Pular para o conteúdo

Banco de questões

Todas as questões do ENEM

Use os filtros para chegar às questões que interessam. Cada resultado abre em uma página própria com enunciado, alternativas e gabarito.

  • 58.062 questões
  • 160 instituições
  • 23 anos de prova

Resultados: 58.062 questões

Página 1.005 de 2.904

  • Ciências da Natureza

    Química

    A respeito da reação de monocloração do metilbutano, sob condições adequadas de temperatura, assinale a alternativa correta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37e8c388-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Química

    O raio iônico afeta as propriedades físicas e químicas de um composto iônico. A estrutura tridimensional de um composto iônico depende das dimensões relativas dos seus cátion e ânions. Considerando os seguintes pares de íons (a) N3− ou F− ; (b) Mg2+ ou Ca2+; (c) Fe2+ ou Fe3+, assinale a alternativa que indica qual das duas espécies dos pares possui maior raio, respectivamente.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37e46fe4-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Química

    Assinale a alternativa que apresenta corretamente a geometria molecular dos compostos tetrafluoreto de silício, pentacloreto de fósforo, hidreto de fósforo e íon nitrito, respectivamente. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37df6b5e-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Química

    Preparou-se uma solução adicionando 0,040 mol de ácido fórmico em água, perfazendo um volume total de 2 litros. Com base no exposto, o grau de ionização dessa solução é, aproximadamente,
    Dados: Ka (HCOOH) = 1,8x10-4 ;
    √7,2 = 2, 68;√3, 6 = 1, 90; √14, 4 = 3, 79.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37dd5cf1-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Física

    No desenvolvimento das máquinas térmicas, especialmente durante a Revolução Industrial, surgiram equipamentos para retirar água das minas de carvão, como a “máquina de Savery” (ver ilustração), e, mais tarde, a máquina de Newcomen. Nesse sentido, James Watt introduziu, anos depois, um dispositivo que melhorou muito a eficiência mecânica da máquina termodinâmica. Que dispositivo era esse?

    Imagem da questão de Física, UEMG 2022, Física Térmica - Termologia
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37db642d-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Física

    Em um poço imaginário que atravessasse toda a Terra, o que ocorreria com uma pedra deixada cair desde uma de suas extremidades?
    Obs.: Desconsidere os efeitos da resistência do ar, da temperatura, da pressão e da rotação do planeta.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37d942b1-9c
  • Ciências da Natureza

    Física

    Considere os seguintes instrumentos de observação e registro astronômico, identifique-os de acordo com a sequência apresentada e assinale a alternativa correta. 

    Imagem da questão de Física, UEMG 2022, Gravitação Universal
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37d044a1-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Considering Damian Carrington’s opinion on the movie Don’t look up, mark the INCORRECT option.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ce32d8-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The climate expert Nina Lakhani thinks that “Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists”. Mark the option which best describes the meaning of Nina’s statement.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37cc671d-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Consider the following excerpt: “The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord”. Taking into account the context the excerpt was taken from, mark the option which best defines the expression “to strike a chord”. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37ca4b7b-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    Concerning the excerpt: “Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it”, and the context it was taken from, mark the correct option regarding the usage of the pronoun “it”.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c61c44-9c
  • Linguagens

    Inglês

    Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film

         Critics haven’t been kind to Adam McKay’s eco-satire, but many climate experts are lauding it. Here four give their views
         Rarely has a film been as divisive as Adam McKay’s climate satire Don’t Look Up. Although it has been watched by millions, and is already Netflix’s third most watched film ever, the response from critics was largely negative. Many found its story of scientists who discover an asteroid heading for Earth a clumsy allegory for the climate crisis, while others just found it boring. But many in the climate movement have praised the film, and audience reviews have been generally positive.
         We asked four climate experts to give their views on the film. Warning: spoilers ahead.

