Pular para o conteúdo

Instituição

Questões: Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG) — com gabarito

716 questões de Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG), de 2010 a 2025. Cada uma tem página própria, com enunciado completo, alternativas e gabarito — e dá para responder na própria página.

  • 716 questões
  • 7 provas

Resultados: 171 questões

Página 4 de 9

  • Linguagens

    Português

    Texto I

    Enquanto isso, você, leitor, juiz supremo, aceita ou rejeita a crônica, exercício permanente de semear fantasia e leveza para que, talvez, venha a colher alguma realidade. (“Miolos do ofício”, p.9).

    Texto II

    Uma vez mais, apelarei para a fantasia ao narrar. A ficção é o spa da realidade, na qual o fato precisa perder o peso e o estresse da hora. Após alguma reflexão, sobra a humanidade nua e crua – e isso é o que interessa. (“Sobre cavalos e homens”, p.65).

    Texto III

    Continuamos humanos há um milhão de anos e assim permaneceremos por longo tempo ainda. Para a paixão, milênios são marcas desprovidas de significado, e os corações a ela se submetem encantados. De quebra, as histórias resultantes nos encantam com suas aventuras e, sobretudo, desventuras. Os escritores se esbaldam. Literatura é a realidade sem riscos. (“Um milhão de anos de paixão”, p.73).

    GIFFONI, L: O acaso abre portas. Belo Horizonte: Abacate, 2014.

    Levando em consideração o contexto do livro, os fragmentos expressam uma concepção de crônica que
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2cf5ca5f-a6
  • Linguagens

    Português

    De todos os percentuais divulgados, meu favoritíssimo aborda extraterrestres: 78,25% das civilizações alienígenas que nos visitam vêm de fora da Via Láctea. Depois dessa precisão alienígena, eu, que vivia fora de órbita, ando agora 78,25% mais à Terra. Com tanta gente estranha por aqui, acredito que a confusão estatística é coisa de ET. Ou do diabo. Tenho 66,6% de certeza.

    GIFFONI, L. Confusão estatística. In: O acaso abre portas. Belo Horizonte: Abacate, 2014. p. 21.

    Os recursos de estilo empregados nesse fragmento indicam a intenção do autor de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 2ceef8c7-a6
  • Linguagens

    Espanhol

    Las cuestiones del 01 al 06 están basadas en los dos textos siguientes. Léalos
    y luego seleccione la opción adecuada en cada cuestión.

    Imagem da questão de Espanhol, UEMG 2011, Interpretação de Texto | Comprensión de Lectura

    Al confrontar los contenidos textuales sobre este lenguaje musical criollo se puede concluir que
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão a3525edd-0e
  • Linguagens

    Espanhol

    Las cuestiones del 01 al 06 están basadas en los dos textos siguientes. Léalos
    y luego seleccione la opción adecuada en cada cuestión.

    Imagem da questão de Espanhol, UEMG 2011, Conjunções | Conjunciones

    En el fragmento: "...velas encendidas que luego son sostenidas por ella en la mano mientras baila...", la palabra subrayada establece una relación de
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 9d9bcb51-0e
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Quanto à organização do texto teatral ou dramático, ao seu desenvolvimento e ao tipo de público a que se dirige, verifca-se que a obra Lisbela e o Prisioneiro
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 3d862db7-0e
  • Linguagens

    Português

    LEIA com atenção os textos seguintes:

    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2011, Interpretação de Textos

    Considere os comentários feitos sobre esses textos:

    I Todos os textos apresentam o mesmo tema: lavar roupa. Apesar disso, pertencem a gêneros diferentes.

    II O texto I apresenta características da injunção, uma vez que dá conselhos aos pais sobre como proceder em determinadas situações.

    III A expressão “roupa suja se lava em casa”, do texto III, aparece entre aspas, pois, além de ser uma citação, é, também, um ditado popular.

    IV O conectivo entretanto, sublinhado no texto I, equivale, semanticamente, a portanto.

    V O propósito do texto II é o de provocar efeitos de humor. São pertinentes os comentários apresentados em
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 393f9bf0-0e
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Em maio de 2007, o IBOPE fez uma pesquisa sobre o comportamento sexual do brasileiro. A tabela a seguir revela a opinião dos brasileiros sobre o acesso do jovem ao preservativo. Foi feito o seguinte questionamento:

    VOCÊ CONCORDA OU DISCORDA QUE OS JOVENS COM MENOS DE 18 ANOS TENHAM ACESSO AO PRESERVATIVO?

