamente rico e transbordante. Na civilidade há qualquer coisa de coercitivo — ela pode exprimir-se em mandamentos e em sentenças. Entre os japoneses, onde, como se sabe, a polidez envolve os aspectos mais ordinários do convívio social, chega a ponto de confundir-se, por vezes, com a reverência religiosa. Já houve quem notasse este fato significativo, de que as formas exteriores de veneração à divindade, no cerimonial xintoísta, não diferem essencialmente das maneiras sociais de demonstrar respeito.
       Nenhum povo está mais distante dessa noção ritualista da vida do que o brasileiro. Nossa forma ordinária de convívio social é, no fundo, justamente o contrário da polidez. Ela pode iludir na aparência — e isso se explica pelo fato de a atitude polida consistir precisamente em uma espécie de mímica deliberada de manifestações que são espontâneas no “homem cordial”: é a forma natural e viva que se converteu em fórmula. Além disso a polidez é, de algum modo, organização de defesa ante a sociedade. Detém-se na parte exterior, epidérmica do indivíduo, podendo mesmo servir, quando necessário, de peça de resistência. Equivale a um disfarce que permitirá a cada qual preservar intatas sua sensibilidade e suas emoções.
       Por meio de semelhante padronização das formas exteriores da cordialidade, que não precisam ser legítimas para se manifestarem, revela-se um decisivo triunfo do espírito sobre a vida. Armado dessa máscara, o indivíduo consegue manter sua supremacia ante o social. E, efetivamente, a polidez implica uma presença contínua e soberana do indivíduo.
        No “homem cordial”, a vida em sociedade é, de certo modo, uma verdadeira libertação do pavor que ele sente em viver consigo mesmo, em apoiar-se sobre si próprio em todas as circunstâncias da existência. Sua maneira de expansão para com os outros reduz o indivíduo, cada vez mais, à parcela social, periférica, que no brasileiro — como bom americano — tende a ser a que mais importa. Ela é antes um viver nos outros.
    (O homem cordial, 2012.)
    1 lhaneza: afabilidade. 
    De acordo com o autor,
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão f589d91a-fc
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                                      Why so few nurses are men


                       Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNIFESP 2018, Sinônimos | Synonyms

          Ask health professionals in any country what the biggest problem in their health-care system is and one of the most common answers is the shortage of nurses. In ageing rich countries, demand for nursing care is becoming increasingly insatiable. Britain’s National Health Service, for example, has 40,000-odd nurse vacancies. Poor countries struggle with the emigration of nurses for greener pastures. One obvious solution seems neglected: recruit more men. Typically, just 5-10% of nurses registered in a given country are men. Why so few?

          Views of nursing as a “woman’s job” have deep roots. Florence Nightingale, who established the principles of modern nursing in the 1860s, insisted that men’s “hard and horny” hands were “not fitted to touch, bathe and dress wounded limbs”. In Britain the Royal College of Nursing, the profession’s union, did not even admit men as members until 1960. Some nursing schools in America started admitting men only in 1982, after a Supreme Court ruling forced them to. Senior nurse titles such as “sister” (a ward manager) and “matron” (which in some countries is used for men as well) do not help matters. Unsurprisingly, some older people do not even know that men can be nurses too. Male nurses often encounter patients who assume they are doctors.

          Another problem is that beliefs about what a nursing job entails are often outdated – in ways that may be particularly off-putting for men. In films, nurses are commonly portrayed as the helpers of heroic male doctors. In fact, nurses do most of their work independently and are the first responders to patients in crisis. To dispel myths, nurse-recruitment campaigns display nursing as a professional job with career progression, specialisms like anaesthetics, cardiology or emergency care, and use for skills related to technology, innovation and leadership. However, attracting men without playing to gender stereotypes can be tricky. “Are you man enough to be a nurse?”, the slogan of an American campaign, was involved in controversy.

          Nursing is not a career many boys aspire to, or are encouraged to consider. Only two-fifths of British parents say they would be proud if their son became a nurse. Because of all this, men who go into nursing are usually already closely familiar with the job. Some are following in the career footsteps of their mothers. Others decide that the job would suit them after they see a male nurse care for a relative or they themselves get care from a male nurse when hospitalised. Although many gender stereotypes about jobs and caring have crumbled, nursing has, so far, remained unaffected.

                                                  (www.economist.com, 22.08.2018. Adaptado.)

    No trecho do quarto parágrafo “gender stereotypes about jobs and caring have crumbled”, o termo sublinhado pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido, por
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 756a9a05-51
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                                      Why so few nurses are men


                       Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNIFESP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

          Ask health professionals in any country what the biggest problem in their health-care system is and one of the most common answers is the shortage of nurses. In ageing rich countries, demand for nursing care is becoming increasingly insatiable. Britain’s National Health Service, for example, has 40,000-odd nurse vacancies. Poor countries struggle with the emigration of nurses for greener pastures. One obvious solution seems neglected: recruit more men. Typically, just 5-10% of nurses registered in a given country are men. Why so few?