          Ketan Joshi: ‘The main character of the climate crisis is absent’
          […]
        Fiona Harvey: ‘The role of the technoloon, played by Mark Rylance, struck a chord’
           […]
          After 17 years of reporting on the climate crisis, I doubted at first that the film had much to tell me about the frustrations of communicating a hypothetical catastrophe. As the film’s scientists first struggled to clothe their data in sober, measured terms, then broke into swearing, armwaving shrieks about provable imminent apocalypse, I nodded along. Yes, that’s what it feels like, and no, no one listens, not until it is too late.
          Yet it was illuminating in unexpected ways – something I’ve always struggled with is how rational people can fail to grasp the scale of climate breakdown, how we could leave it so late. As the film shows, it’s partly because vested interests keep it that way, but it’s also just because we’re human. Believing in disaster before it strikes is fundamentally not how we work. 
         The role of the techno-loon, played by Mark Rylance, struck another chord. Cop26 was not a failure, though on the surface that was the obvious conclusion – it was more nuanced than that. Soon after the Cop26 circus left Glasgow, the danger of painting the outcome in such blackand-white terms became apparent, as wellmeaning experts concluded – in all seriousness – as talking didn’t work, our best hope would be for billionaires to bypass the UN and geoengineer the climate from space. Because obviously the answer to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere is to conduct a vast uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere.
           […]
        Nina Lakhani: ‘Jennifer Lawrence’s character will resonate with many female climate scientists’
           […]
        How Kate Dibiasky, the postgraduate student played by Jennifer Lawrence who discovered the comet, is portrayed as an unhinged hysterical woman, will resonate with many female climate scientists and activists whose crucial knowledge has been sidelined. The scene where her parents declare that they’re in favour of the jobs the comet will provide will resonate with millions of people, including me, trying to deal with relatives who have bought into political lies.
            […]
         Damian Carrington: ‘It highlights the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away’
          I loved Don’t Look Up, both as an entertainment and as a climate crisis parable. But the movie has been panned by many critics, with the main charge being that it is heavy-handed, blunt and too obvious. But that is exactly the point.
          Scientists have been issuing blunt warnings about obvious dangers of global heating for years and have been ignored – carbon emissions are still rising. The film perfectly skewers the key ways in which they have been ignored: for short-term political expediency and short-term corporate profit.
        In particular, the movie beautifully portrays the incredulity of scientists that their carefully constructed evidence can be dismissed with bluster such as “we’ll sit tight and assess” by leaders more concerned about today’s political weather and a media more interested in the minutiae of celebrities’ lives.
            […] 
    The point of the film is savagely highlighting the absurdity of staring disaster in the face, then looking away rather than acting. In that respect, it is a triumph.

    Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-upfour-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film. Access: 08/01/2022.
    The text talks about Netflix climate satire Don’t look up. Mark the correct option concerning how the movie was received by critics.
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c3fea8-9c
  • Linguagens

    Literatura

    O texto a seguir é um excerto da obra Iracema, do escritor do Romantismo brasileiro José de Alencar.

    [...]
    Iracema saiu do banho: o aljôfar d’água ainda a roreja, como à doce mangaba que corou em manhã de chuva. Enquanto repousa, empluma das penas do gará as flechas de seu arco, e concerta com o sabiá da mata, pousado no galho próximo, o canto agreste.
    A graciosa ará, sua companheira e amiga, brinca junto dela. Às vezes sobe aos ramos da árvore e de lá chama a virgem pelo nome; outras remexe o uru de palha matizada, onde traz a selvagem seus perfumes, os alvos fios do crautá, as agulhas da juçara com que tece a renda, e as tintas de que matiza o algodão.
    Rumor suspeito quebra a doce harmonia da sesta. Ergue a virgem os olhos, que o sol não deslumbra; sua vista perturba-se.
    Diante dela e todo a contemplá-la está um guerreiro estranho, se é guerreiro e não algum mau espírito da floresta. Tem nas faces o branco das areias que bordam o mar; nos olhos o azul triste das águas profundas. Ignotas armas e tecidos ignotos cobrem-lhe o corpo.
    [...]

    ALENCAR, José de. Iracema. São Paulo: Ática, 2004.

    Considerando esse excerto da obra e o contexto de toda a narrativa, assim como as características do Romantismo, analise as assertivas e assinale a alternativa correta.

    I. Iracema é uma obra romântica, exercendo, portanto, a função de literatura crítica, denunciando a desumanidade e o apagamento cultural dos nativos implicados no processo de colonização.

    II. A representação da natureza no contexto do Romantismo ocorre de maneira idealizada, ressaltando as belezas do Brasil, o que indica a presença de um nacionalismo ufanista na obra.

    III. O protagonismo feminino verificado em Iracema visa à representação da mulher como figura emancipada, dona de seu destino, surgindo heroínas independentes do poder masculino.