    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2011, Interpretação de Textos

    Sobre a tabela acima, foram feitas algumas afrmações. Julgue-as como (V) verdadeiras ou (F) falsas.

    1 ( ) Quanto maior o nível de escolaridade, maior é a aprovação para o acesso do jovem ao preservativo.

    2 ( ) As mulheres são mais resistentes ao tema que os homens. A maioria desaprova o acesso do jovem ao preservativo.

    3 ( ) Não houve diferença considerável de opinião na variável “idade”, cujos índices permanecem praticamente os mesmos.

    4 ( ) O maior índice de discordância está no grupo que mais precisa de preservativo: pessoas que estudaram até a 4ª série.

    5 ( ) Mais de 80% da população entrevistada concorda que o preservativo seja de livre acesso aos menores de idade.

    A sequência correta de classifcação é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 3687eb47-0e
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    The Impact of the Gulf Oil Spill on the U.S.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UEMG 2010, Voz Ativa e Passiva | Passive and Active Voice

    www.freewebs.com/mathewstolte/oilspills.html. 21/06/2010


          Although the oil has been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico for months, the consequences of this larger than ever environmental disaster have yet to be fully examined and determined. Scientists and researchers have started to put together some of the puzzle pieces, and the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill are likely to be big.

          North Americans will have fewer choices on the store shelves. The Gulf of Mexico is a huge shipping lane through which products of all shapes and sizes come into North America. From toys to clothes to cars to building materials, you may find that the selection at your local store begins to shrink as shipping lanes slow down as a result of the oil spill.

          Whether you’re taking a vacation or hoping to walk along the shore, you may be disappointed. Many beaches in the U.S.A. are now closing as clean-up efforts on removing oil slick from the sands. But the impact may be felt for quite some time as oil continues to wash up on shore.

          Many wildlife animals will be impacted by the oil spill. Oiled birds, otter, bald eagles, pelicans, turtles, fish, and dolphins are already washing up on shore, making the beach sights less than palatable for someone looking to see some pristine nature.

          Over time, molluscs like clams incorporate calcium into their shells throughout their lifetimes. But the heavy metals like nickel and vanadium from the petroleum industry and the resulting oil spill may be incorporated into the shells of these creatures. As other wildlife consumes these clams, they incorporate the toxins into their bodies, and on it goes as the heavy metals bio-accumulate in the food chain. This could have serious, long-term consequences for human health. 

          Environmentalists have been working on restoring the populations of oysters by reseeding certain reefs to boost their numbers. The Gulf of Mexico has been home-working on some of these projects, but with the massive oil spilling into that environment, the oysters could soon become tainted with chemicals, making them unsafe to eat.

          The Gulf of Mexico is also a nursery for species like shrimp that grow up in the estuaries. The oil that is taking over this natural environment will choke out the plants that make the estuaries so nutritious to shrimp. 

          According to the National Weather Service, a hurricane like Hurricane Katrina could have a devastating impact on New Orleans. Researchers expect 15 named storms to develop into 8 hurricanes, and with a well-placed hurricane, the oil could be pushed onto New Orleans shores, further impacting the already devastated region.

    Adapted from http://www.thenewecologist.com (21/06/2010)

    Which of the alternatives below is the CORRECT correspondent active voice form for the passive voice of the sentence “Many wildlife animals will be impacted by the oil spill”?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 52100279-b1
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    The Impact of the Gulf Oil Spill on the U.S.


    Imagem da questão de Inglês, UEMG 2010, Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions

    www.freewebs.com/mathewstolte/oilspills.html. 21/06/2010


          Although the oil has been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico for months, the consequences of this larger than ever environmental disaster have yet to be fully examined and determined. Scientists and researchers have started to put together some of the puzzle pieces, and the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill are likely to be big.

          North Americans will have fewer choices on the store shelves. The Gulf of Mexico is a huge shipping lane through which products of all shapes and sizes come into North America. From toys to clothes to cars to building materials, you may find that the selection at your local store begins to shrink as shipping lanes slow down as a result of the oil spill.