          Views of nursing as a “woman’s job” have deep roots. Florence Nightingale, who established the principles of modern nursing in the 1860s, insisted that men’s “hard and horny” hands were “not fitted to touch, bathe and dress wounded limbs”. In Britain the Royal College of Nursing, the profession’s union, did not even admit men as members until 1960. Some nursing schools in America started admitting men only in 1982, after a Supreme Court ruling forced them to. Senior nurse titles such as “sister” (a ward manager) and “matron” (which in some countries is used for men as well) do not help matters. Unsurprisingly, some older people do not even know that men can be nurses too. Male nurses often encounter patients who assume they are doctors.

          Another problem is that beliefs about what a nursing job entails are often outdated – in ways that may be particularly off-putting for men. In films, nurses are commonly portrayed as the helpers of heroic male doctors. In fact, nurses do most of their work independently and are the first responders to patients in crisis. To dispel myths, nurse-recruitment campaigns display nursing as a professional job with career progression, specialisms like anaesthetics, cardiology or emergency care, and use for skills related to technology, innovation and leadership. However, attracting men without playing to gender stereotypes can be tricky. “Are you man enough to be a nurse?”, the slogan of an American campaign, was involved in controversy.

          Nursing is not a career many boys aspire to, or are encouraged to consider. Only two-fifths of British parents say they would be proud if their son became a nurse. Because of all this, men who go into nursing are usually already closely familiar with the job. Some are following in the career footsteps of their mothers. Others decide that the job would suit them after they see a male nurse care for a relative or they themselves get care from a male nurse when hospitalised. Although many gender stereotypes about jobs and caring have crumbled, nursing has, so far, remained unaffected.

                                                  (www.economist.com, 22.08.2018. Adaptado.)

    O trecho do terceiro parágrafo que exemplifica a visão ultrapassada sobre a enfermagem, que pode desestimular homens a seguirem a profissão, é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 755bf214-51
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                                      Why so few nurses are men


                       Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNIFESP 2018, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

          Ask health professionals in any country what the biggest problem in their health-care system is and one of the most common answers is the shortage of nurses. In ageing rich countries, demand for nursing care is becoming increasingly insatiable. Britain’s National Health Service, for example, has 40,000-odd nurse vacancies. Poor countries struggle with the emigration of nurses for greener pastures. One obvious solution seems neglected: recruit more men. Typically, just 5-10% of nurses registered in a given country are men. Why so few?

          Views of nursing as a “woman’s job” have deep roots. Florence Nightingale, who established the principles of modern nursing in the 1860s, insisted that men’s “hard and horny” hands were “not fitted to touch, bathe and dress wounded limbs”. In Britain the Royal College of Nursing, the profession’s union, did not even admit men as members until 1960. Some nursing schools in America started admitting men only in 1982, after a Supreme Court ruling forced them to. Senior nurse titles such as “sister” (a ward manager) and “matron” (which in some countries is used for men as well) do not help matters. Unsurprisingly, some older people do not even know that men can be nurses too. Male nurses often encounter patients who assume they are doctors.

          Another problem is that beliefs about what a nursing job entails are often outdated – in ways that may be particularly off-putting for men. In films, nurses are commonly portrayed as the helpers of heroic male doctors. In fact, nurses do most of their work independently and are the first responders to patients in crisis. To dispel myths, nurse-recruitment campaigns display nursing as a professional job with career progression, specialisms like anaesthetics, cardiology or emergency care, and use for skills related to technology, innovation and leadership. However, attracting men without playing to gender stereotypes can be tricky. “Are you man enough to be a nurse?”, the slogan of an American campaign, was involved in controversy.

          Nursing is not a career many boys aspire to, or are encouraged to consider. Only two-fifths of British parents say they would be proud if their son became a nurse. Because of all this, men who go into nursing are usually already closely familiar with the job. Some are following in the career footsteps of their mothers. Others decide that the job would suit them after they see a male nurse care for a relative or they themselves get care from a male nurse when hospitalised. Although many gender stereotypes about jobs and caring have crumbled, nursing has, so far, remained unaffected.

                                                  (www.economist.com, 22.08.2018. Adaptado.)

    The excerpt from the first paragraph “In ageing rich countries, demand for nursing care is becoming increasingly insatiable” means that
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 754c0925-51
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

                                    Words that define the presente


    At a time when the world is changing more quickly than ever before, we need a new vocabulary to help us grasp what’s happening.


                     Imagem da questão de Inglês, UNIFESP 2018, Vocabulário | Vocabulary


          Catfishing. This word would make more sense if it referred to fishing for cats, but in fact, it refers to people who construct false identities online. Whether out of boredom, loneliness or malice, they lure other people into continued messaging correspondence, thereby building false relationships with them (the apparent source of the term “catfish” is a 2010 documentary called Catfish, whose verity, ironically enough, has been questioned).

          There are two ways of looking at this: 1) The internet/ cyberspace is wonderful, because it gives people the freedom to augment or totally change their identities, and this is a marvellous new dawn for human expression, a new step in human evolution. 2) Nah, it’s a false dawn, because the internet is essentially a libertarian arena, and, as such, an amoral one (lots of “freedoms” but with no attendant social obligations); it is a new jungle where we must watch our backs and struggle for survival, surely a backward step in evolution. I lean toward the latter.

                                 (Cameron Laux. www.bbc.com, 08.08.2018. Adaptado.)

    No trecho final do terceiro parágrafo “I lean toward the latter”, a expressão sublinhada refere-se
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 75429e58-51