    IV. A linguagem é um aspecto fundamental no Romantismo, de modo que, embora o texto de Iracema seja em prosa, observam-se marcas líricas, com aguçado tom poético, na construção da narrativa.

    V. Em Iracema, o colono surge como herói da narrativa, sendo o par romântico da nativa, reforçando o discurso de harmonia entre os colonos e os indígenas.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37c1cf21-9c
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Texto I


    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2022, Interpretação de Textos


    Laerte.

    Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.


    Texto II

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Luiz Vaz de Camões

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;

    Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,

    Tomando sempre novas qualidades.


    Continuamente vemos novidades,

    Diferentes em tudo da esperança;

    Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,

    E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.


    O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,

    Que já coberto foi de neve fria,

    E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.


    E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,

    Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:

    Que não se muda já como soía.


    Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.


    Glossário:

    Soía: costumava

    Com base no conteúdo e nos aspectos textuais dos Textos I e II, assinale a alternativa correta. 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37bd3bda-9c
  • Linguagens

    Português

    Texto I


    Imagem da questão de Português, UEMG 2022, Análise sintática


    Laerte.

    Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CWtk14SFixR/. Acesso em 19 jan. 2022.


    Texto II

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Luiz Vaz de Camões

    Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades,

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;

    Todo o mundo é composto de mudança,

    Tomando sempre novas qualidades.


    Continuamente vemos novidades,

    Diferentes em tudo da esperança;

    Do mal ficam as mágoas na lembrança,

    E do bem, se algum houve, as saudades.


    O tempo cobre o chão de verde manto,

    Que já coberto foi de neve fria,

    E em mim converte em choro o doce canto.


    E, afora este mudar-se cada dia,

    Outra mudança faz de mor espanto:

    Que não se muda já como soía.


    Disponível em: https://www.escritas.org/pt/t/2513/mudam-se-ostempos-mudam-se-as-vontades. Acesso em 17 jan. 2022.


    Glossário:

    Soía: costumava

    Analise o excerto a seguir, extraído do Texto II, e assinale a alternativa INCORRETA.

    “Mudam-se os tempos, mudam-se as vontades

    Muda-se o ser, muda-se a confiança;”.

    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 37bb1839-9c
  • Ciências Humanas

    História

    Imagem da questão de História, UERJ 2022, História do Brasil


    Tereza de Benguela é um dos nomes esquecidos pela historiografia nacional. Nos últimos anos, passou a ser mais reconhecida, na busca de multiplicar as narrativas que revelam a formação sociopolítica brasileira. Tereza, que viveu no século XVIII, pode ter nascido no continente africano ou no Brasil. Ela chefiou o Quilombo do Quariterê, que se localizava na atual fronteira entre Mato Grosso e Bolívia. O Quilombo resistiu até 1770, quando foi destruído. Em homenagem a Tereza de Benguela, o dia 25 de julho é oficialmente, no Brasil, o Dia Nacional de Tereza de Benguela e da Mulher Negra.

    Adaptado de ufrb.edu.br.


    O reconhecimento de Tereza de Benguela e a celebração do dia 25 de julho indicam uma mudança com o intuito de multiplicar narrativas sobre a formação social brasileira. Essa mudança tem como objetivo:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7bae742d-7a
  • Ciências Humanas

    História

    Oito centímetros impediram o sepultamento de D. Pedro I

    O governo militar, sob a chefia do general Emílio Garrastazu Médici, não poupou esforços para transformar as comemorações dos 150 anos da Independência numa enorme celebração nacional. Seu ponto alto? A vinda de Portugal dos restos mortais de nosso primeiro imperador, Dom Pedro I. Em 1971, o presidente de Portugal concordou em transladar e presentear o Brasil com os restos mortais do imperador, deixando claro que o coração não viria e permaneceria na cidade do Porto, já que o próprio D. Pedro o deixou, em testamento, à cidade. O presidente Médici expressou, em rede nacional de televisão e rádio: “Brasileiros, não posso esconder minha emoção. Fala por si mesmo este fato que nenhuma eloquência poderia superar: no ano em que celebramos o Sesquicentenário da nossa Independência, regressará ao Brasil o corpo daquele que, em Sete de Setembro, às margens do Ipiranga, com a bravura, o arroubo e a paixão que eram a marca de sua personalidade, proclamou livres estas terras.” Mas, quase como uma anedota, o caixão feito em Portugal não coube no lugar onde deveria ser colocado na Capela Imperial, no Ipiranga. Apenas quatro anos depois do Sesquicentenário da Independência, o sarcófago de D. Pedro I foi devidamente disposto no mausoléu para ele construído.