          Whether you’re taking a vacation or hoping to walk along the shore, you may be disappointed. Many beaches in the U.S.A. are now closing as clean-up efforts on removing oil slick from the sands. But the impact may be felt for quite some time as oil continues to wash up on shore.

          Many wildlife animals will be impacted by the oil spill. Oiled birds, otter, bald eagles, pelicans, turtles, fish, and dolphins are already washing up on shore, making the beach sights less than palatable for someone looking to see some pristine nature.

          Over time, molluscs like clams incorporate calcium into their shells throughout their lifetimes. But the heavy metals like nickel and vanadium from the petroleum industry and the resulting oil spill may be incorporated into the shells of these creatures. As other wildlife consumes these clams, they incorporate the toxins into their bodies, and on it goes as the heavy metals bio-accumulate in the food chain. This could have serious, long-term consequences for human health. 

          Environmentalists have been working on restoring the populations of oysters by reseeding certain reefs to boost their numbers. The Gulf of Mexico has been home-working on some of these projects, but with the massive oil spilling into that environment, the oysters could soon become tainted with chemicals, making them unsafe to eat.

          The Gulf of Mexico is also a nursery for species like shrimp that grow up in the estuaries. The oil that is taking over this natural environment will choke out the plants that make the estuaries so nutritious to shrimp. 

          According to the National Weather Service, a hurricane like Hurricane Katrina could have a devastating impact on New Orleans. Researchers expect 15 named storms to develop into 8 hurricanes, and with a well-placed hurricane, the oil could be pushed onto New Orleans shores, further impacting the already devastated region.

    Adapted from http://www.thenewecologist.com (21/06/2010)

    The conjunction “although”, in the first paragraph, can be replaced by all the alternatives EXCEPT:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 52032962-b1
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Considering Damian Carrington’s opinion on the movie Don’t look up, mark the INCORRECT option.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ce32d8-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that “Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists”. Mark the option which best describes the meaning of Nina’s statement.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37cc671d-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Consider the following excerpt: “The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord”. Taking into account the context the excerpt was taken from, mark the option which best defines the expression “to strike a chord”. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ca4b7b-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c61c44-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c3fea8-9c
  • Linguagens

    Literatura

    O texto a seguir é um excerto da obra Iracema, do escritor do Romantismo brasileiro José de Alencar.

    [...]
    Iracema saiu do banho: o aljôfar d’água ainda a roreja, como à doce mangaba que corou em manhã de chuva. Enquanto repousa, empluma das penas do gará as flechas de seu arco, e concerta com o sabiá da mata, pousado no galho próximo, o canto agreste.
    A graciosa ará, sua companheira e amiga, brinca junto dela. Às vezes sobe aos ramos da árvore e de lá chama a virgem pelo nome; outras remexe o uru de palha matizada, onde traz a selvagem seus perfumes, os alvos fios do crautá, as agulhas da juçara com que tece a renda, e as tintas de que matiza o algodão.
    Rumor suspeito quebra a doce harmonia da sesta. Ergue a virgem os olhos, que o sol não deslumbra; sua vista perturba-se.
    Diante dela e todo a contemplá-la está um guerreiro estranho, se é guerreiro e não algum mau espírito da floresta. Tem nas faces o branco das areias que bordam o mar; nos olhos o azul triste das águas profundas. Ignotas armas e tecidos ignotos cobrem-lhe o corpo.
    [...]

    ALENCAR, José de. Iracema. São Paulo: Ática, 2004.

    Considerando esse excerto da obra e o contexto de toda a narrativa, assim como as características do Romantismo, analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa correta.

    I. Iracema é uma obra romântica, exercendo, portanto, a função de literatura crítica, denunciando a desumanidade e o apagamento cultural dos nativos implicados no processo de colonização.

    II. A representação da natureza no contexto do Romantismo ocorre de maneira idealizada, ressaltando as belezas do Brasil, o que indica a presença de um nacionalismo ufanista na obra.

    III. O protagonismo feminino verificado em Iracema visa à representação da mulher como figura emancipada, dona de seu destino, surgindo heroínas independentes do poder masculino.