    LIZ BATISTA Adaptado de m.acervo.estadao.com.br, 15/02/2013. 

    Conserva de imperador

    O governo brasileiro requereu a Portugal que, no âmbito das comemorações dos 200 anos da Independência, enviasse para o Brasil o coração de Dom Pedro, guardado numa igreja da cidade do Porto. O pedido tem o seu quê de bizarro. Imagino que a miudeza real vá ser exposta e contemplada no Brasil, o que me parece sinceramente ficar aquém da data. Uma celebração competente do Bicentenário da Independência devia incluir, além do coração de Dom Pedro, um rim de José Bonifácio, o pâncreas de Thomas Cochrane, o fígado de Cipriano Barata e, talvez para dar um toque de ironia à cerimônia, um dente de Tiradentes. Creio que, com esse rodízio de vísceras, ficaria a efeméride mais bem assinalada.

    RICARDO ARAÚJO PEREIRA Adaptado de m.folha.uol.com.br, 09/07/2022.
    Os textos apresentam ações governamentais associadas ao Sesquicentário da Independência do Brasil, em 1972, e a seu Bicentenário, em 2022.

    Um aspecto comum dessas ações governamentais é: 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7baa7dae-7a
  • Ciências Humanas

    Geografia

    PROPORÇÃO DE PESSOAS COM MAIS DE 65 ANOS NA INGLATERRA E EM GALES (2021)

    Imagem da questão de Geografia, UERJ 2022, Conceitos Demográficos


    Adaptado de dailymail.co.uk, 29/06/2022.

    Um fator demográfico que contribui para explicar a proporção de idosos na região metropolitana de Londres é:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7ba3a0ce-7a
  • Ciências Humanas

    Geografia

    Branding é um termo oriundo da língua inglesa utilizado para se referir às diferentes ações relacionadas à criação e à gestão de marcas. Esse termo também se aplica à ação de criação, fortalecimento e divulgação da identidade ou imagem de determinado território, com características únicas que o tornem distinto perante outros.

    Alguns dos principais objetivos das ações de branding de território são: aumentar seu atrativo como lugares de investimento empresarial; melhorar sua posição competitiva no mercado turístico; fortalecer a identidade dos cidadãos com seu lugar de residência e aumentar sua autoestima; obter predisposição para consumir mercadorias características de um determinado lugar; facilitar o desenvolvimento do território.

    VALDIR DALLABRIDA Adaptado de GRIEBELER, M. (org.). Dicionário de desenvolvimento regional e temas correlatos. Uruguaiana, RS: Conceito, 2021.

    Uma iniciativa muito praticada nas ações de branding de território é a demarcação de áreas caracterizadas pela:
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7ba05ec2-7a
  • Ciências Humanas

    Geografia

    Muitos nos círculos financeiros disseram que o esforço das indústrias americanas para reduzir suas cadeias de fornecimento e trazer a produção de volta para casa duraria pouco. Assim que a pandemia desse uma trégua, e as cadeias globais de logística e transporte voltassem a funcionar, a moda passaria, argumentavam. Mas, dois anos e meio depois do início da pandemia da covid-19, essa tendência parece estar mais forte do que nunca. Diante da guerra na Ucrânia e das levas mais recentes de lockdowns na China para conter novos surtos do coronavírus, nunca os executivos americanos mencionaram tanto os planos de realocar a produção de suas empresas.

    Em oposição ao offshoring, termo que ficou famoso nos anos de ouro da globalização como sinônimo de levar a fabricação de partes do produto ou até do item completo para subsidiárias em países de mão de obra mais barata – sobretudo a China –, o onshoring significa produzir no país onde o bem será consumido. Reshoring, por sua vez, é trazer de volta para o país de origem da empresa a produção que, no passado, estava em offshoring.

    Adaptado de oglobo.globo.com, 06/07/2022.

    A mudança na estratégia locacional das grandes corporações, mencionada na reportagem, tem como explicação a dificuldade em preservar algumas práticas do atual modelo produtivo.

    Uma dessas práticas está apontada em: 
    Escolha uma alternativa para a questão 7b950ef9-7a