    IV. A linguagem é um aspecto fundamental no Romantismo, de modo que, embora o texto de Iracema seja em prosa, observam-se marcas líricas, com aguçado tom poético, na construção da narrativa.

    V. Em Iracema, o colono surge como herói da narrativa, sendo o par romântico da nativa, reforçando o discurso de harmonia entre os colonos e os indígenas.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c1cf21-9c
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Texto I


    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2022, Interpretação de Textos


    Laerte.

    Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.


    Texto II

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Luiz Vaz de Camões

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;

    Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,

    Tomando sempre novas qualidades.


    Continuamente vemos novidades,

    Diferentes em tudo da esperança;

    Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,

    E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.


    O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,

    Que já coberto foi de neve fria,

    E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.


    E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,

    Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:

    Que não se muda já como soía.


    Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.


    Glossário:

    Soía: costumava

    Com base no conteúdo e nos aspectos textuais dos Textos I e II, assinale a alternativa correta. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37bd3bda-9c
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Texto I


    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2022, Análise sintática


    Laerte.

    Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.


    Texto II

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Luiz Vaz de Camões

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;

    Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,

    Tomando sempre novas qualidades.


    Continuamente vemos novidades,

    Diferentes em tudo da esperança;

    Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,

    E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.


    O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,

    Que já coberto foi de neve fria,

    E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.


    E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,

    Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:

    Que não se muda já como soía.


    Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.


    Glossário:

    Soía: costumava

    Analise o excerto a seguir, extraído do Texto II, e assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.

    “Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;”.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37bb1839-9c
  • Linguagens

    Português

    As gravações de “Cuitelinho”
    (Sírio Possenti)

    “Cuitelinho” é o título de belíssima canção “folclórica”, já gravada por dezenas de cantores. Sua letra é corpus muito interessante para quem quiser saber como é o português falado no Brasil. Sendo música do folclore, tem evidentemente muitas características da gramática do português popular. Ouvindo as diversas gravações, descobrem-se pelo menos duas coisas: a primeira é que há muita variação, especialmente de pronúncia ou sotaque; a segunda, bem mais curiosa, deixando os detalhes de lado, refere-se ao fato de que, quanto menos “letrados” são os cantores, mais eles corrigem a letra, confirmando a tese de que a ideologia dominante é a ideologia da classe dominante.

    (http://goo.gl/QTUzd. Acesso: 28/03/2013. Adaptado.)


    O que as correções feitas pelos intérpretes na pronúncia da letra “Cuitelinho” revelam acerca da relação entre ideologia e variação linguística?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão ced5060c-00
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Esse teu olhar
    Quando encontra o meu
    Fala de umas coisas
    Que eu não posso acreditar
    Doce é sonhar
    É pensar que você
    Gosta de mim como eu de você

    (JOBIM. Tom. Esse seu olhar – Grandes Hits da Bossa Nova 1 - DVDoKê )


    Nesses versos, há um desvio de concordância: concordar teu com você. Que frase publicitária apresenta o mesmo tipo de inadequação?
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão cec78700-00
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Ao respeitável público


    Chegou meu dia.Todo cronista tem seu dia em que não tendo nada a escrever, fala da falta de assunto. Chegou meu dia. Que bela tarde para não escrever! Esse calor que arrasa tudo; esse carnaval que está perto, que aí vem no fim da semana; esses jornais lidos e relidos na minha mesa, sem nada interessante; esse cigarro que fumo sem prazer; essas cartas na gaveta onde ninguém me conta nada que possa me fazer mal ou bem; essa perspectiva morna do dia de amanhã; essa lembrança aborrecida do dia de ontem; e outra vez, e sempre, esse calor, esse calor, esse calor... Portanto, meu distinto leitor, portanto, minha encantadora leitora, queiram ter a fineza de retirar os olhos dessa coluna. Não leiam mais. Fiquem sabendo que eu secretamente os odeio a todos; que vocês todos são pessoas aborrecidas e irritantes; que eu desejo sinceramente que todos tenham péssimo carnaval, uma horrível quaresma, um infelicíssimo ano de 1934, uma vida toda atrapalhada, uma morte estúpida!.


    (BRAGA, Rubem 1980 Literatura Comentada. São Paulo: Abril Educação, 1980, p.13)


    Todas as afirmativas se referem ao titulo do texto, exceto:

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão cec4820b-00